Perioperative Primary Care Utilization and Postoperative Readmission, Emergency Department Use, and Mortality in Older Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge primary care follow-up is associated with lower readmission rates after medical hospitalizations. However, the effect of primary care utilization on readmission has not been studied in surgical patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older undergoing major inpatient diagnostic or therapeutic procedures (n = 3,552,906) from 2017 through 2018, examining the association between postdischarge primary care visits within 14 days of discharge (primary exposure), and Annual Wellness Visits in the year prior (secondary exposure), with 30-day unplanned readmission (primary outcome), emergency department visits, and mortality (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Overall, 9.5% (n = 336,837) had postdischarge visits within 14 days, 2.9% (n = 104,571) had Annual Wellness Visits in the year preceding the procedure, 9.5% (n = 336,401) were readmitted, 9% (n = 319,054) had emergency department visits, and 0.6% (n = 22,103) of the cohort died within 30 days. Our fully adjusted propensity-matched proportional hazards Cox regression analysis showed that postdischarge visits were associated with a 5% lower risk of readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.97), 43% higher risk of emergency department use (HR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.40-1.46) and no difference in mortality risk (HR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.90-1.06), compared with not having a visit within 14 days of discharge. In a separate set of regression models, Annual Wellness Visits were associated with a 9% lower risk of readmission (HR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), 45% higher risk of emergency department utilization (HR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.40-1.49) and an 18% lower mortality risk (HR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.75-0.89) compared with no Annual Wellness Visit in the year before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Both postdischarge visits and the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit appear to be extremely underutilized among the older surgical population. In those patients who do utilize primary care, compared with propensity-matched patients who do not, our study suggests primary care use is associated with modestly lower readmission rates. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether targeted primary care involvement can reduce readmission.

The Effect of Antiseizure Medication Administration on Mortality and Early Posttraumatic Seizures in Critically Ill Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Older adults represent an understudied and growing TBI population. Current Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines support prophylactic antiseizure medication (ASM) administration to reduce the risk of early posttraumatic seizures (within 7 days of injury) in patients with severe TBI. Whether ASM decreases mortality or early seizure risk in this population remains unclear. This study addresses the knowledge gap regarding the impact of ASM administration on the risk of seizure or mortality after TBI in patients more than 65 years of age. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a publicly available data set from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Our cohort included patients 65 years or older with a primary exposure of early ASM administration with TBI resulting in an intensive care unit (ICU) admission in a level I trauma center from 2001 to 2012. A double-robust inverse propensity scale weighted model on the basis of proportional hazard and logistic regression models was created to assess the association between ASM administration and risk of death within 7 days of admission to the ICU. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality, early posttraumatic seizures, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Of 1145 patients 65 years or older with TBI admitted to an ICU, 783 (68.4%) received ASM within the first 24 h. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were predominantly white (83.8%) and were male (52.3%), with a median (interquartile range) age of 81 (74-86) years. TBI severity, classified by Glasgow Coma Score, was predominantly mild (71.2%), followed by moderate (16.8%) and severe (11.3%). Patients who received ASM were less likely to have died at 7 days (adjusted death hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.28-0.88], P = 0.005), at 30 days (adjusted HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.45-0.99], P = 0.045), and at 1 year (adjusted HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.54-0.97], P = 0.029). Groups were not different in regard to seizure (adjusted seizure odds ratio 1.18 [95% CI 0.61-2.26]) compared with those who did not receive ASM. CONCLUSIONS: Early ASM administration was associated with reduced mortality at 7 days, 30 days, and 1 year but did not decrease the risk of early seizures among older adults who presented with TBI at an ICU. This benefit was observed in mild, moderate, and severe TBI assessed by Glasgow Coma Score on presentation among patients 65 years old and older and suggests broader recommendations for the use of ASM in older adults who present with TBI of any severity at an ICU.

