Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Neurol Sci ; 45(2): 655-662, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37672177

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Time plays a crucial role in the management of stroke, and changing the prehospital emergency network, altering the HUB and spoke relationship in pandemic scenarios, might have an impact on time to fibrinolysis or thrombectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent stroke emergency network in Lombardy region (Italy) by comparing 2019 with 2020 and early 2021. Three parameters were investigated: (i) time of arrival of the first vehicle at the scene, (ii) overall duration of missions, and (iii) number of patients transported by emergency vehicles. METHODS: Data analysis process conducted using the SAS-AREU portal (SAS Institute, USA). RESULTS: The number of patients with a positive CPSS was similar among the different pandemic waves. Mission duration increased from a mean time (SD) of 52.9 (16.1) min in 2019 to 64.1 (19.7) in 2020 and 55.0 (16.8) in 2021. Time to first vehicle on scene increased to 15.7 (8.4) min in 2020 and 16.0 (7.0) in 2021 compared to 2019, 13.6 (7.2) (P < 0.05). The number of hospital with available stroke units decreased from 46 in 2019 to 10 during the first pandemic wave. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic forced changes in the clinical mission of many hospitals by reducing the number of stroke units. Despite this, the organization of the emergency system allowed to identify strategic hospitals and thus avoid excessive transport time. The result was an adequate time for fibrinolysis/thrombectomy, in agreement with the guidelines. Coordinated management in emergency situations makes it possible to maintain service quality standards, despite the unfavorable scenario.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Stroke , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/therapy , Ambulances
3.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(9): 1124-1129, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35894939

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed the time-dependent cardiac arrest network. This study aims to understand whether the rescue standards of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) were handled differently during pandemic compared to the previous year. METHODS: Data for the years 2019 and 2020 were provided by the records of the Lombardy office of the Regional Agency for Emergency and Urgency. We analysed where the cardiac arrest occurred, when CPR started and whether the bystanders used public access to defibrillation (PAD). RESULTS: During 2020, there was a reduction in CPRs performed by bystanders (odds ratio [OR] = 0.936 [95% confidence interval (CI95% ) 0.882-0.993], p = .029) and in the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (OR = 0.621 [CI95% 0.563-0.685], p < .0001), while there was no significant reduction in the use of PAD. Analysing only March, the period of the first wave in Lombardy, the comparison shows a reduction in bystanders CPRs (OR = 0.727 [CI95% 0.602-0.877], p = .0008), use of PAD (OR = 0.441 [CI95% 0.272-0.716], p = .0009) and in ROSC (OR = 0.179 [CI95% 0.124-0.257], p < .0001). These phenomena could be influenced by the different settings in which the OHCAs occurred; in fact, those that occurred in public places with a mandatory PAD were strongly reduced (OR = 0.49 [CI95% , 0.44-0.55], p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had a profound impact on the time-dependant OHCA network. During the first pandemic wave, CPR and PAD used by bystanders decreased. The different contexts in which OHCAs occurred may partially explain these differences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Pandemics
4.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; : 1-8, 2022 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000651

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: during the COVID-19 pandemic a total lockdown was enforced all over Italy starting on March 9th. This resulted in the shrinking of economic activities. In addition, all formal occupational security-training courses were halted, among them the 81/08 law lectures and Basic Life Support-Defibrillation (BLS-D) laymen training courses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on BLS-D laymen training courses in the Lombardy region. METHODS: BLS-D training courses records for the Lombardy region were analysed. The analysis was conducted from 2016 to 2020 as part of the Hippo project. RESULTS: between 2017 and 2019 BLS-D trained laymen kept increasing, moving from 53,500 trained individuals up to 74,700. In 2020 a stark reduction was observed with only 22,160 individuals trained. Formal courses were not halted completely during 2020. Still, in the months available for training, the number of individuals enrolled showed a sharp 50% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: laymen training courses for emergency management are a fundamental component of primary prevention practice. The 81/08 and 158/12 Italian laws have decreed this practice mandatory on the workplace. Following the enforcement of the lockdown and the subsequent interruption of emergency management courses, efforts will be necessary to re-establish and guarantee the high quality training of the pre-pandemic period.

