ABSTRACT
Background: YouTube is the second most popular website worldwide. It features numerous videos about radical prostatectomy.The aim of this study was to assess the quality of these videos and screen their benefit for patients and doctors.Methods: All videos on YouTube about radical prostatectomy were analysed using a specially developed software (python 2.7,numpy). According to a predefined selection process most relevant videos were analyzed for quality and reliability using SuitabilityAssessment of Materials (SAM)-Score, Global Quality Score and others.Results: Out of 3520 search results, 179 videos were selected and analysed. Videos were watched a median of 5836 times (interquartilerange (IQR): 11945.5; 18721546). The median duration was 7.2 minutes (min). 125 of the videos were about roboticprostatectomy. 69 videos each were directly addressed to patients and doctors. Medical content generally was of low quality,while technical quality and total quality were at a high level. Reliability was good.Conclusions: Videos on radical prostatectomy on YouTube allow for patient information. While technical quality and reliabilityare classified as acceptable, medical content was low and warranted preselection. In contrast to Loeb et al. we did notobserve a negative correlation between number of views and scientific quality in different scores. Our findings support the needfor preselection of videos on YouTube as the potential benefit may vary between videos with the significant risk of low medicalquality. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Physicians , Prostatectomy , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) uptake does not occur spontaneously and requires active implementation, especially for long-term implementation. Social media (SoMe) with its power of rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field can open up unprecedented opportunities for CPG dissemination. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the current use of SoMe in CPG dissemination across different medical specialties. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review (SR) of the literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the general platform Google were searched for all relevant publications (no limitation for publication time and no language restrictions). The search revealed 1881 citations; following title and abstract review, 22 studies were identified; and five studies were finally included after full-text review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All included studies were published in the past 5 yr; there was a significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior toward CPGs with the use of SoMe dissemination compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process of CPG dissemination, and expressed an intent to engage in this method in the future. The studies included in the SR reported variable methods of SoMe use and similarly variable methods of analyzing the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the recent application of SoMe in the context of CPG dissemination, there is no standardized format for its use, and the data available are variable and limited. However, encouraging preliminary results have been reported using SoMe for CPG dissemination in multiple fields, and we have provided a pragmatic method of SoMe usage in CPG dissemination based on the review. It is vital to ensure a uniform method of application and assessment of SoMe use in CPG dissemination and implementation going forward. PATIENT SUMMARY: Social media (SoMe) plays an important role in rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field, and its power can be harnessed in the dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that guide clinicians in practice. Our review reveals that SoMe use for CPG dissemination is a relatively new concept published approximately 5 yr ago, and it has led to significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior with respect to the CPGs compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process. We have produced a pragmatic method of using SoMe in CPG dissemination. Considering the importance of CPGs in practice and the ever increasing role of SoMe in the medical profession, a new role for SoMe in CPG dissemination could be established.
