Indocyanine green dye clearance test: early graft (dys)-function and long-term mortality after liver transplant. Should we continue to use it? An observational study.

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) can be a serious complication in the immediate postoperative period following liver transplantation. Our aim was to study the prognostic role of the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) in predicting early and late EAD and mortality at 3 and 12 months and 5 years after liver transplantation. ICG-PDR values were also assessed for association with the Donor Risk Index (DRI). 220 patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. In 77 patients, ICG-PDR was assessed on the 1st post-operative (PO) day. ICG, a water-soluble dye almost entirely excreted into the bile, was measured by spectrophotometry to evaluate graft (dys)-function. DRI was calculated in all patients. The primary study outcomes were the presence (or absence) of EAD after transplant and the results of mortality risk factor analysis. EAD occurred in 18 patients. 1st PO day ICG-PDR was significantly associated with EAD (p < 0.005). A threshold ICG-PDR value < 16%/min on the 1st PO day was also associated with patient probability to survive at 3 and 12 months and 5 years. The sensitivity and specificity of the AUC was good in predicting EAD, being 83% and 56%, respectively, for a 1st PO day ICG-PDR cut-off value < 16%/min. In this study, ICG-PDR on the 1st PO day following OLT can reliably predict EAD and survival at 3 and 12 months and 5 years. ICG-PDR should, therefore, be routinely performed on the 1st PO day following OLTx in all patients in light of its important prognostic role.

Ancient Origin of the CARD-Coiled Coil/Bcl10/MALT1-Like Paracaspase Signaling Complex Indicates Unknown Critical Functions.

The CARD-coiled coil (CC)/Bcl10/MALT1-like paracaspase (CBM) signaling complexes composed of a CARD-CC family member (CARD-9, -10, -11, or -14), Bcl10, and the type 1 paracaspase MALT1 (PCASP1) play a pivotal role in immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Targeting MALT1 proteolytic activity is of potential therapeutic interest. However, little is known about the evolutionary origin and the original functions of the CBM complex. Type 1 paracaspases originated before the last common ancestor of planulozoa (bilaterians and cnidarians). Notably in bilaterians, Ecdysozoa (e.g., nematodes and insects) lacks Bcl10, whereas other lineages have a Bcl10 homolog. A survey of invertebrate CARD-CC homologs revealed such homologs only in species with Bcl10, indicating an ancient common origin of the entire CBM complex. Furthermore, vertebrate-like Syk/Zap70 tyrosine kinase homologs with the ITAM-binding SH2 domain were only found in invertebrate organisms with CARD-CC/Bcl10, indicating that this pathway might be related to the original function of the CBM complex. Moreover, the type 1 paracaspase sequences from invertebrate organisms that have CARD-CC/Bcl10 are more similar to vertebrate paracaspases. Functional analysis of protein-protein interactions, NF-κB signaling, and CYLD cleavage for selected invertebrate type 1 paracaspase and Bcl10 homologs supports this scenario and indicates an ancient origin of the CARD-CC/Bcl10/paracaspase signaling complex. By contrast, many of the known MALT1-associated activities evolved fairly recently, indicating that unknown functions are at the basis of the protein conservation. As a proof-of-concept, we provide initial evidence for a CBM- and NF-κB-independent neuronal function of the Caenorhabditis elegans type 1 paracaspase malt-1. In conclusion, this study shows how evolutionary insights may point at alternative functions of MALT1.

The E3 ubiquitin ligases HOIP and cIAP1 are recruited to the TNFR2 signaling complex and mediate TNFR2-induced canonical NF-κB signaling.

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) is a proinflammatory cytokine that elicits its action by binding to two cell surface TNF receptors (TNFR), TNFR1 and TNFR2, which are expressed by many different cell types. Stimulation of TNFR1 activates canonical NF-κB signaling, leading to the NF-κB dependent expression of a large number of genes. Canonical NF-κB signaling requires the assembly of a TNFR1 signaling complex at the cell membrane, whose formation is regulated by different protein ubiquitination events. In this context, recruitment of the Linear Ubiquitin Chain Assembly Complex (LUBAC) to TNFR1 plays an important role by mediating M1-linked polyubiquitination of specific NF-κB signaling proteins. In contrast to TNFR1, much less is known about the role of ubiquitination in TNFR2 signaling. Here we demonstrate that specific TNFR2 stimulation rapidly triggers M1- and K63-linked polyubiquitination at the TNFR2 signaling complex. In agreement, TNFR2 stimulation induces the recruitment of HOIP, a LUBAC component and the only known E3 ubiquitin ligase for M1-polyubiquitination, to the TNFR2 signaling complex. Also cIAP1, a E3 ubiquitin ligase able to modify proteins with K63-polyubiquitin chains, was recruited to the TNFR2 signaling complex. Treatment of cells with a cIAP antagonist inhibited the recruitment of HOIP and prevented HOIP-mediated M1-ubiquitination of the TNFR2 signaling complex, indicating that HOIP recruitment to the TNFR2 relies on cIAPs. Finally, we show that both HOIP and cIAP1 are required for TNFR2-induced canonical NF-κB activation. Together, our findings demonstrate an important role for M1- and K63-linked polyubiquitination in TNFR2 signaling.

TRAF2 multitasking in TNF receptor-induced signaling to NF-κB, MAP kinases and cell death.

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) is a potent inflammatory cytokine that exerts its functions through the activation of two distinct receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2. Both receptors can activate canonical NF-κB and JNK MAP kinase signaling, while TNFR2 can also activate non-canonical NF-κB signaling, leading to numerous changes in gene expression that drive inflammation, cell proliferation and cell survival. On the other hand, TNFR1 also activates signaling pathways leading to cell death by either apoptosis or necroptosis, depending on the cellular context. A key player in TNFR1- and TNFR2-induced signaling is the RING finger protein TRAF2, which is recruited to both receptors upon their stimulation. TRAF2 exerts multiple receptor-specific functions but also mediates cross-talk between TNFR1 and TNFR2, dictating the outcome of TNF stimulation. In this review, we provide an overview of the positive and negative regulatory role of TRAF2 in different TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling pathways. We discuss the underlying molecular mechanism of action, distinguishing between TRAF2 scaffold and E3 ubiquitin ligase functions, and the regulation of TRAF2 by specific post-translational modifications. Finally, we elaborate on some possible strategies to modulate TRAF2 function in the context of therapeutic targeting in autoimmunity and cancer.

XEDAR activates the non-canonical NF-κB pathway.

Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily are involved in a number of physiological and pathological responses by activating a wide variety of intracellular signaling pathways. The X-linked ectodermal dysplasia receptor (XEDAR; also known as EDA2R or TNFRSF27) is a member of the TNFR superfamily that is highly expressed in ectodermal derivatives during embryonic development and binds to ectodysplasin-A2 (EDA-A2), a member of the TNF family that is encoded by the anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (EDA) gene. Although XEDAR was first described in the year 2000, its function and molecular mechanism of action is still largely unclear. XEDAR has been reported to activate canonical nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Here we report that XEDAR is also able to trigger the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, characterized by the processing of p100 (NF-κB2) into p52, followed by nuclear translocation of p52 and RelB. We provide evidence that XEDAR-induced p100 processing relies on the binding of XEDAR to TRAF3 and TRAF6, and requires the kinase activity of NIK and IKKα. We also show that XEDAR stimulation results in NIK accumulation and that p100 processing is negatively regulated by TRAF3, cIAP1 and A20.