Access to Dental Care for Children and Young People in Care and Care Leavers: A Global Scoping Review.

AIMS: This scoping review aimed to explore three research questions: 1. What is the dental care access for children and young people (CYP) in care and care leavers? 2. What factors influence CYP in care and care leavers' access to dental care? 3. What pathways have been developed to improve access to oral health care for CYP in care and care leavers? METHODS: Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, SocINDEX and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source) and grey literature sources were systematically searched. Articles relating to CYP in care or care leavers aged 0-25 years old, published up to January 2023 were included. Abstracts, posters and publications not in the English language were excluded. The data relating to dental care access were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 942 articles, of which 247 were excluded as duplicates. A review of the titles and abstracts yielded 149 studies. Thirty-eight were eligible for inclusion in the review: thirty-three peer-reviewed articles, one PhD thesis and four grey literature sources. All papers were published from very high or medium Human Development Index countries. The studies indicate that despite having higher treatment needs, CYP in care and care leavers experience greater difficulty in accessing dental services than those not care-experienced. Organisational, psycho-social and logistical factors influence their access to dental care. Their experience of dental care may be impacted by adverse childhood events. Pathways to dental care have been developed, but little is known of their impact on access. There are very few studies that include care leavers. The voices of care-experienced CYP are missing from dental access research. CONCLUSIONS: care-experienced CYP are disadvantaged in their access to dental care, and there are significant barriers to their treatment needs being met.

A Scoping Review of the Oral Health Status, Oral Health Behaviours and Interventions to Improve the Oral Health of Children and Young People in Care and Care Leavers.

BACKGROUND: Children and young people (CYP) in care experience poorer physical health and overall wellbeing in comparison to their peers. Despite this, relatively little is known about what their oral health needs and behaviours are. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a global perspective on the oral health status and behaviours of CYP in care and care leavers. It also aimed to synthesise interventions that have been trialled in this population to improve oral health. METHODS: Five databases were searched, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost) and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost), alongside grey literature sources up to January 2023. Eligibility criteria were studies that (i) reported on children and adolescents aged 25 years or younger who are currently in formal/informal foster or residential care and care leavers, (ii) pertained to oral health profile, behaviours or oral health promotion interventions (iii) and were published in the English language. Thematic analysis was used to develop the domains for oral health behaviours and interventions. RESULTS: Seventy-one papers were included. Most papers were published from very high or medium Human Development Index countries. CYP in care were found to experience high levels of decay, dental trauma, periodontal disease and poorer oral health-related quality of life. Oral health behaviours included limited oral health self-care behaviours and a lack of oral health-based knowledge. The trialled interventions involved oral health education, supervised brushing and treatment or preventative dental care. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review reveals that CYP in care experience poorer oral health in comparison to their peers. They are also less likely to carry out oral health self-care behaviours. This review highlights a scarcity of interventions to improve the oral health of this population and a paucity of evidence surrounding the oral health needs of care leavers.

What is the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to integrate oral health into primary care?

DATA SOURCES AND SEARCH STRATEGY: Seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane and Google Scholar) were searched up to the third week in June 2022. Keyword search terms were based on four key concepts: oral health, primary health, strategies, and integration. STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed studies that evaluated any strategies to integrate oral health into primary care (e.g., guidelines, policies, workforce programmes) were included in the review. Eligibility was restricted to papers written in English language. Papers in non-primary care settings or which did not describe an evaluation were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and thereafter full texts. Disagreements were resolved by consulting a third reviewer. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted by one reviewer; a second person verified accuracy. Covidence was used for data extraction. Two independent reviewers critically appraised the papers using the relevant tools (e.g. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Cochrane Collaboration, and STrengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology). PRISMA flow diagram was used to present the study selection process. Review findings were reported using a narrative synthesis approach. The Health System Building Blocks (HSBB) was used as a basis for structuring the results/discussion. Heterogeneity among the included studies was high and therefore no meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies were included, of which two were RCTs. Most studies described oral healthcare delivered by non-dental primary care professionals within primary care services. Other settings included community, schools, and care homes. Outcomes of interest included: access to oral healthcare, knowledge/attitudes/perceptions, change in dental caries estimates. Almost all studies, except two studies which found no difference in the outcomes measured, favoured an integration strategy. Integration was achieved by enhancing competency (e.g. oral health promotion-trained educators), re-orientating responsibilities of health professionals at an organisation level and/or policy changes (e.g. expanded health insurance policy coverage to include oral health). Integration strategies enhanced access through improved referral pathways, documentation processes, operating efficiency, the number of health staff on hand, increased visits for oral health issues, higher fluoride varnish application rates for children, and more visits to dental health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, promoting an integrated approach for oral health was associated with improvements across a range of outcomes. Integrating oral health into primary care is complex but holds promise for reducing the burden of dental diseases. Identifying the best practice models of service integration requires further research and evaluation.

A scoping review of interventions to improve oral health in prison settings.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of oral health interventions implemented in prison settings and explore the barriers and facilitators towards implementation. METHODS: Following Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, six databases were searched including Medline (R), Emcare, Embase, AMED, Cochrane and PsycINFO. A total of 978 studies were returned and screened. The inclusion criteria were those studies conducted in a prison population, with an intervention to address oral health and published since 2000. RESULTS: Ten studies published between 2008 and 2021 were included. All were conducted in high-income countries. Three intervention types were identified: health education (n = 5), teledentistry (n = 3) and screening or triaging (n = 2). The barriers and facilitators to successful implementation were grouped into a framework of four overarching concepts. These included prison environment, population makeup, compliance and staffing. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Evidence suggests that oral health interventions in prisons are focused on improving access to services and oral health messages. A range of drivers including the prison environment, staffing levels, recruitment and intervention compliance influence implementation and the success of interventions.