Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
Dent Traumatol ; 40(2): 204-212, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818928

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mouthguards are used to prevent dental trauma and orofacial injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) aging by thermocycling on elastic modulus, stress, strain and shock absorption ability of different ethylene-vinyl acetate brands used for mouthguards. METHODS: Thirty EVA samples with a dimension of 70 × 10 × 3 mm were obtained from four commercial brands (Bioart®, Erkodent®, Polyshok® and Proform®). Fifteen samples were submitted to 10,000 cycles (5°C-55°C) in a thermocycling machine with an immersion time of 30 s and a transfer time of 5 s. The samples were submitted to a uniaxial tensile test in a universal testing machine to calculate the elastic modulus. Data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak test. A three-dimensional model of the anterior maxilla was created using Rhinoceros 5.0. A 3 mm custom-fitted mouthguard was simulated. The three-dimensional volumetric mesh was generated using the Patran software (MSC Software) with isoparametrics, 4-noded tetrahedral elements and exported to Marc/Mentat (MSC Software) as element number 134. A non-linear dynamic impact analysis was performed in which a rigid object struck the central incisor at a speed of 5 m/s. The stresses were evaluated by the modified von Mises criteria and the strains were also recorded. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed for elastic modulus values (p < .001). Mean and standard deviation values (MPa) without thermocycling were: Bioart (34.5 ± 0.9), Erkodent (15.0 ± 0.4), Polyshok (17.3 ± 0.4), Proform: (20.6 ± 0.8); and with thermocycling: Bioart (25.4 ± 0.8), Erkodent (10.7 ± 0.5), Polyshok (13.3 ± 0.6), Proform (13.1 ± 0.6). The thermocycling process reduced stress and strain levels regardless of the mouthguard materials. Shock absorption ability calculated based on the strain values was increased with thermocycling process. CONCLUSION: The thermocycling process, regardless of the commercial brand, reduced the stress/strain and increased the shock absorption ability of mouthguards.


Subject(s)
Mouth Protectors , Polyethylenes , Polyvinyls , Vinyl Compounds , Elastic Modulus , Equipment Design , Ethylenes
2.
J Mater Sci Mater Med ; 32(8): 90, 2021 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34338911

ABSTRACT

This in vitro study evaluates the influence of pressed lithium disilicate thickness, shade and translucency on the transmitted irradiance and the Knoop microhardness (KHN) of a light-cured resin cement at two depths. One hundred and thirty-five ceramic discs of IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent) were fabricated and divided into twenty-seven groups (n = 5) according to the association between translucency: HT (hight translucency), LT (low translucency), and MO (medium opacity); shade: BL2, A1 and A3.5; and thickness: 0.5 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm. One side of each ceramic disc was finished, polished and glazed. The irradiance (mW/cm²) of a multiwave LED light curing unit (Valo, Ultradent) was evaluated with a potentiometer (Ophir 10ª-V2-SH, Ophir Optronics) without (control group) or with interposition of ceramic samples. The microhardness of Variolink Esthetic LC resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent) was evaluated after 24 h at two depths (100 µm and 700 µm). Data were submitted to ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Irradiance and KHN were significantly influenced by ceramic thickness (p < 0.0001), shade (p < 0.001), translucency (p < 0.0001) and depth (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: the interposition of increasing ceramic thicknesses significantly reduced the irradiance and microhardness of resin cement. Increased depth in the resin cement showed significantly reduced microhardness for all studied groups. Increased ceramic opacity reduced the KHN of the resin cement at both depths for all ceramic thicknesses and shades.


Subject(s)
Bone Cements , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Acrylic Resins , Composite Resins , Curing Lights, Dental , Hardness , Light , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Polymerization , Polyurethanes , Reproducibility of Results , Resin Cements , Temperature
3.
Braz Dent J ; 31(5): 532-539, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146338

