ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of the present systematic review is to collect all the available evidence regarding the clinical and radiological results of revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) of modular anatomic shoulder prostheses (TSA) using a convertible metal-backed glenoid (MBG). METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies investigating revision of TSA to RSA utilizing a convertible MBG and reporting clinical and radiological outcomes were identified. RESULTS: A total of five studies on the use of convertible modular glenoid component in the setting of TSA revision to RSA were finally included in the present systematic review. A total of 60 procedures were reported. Mean operative times was 65 min. Intraoperative complications included 3 cases of glenoid loosening. Only one case of dislocation was reported as postoperative complication. At mean follow-up of 32.3 months post-revision, no glenoid loosening was reported, VAS score decreased from 7.7 to 1.5, Constant Score increased from 24.8 to 57.6. CONCLUSIONS: Revision to RSA after failed TSA using a convertible modular glenoid component was associated with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, low surgical time and led to good results in term of pain relieve and functional outcomes. Given the complexity and risk associated with revision of anatomic shoulder prosthesis having a convertible glenoid may help to simplify the procedure and improve clinical results.
ABSTRACT
Background: Scapular notching following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is caused by both biological and mechanical mechanisms. Some authors postulated that osteolysis that extends over the inferior screw is caused mainly by biological notching. Inverted-bearing RSA (IB-RSA) is characterized by a polyethylene glenosphere and a metallic humeral liner, decreasing the poly debris formation and potentially reducing high grades of notching. This study aims to report the results of IB-RSA on a consecutive series of patients at mid-term follow-up, focusing on the incidence of Sirveaux grade 3 and 4 scapular notching. Methods: A retrospective study on 78 consecutive patients who underwent primary IB-RSA between 2015−2017 was performed. At a 4 years minimum follow-up, 49 patients were evaluated clinically with Constant score (CS), Subjective shoulder value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow score (ASES), pain and range of motion, and with an X-ray assessing baseplate position (high, low), implant loosening, and scapular notching. Results: At a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 0.9, all the clinical parameters improved (p < 0.05). One patient was revised for an infection and was excluded from the evaluation, two patients had an acromial fracture, and one had an axillary neuropraxia. Scapular notching was present in 13 (27%) patients (six grade 1, seven grade 2) and no cases of grade 3 and 4 were observed. Scapular nothing was significantly associated with high glenoid position (p < 0.001) and with lower CS (70 ± 15 vs. 58 ± 20; p = 0.046), SSV (81 ± 14 vs. 68 ± 20; p = 0.027), ASES (86 ± 14 vs. 70 ± 22; p = 0.031), and anterior elevation (148 ± 23 vs. 115 ± 37; p = 0.006). A 44 mm- compared to 40 mm-glenosphere was associate with better CS (63 ± 17 vs. 78 ± 11; p = 0.006), external (23 ± 17 vs. 36 ± 17; p = 0.036), and internal rotation (4.8 ± 2.7 vs. 7.8 ± 2.2; p = 0.011). Conclusions: IB-RSA is a safe and effective procedure for mid-term follow-up. Inverting biomaterials leads to a distinct kind of notching with mainly mechanical features. Scapular notching is associated with a high baseplate position and has a negative influence on range of motion and clinical outcome.
ABSTRACT
The recurrence of shoulder instability is a challenging complication after anterior open or arthroscopic stabilization in patients with glenohumeral instability. Use of the arthroscopic Bankart procedure has increased over the last decade, because of its less invasiveness and low complication rates compared with the Latarjet procedure. However, arthroscopic repair has the possibility of a greater recurrent instability rate. The Instability Shoulder Index Score (ISIS) has been developed to predict the success of isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The risk factors associated with the recurrence of instability are age, level and type of sports participation, shoulder hyperlaxity, and humeral and glenoid bony lesions. The ISIS is a validated tool to predict the recurrence of dislocation after arthroscopic surgery in patients with shoulder instability. The arthroscopic Bankart procedure can be performed in patients with ISIS ≤3 with a low risk of recurrence of glenohumeral instability. The Latarjet procedure should be recommended in patients with ISIS >6. The management of patients with ISIS between 4 and 6 is still controversial and ranges from arthroscopic Bankart procedure with the addition of remplissage to the Latarjet procedure. Because advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography scans, allow us to assess appropriately the glenoid and humeral bone defect, their use is recommended in addition to ISIS.
Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Dislocation , Shoulder Joint , Arthroscopy , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of US-guided percutaneous irrigation of calcific tendinopathy (US-PICT) of the rotator cuff in patients with or without previous external shockwave therapy (ESWT). METHODS: We analyzed all patients treated with US-PICT from March 1, 2016, to October 1, 2019, with shoulder pain refractory to conservative management for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy, diagnosed with ultrasound. Each patient was examined using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) questionnaire (score 0-100) before and after treatment. We tested CMS differences using the Mann-Whitney U (Wilcoxon rank-sum) test in the two groups. US-PICT was performed placing two or multiple 14G needles, according to the calcification size, inserted under US guidance to create a circuit of irrigation in the calcified tendon. NaCl solution at 38 °C was then injected from the entry needle in a variable amount to hydrate and fragment the calcification, finally allowing for its expulsion through the exit needle. All patients also received an intrabursal steroid injection. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, 72 US-PICT treatments were performed on 70 patients (females = 46; males = 26) with a mean age of 49.7 years (SD = 8.7. Thirty-three (47%) underwent previous ESWT, while thirty-seven (53%) had no previous treatments. No treatment-related complications were observed. Follow-up was averagely 14.4 months (median = 11.6, SD = 11.9, range 1-45); 37 patients had a follow-up shorter than 12 months (1-11.6); 35 patients were visited after more than 1 year (12.2-45.6, Table W). Before treatment, the mean CMS was 35 (SD = 21); after treatment, it reached 75.4, with an average CMS improvement of 40.3 points (SD = 23.7, p < 0.001). The comparison of improvement between the ESWT and non-ESWT group yielded no significant difference (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: US-PICT of the rotator cuff is an effective procedure to reduce shoulder pain and increase mobility in patients with calcific tendinopathy, both in short- and long-term time intervals. Previous unsuccessful ESWT does not affect the outcome of US-PICT.
Subject(s)
Calcinosis/therapy , Rotator Cuff Injuries/therapy , Shoulder Pain/therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , High-Energy Shock Waves , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Male , Middle Aged , Steroids/therapeutic use , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the Instability Severity Index Score in predicting the rate of recurrence of dislocation in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were recurrent anterior traumatic glenohumeral instability and a minimum follow-up of 5 years. According to the preoperative Instability Severity Index Score, patients were divided into the following groups: ≤3 points (A), 4 to 6 points (B), and >6 points (C). The recurrence rate was determined by telephone interviews. The estimated overall rate of success at 5 years was defined as the estimated overall percentage of patients free of recurrence at 5 years. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy patients (572 men and 98 women) were included. The average age was 27 years (range, 18 to 39 years) at the time of surgery. One hundred fourteen of 670 patients had a recurrence of instability, with an overall recurrence rate of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.2%-19.9%). The Instability Severity Index Score had a significant association with recurrence. Compared with patients in group A, those in group B had double the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, 95% CI 1.38-4.28, P = .002), and patients in group C a 9 times greater risk of recurrence (HR = 9.42, 95% CI 5.20-17.7, P < .001). The estimated overall rate of success at 5 years was 84.8% (95% CI 81.8-87.3). The rate of success with an Instability Severity Index Score ≤3 points was 93.7% (95% CI 89.6-96.2), but it dropped to 85.7% (95% CI 81.7-88.9) in those with an Instability Severity Index Score of 4 to 6 points and became 54.6% (95% CI 42.8-64.9) in those with an Instability Severity Index Score >6 points. On multivariable analysis, the Instability Severity Index Score was found to significantly affect the risk of recurrence, corrected by type of sport and glenoid bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: The Instability Severity Index Score is a validated tool with which to assess the recurrence rate of dislocation after arthroscopic surgery in patients with shoulder instability. Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an Instability Severity Index Score ≤3 is associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrence of glenohumeral instability compared with that in patients with an Instability Severity Index Score >3 points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Joint Instability/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Scapula/surgery , Sports , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although many hypotheses have been formulated, aetiopathogenesis of cuff-tear arthropathy (CTA) is still motive for discussion. Since prevalence of CTA is notoriously higher in women, as is joint hypermobility, we hypothesised a possible correlation between the two conditions. