Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 44(1): 77-80, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110236

ABSTRACT

At 16 + 6-weeks a fetal scan performed in the second pregnancy of a 42 y.o. woman identified a right multicystic dysplastic kidney, left renal agenesis, absent urinary bladder, myocardial hypertrophy, increased nuchal fold, a single umbilical artery, and oligohydramnios. Trio exome sequencing analysis detected a novel pathogenic NONO variant. Postmortem examination after the termination of pregnancy confirmed the ultrasound findings and also revealed pulmonary hypoplasia, retrognathia and low-set ears. The variant was a novel de novo hemizygous pathogenic loss-of-function variant in NONO [NM_007363.5], associated with a rare X-linked recessive neurodevelopmental disorder, named intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked syndromic 34 (OMIM#300967). The postnatal characteristic features of this disorder include intellectual disability, developmental delay, macrocephaly, structural abnormalities involving the corpus callosum and/or cerebellum, left ventricular noncompaction and other congenital heart defects. In the prenatal setting, the phenotype has been poorly described, with all described cases presenting with heart defects. This case highlights the need of further clinical delineation to include renal abnormalities in the prenatal phenotype spectrum.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Intellectual Disability , Kidney Diseases , Urogenital Abnormalities , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Kidney/abnormalities , Fetus/abnormalities , Kidney Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Diseases/genetics , Intellectual Disability/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics
2.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 48(10): 746-756, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775388

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield of 2 different next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches: gene panel and "solo" clinical exome sequencing (solo-CES), in fetuses with structural anomalies and normal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), in the absence of a known familial mutation. METHODOLOGY: Gene panels encompassing from 2 to 140 genes, were applied mainly in persistent nuchal fold/fetal hydrops and in large hyperechogenic kidneys. Solo-CES, which entails sequencing the fetus alone and only interpreting the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man genes, was performed in multisystem or recurrent structural anomalies. RESULTS: During the study period (2015-2020), 153 NGS studies were performed in 148 structurally abnormal fetuses with a normal CMA. The overall diagnostic yield accounted for 35% (53/153) of samples and 36% (53/148) of the fetuses. Diagnostic yield with the gene panels was 31% (15/49), similar to 37% (38/104) in solo-CES. CONCLUSIONS: A monogenic disease was established as the underlying cause in 35% of selected fetal structural anomalies by gene panels and solo-CES.


Subject(s)
Exome , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Female , Fetus , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First
3.
Hum Reprod ; 35(5): 1222-1229, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386059

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Can maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detect chromosomal anomalies in early pregnancy loss (EPL) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Genome-wide cfDNA testing can serve as an alternative to cytogenetic analysis in products of conception (POCs) in RPLs and can guide further management. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Random chromosomal anomalies are the single most common cause for EPL and RPL. Cytogenetic analysis in POCs may be used to direct management in RPL because the detection of random chromosomal anomalies can eliminate further unwarranted testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective diagnostic test study from March 2018 to January 2019 of 109 patients experiencing pregnancy loss before 14 weeks gestation at a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blood samples were drawn for genome-wide cfDNA testing prior to chorionic villous sampling for cytogenetic analysis of POCs with both short-term cultures (STCs) and long-term cultures (LTCs). Final analysis included 86 patients with non-mosaic cytogenetic results in POCs and available cfDNA results. Aneuploidy detection rates by cfDNA testing and POC cytogenetic analysis were compared. The first 50 samples served as the Training Set to establish pregnancy loss-specific log-likelihood ratio (LLR) thresholds using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC)-like analyses. These were then used for the entire cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Seventy-eight samples (71.5%) had results available from both STC and LTC; 12 samples (11%) had a result from STC only, and 7 samples (6.4%) had a result from LTC only. A chromosomal anomaly was detected in 55/86 (64%). The rates of chromosomal anomalies were 61, 72, 73 and 44% in patients undergoing their first, second, third and ≥4th pregnancy losses, respectively. The median cfDNA fetal fraction was 5%. With standard LLR thresholds used for noninvasive prenatal screening, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 55% (30/55) and with a specificity of 100% (31/31). Using pregnancy loss-specific LLR thresholds, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 82% (45/55), with a specificity of 90% (28/31). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.46 and 0.20, respectively. Fetal sex was correctly assigned in all cases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Cases with a false-positive result by cfDNA analysis would not receive the indicated RPL workup. Specificity could be improved by using a fetal fraction (FF) cutoff of 4%, but this would result in exclusion of more than a quarter of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: cfDNA-based testing can serve as an alternative to POC cytogenetic analysis and can guide further RPL management: if cfDNA demonstrates aneuploidy, no further action is taken and if no abnormality is detected, the recommended RPL workup is performed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Cell-free DNA testing was funded by Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA. Y.Y. is a member of Illumina's Clinical Expert Panel and has received travel grants. A.B. has received travel grants from Illumina. All authors have no competing interest to declare.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Chromosome Disorders , Aneuploidy , Female , Humans , Plasma , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
4.
Front Genet ; 11: 561720, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33519888