ABSTRACT

The aim was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mTBS) to dentin and interfacial stress in a class II cavity restored with bulk-fill or conventional composite resins and the margin interfaces. Vertical slot class II cavities in the mesial face, with the gingival end in dentin, were prepared in 72 third molars, being divided into groups (n=24): G1-Tetric N-Ceram; G2-Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill; G3-SonicFill. Clearfil SE Bond adhesive system was used in all groups. Half of the teeth in each group (n=12) were submitted to thermo-mechanical cycling (TMC). Restored teeth (n=9) were cut perpendicular to obtain beams, which were submitted to a mTBS test in an EMIC machine. The cervical margins in dentin of the restored teeth (n=3) were assessed using SEM through epoxy resin replicas as well as the section of the restoration. Interfacial stresses after load application were calculated by 2D finite element analysis. The mTBS means-MPa followed by different letters represent statistical difference by ANOVA and Games-Howell's test (p<0.05): Without TMC: G1-15.68±6.10a; G2-10.08±5.21ab; G3-7.98±3.76b. With TMC: G1-9.70±5.52a; G2-5.79±1.42a; G3-4.37±1.87a. Interfacial stress (MPa) was 4.4 for SonicFill, 3.9 for Tetric N-Ceram, and 3.5 for Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill. SEM images showed continuous margins for all composite resin restorations. It was possible to conclude that SonicFill obtained a slightly higher interfacial stress and lower bond strength to dentin in comparison with Tetric N-Ceram and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill. Continuous margin interfaces were obtained for Tetric N-Ceram, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, and SonicFill. However, voids were observed in the SonicFill restorations.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Composite Resins , Dentin , Humans , Materials Testing
4.
Braz Dent J ; 31(5): 540-547, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146339

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of orthodontic bracket type (metallic or ceramic) and mouthguard on biomechanical response during impact. Two-dimensional plane-strain models of a patient with increased positive overjet of the maxillary central incisor was created based on a CT scan, simulating the periodontal ligament, bone support, gingival tissue, orthodontic brackets (metallic or ceramic) and mouthguard. A nonlinear dynamic impact finite element analysis was performed in which a steel object hit the model at 1 m/s. Stress distributions (Von Mises and Modified Von Mises) and strain were evaluated. Stress distributions were affected by the bracket presence and type. Models with metallic and ceramic bracket had higher stresses over a larger buccal enamel impact area. Models with ceramic brackets generated higher stresses than the metallic brackets. Mouthguards reduced the stress and strain values regardless of bracket type. Mouthguard shock absorption were 88.37% and 89.27% for the metallic and ceramic bracket, respectively. Orthodontic bracket presence and type influenced the stress and strain generated during an impact. Ceramic brackets generated higher stresses than metallic brackets. Mouthguards substantially reduced impact stress and strain peaks, regardless of bracket type.


Subject(s)
Mouth Protectors , Orthodontic Brackets , Ceramics , Dental Stress Analysis , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Incisor , Materials Testing , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Stress, Mechanical
5.
J Adhes Dent ; 22(5): 503-514, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33073781

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture load of weakened premolars restored with different conventional and bulk-fill composite resins and restorative techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty premolars received a 4.0 x 3.5mm mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) class II preparation. The lingual and buccal cups were internally weakened. Specimens were restored according to the following 5 groups: Filtek Z350 XT/10 increments; Filtek Z350 XT/8 increments (both 3M Oral Care); Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative + Filtek Z350 XT (both 3M Oral Care); SDR + Spectra Basic (Dentsply Sirona); and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent). Cuspal strains were measured using strain gauges (n = 10). After restoration, specimens were submitted to thermal/mechanical cycles and fractured. Post-gel shrinkage of the composites was determined. Additionally, residual shrinkage strains and stresses were analyzed using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences among composite resins (p < 0.001) for the post-gel shrinkage. Filtek Z350 XT had the highest post-gel shrinkage and no difference was found between Spectra Basic and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (p = 0.110). The Filtek Z350 XT/10 increments, Filtek Z350 XT/8 increments and Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative/Filtek Z350 XT had statistically significantly higher cuspal deformation values when compared to the SDR/Spectra Basic and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill techniques. 3D-FEA confirmed higher stress levels in the incrementally filled conventional restorations. Fracture loads were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSION: The bulk-fill restoration techniques resulted in less cuspal strain and stress than the incremental technique with conventional composite resin. Fracture resistance was not affected by the restorative techniques.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Bicuspid , Dental Stress Analysis , Polymerization
6.
Braz Dent J ; 29(3): 268-274, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29972453

