ABSTRACT
Introduction: This study evaluated the clinical and analytical performances of the Access HBsAg and the Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Materials and methods: Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays were evaluated by comparing the Access assays to the final HBsAg sample status determined using the Architect, PRISM, or Elecsys HBsAg assays, along with Architect or PRISM HBsAg Confirmatory assays. Imprecision, sensitivity on seroconversion panels, analytical sensitivity on WHO, and recognition of HBV variants were also evaluated. Results: A total of 7534 samples were included in the analysis (6047 blood donors, 1032 hospitalized patients, 455 positive patients' samples). Access HBsAg assay sensitivity and specificity were at 100.00% (99.19-100.0) and 99.92% (99.82-99.97), respectively. Sensitivity of Access HBsAg Confirmatory assay was 100.00% (99.21-100.0) on the 464 HBsAg positive samples. The use of a high positive algorithm for the Access HBsAg assay, wherein samples with S/CO ≥ 100.00 were considered positive without requiring repeat or confirmatory testing, was successfully evaluated with all 450 specimens with S/CO greater than 100.00 (sensitivity 100.00%; 99.19-100.0). Access HBsAg assay demonstrated good analytical performance, equivalent recognition of seroconversion panels compared to Architect assay, and an analytical sensitivity between 0.022 and 0.025 IU/mL. All HBV genotypes, subtypes and mutants were well detected without analytical sensitivity loss. Conclusion: Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays demonstrated robust performances. They provide low samples volume requirements and a simplified process, no systematic retesting for high positive samples.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurement is useful as an aid in the evaluation of ovarian reserve. In the past, its conventional use was restricted by the low-throughput and variability of existing manual AMH assays. We developed the automated Access AMH assay for the quantitative determination of AMH levels on the Access family of immunoassay systems. The analytical performance of this new assay was evaluated. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sensitivity, dilution linearity, assay imprecision, AMH sample stability, lot-to-lot comparison and correlation with AMH Gen II assay (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) were evaluated. Reference intervals for Access AMH were established in healthy females, males, newborns (≤60days) and pediatric males classified by Tanner stages. RESULTS: The limit of blank and limit of detection were below 0.0077 and 0.0098ng/mL, respectively. The limit of quantitation was 0.010ng/mL. The total imprecision ranged from 2.4 to 5.2%. Linearity was observed up to 24ng/mL. Sample storage at room temperature up to 48h, at 2-8°C up to 7days and at -20°C up to 15months had no impact on measured AMH. The correlation study gave a coefficient between 0.99 and 1 and a regression slope between 0.89 and 0.92. Excellent lot-to-lot comparability was observed on controls and patient samples with a maximum bias of 3.7% between 2.81 and 15.03ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated Access AMH immunoassay demonstrates excellent analytical performance. As a consequence, the availability of this assay will represent a robust, fast and precise alternative to manual AMH assay testing.