5.
Injury ; 53(5): 1581-1586, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000744

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhage in major trauma is life-threatening and the activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) was found to reduce the time to transfusion and mortality. The purpose was (i) to verify whether MTP activation identifies patients that require massive transfusions once admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), (ii) to establish whether pre-hospital MTP activation reduces the time to transfusion on arrival at the ED, (iii) to identify the variable that best predicts MTP activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study. The MTP was implemented at the end of 2012; it was activated for major trauma in pre-hospital setting on the basis on established criteria. Pre-hospital MTP activation aimed to make blood products available prior to the patients' arrival at the ED. The blood products are transfused when the patient arrives at the hospital. RESULTS: The MTP was activated in pre-hospital setting in 219 patients. On arrival at the hospital, the Trauma Team Leader confirmed MTP activation in 146 (66.7%) patients. Patients with MTP criteria received a higher amount of blood products than the patients without MTP criteria, median 7 (IQR 2-13) units versus 2 (0-6) units, respectively (P < 0.001). At the same time, patients with a Shock Index ≥ 0.9 received more transfusions (5.5 [2-13] units) compared with patients characterized by a lower SI (2 [0-7.25] units, P = 0.009). 146 patients were transfused in the first hour of ED admission. Poisson's multiple regression shows that the SI is the variable that better predicted MTP activation compared to age, gender and the number of injured sites. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital MTP activation is useful to identify patients that require an urgent blood transfusion on arrival at the ED. Further analysis should be considered to evaluate the implementation of the Shock Index as a criterion to activate MTP.


Subject(s)
Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries , Blood Transfusion/methods , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hospitals , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e063633, 2022 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600432

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is burdened with a high rate of ineffective resuscitation and poor neurological outcome among survivors. To date, there are few perfusion assessment tools during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and none of them provide reliable data. Despite the lack of information, physicians must decide whether to extend or terminate resuscitation efforts. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre prospective, observational cohort study, involving adult patients, victims of unexpected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Early Neurological ASsessment with pupillometrY during Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation aims to primarily describe the reliability of quantitative pupillometry through use of the Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) during the manoeuvre of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, as a predictor of the return of spontaneous circulation. The second objective is to seek and describe the association between the NPi and neurological outcome in the surviving cohort. Patients will be excluded if they are less than 18 years of age, have sustained traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular emergencies, direct injury to the eyes or have pupil anomalies. Neurological outcome will be collected at intensive care unit discharge, at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) will be used in the emergency department; modified Rankin Score will be adopted for neurological assessment; biomarkers and neurophysiology exams will be collected as well. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Ethics Committee of Milano. Local committee acceptance is required for each of the centres involved in the clinical and follow-up data collection. Data will be disseminated to the scientific community through original articles submitted to peer-reviewed journals and abstracts to conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05192772.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Neurologic Examination , Observational Studies as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
7.
Acta Biomed ; 92(5): e2021486, 2021 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34738566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is estimated at 1/1000 persons/year. In the pre-Covid-19 era world, OHCA survival rate in Europe was 7-6%. The main objective is to analyze OHCA survival in the Lombardy region by highlighting the factors related to both the victims' characteristics and the chain of survival. METHODS: All OHCAs were grouped into four pre-established periods in 2019 (14-23 January; 15-24 April; 15-24 July; 14-23 October). Following the Utstein method, we selected witnessed OHCAs with presumed cardiac etiology. The outcome of each case was collected in four moments in time: Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), Emergency Department (ED), 24 hours and 30 days. The neurological outcome 30 days after OHCA was also investigated and stratified with the Cerebral Performance Category Score (CPC). RESULTS: We selected 456 cases of OHCA with witnessed cardiac etiology. ROSC was achieved in 121 cases (26.5%), survival in the Emergency Departments in 110 patients (24.1%), after 24 hours in 86 (18.86%) and after 30 days in 72 (15.8%). Male sex was shown to improve OHCA survival. A shockable presentation rhythm, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) performed by bystanders and the activation of Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) positively influenced OHCA outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Males are more predisposed to incur an OHCA event than females, but they have greater chances of survival. Factors most related to survival are: shockable rhythm, bystanders CPR and the activation of a PAD. (www.actabiomedica.it).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Female , Humans , Male , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/etiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
8.
World J Emerg Surg ; 16(1): 39, 2021 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281575