ABSTRACT

The aim was to evaluate the influence of different dentin preparation mode in the smear layer characteristics (SL), hybrid layer (HL), and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin with two resin cements. The occlusal dentin of 120 third molars was exposed. The teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=30) according to the dentin preparation mode: 1- fine grain diamond bur; 2- coarse grain diamond bur; 3- multi laminate carbide steel bur; and, 4- ultrasonic CV Dentus diamond bur. Each treated dentin group was divided into 2 sub-groups (n=15) according to the resin cement: (1) RelyX U200 and (2) RelyX ARC. Resin composite blocks were cemented on dentin. After storage at 37o C for 24 h, beams with a cross section area of 1.0 mm2 were obtained, and tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Two additional teeth for each sub-group were prepared to analyze the SL and HL on a scanning electron microscopy. According to Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn tests, there was no significant difference in µTBS among the rotary instruments within each resin cement group. RelyX ARC obtained higher µTBS values compared to RelyX U200 (p<0.05). RelyX ARC formed evident HL, which was not observed for RelyX U200. The dentin mode preparation did not influence the µTBS of the resin cements. The SL was different for all instruments. The cementing agent is more determinant in the hybrid layer formation and bond strength to dentin than the instruments applied on dentin.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tensile Strength , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Molar, Third/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols , Polymethacrylic Acids , Smear Layer
7.
Braz. dent. j ; 29(3): 268-274, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951545

ABSTRACT

Abstract The aim was to evaluate the influence of different dentin preparation mode in the smear layer characteristics (SL), hybrid layer (HL), and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin with two resin cements. The occlusal dentin of 120 third molars was exposed. The teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=30) according to the dentin preparation mode: 1- fine grain diamond bur; 2- coarse grain diamond bur; 3- multi laminate carbide steel bur; and, 4- ultrasonic CV Dentus diamond bur. Each treated dentin group was divided into 2 sub-groups (n=15) according to the resin cement: (1) RelyX U200 and (2) RelyX ARC. Resin composite blocks were cemented on dentin. After storage at 37o C for 24 h, beams with a cross section area of 1.0 mm2 were obtained, and tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Two additional teeth for each sub-group were prepared to analyze the SL and HL on a scanning electron microscopy. According to Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn tests, there was no significant difference in µTBS among the rotary instruments within each resin cement group. RelyX ARC obtained higher µTBS values compared to RelyX U200 (p<0.05). RelyX ARC formed evident HL, which was not observed for RelyX U200. The dentin mode preparation did not influence the µTBS of the resin cements. The SL was different for all instruments. The cementing agent is more determinant in the hybrid layer formation and bond strength to dentin than the instruments applied on dentin.


Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de diferentes modos de preparação da dentina nas características da smear layer (SL), da camada híbrida (CH) e na resistência de união à microtração (RUµT) à dentina com dois cimentos resinosos. A dentina oclusal de 120 terceiros molares humanos foi exposta. Os dentes foram divididos em 4 grupos (n=30) de acordo com o modo de preparação da dentina: 1 - ponta diamantada de granulação fina; 2 - ponta diamantada de granulação grossa; 3 - ponta de carboneto de aço multilaminada; 4 - ponta diamantada ultrassônica. Cada grupo foi subdividido em dois subgrupos (n=15) de acordo com o cimento resinoso: (1) RelyX U200 e (2) RelyX ARC. Blocos de resina composta foram cimentados na dentina. Após armazenamento a 37 °C por 24 h, as amostras foram cortadas para obter palitos com área de 1,0 mm2, os quais foram testados em máquina de ensaio universal com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Dois dentes adicionais por subgrupo foram preparados para analisar as características da SL e da CH em microscópio eletrônico de varredura. De acordo com o teste de Kruskal-Wallis e o teste de Dunn, não houve diferença significativa na RUµT entre os instrumentos rotatórios para cada cimento resinoso. RelyX ARC obteve maiores valores de RUµT em comparação ao RelyX U200 (p<0,05). RelyX ARC formou uma CH evidente, o que não foi observado para o RelyX U200. O modo de preparação da dentina não influenciou na RUµT dos cimentos resinosos. A SL foi diferente para todos os instrumentos. O agente de cimentação foi mais determinante na formação da camada híbrida e na resistência de união do que os instrumentos utilizados para preparar a dentina.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tensile Strength , Dental Bonding , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dentin/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols , Polymethacrylic Acids , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Smear Layer , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dental Stress Analysis , Molar, Third/chemistry
8.
Odontology ; 106(1): 56-63, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28160094

