Schistosoma haematobium urinary tract complications in African migrants attending primary care facilities in Paris, France: A retrospective cohort study (2004-2018).

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the burden of urogenital schistosomiasis (UGS) outside endemic areas. This study was aimed at describing urinary complications of UGS detected among African migrants in French primary care facilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients with UGS diagnosed from 2004 to 2018 in 5 primary health centers in Paris. Cases were defined by the presence of typical Schistosoma haematobium eggs at urine microscopy. Demographic, clinical, biological and imaging data were collected. Ultrasonography (U-S) findings were classified in accordance with the WHO guidelines. RESULTS: U-S was prescribed for all patients and performed in 100/118. Sex ratio (F/M) was 2/98, and mean age 24.4 years. Patients were from West Africa (73% from Mali) and consulted 8 months (median) after their arrival. Among the 95 patients with interpretable findings, 32 (33.7%) had abnormalities related to UGS, considered as major in 6 cases (6.3%), and mostly localized at the bladder (31/32) without detection of cancer. No sociodemographic, clinical, or biological factors were found to be associated with U-S abnormalities. All 100 patients were treated by praziquantel (PZQ). Among those with abnormalities, 20/32 received two to four doses at various time intervals. Post-cure imaging control performed in 19/32 showed persistent abnormalities in 6 patients, on average 5 months after the last PZQ uptake. CONCLUSION: Urinary tract abnormalities associated with UGS were common and predominated at the bladder. U-S should be prescribed to any patient with positive urine microscopy. Schedules for PZQ uptake and U-S monitoring for patients with complications remain to be determined.

Effectiveness of hepatitis B rapid tests toward linkage-to-care: results of a randomized, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, many infected individuals are unaware of their hepatitis B virus (HBV) status. We evaluated the effectiveness of HBV rapid testing in promoting linkage-to-care. METHODS: In 2012, volunteers were recruited from five Parisian centers. Participants were randomized 1 : 1 to receive standard serology (S) or rapid testing (VIKIA-HBsAg/Quick Profile anti-HBsAb) with confirmatory serology (R+S). The primary endpoint was percentage of individuals with appropriate linkage-to-care (nonimmunized individuals starting vaccination or HBsAg-positive individuals receiving medical evaluation). The secondary outcomes were percentage receiving HBV-test results and performance of HBV rapid tests. RESULTS: In total, 995 individuals were screened. Among the HBV-infection groups included in the primary endpoint (n=409), 20 (4.9%) received appropriate linkage-to-care, with no difference between S and R+S groups (5.7 vs. 4.1%, P=0.5). Two of eight HBsAg-positive participants had a medical visit (1/6 and 1/2 in the S and R+S groups, respectively) and 18/401 (4.5%) nonimmunized participants initiated HBV-vaccination (11/205 and 7/196). Factors that tended to be associated with linkage-to-care were female sex, birth country of high HBV prevalence, and extended medical stay. Test results were not obtained in 4.7% of participants, which was significantly higher in the S arm (P=0.02). Both sensitivity and specificity were 100% for the VIKIA-HBsAg rapid test and 94.4 and 80.8%, respectively, for the anti-HBsAb Quick Profile rapid test. CONCLUSION: Despite a higher proportion of participants obtaining their results in the R+S arm and better performance of anti-HBsAb rapid tests than described previously, we found no evidence that HBV screening based initially on rapid tests leads to increased HBV-vaccination rates or medical evaluation. This strategy should be evaluated in more hard-to-reach populations.

Current state of and needs for hepatitis B screening: results of a large screening study in a low-prevalent, metropolitan region.

BACKGROUND: In low hepatitis B virus (HBV)-prevalent countries, most HBV-infected persons are unaware of their status. We aimed to evaluate whether (i) previous HBV-testing, (ii) physicians decision to screen, and (iii) CDC's recommendations identified infected individuals and which risk-factor groups needing testing. METHODS: During a mass, multi-center HBV-screening study from September 2010-August 2011, 3929 participants were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBs and anti-Hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBcAb). Questions on HBV risk-factors and testing practices were asked to participants, while participants' eligibility for HBV-testing was asked to study medical professionals. RESULTS: 85 (2.2%) participants were HBsAg-positive, while 659 (16.8%) had either resolved HBV infection or isolated anti-HBcAb. When comparing practices, HBV-testing was more likely to occur in HBV-infected participants if Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations were used (Sensitivity = 100%, 95%CI: 95.8-100) than physicians' discretion (Sensitivity = 87.1%, 95%CI: 78.0-93.4) or previous HBV-test (Sensitivity = 36.5%, 95%CI: 26.3-47.6) (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, many non-infected individuals would still have been screened using CDC-recommendations (Specificity = 31.1%, 95%CI: 29.6-32.6). Using multivariable logistic regression, HBsAg-positive status was significantly associated with the following: males, originating from high HBV-endemic region, contact with HBV-infected individual, without national healthcare, and intravenous-drug user (IDU). Of these risk-factors, physician's discretion for testing HBV was not significantly associated with participants' geographical origin or IDU. CONCLUSIONS: Missed opportunities of HBV-screening are largely due to underestimating country of origin as a risk-factor. Applying CDC-recommendations could improve HBV-screening, but with the disadvantage of many tests. Further development of HBV-testing strategies is necessary, especially before severe disease occurs.

Performance of rapid tests for detection of HBsAg and anti-HBsAb in a large cohort, France.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The systematic use of rapid tests performed at points-of-care may facilitate hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening and substantially increase HBV infection awareness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of such tests for HBsAg and anti-HBsAb detection among individuals visiting a variety of healthcare centers located in a low HBV-prevalent area. METHODS: Three rapid tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) detection (VIKIA, Determine and Quick Profile) and one test for anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBsAb) detection (Quick Profile) were evaluated in comparison to ELISA serology. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and area under the ROC curve were used to estimate test performance. Non-inferiority criteria of the joint Se, Sp were set at 0.80, 0.95. RESULTS: Among the 3956 subjects screened, 85 (2.1%) were HBsAg-positive and 2225 (56.5%) had a protective anti-HBsAb titer. Test Se and Sp (lower bound of 97.5% CI) were as follows: 96.5% (89.0%), 99.9% (99.8%) for Vikia; 93.6% (80.7%), 100.0% (99.8%) for Determine; and 90.5% (80.8%), 99.7% (99.5%) for Quick Profile; with all three tests achieving minimal non-inferiority criteria. False negatives were typically observed in inactive HBsAg carriers. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile test had excellent specificity (97.8%) and PPV (97.8%) albeit low sensitivity (58.3%), thus failing to establish non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: All three HBsAg rapid tests could be considered ideal for HBV screening in low HBV-prevalent countries, given the ease of use, rapidity, and high classification probabilities. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile could be considered reliable only for positive tests.