Application of antimicrobial stewardship to optimise management of community acquired pneumonia.

The aim of this study was to review the application of antimicrobial stewardship principles to the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Data from 14 published clinical studies, meta-analyses and practice guidelines regarding the application of antimicrobial stewardship strategies to the management of CAP were identified and analysed. In the context of CAP, application of stewardship strategies (alone or in combination) has been shown to increase physician awareness of guidelines, improve appropriate antimicrobial use and reduce unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing. In addition, application has had a profound favourable impact on patient outcomes, including decreased 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality rates, reduced length of hospital stay, reduced treatment failure rates and reduced healthcare costs. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes have been demonstrated to successfully increase the level of appropriate antibiotic prescribing, reduce pathogen resistance and improve clinical outcomes in the management of CAP within hospitals. Studies have also shown that adherence to evidence-based guidelines, even at the level of the individual clinician, can have a profound and positive impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines can have a profound and positive impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

The association between antibiotic use and resistance: the role of secondary antibiotics.

Using susceptibility rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae over time as markers, we assessed the significance of the change of susceptibility rates to imipenem, ceftriaxone, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin over time and the relationship to antibiotic use for the period 2000-2006. Antibiotic use-susceptibility relationships were assessed using longitudinal regression analysis. The variables "time" and define daily doses (DDD)/1,000 patient days for the specific drug related to the susceptibility rates of that particular model's dependent variable were considered as the main effects, with significance determined at the 0.05 level. Decreases in susceptibility of the target organisms were common over the period of observation. Decreasing susceptibility trends over time were not statistically associated with the primary drug (e.g., organism susceptibility rate to imipenem with imipenem usage). However, secondary drug use was associated with susceptibility rates (e.g., susceptibility of E. cloacae to cefepime with piperacillin/tazobactam usage). These results suggest that antibiotic use-resistance relationships are influenced by the use of secondary antibiotics. Thus, a resistance problem may not be adequately addressed by simply altering the utilization of the primary antibiotic.

Comparative in vitro pharmacodynamics of imipenem and meropenem against ATCC strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacteroides fragilis.

We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of imipenem and meropenem, utilizing time-kill studies over a concentration/MIC (C/MIC) range of 0.0625-1024 for E. coli ATCC 35218 (EC) and S. aureus ATCC 29213 (SA) and from 0.125-512 for B. fragilis ATCC 25285 (BF). Area under the time-kill curves were converted to percent response (%R). AUCs were calculated from drug concentrations corrected for degradation and %R vs. C/MIC and AUC/MIC were fit to a sigmoidal Emax model. Emax was similar for both agents for all organisms. Meropenem was 4x more potent than imipenem against EC based on the MIC and required 7 and 13.5-fold lower AUCs to achieve E50 and E90, (50% and 90% of the maximal response, respectively) respectively, whereas imipenem was 8x more potent than meropenem against SA based on the MIC and required 8 and 13-fold lower AUCs to achieve E50 and E90, respectively. The C/MIC and AUC/MIC to achieve E50 and E90 with imipenem were 2- and fourfold higher, respectively than meropenem against EC. There was less than a twofold difference in C/MICs and AUC/MIC between imipenem and meropenem for both E50 and E90 against SA. Against BF, concentrations and AUCs at E50 were similar for both agents; however, imipenem required 4 to 6-fold higher concentrations and AUC to achieve E90. Although there are differences in the potency of these agents as assessed by the MIC or AUC vs. response, when normalized by the MIC and corrected for drug degradation, these agents displayed similar pharmacodynamic parameter-response relationships.

Evaluation of antibiotic synergy against Acinetobacter baumannii: a comparison with Etest, time-kill, and checkerboard methods.