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the marginal adaptation and microleakage of SonicFill composite with different photopolymerization techniques. Class II cavities were prepared in 40 premolars and divided into groups according to the photopolymerization technique (n = 10): G1:1200 mW/cm2 for 20 s; G2:1200 mW/cm2 for 40 s; G3:Soft-start with 650 mW/cm2 for 5 s and 1200 mW/cm2 for 15 s; G4:Soft-start with 650 mW/cm2 for 10 s and 1200 mW/cm2 for 30 s. The cavities were restored with OptiBond FL adhesive and SonicFill. Epoxy resin replicas were obtained before and after thermocycling. The occlusal and cervical margins were analyzed with scanning electron microcopy and expressed as the percentage of continuous margins (%CM). The specimens were submitted to microleakage with silver nitrate. ANOVA and Tukey's test revealed that the %CM at the linguo-occlusal margin for group 1 (83.19%) was significantly different from groups 2, 3 and 4, which had values over 95%. At the cervical margin, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. After thermocycling, there was a significant decrease in %CM. The predominant score of microleakage was 1 in enamel and 3 in dentin. The SonicFill composite led to gap formation and microleakage, especially in the dentin at the cervical margin, regardless of the photopolymerization technique employed.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dental Leakage , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Materials/chemistry , Photochemical Processes , Bicuspid , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polymerization , Resin Cements , Surface Properties
9.
Open Dent J ; 11: 276-283, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28839476

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate, in vitro, the tensile bond strength to dentin of Scotchbond Universal (SU), All-Bond Universal (AU) and One Coat 7 Universal (OC7) adhesives applied in self-etch mode, after 24 h of storage and after 500,000 loading cycles, using Clearfil SE Bond (SE) as a control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The adhesives were applied on the dentin of bovine teeth, followed by the application of a composite resin. Thirty specimens were obtained for each adhesive. Half of the specimens were submitted to cyclic loading for 500,000 cycles. All specimens were submitted to a tensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. RESULTS: According to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=5%), the interaction between the adhesive and cyclic loading factors was significant (p=0.001). The means followed by the same letter represent no significant difference in the bond strength (MPa) after 24 h: OC7=7.86A (±2.90), SU=6.78AB (±2.03), AU=5.61BC (±2.32), and SE=3.53C (±1.89). After cyclic loading, SE, SU and AU maintained bond strength comparable to 24 h period. There was a significant decrease only for OC7. CONCLUSION: SU, AU and OC7 had bond strength to dentin comparable to that of SE. Only OC7 had decreased bond strength to dentin after cyclic loading.

10.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 22(1): 82-88, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28444011

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Material biodegradation that occurs in the mouth may interfere in the bonding strength between the bracket and the enamel, causing lower bond strength values in vivo, in comparison with in vitro studies. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo and to evaluate, in vitro, the bond strength obtained with the prototype. METHODS: A original plier (3M Unitek) was modified by adding one strain gauge directly connected to its claw. An electronic circuit performed the reading of the strain gauge, and the software installed in a computer recorded the values of the bracket debonding force, in kgf. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the facial surface of 30 bovine incisors with adhesive materials. In Group 1 (n = 15), debonding was carried out with the prototype, while tensile bond strength testing was performed in Group 2 (n = 15). A universal testing machine was used for the second group. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recorded. RESULTS: According to Student's t test (α = 0.05), Group 1 (2.96 MPa) and Group 2 (3.08 MPa) were not significantly different. ARI score of 3 was predominant in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The prototype proved to be reliable for obtaining in vivo bond strength values for orthodontic brackets.


Subject(s)
Dental Debonding , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Orthodontic Brackets , Adhesives , Animals , Cattle , Dental Bonding
11.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 22(1): 82-88, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840206

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: Material biodegradation that occurs in the mouth may interfere in the bonding strength between the bracket and the enamel, causing lower bond strength values in vivo, in comparison with in vitro studies. Objective: To develop a prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo and to evaluate, in vitro, the bond strength obtained with the prototype. Methods: A original plier (3M Unitek) was modified by adding one strain gauge directly connected to its claw. An electronic circuit performed the reading of the strain gauge, and the software installed in a computer recorded the values of the bracket debonding force, in kgf. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the facial surface of 30 bovine incisors with adhesive materials. In Group 1 (n = 15), debonding was carried out with the prototype, while tensile bond strength testing was performed in Group 2 (n = 15). A universal testing machine was used for the second group. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recorded. Results: According to Student’s t test (α = 0.05), Group 1 (2.96 MPa) and Group 2 (3.08 MPa) were not significantly different. ARI score of 3 was predominant in the two groups. Conclusion: The prototype proved to be reliable for obtaining in vivo bond strength values for orthodontic brackets.


