Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 51(4): 517-524, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35350011

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Timely recognition and management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) offer the greatest opportunity to prevent subsequent stroke. But variability of TIA management quality exists across hospitals. Under the impetus of national plans, measures were adopted to improve TIA management, including a structured local pathway. Our objective was to compare TIA management between two periods over 10 years, before and after the implementation of these measures. METHODS: A before-and-after study was conducted with two identical population-based cohort studies in 2006-2007 (AVC69) and 2015-2016 (STROKE69) including all patients with TIA diagnosis over a 7-month period in six public and private hospitals in the Rhône county in France. The primary outcome was the adequate TIA management defined as brain and vessel imaging within 24 h of admission and the prescription of antithrombotic treatment at discharge. RESULTS: We identified 109 patients TIA patients in 2006-2007, and 458 over the same period in 2015-2016. A higher proportion of patients were adequately managed in 2015-2016 compared to 2006-2007 (14/96 [15%] in 2006-2007 vs. 306/452 [68%] in 2015-2016, p < 0.001). This difference was mainly driven by a marked increase of vessel imaging performed within 24 h of admission, most often by computed tomography angiography. Furthermore, patients called more often emergency medical dispatch before admission, were admitted with a shorter delay after symptom onset, and were more likely discharged to home in 2015-2016 compared to 2006-2007. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated an increasing rate of adequate TIA management, mainly driven by a marked increase of vessel imaging within 24 h of admission, over a 10-year period in the Rhône county in France.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Attack, Transient , Stroke , Computed Tomography Angiography , Hospitalization , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Attack, Transient/epidemiology , Patient Discharge , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/epidemiology
2.
Crit Care Med ; 50(5): 791-798, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34605777

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare survival among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as a function of their status for coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: We performed an observational study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients between March 2020 and December 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 status (confirmed, suspected, or negative) was defined according to the World Health Organization's criteria. SETTING: Information on the patients and their care was extracted from the French national out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry. The French prehospital emergency medical system has two tiers: the fire department intervenes rapidly to provide basic life support, and mobile ICUs provide advanced life support. The study data (including each patient's coronavirus disease 2019 status) were collected by 95 mobile ICUs throughout France. PATIENTS: We included 6,624 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: 127 cases with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019, 473 with suspected coronavirus disease 2019, and 6,024 negative for coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The "confirmed" and "suspected" groups of coronavirus disease 2019 patients had similar characteristics and were more likely to have suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a respiratory cause (confirmed: 53.7%, suspected coronavirus disease 2019: 56.5%; p = 0.472) than noncoronavirus disease 2019 patients (14.0%; p < 0.001 vs confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 patients). Advanced life support was initiated for 57.5% of the confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 patients, compared with 64.5% of the suspected coronavirus disease 2019 patients (p = 0.149) and 70.6% of the noncoronavirus disease 2019 ones (p = 0.002). The survival rate at 30-day postout-of-hospital cardiac arrest was 0% in the confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 group, 0.9% in the suspected coronavirus disease 2019 group (p = 0.583 vs confirmed), and 3.5% (p = 0.023) in the noncoronavirus disease 2019 group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlighted a zero survival rate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019. This finding raises important questions with regard to the futility of resuscitation for coronavirus disease 2019 patients and the management of the associated risks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Registries
3.
J Neurol ; 268(7): 2314-2319, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic would have particularly affected acute stroke care. However, its impact is clearly inherent to the local stroke network conditions. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care in the Lyon comprehensive stroke center during this period. METHODS: We conducted a prospective data collection of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) during the COVID-19 period (from 29/02/2020 to 10/05/2020) and a control period (from 29/02/2019 to 10/05/2019). The volume of reperfusion therapies and pre and intra-hospital delays were compared during both periods. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were included. The volume of IVT significantly decreased during the COVID-period [55 (54.5%) vs 74 (69.2%); p = 0.03]. The volume of MT remains stable over the two periods [72 (71.3%) vs 65 (60.8%); p = 0.14], but the door-to-groin puncture time increased in patients transferred for MT (237 [187-339] vs 210 [163-260]; p < 0.01). The daily number of Emergency Medical Dispatch calls considerably increased (1502 [1133-2238] vs 1023 [960-1410]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a decrease in the volume of IVT, whereas the volume of MT remained stable although intra-hospital delays increased for transferred patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results contrast in part with the national surveys and suggest that the impact of the pandemic may depend on local stroke care networks.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , COVID-19 , Stroke , Thrombectomy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Brain Ischemia/therapy , France , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Reperfusion , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1712, 2020 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33198689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Public awareness of stroke symptoms is a key factor to ensure access to reperfusion strategies in due time. We designed and launched a regional theory-informed and user-centered information campaign and assessed its impact on emergency medical services (EMS) calls for stroke suspicion, time-to-call, and public attitudes and awareness concerning stroke. METHODS: A controlled before-and-after study was conducted during 3 sequential time-periods in 2 separate counties. Key messages of the campaign were underpinned by stroke representations and the theory of planned behavior, and focused on recognition of stroke warning signs and the need to call EMS urgently. The campaign included posters, leaflets, adverts and films displayed in bus and subway stations, internet, social networks, and local radio. Outcome measures on behavior, attitudes, and knowledge were assessed before the launch of the campaign, at 3 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: The number of EMS calls for stroke suspicion increased by 21% at 12 months in the intervention county and this change was significantly different to that observed in the control county (p = 0.02). No significant changes were observed regarding self-reported attitudes in case of stroke. An 8% significant increase in recognizing at least 2 stroke warning signs was observed in the intervention county (p = 0.04) at 3 months, while it did not change significantly in the control county (p = 0.6). However, there was no significant difference in warning sign recognition between both counties (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: The campaign significantly improved public's behavior of calling EMS, although stroke knowledge was not improved as much as expected. Repeating these campaigns over time might further help improve timeliness and access to reperfusion strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02846363 .


Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Stroke , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/therapy
5.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 49(1): 110-118, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected stroke, brain imaging is recommended in the acute phase for appropriate management and treatment. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered reasonable choices for initial brain imaging. When both techniques are available, choosing one or the other might be associated with specific factors related either to patients, stroke symptoms, and severity or management organization. METHODS: The study was performed within the STROKE 69 database, a population-based cohort of all adult patients with suspected stroke admitted in one of the emergency departments (ED), primary stroke center, or stroke center of the Rhône County, from November 2015 to December 2016. Patients were included if they were admitted within 24 h following either symptom onset or last known normal. To identify factors potentially associated with the choice of initial brain imaging, a multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Among the 3,244 patients with suspected stroke enrolled in the STROKE69 cohort, 3,107 (95.8%) underwent brain imaging within the first 24 h after admission. Among those 74.6% underwent CT as initial imaging while 25.4% had an MRI. In multivariate analyses, several factors were associated with a lower probability of having an MRI as initial brain imaging versus CT. These were either patient characteristics: older age (>80 years old, OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.28-0.54]), preexisting disability (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.84]), use of anticoagulants (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.33-0.81]), stroke characteristics: stroke of unknown onset (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.31-0.58]) or factors associated with overall management: onset-to-door time (>6 h, OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23-0.60]), initial admission to ED (OR 0.02 [95% CI 0.02-0.04]) or intensive care unit (OR 0.01 [95% CI 0.001-0.08]), personal transport (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96]), and admission during working hours (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.84]). CONCLUSIONS: Besides CT or MRI availability, a number of other parameters could influence the choice of first imaging in case of stroke suspicion. These are related to patient characteristics, type of stroke symptoms, and type of organization.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Angiography , Choice Behavior , Computed Tomography Angiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Perfusion Imaging , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Decision-Making , Databases, Factual , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...