Implementation of a risk-stratified approach to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in an institution with high baseline rates of prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although a risk-adjusted approach to preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is generally recommended, the successful implementation of such practice without mandated protocols remains elusive. To date, such a strategy has never been adapted to curb high baseline rates of prophylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational study on a cohort of patients undergoing elective surgery before and after the implementation of a quality improvement initiative including a risk-stratified approach to prevent PONV. The primary outcome was the number of prophylactic interventions administered. Secondary outcome included the repetition of ineffective medications and the need for rescue medication in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: A total of 636 patients were included; 325 patients during the control period and 311 after the intervention. The educational program failed to reduce the amount of prophylactic antiemetics administered (2.0 vs. 2.6, P < 0.001) and the repeat administration of ineffective medications for rescue (16% vs. 20%, P = 0.15). More patients in the intervention group required rescue medication compared to the control group (16.9% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Implementation of best practices to combat PONV remains elusive. Our results indicate that difficulties in changing provider behavior also apply to institutions with high prophylactic antiemetic administration rates.

Chiari I malformation and pregnancy: a comprehensive review of the literature to address common questions and to guide management.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of Chiari I malformation during pregnancy remains uncertain. Labor contractions, which increase intracranial pressure, and neuraxial anesthesia both carry the theoretical risk of brainstem herniation given the altered CSF dynamics inherent to the condition. Mode of delivery and planned anesthesia, therefore, require forethought to avoid potentially life-threatening complications. Since the assumed potential risks are significant, we seek to systematically review published literature regarding Chiari I malformation in pregnancy and, therefore, to establish a best practice recommendation based on available evidence. METHODS: The English-language literature was systematically reviewed from 1991 to 2018 according to PRISMA guidelines to assess all pregnancies reported in patients with Chiari I malformation. After analysis, a total of 34 patients and 35 deliveries were included in this investigation. Additionally, a single case from our institutional experience is presented for illustrative purposes but not included in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: No instances of brain herniation during pregnancy in patients with Chiari I malformation were reported. Cesarean deliveries (51%) and vaginal deliveries (49%) under neuraxial blockade and general anesthesia were both reported as safe and suitable modes of delivery. Across all publications, only one patient experienced a worsening of neurologic symptoms, which was only later discovered to be the result of a previously undiagnosed Chiari I malformation. Several patients underwent decompressive suboccipital craniectomy to treat the Chiari I malformation during the preconception period (31%), during pregnancy (3%), and after birth (6%). Specific data regarding maternal management were not reported for a large number (21) of these patients (60%). Aside from one abortion in our own institutional experience, there was no report of any therapeutic abortion or of adverse fetal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although devastating maternal complications are frequently feared, very few adverse outcomes have ever been reported in pregnant patients with a Chiari I malformation. The available evidence is, however, rather limited. Based on our survey of available data, we recommend vaginal delivery under neuraxial blockade for truly asymptomatic patients. Furthermore, based on our own experience and physiological conceptual considerations, we recommend limiting maternal Valsalva efforts either via Cesarean delivery under regional or general anesthesia or by choosing assisted vaginal delivery under neuraxial blockade. There is no compelling reason to offer suboccipital decompression for Chiari I malformation during pregnancy. For patients with significant neurologic symptoms prior to conception, decompression prior to pregnancy should be considered.

Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Stroke in pregnant women has a mortality rate of 1.4 deaths per 100,000 deliveries. Vascular malformations are the most common cause of hemorrhagic stroke in this population; preeclampsia and other risk factors have been identified. However, nearly a quarter of strokes have an undeterminable cause. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is less frequent but results in significant morbidity. The main objective of this study is to review the literature on pregnant patients who had a spontaneous ICH. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed and the Cochrane library from January 1992 to September 2016 following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting pregnant patients with spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and subdural hemorrhage (SDH) were selected and included if patients had non-structural ICH during pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postpartum confirmed by imaging. Twenty studies were included, and 43 patients identified. Twenty-two patients (51.3%) presented with IPH, 15 patients (34.8%) with SAH, and five patients (11.6%) with SDH. The most common neurosurgical management was clinical in 76.7% of patients, and cesarean section was the most common obstetrical management in 28% of patients. The most common maternal outcome was death (48.8%), and fetal outcomes were evenly distributed among term delivery, preterm delivery, and fetal or neonatal death. Spontaneous ICH carries a high maternal mortality with IPH being the most common type, most frequently presenting in the third trimester. Diagnosis and management do not differ for the parturient compared to the non-pregnant woman.