RESUMO Introdução: a biodegradação de materiais que ocorre na cavidade bucal pode interferir na resistência de união entre o braquete e o esmalte, causando baixos valores de resistência de união in vivo, em comparação aos valores in vitro. Objetivo: o objetivo do presente estudo foi desenvolver um protótipo para mensurar, in vivo, a força de descolagem de braquetes e avaliar, in vitro, a resistência de união obtida com o uso do protótipo. Métodos: um alicate (3M Unitek) foi modificado por meio da adição de um extensômetro diretamente conectado à garra do alicate. Um circuito eletrônico realizou a leitura do extensômetro, e um software instalado em um computador registrou os valores de força de descolagem do braquete em kgf. Os braquetes ortodônticos foram colados com material adesivo na face vestibular de 30 dentes incisivos bovinos. No Grupo 1 (n = 15), a descolagem foi realizada com o protótipo, enquanto no Grupo 2 (n = 15) foi realizado teste de resistência de união à tração, utilizando-se uma máquina universal de ensaios. O índice de adesivo remanescente (ARI) foi analisado. Resultados: de acordo com o teste de t de Student (α = 0,05), os grupos 1 (2,96 MPa) e 2 (3,08 MPa) não foram estatisticamente diferentes. O escore 3 do ARI foi predominante nos dois grupos. Conclusão: o protótipo mostrou-se confiável para se obter, in vivo, os valores de resistência de união dos braquetes ortodônticos.


Subject(s)
Animals , Orthodontic Brackets , Dental Debonding , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Cattle , Adhesives , Dental Bonding
12.
Open Dent J ; 10: 268-77, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27347230

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of Scotchbond Universal to dentin using the etch-and-rinse or the self-etch technique after 24 h and 6 months of storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces were obtained in 24 third molars. The teeth were divided into four groups: G1 - Scotchbond Universal applied in the etch-and-rinse mode; G2 - Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode; G3 - Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; G4 - Clearfil SE Bond. A block of composite was built on the adhesive area. The tooth/resin sets were cut parallel to the long axis to obtain 40 beams (~0.8 mm(2)) for each group. Twenty specimens were immediately submitted to the µTBS test, and the remaining 20 were stored in water for 6 months. Failures and the adhesive interface were analyzed by SEM. RESULTS: According to two-way ANOVA, the interaction between adhesive and storage time was significant (p=0.015).The µTBS (MPa) means were the following: 24 h - G1 (39.37±10.82), G2 (31.02±13.76), G3 (35.09±14.03) and G4 (35.84±11.06); 6 months - G1 (36.99±8.78), G2 (40.58±8.07), G3 (32.44±6.07) and G4 (41.75±8.25). Most failures were mixed. Evidence of hybrid layer and numerous resin tags were noted for Scotchbond Universal applied with the etch-and-rinse mode and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. A thinner hybrid layer and fewer resin tags were noted for Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode and Clearfil SE Bond. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the µTBS for Scotchbond Universal is comparable to the gold-standard adhesives. Scotchbond Universal applied in the self-etch mode and Clearfil SE Bond revealed higher bond stability compared to the etch-and-rinse mode.

13.
Braz Oral Res ; 29: 54, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25859635

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the influence of an alternative surface treatment on the microshear bond strength (µsbs) of zirconia-based ceramic. Thirty-five zirconia disks were assigned to five groups according to the following treatments: Control (CO), glass and silane were not applied to the zirconia surface; G1, air blasted with 100µm glass beads + glaze + silane; G2, a gel containing 15% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; G3, a gel containing 25% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; and G4, a gel containing 50% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane. The specimens were built up using RelyX ARC®, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and inserted in an elastomeric mold with an inner diameter of 0.8 mm. The µsbs test was performed using a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) were applied to the bond strength values (in MPa). CO (15.6 ± 4.1) showed the lowest µsbs value. There were no statistical differences between the G1 (24.9 ± 7.4), G2 (24.9 ± 2.3), G3 (35.0 ± 10.3) and G4 (35.3 ± 6.0) experimental groups. Those groups submitted to surface treatments with higher concentrations of glass showed a lower frequency of adhesive failures. In conclusion, the glass application improved the interaction between the ceramic and the luting cement.


