Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34070561

ABSTRACT

Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy approach offered in selected patients affected by non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Drugs doses currently established for nebulization are very low: oxaliplatin (OXA) 120 mg/sm, cisplatin (CDDP) 10.5 mg/sm and doxorubicin (DXR) 2.1 mg/sm. A model-based approach for dose-escalation design in a single PIPAC procedure and subsequent dose escalation steps is planned. The starting dose of oxaliplatin is 100 mg/sm with a maximum estimated dose of 300 mg/sm; an escalation with overdose and under-dose control (for probability of toxicity less than 16% in case of under-dosing and probability of toxicity greater than 33% in case of overdosing) will be further applied. Cisplatin is used in association with doxorubicin: A two-dimensional dose-finding design is applied on the basis of the estimated dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at all combinations. The starting doses are 15 mg/sm for cisplatin and 3 mg/sm for doxorubicin. Safety is assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). Secondary endpoints include radiological response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (version 1.1) and pharmacokinetic analyses. This phase I study can provide the scientific basis to maximize the optimal dose of cisplatin, doxorubicin and oxaliplatin applied as PIPAC.


Subject(s)
Cisplatin , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Aerosols , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Doxorubicin , Humans , Oxaliplatin , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneum
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(5)2021 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33802269

ABSTRACT

Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy approach with the advantage of a deeper tissue penetration. Thus far, oxaliplatin has been administered at an arbitrary dose of 92 mg/m2, cisplatin at 7.5 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2. This is a model-based approach phase I dose escalation study with the aim of identifying the maximum tolerable dose of the three different drugs. The starting dose of oxaliplatin was 100 mg/m2; cisplatin was used in association with doxorubicin: 15 mg/m2 and 3 mg/m2 were the respective starting doses. Safety was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). Thirteen patients were submitted to one PIPAC procedure. Seven patients were treated with cisplatin and doxorubicin and 6 patients with oxaliplatin; no dose limiting toxicities and major side effects were found. Common adverse events included postoperative abdominal pain and nausea. The maximum tolerable dose was not reached. The highest dose treated cohort (oxaliplatin 135 mg/m2; cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 6 mg/m2) tolerated PIPAC well. Serological analyses revealed no trace of doxorubicin at any dose level. Serum levels of cis- and oxaliplatin reached a peak at 60-120 min after PIPAC and were still measurable in the circulation 24 h after the procedure. Cisplatin and doxorubicin may be safely used as PIPAC at a dose of 30 mg/m2 and 6 mg/m2, respectively; oxaliplatin can be used at an intraperitoneal dose of 135 mg/m2. The dosages achieved to date are the highest ever used in PIPAC.

3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(6)2020 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32521738

ABSTRACT

In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have substantially improved the clinical outcome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) originating from mucinous appendiceal cancer. However, current histopathological grading of appendiceal PMP frequently fails in predicting disease outcome. We recently observed that the integration of cancer cell transcriptional traits with those of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) improves prognostic prediction for tumors of the large intestine. We therefore generated global expression profiles on a consecutive series of 24 PMP patients treated with CRS plus HIPEC. Multiple lesions were profiled for nine patients. We then used expression data to stratify the samples by a previously published "high-risk appendiceal cancer" (HRAC) signature and by a CAF signature that we previously developed for colorectal cancer, or by a combination of both. The prognostic value of the HRAC signature was confirmed in our cohort and further improved by integration of the CAF signature. Classification of cases profiled for multiple lesions revealed the existence of outlier samples and highlighted the need of profiling multiple PMP lesions to select representative samples for optimal performances. The integrated predictor was subsequently validated in an independent PMP cohort. These results provide new insights into PMP biology, revealing a previously unrecognized prognostic role of the stromal component and supporting integration of standard pathological grade with the HRAC and CAF transcriptional signatures to better predict disease outcome.

4.
Biomedicines ; 8(5)2020 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32365877

ABSTRACT

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative approach for treating peritoneal carcinomatosis that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an under-pressure airflow. It improves local bioavailability of cytostatic drugs as compared to conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to prove feasibility, efficacy and safety of this new treatment. Patients included in the analysis underwent at least two single port PIPAC procedures; drugs used were Oxaliplatin for colorectal cancers and Cisplatin + Doxorubicin for ovarian, gastric, and primary peritoneal cancers. The primary endpoint was the Disease Control Rate according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Secondary significant endpoints were overall and progression free survival, tumor regression on histology, and quality of life. Safety and tolerability were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this trial. Forty patients (100 PIPAC) were eligible for analysis. Twenty patients were undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Fourteen patients reported an objective response (35%). Median overall survival was 18.1 months; median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. Minor morbidity was observed in seven procedures. Grade 3 complications occurred in two patients, and grade 4 in one patient submitted to reoperation. Single-port PIPAC is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. The combined treatment based on systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC does not induce significant hepatic and renal toxicity and can be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with advanced peritoneal disease. Further studies on the use of PIPAC alone, possibly with different drug dosages, may define the real effectiveness of the procedure.