Acinetobacter baumannii is becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, often requiring combination therapy. Numerous methods exist to detect the presence of in vitro synergy with the time-kill and checkerboard tests being widely used. The Epsilometer test (E test) is a new method that is less labor intensive, but has not been evaluated using a wide range of antimicrobials and organisms. We assessed synergy using the time-kill and checkerboard tests and compared the results to the E test method using 10 clinical isolates of A. baumannii. Antimicrobial combinations evaluated consisted of trovafloxacin or tobramycin in combination with cefepime or piperacillin. Synergy was detected with all combinations by either the checkerboard or time-kill method. Synergy was not detected by the Etest method. The agreement between the time-kill test and Etest method was 72% (range 42-97%); for the time-kill and checkerboard tests, agreement was 51% (range 30-67%). The Etest method appears promising although further testing should be performed with additional antimicrobial agents and organisms.

Assessment of the relationship between antimicrobial usage and susceptibility: differences between the hospital and specific patient-care areas.

Current evidence suggests that controlling antibiotic resistance requires the monitoring of both susceptibility trends and antimicrobial usage within specific patient-care areas of the hospital. To assess the differences between antimicrobial usage-versus-susceptibility relationships found in the hospital and those relationships found in specific patient-care areas, susceptibility and antimicrobial usage data collected over a 5-year period (1992-1996) at the Medical University of South Carolina were analyzed. For each area, the relationship between drug use and susceptibility was analyzed for 8 gram-negative organisms with respect to 19 different agents and for 3 staphylococci with respect to 10 agents with use of simple linear regression. The relationships found in the hospital had a poorer overall agreement with the relationships found in the intensive care units (ICUs; <20%) than they did with the relationships found in the non-ICUs ( approximately 65%). Surveillance should include both susceptibility and drug usage patterns in individual areas within an institution.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with thermal burn injury.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime following administration of a single 2-g dose were evaluated for 12 adult patients with thermal burn injury and suspected or documented infection. Serial blood and urine samples for cefepime concentration determination were obtained for 24 h following drug administration. Serum and urine cefepime concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and serum concentrations were fit to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, actual body weight (ABW), percent total body surface area burned, and days postburn at the time of study were 41 (13) years, 84 (22) kg, 36 (17)%, and 9 (3) days, respectively. Mean (SD) measured creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), total clearance (CL(T)), renal clearance (CL(R)), alpha phase half-life, beta phase half-life, and volume of distribution at steady state (V(SS)) were 135 (31) ml/min, 8.8 (2.4) liters/h, 8.1 (2.0) liters/h, 0.33 (0.14) h, 2.8 (0.6) h, and 0.43 (0.10) liters/kg ABW, respectively. Cefepime CL(T) and CL(R) in burn patients were similar to previously reported values for healthy volunteers when normalized by CL(CR). Stepwise multiple regression was used to associate CL(T) with CL(CR) and days postburn (r(2) = 0.861), CL(R) with CL(CR) and days postburn (r(2) = 0.773), nonrenal clearance with percent third-degree (% 3 degrees ) burn and albumin concentration (r(2) = 0.550), and V(SS) only with % 3 degrees burn (r(2) = 0.624). Simulated steady-state serum concentrations obtained by using the patients' pharmacokinetic parameters exceeded the susceptibility interpretive standard (breakpoint) of cefepime for at least 60% of the dosing interval with dosing regimens of 1 g every 8 h (q8h), 2 g q8h, and 2 g q12h. Despite differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between our patients and healthy volunteers, it appears that these dosing regimens may be adequate in similar burn patients.

Impact of use of multiple antimicrobials on changes in susceptibility of gram-negative aerobes.

Evaluation of antimicrobial usage vs. susceptibility relationships typically involves single agents. However, susceptibility profiles may be affected by multiple drugs. From 1992 through 1996, we studied relationships between drug usage and the susceptibility (only susceptibility rates of > or = 70%) of Acinetobacter anitratus (baumannii), Enterobacter aerogenes, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens to 22 agents. Linear regression was used to assess usage of each agent vs. susceptibility to it and to all agents. Only relationships with a coefficient of determination of > or = 0.5 and a negative slope were evaluated and classified as increasing drug use and decreasing susceptibility (increasing D, decreasing %S) or decreasing drug use and increasing susceptibility (decreasing D, increasing %S). The mean numbers (range) of drugs associated with a change in susceptibility were 1.7 (0-14) and 0.6 (0-7), respectively, for increasing D, decreasing %S and decreasing D, increasing %S relationships. Multiple antimicrobials are associated with susceptibility to other drugs; thus, surveillance of these relationships should not be limited to single drugs.