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three (n = 133) consecutive patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis [48 men, 85 women; mean age (SD) 72.32 (7.05)] were divided into two groups: Groups 1 (CTA) and 2 (concentric shoulder arthropathy) comprised 71 (22 men, 49 women) and 62 (26 men, 36 women), respectively. The presence of current or previous joint hypermobility was assessed using two standardised methodologies: the Beighton criteria score, and a five-item self-report questionnaire. Data were submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: A moderate association between Beighton criteria and the five-item self-report (φ = 0.481, p < 0.001) was detected. Beighton criteria led to a diagnosis of joint hypermobility in 16 patients (22.5%) in Group 1 and 15 (24.2%) in Group 2. According to five-item self-report questionnaire, juvenile joint laxity was diagnosed in 11 (15.5%) and 12 (19.4%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. No significant association between groups and the Beighton criteria [χ2(1) = 0.051, p = 0.82] and five-item self-report questionnaire [χ2(1) = 0.67, p = 0.41] was found. CONCLUSION: Juvenile joint hyperlaxity is not a predisposing factor for cuff arthropathy. Further studies will be needed to explain CTA aetiopathogenesis. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.
Subject(s)
Joint Instability/complications , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/complications , Shoulder Joint/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnosis , Joint Instability/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and subjective difference between transtendon repair or complete/repair in two homogeneous groups of patients affected by deep partial articular supraspinatus tear. METHODS: Seventy-four patients were randomized in two groups of 37 patients each. The first group (A) was treated with arthroscopic transtendon repair while the second group (B) was treated with an arthroscopic completion of the tear and formal repair. All the patients were revaluated at a minimum 2 years of follow-up with Constant score and Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Constant score improved by a mean value of 25 (95 % CI 21-28) (p < 0.0001) and of 29 (95 % CI 26-31) (p < 0.0001), respectively; VAS score decreased by a mean value of 3.4 (95 % CI 2.9-3.9) (p < 0.0001) and of 3.6 (95 % CI 3.3-4.0) (p < 0.0001), respectively. The improvement was higher in both groups for the ADL, and in Group B, the improvement in strength was higher than in Group A. There were no statistical differences between the two different techniques. CONCLUSION: Both repairing techniques of deep partial supraspinatus tear provide good results in terms of function and pain. There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level II.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Prospective Studies , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rupture/surgery , Suture Anchors , Visual Analog Scale , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicentre retrospective study was to compare reverse total shoulder arthroplasty clinical outcomes with glenospheres of different diameters, designs and materials. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 133 patients were divided into three groups: 60 (45%) with 36-mm standard CoCrMo (group A), 21 (16%) with 36-mm eccentric cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) (group B) and 52 (39%) with 44-mm cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (X-UHMWPE) (group C) glenospheres. Mean (SD) follow-up was 38.7 (17.4) months. Clinical evaluation included Constant score and range of motion. Radiographic analysis included radiolucent lines, instability, loosening and assessment of scapular notching. RESULTS: Mean Constant score significantly increased for all groups (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001). Group C allowed a higher and stable increase in range of motion. After 12 months and 24 months, groups C and B showed less pain than group A (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.05). Group C had significantly lower scapular notching than group B (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.001) and A (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.009) at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months. Groups A and C presented 5 (8.3%) and 4 (7.6%) early complications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reported good results for all groups, although groups C and A presented better clinical outcomes, significantly lower notching and instability. A 44-mm X-UHMWPE glenosphere allowed a faster and more stable functional recovery, despite poorest pre-operative conditions. Additional long-term studies are needed to evaluate survivorship.