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the use of a new molecular work-up based on the stepwise use of Quantitative Fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) extended to eight chromosomes and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) in chorionic villi obtained by chorionic villi sampling (CVS) offered to women experiencing an early pregnancy loss. Methods: During a 3-year period (January 2016-December 2018), CVS was offered to women experiencing an early pregnancy loss before the evacuation of the products of conception (POC) to retrieve chorionic villi, irrespective of the number of previous losses. A new molecular work-up was prospectively assayed encompassing a first QF-PCR round (with the 21, 18, 13, 7, X, and Y chromosomes), a second QF-PCR round (with the 15, 16, and 22 chromosomes), and a high resolution SNP-array in those cases with normal QF-PCR results. A control group in which POC were collected after surgical uterine evacuation was used to be compared with the intervention group. Results: Around 459 women were enrolled in the intervention group (CVS) and 185 in the control group (POC after uterine evacuation). The QF-PCR testing success rates were significantly higher in the intervention group (98.5%: 452/459) as compared to the control group (74%: 109/147; p < 0.001), while the chromosomal anomaly rate at the two QF-PCR rounds was similar between the two groups: 52% (234/452) in the intervention and 42% (46/109) in the control group (p = 0.073). The SNP-array was performed in 202 QF-PCR normal samples of the intervention group and revealed 67 (33%) atypical chromosomal anomalies (>10 Mb), 5 (2.5%) submicroscopic pathogenic copy number variants, and 2 (1%) variant of uncertain significance (VOUS). Conclusion: Eighty-two percent of women experiencing an early pregnancy loss opted for a CVS. The testing success rates were higher in the intervention group (CVS; 98%) as compared to the control group (POC; 74%). The overall yields were 52% by QF-PCR (including three complete hydatiform moles), and 16% by SNP-array, including 15% atypical chromosomal anomalies and 1.1% submicroscopic pathogenic copy number variants.

5.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 47(6): 457-463, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31694020

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the cisterna magna (CM) width measured in first-trimester fetuses is a useful marker for aneuploidy detection. METHODS: This was a prospective study in 2 different cohorts in a tertiary referral center. The first cohort comprised 913 fetuses from the general pregnancy population during the period 2012-2016 and was used to construct the CM reference ranges applying the λ-µ-σ (LMS) method. The second cohort included 714 high-risk fetuses undergoing chorionic villus sampling during the period 2012-2016. Mean detection rates using the 95th percentile for CM width observed in chromosomal anomaly groups were compared with those obtained in chromosomally normal fetuses. RESULTS: The 50th percentile for CM ranged from 1.66 to 2.75 mm when crown-rump length (CRL) increased from 45 to 84 mm. Among high-risk fetuses, the following chromosomal anomalies were diagnosed in 125 (17%) fetuses: trisomy 21 (n = 63), trisomy 18 or 13 (n = 21), monosomy X (n = 9), submicroscopic anomalies (n = 11), and other anomalies (n = 22). The mean CM width for euploid fetuses was 2.4 mm (1.13 multiples of the median, MoM). While CM width was significantly increased in trisomy 21 (mean 2.7 mm; 1.23 MoM; p > 0.05), no differences were found in the other anomaly groups. Among the 63 fetuses with trisomy 21, a CM width above the 99th percentile was observed in 23 fetuses (37%). CONCLUSIONS: The new reference range for CM width at 11-13 weeks of gestation did not differ from previous studies. In first-trimester fetuses with trisomy 21, CM width appears to be increased, although its value as an ultrasound marker is limited, because of its detection rate of 37%.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Chromosome Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Cisterna Magna/diagnostic imaging , Gestational Age , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Chorionic Villi Sampling , Chromosome Aberrations , Cohort Studies , Crown-Rump Length , Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies , Reference Values
6.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 60(5): 432-437, sept.-oct. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-167325