Moyamoya disease in pregnancy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Moyamoya disease (MMD) management during pregnancy poses a challenge to health care providers, and recommendations are outdated, vague, and controversial. We conducted a systematic review to investigate and present the available evidence. METHOD: We searched five online databases and bibliographies of relevant published original studies to identify case reports, case series, cohort studies, and reviews reporting on patients diagnosed with MMD before, during, or shortly after pregnancy. We report and analyze the respective data. RESULTS: Fifty-four relevant articles were identified. In the group of patients with MMD diagnosed prior to pregnancy, 68.7% had previously undergone bypass surgery, 64.5% delivered via cesarean section, 95.2% of mothers had good outcomes, and no bad fetal outcomes were reported. In patients first diagnosed with MMD due to a cerebrovascular accident during pregnancy, the mean gestational age on symptom onset was 28.7 weeks and 69.5% presented with cerebral hemorrhage. In this group, 57.2% received neurosurgical operative management, and 80% underwent cesarean section with 13.6% maternal mortality and 23.5% fetal demise. In patients diagnosed with MMD immediately postpartum, 46.6% suffered a cerebrovascular event within 3 days of delivery, 78.3% of which were ischemic. Only 15.3% underwent surgical hematoma evacuation and one patient (9%) expired. CONCLUSIONS: MMD may coincide with pregnancy, but there is paucity of high-quality data. It appears that MMD is not a contraindication to pregnancy, if blood pressure and ventilation are properly managed. There is no clear evidence that bypass surgery before pregnancy or cesarean mode of delivery improve outcomes.

Tranexamic Acid in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

AIM: To systematically review and quantify the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) use in reducing the risk of receiving a blood transfusion in patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery, in reducing blood loss, and risk of thromboembolic events. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceeding abstracts from 2014 to 2016. A minimum of 2 reviewers screened each study and graded quality. The primary outcome measure was the risk of receiving a blood transfusion in the TXA group versus control. A meta-analysis was performed to construct a combined odds ratio (OR) of receiving a blood transfusion, mean difference (MD) of blood loss, and OR of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the quantitative analysis (1,333 patients). The risk of blood transfusion was significantly less in patients who were administered TXA compared with controls [OR 0.407; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.278-0.594, I = 34, Q = 17, P ≤ 0.001]. There was significantly less blood loss in the TXA group compared with controls, as the mean difference was 304 mL (95% CI, 142-467 mL) (I = 94, Q value = 103, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in risk of symptomatic thromboembolic events (OR 0.968; 95% CI, 0.530-1.766, I = 0, Q value = 5, P = 0.684). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with orthopaedic trauma, TXA reduces the risk of blood transfusion, reduces perioperative blood loss, and has no significant effect on the risk of symptomatic thromboembolic events. More high-quality studies are needed to ensure the safety of the drug in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms with Flow Diversion: A Matched Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Flow diversion has become a popular treatment option for a variety of cerebral aneurysms. We sought to compare conscious sedation and general anesthesia for flow diverter placement in a matched cohort study. METHODS: Patients who underwent flow diverter placement under conscious sedation were matched on the basis of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, aneurysm location, and aneurysm size to patients who received general anesthesia. RESULTS: Seventy patients undergoing flow diverter placement under conscious sedation were matched to 70 patients using general anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, pretreatment modified Rankin Scale scores, or American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Aneurysms were located primarily in the internal carotid artery (87.1%) and posterior circulation (11.4%). Maximal aneurysm diameter and history of aneurysm rupture did not differ between the 2 groups. Duration of flow diverter placement was significantly longer in the general anesthesia group. The number of flow diverters placed was also higher in the general anesthesia group. Complete occlusion was achieved in 75% of aneurysms treated under conscious sedation and 82.4% under general anesthesia. Good functional outcome at last follow-up was recorded in 97.1% of cases of conscious sedation and 96.8% of cases of general anesthesia. The rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic neurologic complications was comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a flow diverter can be safely performed under conscious sedation and is associated with reduced procedure length. The ideal candidate is cooperative, requires an intervention that is not too complex, and has an experienced operator performing the intervention.

The Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Lung protective ventilation has not been evaluated in patients with brain injury. It is unclear whether applying positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) adversely affects intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). We aimed to evaluate the effect of PEEP on ICP and CPP in a large population of patients with acute brain injury and varying categories of acute lung injury, defined by PaO2/FiO2. METHOD: Retrospective data were collected from 341 patients with severe acute brain injury admitted to the ICU between 2008 and 2015. These patients experienced a total of 28,644 paired PEEP and ICP observations. Demographic, hemodynamic, physiologic, and ventilator data at the time of the paired PEEP and ICP observations were recorded. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, a statistically significant relationship between PEEP and ICP and PEEP and CPP was found only among observations occurring during periods of severe lung injury. For every centimeter H2O increase in PEEP, there was a 0.31 mmHg increase in ICP (p = 0.04; 95 % CI [0.07, 0.54]) and a 0.85 mmHg decrease in CPP (p = 0.02; 95 % CI [-1.48, -0.22]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PEEP can be applied safely in patients with acute brain injury as it does not have a clinically significant effect on ICP or CPP. Further prospective studies are required to assess the safety of applying a lung protective ventilation strategy in brain-injured patients with lung injury.

Fever after rewarming: incidence of pyrexia in postcardiac arrest patients who have undergone mild therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: Induction of mild therapeutic hypothermia (TH; temperature 32-34°C) has become standard of care in many hospitals for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Pyrexia, or fever, is known to be detrimental in patients with neurologic injuries such as stroke or trauma. The incidence of pyrexia in the postrewarming phase of TH is unknown. We attempted to determine the incidence of fever after TH and hypothesized that those patients who were febrile after rewarming would have worse clinical outcomes than those who maintained normothermia in the postrewarming period. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) over a period of 29 months (December 2007 to April 2010). INCLUSION CRITERIA: OHCA, age >18, return of spontaneous circulation, and treatment with TH. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: traumatic arrest and pregnancy. Data collected included age, sex, neurologic outcome, mortality, and whether the patient developed fever (temperature > 100.4°F, 38°C) within 24 hours after being fully rewarmed to a normal core body temperature after TH. We used simple descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test to report our findings. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were identified; of these, 82 (55%) underwent TH. The mean age of the TH cohort was 66 years, and 28 (31%) were female. In all, 54 patients survived for >24 hours after rewarming and were included in the analysis. Among the analyzed cohort, 28 (52%) of 54 developed fever within 24 hours after being rewarmed. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality as well as neurologic outcome as defined by a dichotomized Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. When comparing neurologic outcomes between the groups, 16 (57%) of 28 in the postrewarming fever group had a poor outcome (CPC score 3-5), while 15 (58%) of 26 in the no-fever group had a favorable outcome (P = .62). In the fever group, 15 (52%) of 28 died, while in the no-fever group, 14 (54%) of 26 died (P = .62). CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of patients who underwent mild TH after OHCA, more than half of these patients developed pyrexia in the first 24 hours after rewarming. Although there were no significant differences in outcomes between febrile and nonfebrile patients identified in this study, these findings should be further evaluated in a larger cohort. Future investigations may be needed to determine whether postrewarming temperature management will improve the outcomes in this population.