Subject(s)
Cementation/methods , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Glass/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
14.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-2, 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777224

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the influence of an alternative surface treatment on the microshear bond strength (μsbs) of zirconia-based ceramic. Thirty-five zirconia disks were assigned to five groups according to the following treatments: Control (CO), glass and silane were not applied to the zirconia surface; G1, air blasted with 100μm glass beads + glaze + silane; G2, a gel containing 15% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; G3, a gel containing 25% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; and G4, a gel containing 50% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane. The specimens were built up using RelyX ARC®, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and inserted in an elastomeric mold with an inner diameter of 0.8 mm. The μsbs test was performed using a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) were applied to the bond strength values (in MPa). CO (15.6 ± 4.1) showed the lowest μsbs value. There were no statistical differences between the G1 (24.9 ± 7.4), G2 (24.9 ± 2.3), G3 (35.0 ± 10.3) and G4 (35.3 ± 6.0) experimental groups. Those groups submitted to surface treatments with higher concentrations of glass showed a lower frequency of adhesive failures. In conclusion, the glass application improved the interaction between the ceramic and the luting cement.


Subject(s)
Cementation/methods , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Glass/chemistry , Zirconium/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Resin Cements/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
15.
Braz. dent. j ; 25(6): 472-478, Nov-Dec/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-732254

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a fluoride-containing adhesive system submitted to a pH-cycling and storage time regimen for primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes the fluoride released amount was evaluated. Twelve dentin surfaces from sound third molar were divided into 2 groups according to adhesive systems: Clearfil SE Protect (PB) and Clearfil SE Bond (SE). Sticks obtained (1.0 mm2) from teeth were randomly divided into 3 subgroups according to storage regimen model: immediate (24h); 5-month deionized water (W); and pH-cycling model (C). All sticks were tested for µTBS in a universal testing machine. Fluoride concentration was obtained from 1-4 days and 30-day in W and 1-4 days in demineralization (DE)/remineralization (RE) solutions from C, using a fluoride-specific electrode. µTBS and fluoride released data were, respectively, submitted to ANOVA in a split plot design and Tukey, and Friedman' tests (a=0.05). There was no significant interaction between adhesive system and storage regimen for µTBS. W showed the lowest µTBS values. There was no significant difference between 24 h and C models for µTBS. There was no significant difference between adhesive systems. Failure mode was predominantly cohesive within composite for the 24 h and W, for the C group it was mixed for SE and cohesive within composite for PB adhesive system. Fluoride concentrations in the DE/RE solutions were less than 0.03125 ppm and not detected in W. In conclusion, the fluoride-containing adhesive system performed similarly to the regular one. Hydrolytic degradation is the main problem with both adhesive systems, regardless of fluoride contents.


O objetivo principal desse estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união à microtração de dois sistemas adesivos (com e sem flúor) após a ciclagem de pH e armazenagem em água deionizada. A quantidade de flúor liberada foi avaliada secundariamente. Doze terceiros molares hígidos foram separados em 2 grupos de acordo com o sistema adesivo: Clearfil SE Protect - com flúor (PB) e Clearfil SE Bond - sem flúor (SE). Os palitos (1 mm2) obtidos do mesmo dente foram aleatoriamente divididos em 3 subgrupos de acordo com o meio de armazenagem: em água deionizada por 24h ou 5 meses e ciclagem de pH. Os palitos foram tracionados em uma máquina de ensaio universal a 0,5 mm/min. A concentração de flúor foi analisada em água deionizada (1-4 dias e 30 dias) e na solução remineralizadora e desmineralizadora (1-4 dias) usando um eletrodo específico. Os dados de resistência de união e liberação de flúor foram, respectivamente, submetidos à Análise de Variância em esquema de parcela subdividida e ao teste de Friedman (a=0,05). Não houve nenhuma interação significativa na resistência de união entre os sistemas adesivos e os meios de armazenagem. Os menores valores de resistência de união à microtração foram encontrados para os palitos armazenados em água deionizada. Não houve nenhuma diferença significativa nos valores de resistência de união após 24h e ciclagem de pH. Nenhuma diferença significativa na resistência de união foi observada entre os 2 sistemas adesivos. O modo de falha foi predominantemente coesivo em compósito para os grupos armazenados em água por 24h ou 5 meses para ambos os sistemas adesivos. No grupo submetido à ciclagem, a falha foi mista para o SE e coesiva em compósito para o PB. A concentração de flúor nas soluções DE/RE foi menor que 0,03125 ppm e não detectada em água deionizada. Concluindo, o sistema adesivo com flúor (PB) apresentou performance similar ao sistema adesivo sem flúor (SE). A degradação hidrolítica foi o principal fator para ambos os sistemas adesivos, independente da adição de flúor.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Floxuridine/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Evaluation , Drug Tolerance , Floxuridine/toxicity , Isomerism , Neoplasms/drug therapy
16.
J Int Oral Health ; 6(3): 50-5, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25083032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated in vivo the accuracy of metal (Smart®) and plastic (Triple Tray®) dual-arch trays used with vinyl polysiloxane (Flexitime®), in the putty/wash viscosity, as well as polyether (Impregum Soft®) in the regular viscosity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one patient, an implant-level transfer was screwed on an implant in the mandibular right first molar, serving as a pattern. Ten impressions were made with each tray and impression material. The impressions were poured with Type IV gypsum. The width and height of the pattern and casts were measured in a profile projector (Nikon). The results were submitted to Student's t-test for one sample (α = 0.05). RESULTS: For the width distance, the plastic dual-arch trays with vinyl polysiloxane (4.513 mm) and with polyether (4.531 mm) were statistically wider than the pattern (4.489 mm). The metal dual-arch tray with vinyl polysiloxane (4.504 mm) and with polyether (4.500 mm) did not differ statistically from the pattern. For the height distance, only the metal dual-arch tray with polyether (2.253 mm) differed statistically from the pattern (2.310 mm). CONCLUSION: The metal dual-arch tray with vinyl polysiloxane, in the putty/wash viscosities, reproduced casts with less distortion in comparison with the same technique with the plastic dual-arch tray. The plastic or metal dual-arch trays with polyether reproduced cast with greater distortion. How to cite the article: Santayana de Lima LM, Borges GA, Burnett LH Jr, Spohr AM. In vivo study of the accuracy of dual-arch impressions. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):50-5.