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: evaluar el rendimiento incremental del análisis de microarrays genómicos sobre cariotipado convencional en nuestra serie de microarrays prenatales. Métodos: 393 mujeres embarazadas sometidas a un diagnóstico prenatal invasivo debido a malformaciones fetales, aumento de la translucencia nucal o restricción del crecimiento fetal de inicio temprano entre febrero de 2012 y agosto de 2015, a quienes se les ofreció realizar un análisis de microarrays genómicos y aceptaron. Resultados: el rendimiento de diagnóstico incremental sobre cariotipado convencional fue del 3,6% (IC del 95%: 1,7-5,5). Esta tasa aumentó a 4,7% (95% IC 1,7-7,7) en anomalías estructurales aisladas. Conclusiones: el microarray genómico proporciona un rendimiento incremental del 3,6% sobre el cariotipado convencional en fetos con anomalías de ultrasonido y otras indicaciones específicas (AU)


Objectives: To assess the incremental yield of genomic microarray analysis over conventional karyotyping in our series of prenatal microarrays. Methods: 393 pregnant women undergoing an invasive prenatal diagnosis due to fetal malformations, increased nuchal translucency or early onset fetal growth restriction between February 2012 and August 2015, were offered and accepted to perform a genomic microarray analysis. Results: The incremental diagnostic yield over conventional karyotyping was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7-5.5). This rate increased to 4.7% (95% CI 1.7-7.7) in isolated structural anomalies. Conclusions: Genomic microarray provides a 3.6% incremental yield over conventional karyotyping in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and other specific indications (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/trends , Nuchal Translucency Measurement/methods , Fetal Development/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Microarray Analysis/methods , Cohort Studies , Fetus/abnormalities , Prospective Studies
7.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 152(2): 81-89, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28662500

ABSTRACT

In order to contribute to the knowledge of type and frequency of chromosome abnormalities in early pregnancy losses, we analyzed the cytogenetic results from a large series of first trimester miscarriages, using a diagnostic approach with a high success rate and no maternal contamination. A total of 1,119 consecutive chorionic villi samples were obtained before evacuation, and karyotypes were prepared after short-term culture (STC). In 603 samples, a long-term culture (LTC) was also performed. The overall and individual frequencies of the different types of chromosome abnormalities were established, including placental mosaicisms, and their relationship with maternal age and gestational weeks was assessed. An abnormal karyotype was detected in 70.3% of the samples. Single autosomal trisomy was the most frequent abnormality (64.6% of the abnormal cases), followed by triploidy (13.1%) and monosomy X (10.4%). Chromosome rearrangements were found in 5.2%, combined abnormalities in 8.9%, and placental mosaicism in 3.5% of the cases with STC and LTC performed. Individual trisomies behaved differently with respect to maternal age and intrauterine survival. Due to the combination of STC and LTC, our study offers reliable information on the incidence and type of chromosome abnormalities and placental mosaicism in miscarriages and contributes to define the cytogenetic implication in their etiology.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Chorionic Villi/metabolism , Chromosome Aberrations , Karyotype , Karyotyping/methods , Pregnancy Trimester, First/genetics , Female , Gene Rearrangement/genetics , Gestational Age , Humans , Maternal Age , Mosaicism , Placenta/pathology , Ploidies , Pregnancy , Sex Chromosomes/genetics , Trisomy/genetics
8.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 30(13): 1613-1615, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623225