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The current models of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) expose the procedure to the risk of scapular notching, possibly leading to loosening of the glenoid. We compared the clinical and radiographic results obtained with a concentric or eccentric glenosphere to assess whether the eccentric design might give better clinical results and avoid or decrease the risk of scapular notching METHODS: Of our patients, 31 underwent RSA using a concentric glenosphere (group A), while 29 had an eccentric glenosphere (group B). Postoperatively, patients were followed-up at one to 12 months and annually thereafter, with the mean being 33 months in group A and 27.5 in group B. In both groups the minimum follow up (F-U) was 24 months. Preoperatively and at each F-U starting from six months, patients were assessed using the Constant score. On radiographs, prosthesis scapular neck angle (PSNA), distance between scapular neck and glenosphere (DBSNG) and peg-glenoid rim distance (PGRD) were calculated. The severity of notching was classified in four grades. RESULTS: In group A the mean Constant score increased by 30 points compared to the preoperative score and the active ROM increased considerably. At latest F-U, the mean PSNA, DBSNG and PGRD were, respectively, 87°, 3.4 mm and 19.8 mm. Glenoid notching was present in 42% of cases. In group A, the mean Constant score increased by 34 points and the mean ROM was better than in group A. The average PSNA, PGRD and DBSNG were, respectively, 92°, 21.2 mm and 4.3 mm. Radiographs showed no inferior scapular notching. CONCLUSIONS: The eccentric glenosphere yielded better clinical results than the concentric glenosphere and was associated with no scapular notching.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Joint Prosthesis/classification , Prosthesis Design , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Risk Factors , Scapula/diagnostic imaging , Scapula/injuries , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Revision of a shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse arthroplasty is a highly demanding procedure. The aim of this study is to report the clinical results of hemi and total shoulder prosthesis revisions to reverse implants without removal of the humeral stem, using a modular shoulder replacement system (SMR Lima LTD). We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients who underwent an operation from 2004 to 2009. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: in Group I, 18 patients underwent a revision of hemiarthroplasty implanted for fracture; in Group II, eight patients underwent a revision of anatomical total prosthesis. All patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 32.3 (±12.7) months using the Constant score rating scale and by range of motion evaluation, EQ-VAS, X-ray and CT scan. RESULTS: The Constant score of each patient was 47.88 (±5.88) after the revision. The EQ-VAS improved from 40 (±20) to 70 (±10). All patients improved in terms of range of motion. The radiographs and CT scans obtained after revision showed good integration and no signs of loosening of the implant. The mean time of surgery was recorded as 62' (±8'), with a maximum blood loss of less than 300 ml in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that using a full modular system at the time of the first implant allows avoidance of the step to remove the humeral stem and metal back in cases of shoulder prosthesis revision to a reverse prosthesis, resulting in a short operative time, few intraoperative complications and a satisfactory clinical outcome at medium-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Hemiarthroplasty/instrumentation , Prostheses and Implants , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemiarthroplasty/methods , Humans , Male , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Reoperation/instrumentation , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Shoulder Joint/physiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: this study was performed to identify the role of arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair (ACR) in unidirectional post-traumatic shoulder instability in adolescent athletes participating in overhead or contact sports. METHODS: sixty-five adolescent patients (aged 13 to 18 years) with post-traumatic shoulder instability submitted to arthroscopic surgery were selected from our database. The mean follow-up duration was 63 months. Shoulder range of motion and functional outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Rowe, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. In addition, details in the database on the type of sport practiced, time until surgery, and number of dislocations were analyzed to look for possible correlations with the recurrence rate. RESULTS: at the final follow-up, the mean SANE score was 87.23% (range: 30% to 100%) (preoperative mean score: 46.15% [range, 20% to 50%]); the mean Rowe score was 85 (range: 30 to 100) (preoperative mean score: 35.9 [range: 30 to 50]); and the mean ASES score was 84.12 (range: 30 to 100) (preoperative mean score: 36.92 [range: 30 to 48]). Mean forward flexion and external rotation with the arm at 90° abduction did not show changes compared with preoperative values; 81.5% of the patients returned to their pre-injury level of sports activities, and the failure rate was 21.5%. The recurrence rate was not related to the postoperative scores (p = 0.556 for SANE, p = 0.753 for Rowe, and p = 0.478 for ASES), number of preoperative episodes of instability (p = 0.59), or time that elapsed between the first instability episode and the surgery (p = 0.43). A statistically significant association (p = 0.0021) was found between recurrence and the type of sport practiced. CONCLUSIONS: ACR is a reasonable surgical option in an adolescent population participating in sports. It has a role in restoring shoulder stability with very low morbidity; however, the failure rate is higher than in the adult population and both the young patients and their relatives must be properly informed about the expected outcome of the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV, therapeutic case series.
