Preference for biological motion is reduced in ASD: implications for clinical trials and the search for biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remain unclear. Progress has been largely hampered by small sample sizes, variable age ranges and resulting inconsistent findings. There is a pressing need for large definitive studies to delineate the nature and extent of key case/control differences to direct research towards fruitful areas for future investigation. Here we focus on perception of biological motion, a promising index of social brain function which may be altered in ASD. In a large sample ranging from childhood to adulthood, we assess whether biological motion preference differs in ASD compared to neurotypical participants (NT), how differences are modulated by age and sex and whether they are associated with dimensional variation in concurrent or later symptomatology. METHODS: Eye-tracking data were collected from 486 6-to-30-year-old autistic (N = 282) and non-autistic control (N = 204) participants whilst they viewed 28 trials pairing biological (BM) and control (non-biological, CTRL) motion. Preference for the biological motion stimulus was calculated as (1) proportion looking time difference (BM-CTRL) and (2) peak look duration difference (BM-CTRL). RESULTS: The ASD group showed a present but weaker preference for biological motion than the NT group. The nature of the control stimulus modulated preference for biological motion in both groups. Biological motion preference did not vary with age, gender, or concurrent or prospective social communicative skill within the ASD group, although a lack of clear preference for either stimulus was associated with higher social-communicative symptoms at baseline. LIMITATIONS: The paired visual preference we used may underestimate preference for a stimulus in younger and lower IQ individuals. Our ASD group had a lower average IQ by approximately seven points. 18% of our sample was not analysed for various technical and behavioural reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Biological motion preference elicits small-to-medium-sized case-control effects, but individual differences do not strongly relate to core social autism associated symptomatology. We interpret this as an autistic difference (as opposed to a deficit) likely manifest in social brain regions. The extent to which this is an innate difference present from birth and central to the autistic phenotype, or the consequence of a life lived with ASD, is unclear.

Variation in mitochondrial DNA levels in muscle from normal controls. Is depletion of mtDNA in patients with mitochondrial myopathy a distinct clinical syndrome.

Recent studies have identified a group of patients with cytochrome oxidase (COX) deficiency presenting in infancy associated with a deficiency of mtDNA in muscle or other affected tissue (Moraes et al 1991). We used a novel approach to compare the level of mitochondrial (mtDNA) compared to nuclear DNA in skeletal muscle from a group of patients and controls, based on dot blots that were hybridized with a mtDNA probe labelled with 35S[dCTP] and a reference nuclear DNA probe labelled with [32P]dCTP. The ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA varied in samples from different muscles of the same individual. Secondly, fetal muscle had very low levels of mtDNA compared to nuclear DNA, and data from older controls (cross-sectional rather than sequential) suggest that this increases rapidly over the first 3 months after birth and thereafter more slowly. Four patients with COX deficiency had levels of mtDNA that were below the age-specific range defined by 'normal' quadriceps muscle. The clinical features to two of these patients were similar to earlier case reports of mtDNA depletion. In three patients the clinical course was relatively benign compared to cases that have previously been described. Levels of mtDNA in skeletal muscle from some patients with other forms of muscle disease were also found to be low, suggesting that mtDNA depletion, possibly related to depletion of mitochondria, may be a relatively non-specific response of muscle to various pathological processes. However, there does appear to be a distinctive group of young patients with reduced cytochrome oxidase activity in muscle, in whom marked mtDNA depletion reflects the primary defect.