ABSTRACT

A new maternal age-dependent method to estimate absolute excess risks of trisomy 21, either after a previous trisomy 21 (homotrisomy) or after another trisomy (heterotrisomy), is proposed to be added to the estimated risk by conventional screening methods. Excess risk at term for a subsequent trisomy 21 was calculated from midtrimester risks reported by Morris et al., decreasing from 0.49% at 20 years to 0.01% at 46 years at the index pregnancy. Excess risk after a previous uncommon trisomy was derived from data reported by Warburton et al., decreasing from 0.37% at 20 years to 0.01% at 50 years.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Maternal Age , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , DNA/blood , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Recurrence , Registries , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
9.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 149(4): 258-261, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27653741

ABSTRACT

The patient was referred for prenatal diagnosis due to the sonographic finding of a polymalformed male fetus, and an amniocentesis was performed before termination of pregnancy. The pathological study of the placenta did not show morphological alterations. In her next pregnancy, sonographic examination disclosed a missed abortion with a visible embryo, and a chorionic villi sample was obtained for cytogenetic analysis before evacuation. Macroscopic examination of the villi sample did not reveal molar vesicular appearance. QF-PCR and cytogenetic analyses were performed on amniotic fluid (first pregnancy) and chorionic villi samples (second pregnancy). A 69,XXY and 92,XXXY karyotype was found, respectively. QF-PCR results disclosed 2 maternal and 1 paternal alleles in the first pregnancy (digynic triploidy), and double maternal and double paternal contribution to the tetraploid pregnancy. Among the few reported cases of 92,XXXY tetraploidy, those associated with partial moles show a PPPM genotype (3 paternal and 1 maternal alleles), and the only case with a PPMM genotype was found in a spontaneously aborted fetus similar to our case. We are not aware of other cases with combination of a digynic triploid pregnancy and a tetraploid pregnancy with a PPMM contribution. Our case adds evidence to the influence of the balance between paternal and maternal genomic doses on the phenotype.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Fetus/abnormalities , Tetraploidy , Triploidy , Alleles , Amniocentesis , Chorionic Villi Sampling , Female , Humans , Hydatidiform Mole/genetics , Male , Maternal Inheritance/genetics , Microsatellite Repeats , Paternal Inheritance/genetics , Pregnancy
10.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 33(4): 500-505, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496530

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of first-trimester combined screening when replacing the chronological maternal age by Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC)-derived ovarian ages, as the background risk in trisomy risk estimation. A total of 639 pregnant women who completed first-trimester combined screening together with AMH and AFC determination were included. Trisomy risks were estimated based on three distinct 'maternal ages' as a-priori risk (chronological age, AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian age). The screening performance was assessed using three different approaches: received operator curve; detection rate and false positive rates for a fixed 1/250 threshold; and detection rates for a fixed 3% false positive rate. A non-significant trend was shown for AMH-derived age for both an increased area under the curve (0.986 versus 0.979) and an increased detection rate (from 83% to 100%) for a 1/250 risk threshold. For a 3% false-positive rate, a non-significant trend for increased detection with the use of both AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian ages was observed (from 67% to 83%). These results indicate that, although ovarian derived ages seem to potentially reflect a more precise background risk for fetal trisomies, the improvement in screening performance is only residual.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , Ovarian Follicle/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Reserve , Prenatal Diagnosis , Trisomy/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Maternal Age , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Risk , Trisomy/genetics , Young Adult
11.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(8): 1244-51, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067265