A pilot study of the efficacy of constant-infusion ceftazidime in the treatment of endobronchial infections in adults with cystic fibrosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of constant-infusion ceftazidime (CTZ) with that of traditional intermittent dosing in a pilot trial. DESIGN: Prospective, crossover trial. SUBJECTS: Five adults with cystic fibrosis requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy for pulmonary exacerbations of the disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were initially treated with standard CTZ 2 g 3 times/day for 10 days. At the next hospitalization patients were crossed over and CTZ was administered as a constant infusion at a rate determined to achieve a serum concentration 6.6 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the least susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of CTZ were determined, as were MICs for all P. aeruginosa isolates. Outcome parameters of interest were changes with therapy in white blood cell count, P aeruginosa density in sputum, and pulmonary function test results. Differences in these parameters for the two forms of administration were not significant. With the exception of one patient who received 6 g/day with both regimens, the average reduction in dosage with the constant infusion was 50%. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that constant-infusion CTZ may be as safe and efficacious as intermittent dosing.

Comparative bactericidal activity of ceftazidime against isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as assessed in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model versus the traditional time-kill method.

Bactericidal activity, historically assessed by in vitro tests which employ fixed drug concentrations, may also be evaluated in in vitro pharmacodynamic models in which in vivo pharmacokinetics and bacterial growth conditions can be simulated. However, systematic comparisons between the two methods are lacking. We evaluated the bactericidal activities of ceftazidime, at two different concentration/MIC ratios (C/MICs), against 10 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a two-compartment model with continuous-infusion conditions and a 2-h half-life. These values were compared to those determined by traditional 24-h time-kill (TTK) methods at the same C/MICs. Bactericidal activities were compared by using area under the colony count-time curves. Antibiotic exposure (area under the drug concentration-time curve) was also evaluated. Although bactericidal activity appeared greater by the TTK method (P = 0.05), when it was normalized for drug exposure, these differences disappeared (P = 0.2). This disparity was likely due to differences in drug exposure in the TTK method and in the peripheral compartment of the model (site of bacteria) over the first 8 h of the experiment, during which the antibiotic accumulated to target concentrations. This suggests that the bactericidal effects with constant antibiotic concentrations are similar in the two methods; however, this may not hold true with fluctuating drug concentrations. Further, results from the pharmacodynamic model may theoretically be more relevant, as in vivo pharmacokinetics and bacterial growth conditions call be more faithfully simulated.

In vitro pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

The concentration/MIC (C/MIC) ratio maximizing the bactericidal activity of ceftazidime against 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients was identified. Bactericidal activity was assessed by determining the percent difference in the area under the killing curve at each C/MIC ratio for all of the isolates from that of their growth control. The percent effect at each C/MIC ratio was fitted to a sigmoidal Emax model with maximum bactericidal activity defined as the C/MIC ratio that produced an effect that was 90% of the Emax. Our results suggest that at least some isolates may require higher C/MIC ratios than previously reported for maximal activity.

Compatibility of filgrastim with selected antimicrobial drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

The compatibility of filgrastim with imipenem-cilastatin, ceftazidime, fluconazole, gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin was studied. Filgrastim 40 micrograms/mL or filgrastim 10 micrograms/mL (with human albumin) was combined with (1) imipenem-cilastatin 5 mg/mL (in terms of imipenem content), (2) ceftazidime 10 mg/mL (as the sodium salt), (3) fluconazole 2 mg/ mL, (4) gentamicin 1.6 mg/ mL (as the sulfate), (5) tobramycin 1.6 mg/mL (as the sulfate), or (6) amikacin 5 mg/ mL (as the sulfate). Equal volumes (5 mL) of the test-agent solutions were added in pairs to glass containers (simulating Y-site administration) in triplicate. Samples were analyzed for filgrastim activity, drug concentration, pH, and visible physical changes during storage at approximately 25 degrees C for up to four hours. Filgrastim activity was measured by the in vitro bioassay, and antimicrobial drug concentrations were measured by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography or fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Filgrastim retained its activity, except for the combination of filgrastim at the lower concentration with gentamicin or at the higher concentration with imipenem-cilastatin. Antimicrobial drug concentrations did not change significantly during the study. No precipitation, color change, or haze was noted in any mixture. Changes in pH were negligible except for an increase in the mixture of filgrastim at either concentration with ceftazidime. In most cases, filgrastim retained its activity in the presence of a variety of antimicrobial drugs for up to four hours; in all cases, the antimicrobial drugs remained stable.