5.
Front Pharmacol ; 10: 669, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31293417

ABSTRACT

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common metastatic pattern in ovarian, gastric, colorectal, and appendiceal cancer; systemic chemotherapy is the current standard of care for peritoneal metastatic disease; however, in a subset of patients its beneficial effect remains questionable. More effective perioperative chemotherapy is needed. Materials and methods: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new treatment that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. It's a safe and feasible approach that improves local bioavailability of chemotherapeutic drugs as compared with conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Till now the drugs used in PIPAC for the treatment of the peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) are cisplatin, doxorubicin, and oxaliplatin; as of yet, there are no in vivo data comparing different drug formulations and dosage schedules of PIPAC. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 1.5 mg/sm was aerosolized in PIPAC procedures. Results: Pharmacokinetics analysis of 10 procedures performed with conventional doxorubicin solution at the dose of 1.5 mg/m2 were compared to 15 procedures with the same dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Significant differences between experimental groups were detected by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction; a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A statistically different doxorubicin tissue concentration was observed for the doxorubicin solution compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the right parietal peritoneum and right diaphragm. In the Caelyx® series a mean tissue concentration of 1.27 ± 1.33 mg/g was reported, while in the second one we registered a mean concentration of 3.1 ± 3.7 mg/g. Conclusions: The delivery of nano-particles in PIPAC was feasible, but pegylated liposomal concentrations are lower than standard doxorubicin formulation. Probably mechanical and physical properties of pressurized aerosol chemotherapy might alter their stability and cause structural disintegration.

6.
Minerva Chir ; 73(2): 133-141, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397633

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Actual cure rate and patterns of recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) associated to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) are not yet well explored. Moreover, the selection policy to this resource-consuming treatment is still a matter of debate. METHODS: From a dataset of 400 CRS+HIPEC performed between October 1996 and December 2015, we selected 54 consecutive patients with colorectal PC. Exclusion criteria were age>70, PS>2, or disease progression during chemotherapy. From 2004, we also excluded patients with both PCI>16 and poor prognostic factors of primary tumor (i.e. T4, N2 and G3) and only proceeded to HIPEC in case of optimal cytoreduction. Prognostic factors, cure rate and patterns of recurrence were investigated, comparing the two time periods. RESULTS: After 2004, median overall survival was 52 months, with a 40% 5-year survival. Completeness of cytoreduction, primary tumor histology and time period were independent prognostic factors. Median recurrence-free survival was 16 months. A relapse was detected in 41 out of 46 patients with optimal cytoreduction. Main sites of first relapse were peritoneum (73%), and distant metastases (37%), mainly to liver and lungs. Peritoneal and liver/lung metastases presented as isolated recurrence in 73% and 58% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By a selection policy based on patient, disease extension and primary tumor factors, a median survival higher than 50 months can be expected. Most patients will eventually recur, mainly in the peritoneum. The pattern of recurrence suggests a potential role for more effective intraperitoneal therapies and repeat surgical treatments.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Hyperthermia, Induced , Patient Selection , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Palliative Care , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
7.
Anticancer Res ; 38(2): 929-932, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29374723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease characterized by mucinous ascites and widespread peritoneal implants. It usually originates from the rupture of an adenoma/adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Although this tumor is only superficially invasive and does not metastasize, it could be a fatal disease. Extra-abdominal spread of PMP is an unusual occurrence with few reports in medical literature. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with PMP according to the findings of thorax and abdomen CT scan and cytologic and histological examinations. The radiological exam showed irregular thickening on the surface of left diaphragmatic and parietal pleura. RESULTS: First, cytoreductive surgery associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the abdominal disease was performed. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of low grade PMP. The radiological evaluation performed 5 months later showed a dimensional increase in pleural nodules. The treatment consisted of an extensive intrathoracic cytoreductive surgery in combination with pressurized intra-thoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PITAC). Postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSION: PMP with pleural extension is a rare phenomenon and carries an unfavourable prognosis. Due to the rarity of this presentation, its correct treatment is still unclear. We present a therapeutic approach to be applied in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Hyperthermia, Induced , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/pathology
8.
Pleura Peritoneum ; 1(4): 217-222, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30911626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a drug delivery system for treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). A limitation of this technique is the non-access rate (10-15 %) due to peritoneal adhesions. The aim of the study was to assess feasibility and safety of the single-port access technique for PIPAC. METHODS: Single-center, pilot study. Case series, retrospective analysis on 17 patients with PM of various origin treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin, doxorubicin and/or oxaliplatin administered as PIPAC. Single-port access was attempted in all patients by minilaparotomy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine PIPAC procedures were performed. Nine patients were subjected to 1 PIPAC, four patients to 2 PIPAC and four patients to 3 PIPAC. Access to peritoneal cavity was possible in all cases. There was no bowel access lesion. Tightness of the abdomen (CO2-flow = 0) was achieved in all cases. No postoperative complications according to CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events)>2 were observed, no re-laparotomies required and no postoperative mortality recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Single port-access is feasible and safe for PIPAC. Potential advantages over multiple trocars technique are a lower non-access rate, a lower risk of bowel lesions and a better tightness of the abdomen. This has now to be confirmed in a comparative study.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...