ABSTRACT

First trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies has made the implementation of diagnostic techniques essential. Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is the method of choice for obtaining chorionic villi for molecular and cytogenetic analysis in the first trimester. Two techniques have been developed, a transcervical and a transabdominal. The selection criteria have been based historically on factors, such as placental location, parity, maternal weight and preference of the operator. In our institution, we developed an elevated level of expertise in the field of transcervical approach, resulting in good quality of samples and comparable fetal loss rate to other approaches. Despite three decades of transcervical CVS performance, little consensus in terms of its technique and clinical guidelines exists. Considering the expertise and the volume of procedures performed at our center, we suggest a practical clinical guideline for transcervical CVS.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Villi Sampling/methods , Aneuploidy , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Chorionic Villi Sampling/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Patient Positioning , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Pregnancy, Twin , Prenatal Diagnosis , Ultrasonography , Uterus/diagnostic imaging
12.
Fertil Steril ; 103(5): 1221-7.e2, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25796318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of two ovarian reserve markers, antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC), as markers of the background risk for fetal trisomy. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENT(S): Assessment was carried out either in ongoing pregnancies or miscarriages in our center. INTERVENTION(S): AFC was assessed transvaginally during a routine (11-13 weeks) or referral scan. AMH was determined either during the first-trimester maternal serum markers assessment or in cases referred for chorionic villi sampling after the invasive procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH reference ranges were constructed according to maternal age, and AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian ages were compared among three different cytogenetic groups (normal karyotype, autosomal trisomies, and other chromosomal anomalies) in both ongoing pregnancies and miscarriages. RESULT(S): In autosomal trisomies, the median AFC-derived ovarian age was 3-5 years above the median maternal age. No differences were observed between AMH-derived ovarian age and maternal age. CONCLUSION(S): AFC-derived ovarian biologic age reflects a more precise background risk for fetal aneuploidy that is not observed for AMH-derived age.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/diagnosis , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , Ovarian Follicle/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Function Tests/methods , Ovarian Reserve , Trisomy , Abortion, Spontaneous/blood , Abortion, Spontaneous/diagnostic imaging , Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Abortion, Spontaneous/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Karyotyping , Maternal Age , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First/blood , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
13.
Diagn. prenat. (Internet) ; 25(1): 20-27, ene.-jun. 2014.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-123853

ABSTRACT

La amniocentesis es un procedimiento de diagnóstico prenatal invasivo de segundo trimestre, descrito inicialmente en 1966 por Steele y Berg. Consiste en la introducción de una aguja espinal a través de la pared abdominal, la pared uterina y la cavidad amniótica bajo guía ecográfica continua, de forma que se pueda aspirar una muestra del líquido amniótico que envuelve el feto y que contiene células de origen fetal. La amniocentesis se realiza a partir de las 16 semanas de gestación y en el líquido amniótico se pueden realizar estudios cromosómicos, bioquímicos, moleculares o microbiológicos. El procedimiento conlleva un riesgo de pérdida fetal de aproximadamente el 0,5% cuando se realiza en el segundo trimestre, después de la fusión de la membrana amniótica con el corion, además de un riesgo menor de otras complicaciones, como la pérdida de líquido amniótico (0,3%), hemorragia placentaria, infección intraamniótica, hematoma de la pared abdominal o traumatismo fetal. A medida que la experiencia internacional se acumula, se van determinando los factores que pueden ayudar a mejorar aún más la seguridad y la facilidad técnica del procedimiento. Hemos descrito un nuevo método de aspiración para realizar la amniocentesis que emplea un Vacutainer(R) (BD Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, Reino Unido), para obtener un vacío continuo cuando la aguja ya está insertada dentro de la cavidad amniótica, en contraste con la técnica estándar de aspiración mediante jeringa o «pistola» en que las presiones negativas son discontinuas. Sin embargo, la técnica clásica con aspiración con jeringa continua siendo válida y la más utilizada. Basados en la experiencia de 30 años y en el volumen de procedimientos realizados en nuestro centro (más de 20.000 procedimientos invasivos realizados), junto con una revisión de la bibliografía publicada hasta la fecha, hemos planteado una guía práctica actualizada para la realización de la amniocentesis (AU)