Stability of ceftazidime sodium and teicoplanin sodium in a peritoneal dialysis solution.

The stability of ceftazidime sodium and teicoplanin sodium separately and in combination in a peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution was studied. PD solutions containing ceftazidime 100 micrograms/mL (as the sodium salt), teicoplanin 25 micrograms/mL (as the sodium salt), or ceftazidime 100 micrograms/mL plus teicoplanin 24 micrograms/mL were prepared in triplicate for each of two conditions: condition A, storage at 25 degrees C (room temperature) for 24 hours, then at 37 degrees C for eight hours; and condition B, storage for seven days at 4 degrees C, followed by 16 hours at 25 degrees C and 8 hours at 37 degrees C. The dialysis solution used was Dianeal PD-2 with 1.5% dextrose. Samples were removed at intervals and analyzed by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography. Under condition A, ceftazidime sodium alone was stable for 24 hours at 25 degrees C but only 2 hours when then heated to 37 degrees C. Under condition B, ceftazidime sodium alone was stable throughout the observation period. Teicoplanin sodium alone was stable throughout the observation periods under both conditions. In combination, the drugs were stable if initially refrigerated and then brought to room temperature one week later, but were unstable when initially stored at 25 degrees C. No visual changes were noted, and pH did not vary substantially. Ceftazidime 100 micrograms/mL (as the sodium salt) and teicoplanin 25 micrograms/mL (as the sodium salt) combined in a PD solution were unstable when first kept at 25 degrees C before storage at 37 degrees C. The drugs in the combination remained stable when the solution was kept at 4 degrees C before storage at 37 degrees C.

CYP2D6, N-acetylation, and xanthine oxidase activity in cystic fibrosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the activity of CYP2D6, N-acetylation, and xanthine oxidase, three drug-metabolizing enzyme systems, in patients with cystic fibrosis and compare the findings with those in individuals without the disease. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: General pediatrics service. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine patients with cystic fibrosis and 480 healthy Caucasian volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Enzyme activity was determined based on urinary molar metabolite ratios of caffeine and dextromethorphan probes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The percentage of poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 in patients with cystic fibrosis was not different from that in the control group (p = 0.45). N-Acetylation activity was significantly lower in the patients (p = 0.007), but no statistically significant difference was found in xanthine oxidase activity (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: The activity of these drug-metabolic pathways does not appear to be increased in cystic fibrosis. Whether the activity of other pathways is increased, thus providing a partial explanation for the generally increased drug clearance in this disease, remains to be determined.

Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test.

An in vitro method of detecting synergy which is simple to perform, accurate, and reproducible and has the potential for clinical extrapolation is desirable. Time-kill and checkerboard methods are the most widely used techniques to assess synergy but are time-consuming and labor-intensive. The Epsilometer test (E test), a less technically demanding test, has not been well studied for synergy testing. We performed synergy testing of Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 23355, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 with various combinations of cefepime or ceftazidime with tobramycin or ciprofloxacin using time-kill, checkerboard, and E test techniques. Time-kill testing was performed against each organism alone and in combinations at one-fourth times the MIC (1/4 x MIC) and 2 x MIC. With checkerboard tests, the same combinations were studied at concentrations ranging from 1/32 x to 4 x MIC. Standard definitions for synergy, indifference, and antagonism were utilized. E test strips were crossed at a 90 degree angle so the scales met at the MIC of each drug alone, and the fractional inhibitory concentrations index was calculated on the basis of the resultant zone on inhibition. All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the test organisms, and antagonism was infrequent. Agreement with time-kill testing ranged from 44 to 88% and 63 to 75% by the checkerboard and E test synergy methods, respectively. Despite each of these methods utilizing different conditions and endpoints, there was frequent agreement among the methods. Further comparisons of the E test synergy technique with the checkerboard and time-kill methods are warranted.

