ABSTRACT
AIM: To perform an intra-individual comparison of the frequency of respiratory-motion artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cirrhotic patients following injection of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five cirrhotic patients (61 men and 34 women, mean age 58 years) underwent liver MRI with intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine at different times (interval between studies, 189±83 days). Three readers scored the severity of respiratory-motion artefacts on the three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo (GRE) images acquired before and after contrast medium injection. McNemar's test was used to assess the difference in frequency of new respiratory-motion artefacts and transient severe motion (TSM) artefacts between gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine MRI studies. The association between clinical and technical features and the occurrence of TSM on gadoxetate disodium MRI studies was investigated. RESULTS: On arterial phase images, new respiratory-motion artefacts were present in 32/95 (34%) cases after injection of gadoxetate disodium, while only seen in 2/95 (2%) cases after injection of gadobenate dimeglumine (p<0.0001). TSM was present in 6/95 (6%) cases after injection of gadoxetate disodium, and in 0/95 (0%) case after injection of gadobenate dimeglumine. No clinical or technical features were associated with the occurrence of TSM. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients, respiratory-motion artefacts on arterial phase 3D GRE images are more frequently seen after injection of gadoxetate disodium than after injection of gadobenate dimeglumine.
Subject(s)
Artifacts , Gadolinium DTPA/administration & dosage , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Meglumine/analogs & derivatives , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Respiratory Mechanics , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Injections, Intravenous , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Meglumine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Motion , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Despite advances in multimodality imaging of pancreas, there is still overlap between imaging findings of several pancreatic/peripancreatic disease processes. Pancreatic and peripancreatic non-neoplastic entities may mimic primary pancreatic neoplasms on ultrasound, CT, and MRI. On the other hand, primary pancreatic cancer may be overlooked on imaging because of technical and inherent factors. The purpose of this pictorial review is to describe and illustrate pancreatic imaging pitfalls and highlight the basic radiological features for proper differential diagnosis.