Amniocentesis, initially described by Steele and Borg in 1966, is an invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure used in the second trimester. It consists of inserting an ultrasound-guided spinal needle through the abdominal and uterine wall and into the amniotic cavity in order that a sample of the amniotic fluid that surrounds the foetus, and contains cells of foetal origin, can be aspirated. Amniocentesis is performed after 16 weeks gestation, so that chromosomal, biochemical, molecular, or microbiological studies can be performed on the amniotic fluid. The procedure carries a risk of foetal loss in approximately 0.5% when it is performed in the second trimester after the fusion of the amniotic and chorionic membrane, as well as lesser risk of other complications such as, loss of amniotic fluid (0.3%), placental haemorrhage, intra-amniotic infection, abdominal wall haematoma, or foetal injury. As international experience accumulates, more factors that can help to improve the safety and ease of the procedural technique are being determined. We have described a new aspiration method to perform amniocentesis that uses a Vacutainer(R) (BD Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, United Kingdom), to obtain a continuous vacuum when the needle is already inserted in the amniotic cavity, in contrast to the standard aspiration technique using a syringe or suction pistol where the negative pressures are discontinuous. However, the classic technique with continuous syringe aspiration continues being valid and the most used. Based on 30 years experience, and on the volume of procedures performed in our centre (more than 20,000 invasive procedures), together with an up to date literature review, we have established an updated practice guideline for performing amniocentesis (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Amniocentesis/methods , Aneuploidy , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Genetic Testing/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods
14.
Prenat Diagn ; 34(10): 982-5, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24863889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the role of nuchal translucency (NT) in the prediction of unbalanced translocation in offspring of couples in which one of the parents is a balanced translocation carrier. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2012, fetal NT was measured before chorionic villus sampling in 86 pregnancies referred because of parental balanced translocation. RESULTS: No significant differences in pregnancy characteristics and in NT expressed in millimetres or in multiples of the median (MoMs) were observed between the 41 fetuses with a normal karyotype [1.72 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-1.96; 1.14 MoM; 95% CI: 1.01-1.26], the 38 fetuses with balanced translocations (1.78 mm, 95% CI: 1.44-2.12; 1.22 MoM; 95% CI: 1.01-1.43) and the 7 fetuses with unbalanced translocations (2.21 mm, 95% CI: 1.33-3.09; 1.59 MoM; 95% CI: 0.72-2.45). The proportions of fetuses with NT above 95th centile in the three groups were 9.1% in fetuses with normal karyotype, 18.4% in balanced translocations and 28.6% in unbalanced translocations, not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Although a trend to an increased NT was observed in fetuses with unbalanced translocation, no significant differences were reached. According to our results, a normal NT evaluation should not preclude the performance of CVS in pregnancies of balanced translocation parents.


Subject(s)
Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Translocation, Genetic , Adult , Chorionic Villi Sampling , Female , Heterozygote , Humans , Pregnancy
15.
Hum Reprod ; 29(6): 1337-43, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24682614

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Can antral follicle count (AFC) measured during pregnancy be used as a marker of ovarian age to assess the background risk of fetal aneuploidy? SUMMARY ANSWER: AFC was lower than expected according to maternal chronological age in trisomic pregnancies; therefore ovarian age could potentially reflect a more precise background risk of fetal aneuploidy screening. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The decline in a woman's reproductive function is determined by a decline in the ovarian follicle pool and the quality of oocytes. The quantitative status of ovarian reserve can be indirectly assessed by AFC, but the role of AFC as an aneuploidy risk marker in pregnant women has not been assessed yet. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our study comprised a prospective cohort including 1239 singleton pregnancies scanned before 14 weeks in our center during a 14-month period. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Reference ranges for AFC were constructed using 812 spontaneously conceived, chromosomally normal singleton ongoing pregnancies using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method. The study population (n = 934) included 19 pregnancies with viable autosomal trisomies (trisomies 21, 18 and 13), 17 non-viable autosomal trisomies (other than 21, 18 or 13), 7 monosomies X, 1 sex trisomy and 3 triploidies (total n = 47 with chromosomal abnormalities). AFC in chromosomally abnormal pregnancies was plotted against the reference ranges. AFC multiple of the median was calculated according to the median AFC obtained by each year of age. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Sixty-eight percent of women carrying a pregnancy with viable trisomies and 65% with non-viable trisomies presented an AFC below the 50th percentile. The median ovarian age in viable trisomies and non-viable trisomies was estimated to be 3 and 6 years above than median maternal age, respectively. However, the median ovarian age in monosomies X and triploidies was not higher than median maternal age. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We did not assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability, or use specific three-dimensional analysis which may have advantages over our two-dimensional study. In clinical practice, a drawback for assessing AFC during pregnancy is that transvaginal ultrasound is needed at the 11- to 13-week scan, when the transabdominal approach is used most commonly. Furthermore identifying ovaries by ultrasound during pregnancy could be challenging. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Considering that AFC reflects ovarian aging, this 'ovarian biological age' could potentially reflect a more precise background risk of fetal aneuploidy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by PI 11/00685. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria. No competing interests declared.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Ovarian Reserve/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Follicle/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
16.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 34(2): 116-20, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23817147

