Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 9(6)2020 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32575377

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to report on the antimicrobial susceptibility of 141 clinically significant anaerobic bacteria isolated from bloodstream infections between January 2016 and April 2020 in a tertiary-care hospital in Granada (Spain) and to describe the main clinical features of the patients. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed against penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, imipenem, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, and piperacillin-tazobactam using the gradient diffusion technique and EUCAST breakpoints, except for moxifloxacin (CLSI breakpoints). The most frequent anaerobes were Bacteroides (43.9%, n = 62), Clostridium (24.1%, n = 34) and Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPACs) (15.6%, n = 22). Almost all tested anaerobes were susceptible to imipenem and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, except for Bacteroides. High overall resistance rates to clindamycin were observed, especially for Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPACs) (54.5%) and for Bacteroides spp. (45.1%). Overall, low resistance rates to almost all antibiotics were observed for Clostridium. High resistance rates to penicillin were also observed for Gram-positive anaerobic bacilli (GPABs) (44.4%), as well as to metronidazole (22.2%), although only nine isolates were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for anaerobes should always be performed in severe infections, such as those localized in the bloodstream. The information obtained contributes to selecting empirical treatments according with local data on resistance.

5.
Anaerobe ; 54: 260-263, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29425733

ABSTRACT

Atopobium rimae and Parvimonas micra are both Gram-positive anaerobes involved infrequently in human infections. We report a polymicrobial anaerobic bacteremia caused by these microorganisms. A 43-year-old woman receiving coadjuvant chemotherapy due to a retroperitoneal leiomiosarcoma presented with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and fever (38 °C). The two blood cultures resulted in isolation of A. rimae and P. micra, being identified at species level by matrix assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) technology with high log scores. The microorganisms were susceptible to penicilllin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, clindamycin, metronidazole, imipenem, and moxifloxacin. Treatment with levofloxacin was started and subsequently it was changed to piperacillin/tazobactam plus metronidazole and completed for 10 days, but the patient died days later due to her underlying disease.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteremia/microbiology , Firmicutes/isolation & purification , Neoplasms/complications , Actinobacteria/chemistry , Actinobacteria/drug effects , Actinobacteria/physiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/etiology , Female , Firmicutes/chemistry , Firmicutes/drug effects , Firmicutes/physiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
6.
J Endourol ; 21(7): 709-13, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17705755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: On the one hand, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in small renal tumors is a safe and effective alternative to radical nephrectomy. On the other hand, the role of preoperative percutaneous needle biopsies (PNB) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the global current use of NSS in the treatment of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) and the use of PNB among endourologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand questionnaires were distributed during the 23rd World Congress of Endourology and SWL. Six questions regarding NSS and two questions regarding PNB were presented. Two hundred twenty-two questionnaires were returned. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 86.6% perform NSS for small renal tumors, whereas 13.4% perform only radical nephrectomies; 7.5% will consider NSS only in patients with a solitary kidney, and 0.5% will never consider NSS. The techniques for NSS, in descending order of preference, are partial nephrectomy, enucleation, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. The mean and maximum diameter of the tumor in patients with a normal contralateral kidney for which the urologists perform NSS is 4.0 cm. For a centrally located tumor, NSS is an option for 27.2% of the respondents. Regarding PNB in patients with suspicion of RCC, 55.9% of respondents never obtain renal biopsies in the preoperative assessment and 41.8% obtain them only in rare cases. The majority (90%) prefer histologic over cytologic biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Nephron-sparing surgery is evolving to a global worldwide standard treatment for small renal tumors. Percutaneous needle biopsy remains a highly debated procedure.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Health Care Surveys , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrons , Physicians , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urology/methods , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Nephrons/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...