17.
Braz Dent J ; 25(6): 472-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25590191

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a fluoride-containing adhesive system submitted to a pH-cycling and storage time regimen for primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes the fluoride released amount was evaluated. Twelve dentin surfaces from sound third molar were divided into 2 groups according to adhesive systems: Clearfil SE Protect (PB) and Clearfil SE Bond (SE). Sticks obtained (1.0 mm2) from teeth were randomly divided into 3 subgroups according to storage regimen model: immediate (24h); 5-month deionized water (W); and pH-cycling model (C). All sticks were tested for µTBS in a universal testing machine. Fluoride concentration was obtained from 1-4 days and 30-day in W and 1-4 days in demineralization (DE)/remineralization (RE) solutions from C, using a fluoride-specific electrode. µTBS and fluoride released data were, respectively, submitted to ANOVA in a split plot design and Tukey, and Friedman' tests (a=0.05). There was no significant interaction between adhesive system and storage regimen for µTBS. W showed the lowest µTBS values. There was no significant difference between 24 h and C models for µTBS. There was no significant difference between adhesive systems. Failure mode was predominantly cohesive within composite for the 24 h and W, for the C group it was mixed for SE and cohesive within composite for PB adhesive system. Fluoride concentrations in the DE/RE solutions were less than 0.03125 ppm and not detected in W. In conclusion, the fluoride-containing adhesive system performed similarly to the regular one. Hydrolytic degradation is the main problem with both adhesive systems, regardless of fluoride contents.


Subject(s)
Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Fluorides/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Molar, Third , Random Allocation , Self-Curing of Dental Resins , Tensile Strength
18.
J Adhes Dent ; 15(6): 561-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23653900

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection, fracture resistance, and mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite resin inlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two maxillary premolars were divided into 6 groups: 1: sound teeth as control (C); 2: preparations without restoration (WR); 3: inlays luted with RelyX ARC (ARC); 4: inlays luted with RelyX Unicem (RLXU); 5: inlays luted with Maxcem Elite (MCE); 6: inlays luted with SeT (ST). Groups 2 to 6 received mesio-occlusal-distal preparations and endodontic treatment. Stone casts were made for groups 3 to 6. Composite resin inlays were built over each cast and luted with the resin cements. A 200-N load was applied on the occlusal aspect and the cuspal deflection was measured using a micrometer before and after 500,000 cycles of fatigue loading (200 N; 500,000 cycles). The specimens were then submitted to an axial load until failure. RESULTS: The median cuspal deflection (µm) and median fracture resistance (N) were calculated and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.01). Values followed by the same letter represent no statistically significant difference. Cuspal deflection before cyclic loading: C = 3 µma; ARC = 4 µmab; RLXU= 5 µmab; MCE = 21 µmb; ST = 51 µmbc; WR = 69 µmc. Cuspal deflection after cyclic loading: ARC = 6 µma; RLXU = 19 µmab; MCE = 33 µmb; ST = 62 µmb. Fracture resistance in N: C = 1902a; ARC = 980b; RLXU = 670c; MCE = 533c; ST = 601c; WR = 526c. According to the Wilcoxon test, there was no statistical difference between the cuspal deflection before and after cyclic loading only for ARC (p = 0.015). There was a predominance of recovery fractures for the restored groups. CONCLUSION: Composite resin inlays luted with RelyX ARC maintained cuspal deflection stability and showed higher fracture resistance of the teeth than did inlays luted with the other cements tested.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Inlays , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tooth Crown/pathology , Tooth Fractures/physiopathology , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Bicuspid/pathology , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental/classification , Dental Cavity Preparation/instrumentation , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Humans , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors , Tooth, Nonvital/physiopathology , Tooth, Nonvital/therapy
19.
J Adhes Dent ; 15(3): 221-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23560256