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of nasal bone (NB), ductus venosus (DV) and tricuspid flow (TF) at the 11-13 weeks' scan, calculate likelihood ratios for each of the markers and evaluate their efficacy in expanded and contingent screening strategies for Down syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NB, DV and TF were assessed in 11,261 singleton fetuses undergoing first trimester combined screening. For each marker, Down syndrome detection rate (DR), false positive rate (FPR), positive, negative and isolated likelihood ratios (PLR, NLR and iLR) were calculated. Likelihood ratios were multiplied to the combined test risk either to the entire population or to the intermediate risk group (expanded and sequential strategies, respectively). RESULTS: Down syndrome was diagnosed in 101 pregnancies. Feasibility for marker assessment ranged from 71 to 97%, DRs for isolated markers from 20 to 54% and FPRs from 1.3 to 5.3%. PLR ranged from 10 to 15, NLR from 0.5 to 0.8 and iLR from 3.9 to 5.6. When ultrasound markers were added to both strategies, a significant FPR reduction was observed. CONCLUSION: The application of NB, DV and TF likelihood ratios to the combined test risk, either in an expanded or contingent strategy, result in a FPR reduction.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Adult , False Positive Reactions , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Hum Reprod ; 27(10): 3109-17, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22888165

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Is there any effect of maternal age on chromosomal anomaly rate and spectrum in recurrent miscarriage? SUMMARY ANSWER: There was no significant difference in the chromosome abnormality rate between sporadic and recurrent miscarriage but the chromosome abnormality rate increased significantly with maternal age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: About 50-70% of non-recurrent miscarriages occur because of a chromosomal anomaly, but no agreement about the effect of either maternal age or the number of previous miscarriages on the chromosomal anomaly rate has been reached. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective cohort of 353 miscarriages successfully karyotyped in the same center between 2002 and 2011, grouped according to the number of miscarriages and maternal age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Among the 353 women, 153 were below 35 years (73 with sporadic, 48 with two and 32 with recurrent miscarriage) and 200 were 35 years or more (81 with sporadic, 55 with two and 64 with recurrent miscarriage). The chromosomal anomaly rate and the anomaly spectrum were compared between sporadic and recurrent miscarriage, within the two maternal age groups, using the chi-square test and the Bonferroni correction for all the P-values. Risk of chromosomal anomaly was estimated for maternal age, number of miscarriages and previous live births by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Sporadic and recurrent miscarriage did not show significantly different chromosomal anomaly rates (68 versus 60%) and maternal age was the only statistically significant predictor of the chromosomal anomaly risk we identified. Some trends were observed in the chromosomal anomaly spectrum when sporadic was compared with recurrent miscarriage: recurrent miscarriage exhibited a decrease in viable trisomies (37 versus 11%) and an increase in non-viable trisomies (38 versus 57%) in women >35 years, together with an increase in unbalanced structural anomalies (4.9 versus 29%) in younger women. LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The mixed origin of our study population, and the limited number of recurrent miscarriages, particularly in the younger group, limits statistical power to detect differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The most commonly observed chromosomal anomaly type in recurrent miscarriage depends on maternal age: non-viable autosomal trisomies in older women and unbalanced structural anomalies in younger women. When a chromosomal anomaly is identified as the cause of miscarriage, additional maternal evaluation may be avoided. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No competing interests declared.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Habitual/etiology , Chromosome Aberrations , Maternal Age , Abortion, Habitual/genetics , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
18.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 55(5): 221-225, mayo 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-99860