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically strained the health systems worldwide, obligating the reassessment of how healthcare is delivered. In Lombardia, Italy, a Regional Emergency Committee (REC) was established and the regional health system reorganized, with only three hospitals designated as hubs for trauma care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of this reorganization of regional care, comparing the distribution of patients before and during the COVID-19 outbreak and to describe changes in the epidemiology of severe trauma among the two periods. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted using retrospectively collected data from the Regional Trauma Registry of Lombardia (LTR). We compared the data of trauma patients admitted to three hub hospitals before the COVID-19 outbreak (September 1 to November 19, 2019) with those recorded during the pandemic (February 21 to May 10, 2020) in the same hospitals. Demographic data, level of pre-hospital care (Advanced Life Support-ALS, Basic Life Support-BLS), type of transportation, mechanism of injury (MOI), abbreviated injury score (AIS, 1998 version), injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), and ICU admission and survival outcome of all the patients admitted to the three trauma centers designed as hubs, were reviewed. Screening for COVID-19 was performed with nasopharyngeal swabs, chest ultrasound, and/or computed tomography. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, trauma patients admitted to the hubs increased (46.4% vs 28.3%, p < 0.001) with an increase in pre-hospital time (71.8 vs 61.3 min, p < 0.01), while observed in hospital mortality was unaffected. TRISS, ISS, AIS, and ICU admission were similar in both periods. During the COVID-19 outbreak, we observed substantial changes in MOI of severe trauma patients admitted to three hubs, with increases of unintentional (31.9% vs 18.5%, p < 0.05) and intentional falls (8.4% vs 1.2%, p < 0.05), whereas the pandemic restrictions reduced road- related injuries (35.6% vs 60%, p < 0.05). Deaths on scene were significantly increased (17.7% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 outbreak affected the epidemiology of severe trauma patients. An increase in trauma patient admissions to a few designated facilities with high level of care obtained satisfactory results, while COVID-19 patients overwhelmed resources of most other hospitals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Registries , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
9.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 25(1): 1-7, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32940538

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Lombardy region was among the areas most affected by COVID-19 infection worldwide; the Lombardy Emergency Medical System (EMS) responded immediately to this emergency. We analyzed several critical aspects to understand what occurred in that region. METHODS: This retrospective study compares the events managed by the dispatch center and the characteristics of the patients transported to the hospital -age, sex, SpO2, deaths- managed by the EMS in Brescia and Bergamo provinces between March-April 2020 and March-April 2019. Ambulances' waiting time at the hospitals before discharging patients and the patients' severity at emergency department admission were also analyzed. RESULTS: EMS managed 37,340 events in March-April 2020, +51.5% versus 2019. "Breathing" or "Infective" events reported to the dispatch center increased more than ten-fold (OR 25.1, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 and two-fold in April 2020 compared to 2019 (OR 3, p < 0.0001). Deaths increased +246% (OR 1.7, p < 0.0001), and patients not transported to hospital +481% (OR 2.9, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 compared to 2019. In some hospitals, ambulances waited more than one hour before discharging the patients, and the emergency departments doubled the admission of critically ill patients. Transported patients for "Breathing" or "Infective" events were primarily males (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001). The patients had lower SpO2 in 2020 than in 2019 and they were younger. CONCLUSIONS: The Lombardy region experienced an unexpected outbreak in an extremely short timeframe and in a limited area. The EMS coped with this pandemic, covering an extremely higher number of requests, with a ten-fold increase in the number of events managed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ambulances , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness , Disease Outbreaks , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Acta Biomed ; 91(3-S): 111-118, 2020 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32275275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The main objectives of our work were the regional harmonization and standardization of pharmaceutical supplies on MSA in Lombardy. METHODS: The retrospective investigation was articulated in 2 phases: the first was the collection of data in every area of the Region (2012), the second was the analysis and elaboration of the information retrieved. RESULTS: Beginning with 24 common drugs used by 8 AATs out of 12 an evaluation of the chemical-therapeutic characteristics was performed. The temporary list, including over 80 drugs classified in more than 25 therapeutic groups, was finally reduced to provide bags that were easier to handle but at the same time complete. Between October and November 2014, the proposed supply, including 71 formulations and approved by the Technical Board of AREU, officially entered into force. At the same time, the working group followed the same procedure to define the standard equipment for the Region's helicopters, with only 58 formulations for relatively reduced weight allowed on board. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we can state that, thanks to the support of experts, of the literature review, and thanks to the practical experience of the members of the AREU working groups and thanks to the documents coming from AIFA and EMA, the first operative regional project of unified pharmacological supply for MSA was delivered.