ABSTRACT
The tendon of the long head of the biceps (LHB) is a common source of pain in the shoulder, and the surgical treatments proposed are tenotomy or tenodesis performed in different ways. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results (objective and subjective) of tenotomy versus soft tissue tenodesis. One-hundred and four patients with an isolated LHB pathology, arthroscopically treated between 2004 and 2007, were observed retrospectively. Forty-eight of these patients were treated with tenotomy and 56 with a soft tissue tenodesis technique. All the patients were evaluated by an independent observer with a minimum follow-up of 2 years which included VAS, DASH questionnaire, Constant score and ROM evaluation with a goniometer. All these evaluations were performed pre- and post-operatively. An independent expert radiologist then performed an ultrasound examination only in the post-operative evaluation of the tenodesis group looking to confirm the effectiveness of the procedure. In both groups, the scores were significantly improved. In the tenotomy group, 16.6 % of the patients had bicipital cramps for a mean post-operative time of 1 month. Constant score improved in both groups: 46.6 to 86.1 in tenotomy group and 48.9-84.9 in tenodesis group; VAS improved from 8.4 to 1.5 in tenotomy group and from 8.8 to 1.4 in tenodesis group; DASH scores changed from 42.5 to 13.6 in tenotomy group and from 55.8 to 11.4 in tenodesis group. Popeye sign was present in 37.5 % in the tenotomy group and in 5.3 % in tenodesis group. In 3 patients of the tenodesis group, ultrasound revealed complete failure of the tenodesis. In conclusion, both procedures are effective in terms of treatment of LHB pathologies. Tenotomy does not require specific post-operative treatment and is easy to perform, but cramp and Popeye sign may occur after surgery. The soft tissue tenodesis technique is an easy and cost-effective way to perform tenodesis with good results, especially in preventing the Popeye sign, but requires a longer rehabilitation time. Level of evidence IV.
Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Shoulder Pain/surgery , Tenodesis , Tenotomy , Adult , Aged , Arm , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, an eccentric glenosphere has been developed with the aim of lowering the centre of rotation, in order to prevent inferior scapular notching as occurs with concentric designs. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes using the eccentric glenosphere and to determine whether this design might prevent inferior scapular notching. Between 2006 and 2010, 40 patients affected by cuff tear arthropathy underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric 36-mm glenoid component. Patients with less than 2 years' follow-up were excluded. The results for 25 patients with a minimum of 24 months' follow-up are reported. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter. All patients were evaluated with MRI or CT scan preoperatively and with X-ray examinations postoperatively to evaluate the presence of inferior scapular notching and to measure the prosthesis-scapular neck angle (PSNA), the peg-glenoid rim distance (PGRD) and the distance between the scapula neck and the glenosphere. At last follow-up (average 27.5 months, range 24-46), the Constant Score, the VAS score and range of motion had improved significantly. The average PSNA was 92° + 29°, the average PGRD was 21.2 mm + 9 mm and the average distance between the inferior bony glenoid rim and the inferior edge of the glenosphere was 4.3 mm + 0.8 mm. No inferior scapular notching and no implant-related complications were seen. The data suggest that use of an eccentric glenosphere lowers the centre of rotation, reducing the risk of inferior scapular notching. Level of evidence IV.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Joint Prosthesis , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Radiography , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little information is available for the outcomes of conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) of failed hemiarthroplasty (HA) implanted for fractures or fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results in 16 patients who underwent conversion of HA to TSA due to pain and shoulder disfunction. Patients were a mean age of 63 years at revision, which was occurred a mean of 3.3 years after the HA. The main prerequisites for conversion were forward flexion to at least 60°, no massive cuff tear, or severe resorption or nonunion of the tuberosities. In all cases, a modular prosthesis was used in the HA, uncemented in 14 and cemented in 2. The latest follow-up was a mean of 4.6 years after revision. RESULTS: The mean Constant score was 50.6 (range, 33-69), with an average increase of 11.9 points compared with the preoperative score (P = .001). In 75% of patients, the mean score was 54.6 (average increase, 15.1 points). The lowest scores occurred in patients with a cemented prosthesis that needed to be removed, and in 1 patient who had loosening of the implanted glenoid that was revised. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of HA to TSA can improve the preoperative condition in most patients aged in their 50s or 60s in the absence of rotator cuff deficiency and severe bone loss of the proximal humerus.
Subject(s)
Hemiarthroplasty , Humerus/surgery , Joint Prosthesis , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Humerus/injuries , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Range of Motion, Articular , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Fractures/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the outcome of arthroscopic capsular repair for shoulder instability in an active adolescent population participating in overhead or contact sports. METHODS: We identified 67 patients (aged 13 to 18 years) with post-traumatic recurrent shoulder instability for inclusion in the study from our computer database. Of these patients, 65 (96%) were available for clinical review. There were 44 male and 21 female patients, with a mean age of 16 years at the time of surgery. All patients participated in overhead or contact sports at a competitive level. Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair was performed after at least 6 months of failed nonoperative treatment. The mean follow-up was 63 months. Shoulder range of motion and functional outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Rowe, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. Furthermore, type of sport, time until surgery, and number of dislocations were analyzed from our database to find any correlation with the recurrence rate. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean SANE score was 87.23% (range, 30% to 100%) (preoperative mean, 46.15% [range, 20% to 50%]); the mean Rowe score was 85 (range, 30 to 100) (preoperative mean, 35.9 [range, 30 to 50]); and the mean ASES score was 84.12 (range, 30 to 100) (preoperative mean, 36.92 [range, 30 to 48]). The mean forward flexion and external rotation with the arm at 90° abduction did not change from preoperative values; 81% of the patients returned to their preinjury level of sport, and the rate of failure was 21%. The recurrence rate was not related to the postoperative scores (P = .556 for SANE score, P = .753 for Rowe score, and P = .478 for ASES score), the number of preoperative episodes of instability (P = .59), or the time from the first instability episode to the time of surgery (P = .43). There was a statistically significant relation (P = .0021) between recurrence and the type of sport practiced. Recurrence rate was related to the type of sport practiced. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic stabilization is a reasonable surgical option even in an adolescent population performing sports activities. However, it must be emphasized to the patients and their relatives that the recurrence rate that could be expected after an arthroscopic procedure is higher than in the adult population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Athletic Injuries/complications , Joint Instability/surgery , Shoulder Dislocation/complications , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Instability/etiology , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Dislocation/etiology , Shoulder Injuries , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The traditional open transosseous rotator cuff repair gives excellent results for the fixation of tendon to bone and has represented the gold standard for rotator cuff surgery with excellent long-term results. In the last few years, different arthroscopic techniques using suture anchors have been developed to increase the tendon-bone contact area in an attempt to reconstitute a more anatomic configuration of the rotator cuff footprint while providing a better environment for tendon healing. However, the anchor-based techniques have still not replicated the traditional open transosseous repair. A surgical technique that allows surgeons to perform a standardized arthroscopic transosseous (anchor free) repair of rotator cuff tears using a new disposable device is described. With this system, it is possible to perform a transosseous technique in a reproducible fashion. This novel technique combines the clinical advantages of minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery and the biomechanical advantages of open transosseous procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Suture Techniques , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Arthroscopy/instrumentation , Humans , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Suture Anchors , Suture Techniques/instrumentationABSTRACT
Over the last decade, the concept of internal impingement has continued to evolve, and the frequency with which this condition is recognised continues to increase. This syndrome should be clearly differentiated from the classical (external) impingement that is thought to be caused by compression of the subacromial bursa, long head of the biceps tendon and rotator cuff (RC) by the coraco-acromial arch. Internal (posterosuperior) impingement syndrome is typified by a painful shoulder due to impingement of the soft tissue, including the RC, joint capsule and the posterosuperior part of the glenoid. The aetiology of this syndrome is unclear, but hypotheses include anterior shoulder instability or micro-instability, contracture of the posterior capsule, reduced humeral retroversion and scapular dyskinesis. Non-operative therapy represents the first line of treatment for this syndrome and includes the management of pain, stretching of the posterior capsule and a muscle strengthening programme. Surgical treatment should only be considered when conservative management fails. A number of different surgical procedures have been proposed, but the results are variable. The success rate is generally improved when the subtle instability, associated with internal impingement, is also addressed.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/therapy , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/therapy , Arthroscopy/methods , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Medical History Taking/methods , Physical Examination/methods , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/diagnosis , Shoulder Impingement Syndrome/etiologyABSTRACT
Posterior dislocation of the shoulder is an unusual injury that most often occurs secondary to a high-energy trauma. Unfortunately the diagnosis is commonly missed, thus making its treatment a challenge. Neglected posterior dislocation is mainly characterised by an impression fracture on the anterior articular surface of the humeral head, which makes the dislocation often difficult to reduce. Diagnosis is based upon a careful history assessment, physical examination and radiological findings. Several treatment approaches have been described. The modified MacLaughlin procedure in our hands has been shown to be a reproducible technique allowing good results at medium- and long-term follow-up. According to our experience it is possible to adopt this technique also in patients with a locked posterior dislocation older than 6 months or in cases with a humeral head defect up to 50% when a shoulder prosthesis is not a good indication. Poorer results should be expected in patients with an associated fracture of the proximal humerus.
Subject(s)
Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Accidental Falls , Adult , Bone Wires , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic/complications , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Shoulder Dislocation/classification , Shoulder Dislocation/etiology , Shoulder Fractures/complications , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Suture Techniques , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transtendinous repair is a well-known technique for the arthroscopic management of partial rotator cuff tear. However, there are not a lot of clinical follow-up studies in the literature reporting data on this approach, and, moreover, potential factors responsible to influence the outcomes have not been investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic transtendinous repair and to identify predictive factors of residual shoulder symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with a mean age of 56.7 +/- 8.8 years (range, 31-71 years) who had undergone an arthroscopic transtendon repair for a painful