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of 11.5% polyacrylic acid pretreatment on the interface and bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements (Maxcem Elite, RelyX Unicem, SeT) to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six third molars were randomly divided into seven groups: RelyX ARC as control (ARC), RelyX Unicem (RLXU), Maxcem Elite (MCE), SeT (ST), polyacrylic acid+RelyX Unicem (RLXU-P), polyacrylic acid+Maxcem Elite (MCE-P), and polyacrylic acid+SeT (ST-P). Resin composite blocks were luted to flat dentin. After storage in distilled water for 24 h, sticks with a cross-sectional area of ca 0.80 mm2 were obtained (n = 24 per group) and submitted to a microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Two sets from each group were sectioned mesiodistally in the center of the crown and observed with a scanning electron microscope at 4000X magnification. RESULTS: The mean results of the µTBS test (MPa) followed by the same letter do not differ statistically significantly according to ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05): ARC = 24.19 (± 6.90)a, RLXU-P = 23.12 (± 6.18)a, MCE-P = 13.09 (± 5.87)b, RLXU = 10.23 (± 2.88)b,c, and MCE = 8.14 (± 4.63)c. All SeT specimens failed during the cutting procedure. The hybrid layer was not observed for the self-adhesive resin cements, and resin tags were observed for RelyX Unicem and Maxem Elite when dentin was pretreated with polyacrylic acid. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with 11.5% polyacrylic acid was effective for bonding RelyX Unicem and Maxcem Elite to dentin.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dentin/ultrastructure , Resin Cements/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Glass/chemistry , Humans , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
20.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 71(3-4): 664-70, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22906039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of resin cements on cuspal deflection, fracture load and failure mode of endodontically-treated teeth restored with composite resin inlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty maxillary premolars were randomly divided into four groups: G1 (sound teeth, control), G2 (RelyX ARC), G3 (RelyX Unicem) and G4 (Maxcem Elite). The teeth from groups 2, 3 and 4 received mesial-occlusal-distal preparations and endodontic treatments. Impressions were taken with vinyl polysiloxane and poured using type IV die stone. Inlays with Z250 composite resin were built over each cast and luted with the resin cements. A 200-N load was applied on the occlusal surface and the cuspal deflection was measured using a micrometer. The specimens were then subjected to an axial load until failure occurred. The resulting failure mode was analyzed. RESULTS: The means for cuspal deflection (µm) and fracture load (N) followed by the same letter represent no statistically significant difference based on ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Cuspal deflection: G1 = 4.7 (± 1.7)(a), G2 = 12.0 (± 8.9)(a), G3 = 39.0 (± 27.0)(b) and G4 = 56.8 (± 18.2)(b). Fracture load: G1 = 1982 (± 893)(a), G2 = 690.9 (± 225.5)(b), G3 = 679 (± 193.6)(b) and G4 = 465.5 (± 121.6)(b). G1 presented cusp fractures only at the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). There was a high frequency of cusp fractures below the CEJ in G2, G3 and G4. CONCLUSIONS: Composite resin inlays luted with resin cements do not recover the strength of sound teeth. However, teeth restored with composite resin inlays and luted with RelyX ARC can withstand mechanical fatigue longer before failure occurs than those luted with RelyX Unicem and Maxcem Elite.


Subject(s)
Cuspid/physiology , Dental Stress Analysis , Endodontics , Resin Cements , Analysis of Variance , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...