Subject(s)
Drug Therapy/standards , Drug Utilization/standards , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Treatment , Humans , Italy , Motor Vehicles , Retrospective Studies
11.
Crit Care Med ; 36(11): 3089-92, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18824902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reduction of cerebral blood flow plays a crucial role in causing posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. However, the methodologic adequacy of studies from which currently used cerebral blood flow thresholds in traumatic brain injury have been derived has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the evidence available on cerebral blood flow thresholds and its methodologic adequacy in adults with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Included were primary studies on adults with traumatic brain injury in which cerebral blood flow thresholds were evaluated and reported, and follow-up brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used as the gold standard for diagnosing the finally infarcted area. RESULTS: Among the 53 diagnostic studies identified, 31 did not report any threshold value, whereas 20 studies used thresholds derived from the literature, mainly animal or clinical studies on ischemic stroke. One study measured cerebral blood flow thresholds, but did not use accepted neuroradiological criteria for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. The remaining study fulfilled all methodologic inclusion criteria, but was restricted to 14 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and cerebral contusion. This study proposed a cerebral blood flow threshold of 15 mL/100 mL/min, with sensitivity and specificity of 43% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral blood flow thresholds for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia are based on weak evidence, and cannot be recommended.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Adult , Animals , Brain Injuries/complications , Humans
12.
Crit Care ; 11(1): R11, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17254336

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Critical illness myopathy and/or neuropathy (CRIMYNE) is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Although complete electrophysiological tests of peripheral nerves and muscles are essential to diagnose it, they are time-consuming, precluding extensive use in daily ICU practice. We evaluated whether a simplified electrophysiological investigation of only two nerves could be used as an alternative to complete electrophysiological tests. METHODS: In this prospective, multi-centre study, 92 ICU patients were subjected to unilateral daily measurements of the action potential amplitude of the sural and peroneal nerves (compound muscle action potential [CMAP]). After the first ten days, complete electrophysiological investigations were carried out weekly until ICU discharge or death. At hospital discharge, complete neurological and electrophysiological investigations were performed. RESULTS: Electrophysiological signs of CRIMYNE occurred in 28 patients (30.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9% to 40.4%). A unilateral peroneal CMAP reduction of more than two standard deviations of normal value showed the best combination of sensitivity (100%) and specificity (67%) in diagnosing CRIMYNE. All patients developed the electrophysiological signs of CRIMYNE within 13 days of ICU admission. Median time from ICU admission to CRIMYNE was six days (95% CI five to nine days). In 10 patients, the amplitude of the nerve action potential dropped progressively over a median of 3.0 days, and in 18 patients it dropped abruptly within 24 hours. Multi-organ failure occurred in 21 patients (22.8%, 95% CI 15.4% to 32.4%) and was strongly associated with CRIMYNE (odds ratio 4.58, 95% CI 1.64 to 12.81). Six patients with CRIMYNE died: three in the ICU and three after ICU discharge. Hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without CRIMYNE (21.4% and 17.2%; p = 0.771). At ICU discharge, electrophysiological signs of CRIMYNE persisted in 18 (64.3%) of 28 patients. At hospital discharge, diagnoses in the 15 survivors were critical illness myopathy (CIM) in six cases, critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) in four, combined CIP and CIM in three, and undetermined in two. CONCLUSION: A peroneal CMAP reduction below two standard deviations of normal value accurately identifies patients with CRIMYNE. These should have full neurological and neurophysiological evaluations before discharge from the acute hospital.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Critical Illness , Muscular Diseases/diagnosis , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Peroneal Nerve/physiology , Sural Nerve/physiology , Electrophysiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Muscular Diseases/etiology , Muscular Diseases/physiopathology , Peripheral Nerves/physiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Stroke ; 37(5): 1334-9, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16574919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) reduction below critical thresholds discriminates between irreversible infarct core, penumbra, and benign oligemia (penumbra that recovers spontaneously). Thresholds are based on animal studies, and their diagnostic accuracy in humans has never been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the evidence available on CBF thresholds for infarct core and penumbra in adult stroke patients. METHODS: Electronic database searching using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library, crosschecking of references, and contact with experts and authors of primary studies was used. Studies on adult stroke patients were included if they compared CBF measurements with a diagnostic gold standard (follow-up brain CT/MRI), and reported CBF thresholds. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. RESULTS: A meta-analysis could not be carried out because of insufficient data. The optimal reported CBF thresholds varied widely, from 14.1 to 35.0 and from 4.8 to 8.4 mL/100 g per minute for penumbra and infarct core, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CBF thresholds in commercial software for imaging methods cannot be recommended without further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Circulation , Stroke , Adult , Databases, Bibliographic , Disease Progression , Humans , Stroke/pathology , Stroke/physiopathology
14.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 11(2): 126-32, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15758592