The role of dornase alfa in the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current utility and proper role of dornase alfa (recombinant human DNase or rhDNase), which has been approved for use in cystic fibrosis. Several aspects related to these issues are addressed including the drug's mechanism of action, administration and dosing, and clinical safety and efficacy. We also critically examine the agent's role in the treatment of cysti fibrosis and consider the controversies involved with its use. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify pertinent literature, including review articles and clinical trials. STUDY SELECTION: Studies examining the efficacy and safety of dornase alfa in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA EXTRACTION: Results from published, prospective, randomized trials are presented and critiqued. DATA SYNTHESIS: Production of viscous respiratory secretion is a hallmark phenomenon of cystic fibrosis, leading to a variety of symptoms. Dornase alfa targets this symptom and decreases the viscosity of these secretions. Clinical trials have indicated a small but statistically significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity. Enhancement in a patient's dyspnea and quality of life has varied between the trials, with few of the studies noting no statistically significant improvement. Adverse reactions are minimal and did not result in any patient withdrawals from the trials. A positive impact on infection rates, length of hospitalization, and need for intravenous antibiotic therapy was noted in one trial. However, reports of similar results have not yet been published, and thus the clinical significance or impact of this phenomenon is not fully understood. Moreover, results of more long-term use and in patients whose conditions are less stable have yet to undergo the scrutiny of peer/editorial review. Administration of the drug, which must be maintained continuously, is relatively expensive. CONCLUSIONS: Dornase alfa appears to produce small but sustained improvements in lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. It may also slow the progression of pulmonary disease. Infection rates appear to be reduced, which may well have important long-term consequences. However, evidence to date has not clarified the most appropriate use of dornase alfa in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. Whether quality of life is affected in a meaningful and measurable way is yet to be clarified. A trial of the drug in patients with cystic fibrosis who have obvious lung disease is reasonable, but continued treatment should be based on clear clinical response. Therefore, questions about the drug's exact role in the overall management of cystic fibrosis remain to be answered. Although benefits received may not prove to be cost-effective, long-term effects on disease progression may well justify use of this agent.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in cystic fibrosis patients.

The purposes of this study were to determine and compare the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with and without cystic fibrosis. Twelve patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalized for treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations were studied. In addition, pharmacokinetic data for seven of the patients with cystic fibrosis were compared with those for seven age-matched control patients. The cefepime dose was 50 mg/kg of body weight (maximum, 2 g) administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion every 8 h for a minimum of 8 days. Serial plasma and urine samples, obtained after the first and last doses, were analyzed for cefepime content by a validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay. By standard noncompartmental analysis, the pharmacokinetic parameters ascertained were area under the concentration in plasma-time curve, elimination half-life, total body clearance, renal clearance, and volume of distribution at steady state. In addition, the maximum concentration in plasma was recorded. Mean (+/- standard deviation) results of the first dose analysis in patients with cystic fibrosis were as follows: maximum concentration in plasma, 142.6 (+/- 26.07) micrograms/ml; area under the concentration in plasma-time curve, 265.3 (+/- 114.31) micrograms.h/ml; elimination half-life, 1.8 (+/- 0.53) h; total body clearance, 127.2 (+/- 50.94) ml/min; renal clearance, 91.1 (+/- 38.86) ml/min/kg; volume of distribution at steady state, 14.1 (+/- 4.31) liters. Analysis for the last dose in patients with cystic fibrosis did not vary appreciably from these values, nor did those from the controls. Thus, it appears that the first-dose pharmacokinetics of cefepime are predictive of those at steady state. In order to consistently exceed the MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the entire dosing interval in patients with cystic fibrosis, a higher dose and/or different dosing interval compared with those used in this study may be necessary.