ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty can provide symptomatic relief to patients suffering from macromastia, however complications such as dehiscence are common. It is unknown if the presence of complications may affect patient reported outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (1) determine risk factors for development of complications, and (2) to examine the correlation between postoperative complications and patient reported outcomes in reduction mammaplasty. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received reduction mammaplasties (CPT19318) between 1/17-2/23 by thirteen surgeons. Breast cancer cases and oncoplastic reconstructions were excluded. Patients with >1 complication were grouped into the complications cohort. BREAST-Q-survey was used to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 661 patients were included for analysis, and 131 patients developed at least one complication. Patients in the complication group had significantly higher average ages and body mass indexes, and a higher likelihood of hypertension and diabetes (p<0.01). Among 180 BREAST-Q responders, 41 had at least one complication. There were no significant differences between the two groups across survey outcomes. Although obese patients were more likely to develop infection and require revisions (p<0.01), no significant differences in subgroup analysis of patient-reported outcomes focusing on obese patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with postoperative complications of reduction mammaplasty. Patients with complications had similar postoperative Breast-Q satisfaction to patients without complications. While risk optimization is critical, patients and surgeons should be reassured that satisfaction may be achieved even in the event of a complication.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Microneedling is used to enhance transcutaneous drug delivery. However, the extent to which microneedling devices impact filler delivery and whether this varies by filler type, microneedling device type, and treatment sequence is not known. OBJECTIVE: To histologically assess and quantify the delivery of commonly used fillers through microneedling, using both a microneedling pen and a microneedling roller. In addition, the authors investigated whether there is a variation in filler delivery based on the sequence of microneedling in relation to topical filler application. METHODS: Ex vivo human abdominal skin samples were subjected to microneedling pen or microneedling roller treatment. Black tissue marking ink, hyaluronic acid, poly-l-lactic acid, or undiluted calcium hydroxyapatite was topically applied before or immediately after microneedling treatment. RESULTS: Histological evaluation revealed a notable presence of black ink within channels formed by both microneedling treatments (15.5%-98.1%), whereas there was limited presence of the various filler types tested (0%-6.6%) in all settings. Topical application before microneedling treatment led to relatively higher filler/ink deposition within the channels formed by the microneedling treatments compared with topical application after microneedling. CONCLUSION: Transcutaneous delivery of fillers was not significantly helped by microneedling treatment, whereas the microneedling devices demonstrated effective delivery of an aqueous solution.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical students who attend institutions without plastic surgery residency programs are at a disadvantage in the plastic surgery match. We developed an educational program for medical students without home programs called Explore Plastic Surgery to provide an overview of the steps toward a career in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact, utility, and success of the novel program. METHODS: Pre- and postevent surveys were distributed to participants. Survey data were analyzed including participant demographics, perceptions of barriers unique to those without home programs, and the overall event utility. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen students registered for the program. Ninety-five participants completed the pre-event survey (44%), and of those, 57 participants completed the post-event survey (60%). There was an increase in understanding of the steps toward a career in plastic surgery ( P < 0.001), confidence in overcoming barriers ( P = 0.005), and level of comfort in reaching out to faculty for opportunities ( P = 0.01). There was a decrease in the perceived negative impact that attending medical schools without a home program will have on their abilities to pursue careers in plastic surgery ( P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: After the event, participants demonstrated an increase in their confidence in overcoming barriers and a decrease in their perceptions that attending an institution without a home program would negatively impact their ability to pursue plastic surgery. Initiatives focused on early exposure and recruitment of medical students may be important to promote accessibility and diversity within plastic surgery.