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the major pathophysiological and diagnostic features of critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP), and to discuss problems concerning the risk factors for CIM and CIP. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of critical illness myopathy and critical illness polyneuropathy is complex, involving metabolic, inflammatory, and bioenergetic alterations. This review cites new evidence supporting several pathogenetic mechanisms. These include microvascular changes in peripheral nerves (with increased endothelial expression of E-selectin), the possible role for an altered lipid serum profile in promoting organ dysfunction (including nerve dysfunction), the damage or inhibition of complex I of the respiratory chain as a cause of muscle ATP depletion and bioenergetic failure, and the activation of specific intracellular proteolytic systems causing myofilament loss and apoptosis in CIM. The diagnostic role of direct muscle stimulation and the rapid quantification of myosin/actin ratio based on electrophoresis are also presented. SUMMARY: Basic and clinical research is unraveling the pathophysiological mechanisms of critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy, and methods for rapid diagnosis are actively investigated. Future studies should better define the population at risk of developing CIM and CIP. In fact, although sepsis, multi-organ failure and steroids are often cited as risk factors, uncertainty remains due to the poor methodological quality of studies, or because of inferences that are exclusively based on animal studies. New simplified diagnostic techniques and machines for electrophysiological investigations of peripheral nerves and muscles in the intensive-care unit (ICU) patient would also be welcome.


Subject(s)
Muscular Diseases/diagnosis , Muscular Diseases/etiology , Polyneuropathies/diagnosis , Polyneuropathies/etiology , Critical Illness , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Muscular Diseases/physiopathology , Polyneuropathies/physiopathology , Risk Factors
15.
Intensive Care Med ; 28(9): 1316-23, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12209283

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the number and quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Intensive Care Medicine. DESIGN: Systematic revision. SETTING: Randomised controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine. STUDY SELECTION: All RCTs published in this journal from its birth to December 2000 identified by MEDLINE and our own research. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The Jadad scale and the individual assessment of key methodological components, namely the randomisation process, blinding and reporting and handling of loss to follow-up, were used to evaluate the quality of reporting. Other information was extracted regarding the design characteristics and the analytical approach. 173 RCTs, 63% of which were from European countries, were analysed. Adequately reported RCTs according to a Jadad scale score of more than 2 were 44 (25.4%). Analysis of individual methodological components revealed a variable percentage of adequate reporting ranging from 3.5% for randomisation to 10.4% for blinding and to 49.1% for loss to follow-up. Sample sizes were small with a median of 30 patients and rationale for its estimation was reported in 7.5%. Despite this, 81.5% of RCTs reported statistically significant results, suggesting that the treatment effects were strong or that a publication bias existed or that the uncertainty principle was not fulfilled. CONCLUSIONS: Randomised controlled trials offer the best evidence of the efficacy of medical interventions, provided that high standards of transparent reporting are used. More resolute attention to the methodological quality of reporting and adherence to recently published guidelines (CONSORT II) may help to achieve this result.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Critical Care , Publication Bias , Quality Control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Periodicals as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...