articular-sided rotator cuff tear with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were contacted. Clinical outcomes using a patient-based questionnaire, the Constant score, University of California at Los Angeles score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale were evaluated. The influence of patient age, presence or absence of a trauma responsible for the cuff tear, presence of associated shoulder lesions, millimeters of exposed footprint, and millimeters of torn tendon retraction on the outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The mean cuff tear exposure footprint was 5.2 mm, and the mean retraction of the torn part of the tendon was 8 mm. Only one patient reported dissatisfaction with surgery because of persistence of pain during overhead activities. After arthroscopic repair, University of California at Los Angeles, Constant, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were significantly improved from 14.1, 45.3, and 9.8 to 32.9, 90.6, and 0.8, respectively (P < .001). Twenty-two patients (41%) reported occasional shoulder discomfort at the extremes of range of motion (particularly at extremes of abduction and internal rotation) occurring during some daily living and sports activities. The best multivariate model showed that residual shoulder discomfort is strongly linked with a partial thickness supraspinatus tendon avulsion-type articular-sided rotator cuff lesion consisting of a large tendon retraction and/or a relatively small exposure footprint area in an older patient in the absence of a specific trauma (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic transtendon partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion-type rotator cuff repair was a reliable procedure that resulted in a good outcome in terms of pain relief and shoulder scores in 98% of the 54 patients. Better results could be expected in patients with less tendon retraction, a larger footprint exposure, of younger age, and with a clinical history of trauma.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The effects of posterior plications associated with anterior shoulder instability surgery are still unclear both on shoulder range of motion (ROM) and on recurrence rate. The objective of this randomized study is to evaluate the influence of posterior-inferior plications, performed in association with repair of anterior Bankart lesion, on gleno-humeral (GH) range of motion. In a 24-month period, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. The criteria for inclusion were age between 17 and 40 years, traumatic unidirectional instability, no previous shoulder surgery, no more than three episodes of dislocation, no relevant glenoid bone deficiency, no clinical evidence of pathological anterior inferior laxity (measured with external rotation with the arm at the side inferior to 90 degrees and Gagey sign negative) and arthroscopic finding of isolated anterior Bankart lesion. A total of 20 patients (group A) were randomized to treat Bankart lesion using three bioadsorbable anchors loaded with a #2 braided polyester suture. In 20 randomized patients (group B) two posterior-inferior capsular plications performed with a #1 polidioxanone suture without any capsular shift were added to the same anterior capsulorraphy performed in group A. Postoperative rehabilitation protocol was the same for all 40 patients. Patients were examined preoperatively and at a 2-year follow-up by a single independent expert physician unaware of the surgical procedure. GH ROM, Constant, UCLA and ASES rating scores as well as recurrence of instability were recorded. At follow-up, forward flexion (FF) decreased by a mean value of 14.5 degrees (median -10 degrees ; range -5 degrees to -35 degrees ; P < 0.001) in group B and increased by a mean value of 3.5 degrees (median 0 degrees ; range -25 degrees to 40 degrees ; P < 0.312) in group A; external rotation with arm adducted (ER1) increased by a mean value of 1.8 degrees (median 0 degrees ; range -15 degrees to 30 degrees ; P < 0.924) in group B, and increased by a mean value of 2.6 degrees (median 2.5 degrees ; range -38 degrees to 40 degrees ; P < 0.610) in group A; external rotation with arm abducted at 90 degrees (ER2) decreased by a mean value of 2.9 degrees (median 0 degrees ; range: -20 degrees to 10 degrees ; P < 0.161) in group B and increased by a mean value of 0.7 degrees (median 0 degrees ; range -30 degrees to 25 degrees ; P < 0.837) in group A; the IR2 decreased by a mean value of 2.4 degrees (median -3.5 degrees ; range -15 degrees to 10 degrees ; P < 0.167) in group B and increased by a mean value of 2.2 degrees (median 0 degrees ; range -20 degrees to 30 degrees ; P < 0.456) in group A. The UCLA mean score gains by 43.1% (median 40; P < 0.001) relatively, and of 45.2% relatively (median 40; P < 0.001), respectively, in group B and A, ASES mean score relatively gains by 21.7% (median 21.2%; P < 0.001) in group B, and of 19.2% (median 18.9%; P < 0.001) in group A, and Constant mean score improves by 20.2% (median 16.5; P < 0.001) in group B, and 10.2% (median 8.4%; P < 0.001) in group A. Thus, the only statistical significant differences were the reduction of forward flexion in group B and the improvements of the scores in both groups. No recurrence of instability was found in the plicated group, while in the non-plicated group we had one traumatic recurrence. In conclusion, arthroscopic posterior-inferior plications associated with a Bankart lesion repair in a selected group of patients seem to reduce only FF, without any effect on rotation. A longer follow-up and a larger number of patients are needed to give definitive conclusions on the benefit to the recurrence rate.