Immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal tumors: is the time ripe?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized the management of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Based on notable results observed in the metastatic setting, several clinical trials investigated ICIs as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for localized dMMR/MSI-H GI cancers, achieving striking results in terms of clinical and pathological responses and creating the opportunity to spare patients from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and even surgical resection. Nevertheless, these impressive findings are mainly derived from small proof of concept phase II studies and there are still several open questions to address. Moreover, dMMR/MSI-H represents a limited subgroup accounting for less than 10% of GI cancers. Consequently, many efforts have been produced to investigate neoadjuvant ICIs also in mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers, considering the potential synergistic effect in combining immune-targeted agents with standard therapies such as chemo and/or radiotherapy. However, results for combining ICIs to the standard of care in the unselected population are still unsatisfactory, without improvements in event-free survival in esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma for the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy, and sometimes limited benefit in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Therefore, a major challenge will be to identify among the heterogenous spectrum of this disease, those patients that could take advantage of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and deliver the most effective treatment. In this review we discuss the rationale of NAT in GI malignancies, summarize the available evidence regarding the completed trials that evaluated this treatment strategy in both MSI-H and MSS tumors. Finally, we discuss ongoing studies and future perspectives to render neoadjuvant immunotherapy another arrow in the quiver for the treatment of locally advanced GI tumors.

Efficacy and Toxicity Analysis of mFOLFIRINOX in High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise both well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) nearly always include poorly differentiated NEC as the neuroendocrine component. The efficacy and safety of frontline mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy has never been investigated in patients with high-grade NENs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with advanced high-grade NEN of the gastroenteropancreatic tract or of unknown origin seen between February 2016 and April 2023 who received treatment with frontline mFOLFIRINOX. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included (G3 NETs: n=2; NECs: n=25; MiNENs: n=8; stage III: n=5; stage IV: n=30). The objective response rate was 77% (complete response: 3%; partial response: 74%). Median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI, 9.2-16.2 months) and median overall survival was 20.6 months (95% CI, 17.2-30.6 months). No significant differences in efficacy were seen according to primary site, histopathology, and Ki-67 proliferative index. All 5 patients with stage III disease who received mFOLFIRINOX obtained an objective response and underwent radical surgery or definitive radiotherapy with curative intent, with a recurrence rate of 40%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 43% of patients (mainly neutropenia and diarrhea). Females were at significantly increased risk of developing severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: mFOLFIRINOX shows antitumor activity against high-grade NENs. Well-designed, prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings.

Multimodal treatment for resectable neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

Non-metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Lacking prospective studies, the optimal multimodal treatment approach has not yet been clearly defined. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with non-metastatic NECC treated with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, according to pathologic prognostic factors and multimodal treatments received. We retrospectively examined data from patients with non-metastatic NECC candidate to receive surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and discussed at the European Institute of Oncology's Multidisciplinary Neuroendocrine Tumor Board, between January 2003 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were event-free survival and overall survival. A total of 27 consecutive patients were evaluated, 15 with early stage NECC and 12 with a locally advanced NECC. Eight patients received neoadjuvant and 19 adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy; 14 received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, half with external-beam radiation therapy alone, and half combined with brachytherapy. No patients progressed or relapsed during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The median event-free survival was 21.1 months and the median overall survival was 33.0 months. Pathological FIGO stage ≥ IIB, adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy with or without brachytherapy emerged as significant and independent prognostic factors for event-free survival. Brachytherapy was also prognostic for overall survival. Non-metastatic NECC requires a multimodal approach, mainly weighted on the FIGO stage. The addition of brachytherapy should be considered, especially in patients with locally advanced disease. Because of the scarcity of robust clinical data, treatment strategy should be discussed in multidisciplinary board, taking into account patient.

Organisational challenges, volumes of oncological activity and patients' perception during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic.

BACKGROUND: On February 23rd, the 1st case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22-inpatient bed coronavirus disease (COVID) Unit, and we reshaped our organisation to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining oncological activities. METHODS: We tracked down (i) volumes of oncological activities (January 1st - March 31st, 2020 versus the same period of 2019), (ii) patients' and caregivers' perception and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in oncology health professionals and SARS-CoV-2 infection-related hospital admissions of "active"' oncological patients. RESULTS: As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations and specialist visits in January-March 2020 was 8%, 6% and 3%, respectively; based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. The overall acceptance of adopted measures, as measured by targeted questionnaires administered to a sample of 241 outpatients, was high (>70%). Overall, 8 of 85 oncology health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (all but one employed in the COVID Unit, no hospital admissions and no treatment required); among 471 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 had an "active"' oncological disease (2 died of infection-related complications). CONCLUSIONS: A slight, but statistically significant reduction in oncology activity was registered during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in Verona, Italy. Organisational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both oncological patients and health professionals to a minimum.