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Evaluar la aplicación clínica de los métodos no invasivos en el manejo de la isoinmunización, durante el período de 2006-2010. Sujetos y métodos. Se estudiaron 70 gestaciones con riesgo de anemia fetal en las que se realizó el estudio Doppler de la velocidad sistólica de la arteria cerebral media (VS-ACM). Se comparó la eficacia de la VS-ACM después de una, 2 o 3 transfusiones intrauterinas. El genotipado fetal RHD en sangre materna se realizó en las gestaciones seguidas en nuestro centro. Resultados. Se practicó cordocentesis en 22 de gestaciones y en 20 se practicó transfusión intrauterina. Las tasas de detección y de falsos positivos de la VS-ACM en la predicción de anemia fetal moderada o severa fueron del 89 y el 15% en gestaciones sin transfusión previa, del 100 y el 41% en los casos con una transfusión previa y del 40 y el 24% cuando se practicaron más de una transfusión. Conclusiones. La VS-ACM mantiene una sensibilidad alta en una transfusión previa aunque su especificidad disminuye (AU)


Objective. To assess the clinical application of non-invasive methods in the management of alloimmunization from 2006 to 2010. Subjects and methods. Seventy pregnancies with risk of fetal anemia were studied by fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV). The efficacy of MCA-PSV was compared between the first, second and third transfusions. Prenatal testing of fetal RHD blood group using maternal blood was performed in pregnancies followed-up in our center. Results. Fetal blood sampling was performed in 22 pregnancies; of these, fetal transfusion was carried out in 20. Detection rates and the false-positive rate of MCA-PSV in the prediction of severe or moderate fetal anemia were 89% and 15% in pregnancies with no previous transfusions, 100% and 41% in patients with one previous transfusion, and 40% and 24% when more than one transfusion was performed. Conclusion. MCA-PSV has high sensitivity when there is one previous fetal transfusion but its specificity is lower (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Cerebral Arteries/immunology , Cerebral Arteries/physiopathology , Cerebral Arteries , Rh Isoimmunization/diagnosis , Rh Isoimmunization/physiopathology , Genotyping Techniques , Cordocentesis , /methods , Rh Isoimmunization , Genotype , Doppler Effect , Echocardiography, Doppler , Cordocentesis/methods , Cordocentesis/trends , Phototherapy/methods , Phototherapy
19.
Diagn. prenat. (Internet) ; 23(1): 2-10, ene.-mar. 2012. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-133528

ABSTRACT

La anticipación del cribado de las aneuploidías fetales al primer trimestre ha requerido implementar técnicas diagnósticas en este momento de la gestación. La biopsia de vellosidades coriales (BVC) es un procedimiento diagnóstico invasivo en Medicina Materno-Fetal, que consiste en la obtención de vellosidades coriales para estudio citogenético, molecular o bioquímico. Existen dos vías para la realización de la BVC, la transcervical y la transabdominal. La preferencia por una de las dos vías se ha basado históricamente en factores como son la localización placentaria, paridad, peso materno, preferencias del operador, etc. En nuestra institución pasamos a utilizar la vía transcervical de manera casi exclusiva, con resultados ventajosos para la gestante y el laboratorio. Todo ello, sin diferencias en cuanto a la tasa de pérdida gestacional u otras complicaciones. A pesar de 3 décadas de uso de la BVC transcervical, existe poco consenso en cuanto a su técnica y las guías clínicas específicas para su realización son escasas. Aprovechando la experiencia y el volumen acumulado de procedimientos realizados en nuestro centro, hemos planteado una guía clínica eminentemente práctica para la realización de BVC transcervical (AU)


Early screening for foetal aneuploidies in the first trister has required the introduction of diagnostic procedures appropriate for this period of pregnancy. Chorionic villi sampling(CVS) is an invasive diagnostic procedure in Maternal-Foetal Medicine to obtain chorionic villi for cytogenetic, molecular or biochemical analysis. There are two routes for CVS, transcervical and transabdominal. Preference for one of two routes has been historically based on factors such as, placental location, parity, maternal weight, operator preferences, etc. Our institution switched to using the transcervical approach almost exclusively, with advantages for the patients and laboratory with no differences in the pregnancy loss rate and other complications. Despite 3 decades of CVS use, there is no consensus as regards its application, and practice guidelines are few. Taking advantage of our experience with a large amount of procedures, we propose this practice guideline (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Chorionic Villi Sampling/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Aneuploidy , Genetic Testing/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Risk Factors , Pregnancy Trimester, First/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...