Investigating somatic variants and pathways in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal carcinoma in South Africa.

AIMS: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and an emerging public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. Several authors have described an increased frequency of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) CRC in sub-Saharan Africa, but these tumours remain poorly characterised molecularly. We sought to interrogate the somatic molecular genetic landscape of dMMR CRC in a cohort of young patients to better inform Lynch syndrome (LS) screening strategies and personalised medicine approaches in our setting. METHODS: 32 patients (aged <60 years) were identified with dMMR CRC. DNA was extracted from selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue resection samples and subjected to amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were detected in the corresponding MMR gene in 14 of 18 (78%) MLH1/PMS2-deficient tumours, 5 of 8 (63%) MSH2/MSH6-deficient tumours, 1 of 4 (25%) tumours with isolated MSH6 loss and 0 of 2 tumours with isolated PMS2 loss. Previously unreported variants were identified in MLH1 (three) and MSH2 (one). Cases with a variant allele frequency suggesting a germline mutation were identified in MLH1 (eight), MSH2 (two) and MSH6 (one). Only one MMR gene variant was detected in more than one patient (MLH1 p.Q510*). Four POLE/POLD1 exonuclease domain variants were identified, one of which was previously unreported. CONCLUSION: The spectrum of disease-causing MMR gene variants in our population necessitates NGS testing for LS screening. This study also highlights the role of somatic testing on readily available FFPE samples to generate data on the epidemiology of CRC in different settings.

The elephant in the room: Exploring the influence and participation of patients in infection-related care across surgical pathways in South Africa and India.

OBJECTIVE: The irrational use of antibiotics is a leading contributor to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) interventions predominantly focus on prescribers. This study investigated the influence and participation of inpatients in infection-related care, including antibiotic decision-making, within and across two tertiary hospitals in South Africa (Cape Town) and India (Kerala). METHODS: Through ethnographic enquiry of clinical practice in surgical pathways, including direct nonparticipant observation of clinical practices, healthcare worker (HCW), patient and carer interactions in surgical ward rounds and face-to-face interviews with participants (HCWs and patients), we sought to capture the implicit and explicit influence that patients and carers have in infection-related care. Field notes and interview transcripts were thematically coded, aided by NVivo 12® Pro software. RESULTS: Whilst observational data revealed the nuanced roles that patients/carers play in antibiotic decision-making, HCWs did not recognize these roles. Patients and carers, though invested in patient care, are not routinely involved, nor are they aware of the opportunities for engagement in infection-related decision-making. Patients associated clinical improvement with antibiotic use and did not consider hospitalization to be associated with infection acquisition or transmission, highlighting a lack of understanding of the threat of infection and antibiotic resistance. Patients' economic and cultural positionalities may influence their infection-related behaviours. In the study site in India, cultural norms mean that carers play widespread but unrecognized roles in inpatient care, participating in infection prevention activities. CONCLUSION: For patients to have a valuable role in AS and make informed decisions regarding their infection-related care, a mutual understanding of their role in this process among HCWs and patients is crucial. The observed differences between the two study sites indicate the critical need for understanding and addressing the contextual drivers that impact effective patient-centred healthcare delivery. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Ethnographic observations and interviews conducted in this study involved patients as participants. Patients were recruited for interviews after obtaining signed informed consent forms. Patients' identities were completely anonymized when presenting the study findings.

Genomic landscape of colorectal carcinoma in sub-Saharan Africa.

Our understanding of the molecular classification of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has evolved significantly over the past two decades. Tumours can be broadly categorised as microsatellite stable (MSS), microsatellite instability (MSI) or CpG island-methylator phenotype. Prognostic and predictive information is provided by these categories. The overwhelming majority of the data on which these categories are based have originated from Europe and North America. There is a dearth of information represented from Africa and indigenous African patients. However, some small studies and preliminary data have shown significant differences in all of these groups. The prevalence of MSI in Africa is consistently reported as almost double that of European and North American data. Interestingly, BRAF V600E mutations and MLH1 promotor hypermethylation seem to be uncommon in Africa. The high proportion of MSI tumours is only partly accounted for by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome), suggesting that there are likely to be other mechanisms at play. Within the MSS group, preliminary data suggest that the typical molecular pathways (Wingless/Integrated pathway activation) may not be as dominant in Africa. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current state of the molecular genetic landscape of CRC in Africa and provide insights into areas for further study.

Survey of healthcare worker perceptions of changes in infection control and antimicrobial stewardship practices in India and South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To identify perceptions and awareness of changes in infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in India and South Africa (SA). Method: A self-administered online survey which included participant demographics, knowledge and sources of COVID-19 infection, perceived risks and barriers, and self-efficacy. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: The study received 321 responses (response rate: 89.2%); 131/321 (40.8%) from India and 190/321 (59.2%) from SA; male to female response rate was 3:2, with majority of respondents aged 40-49 (89/321, 27.7%) and 30-39 (87/321, 27.1%) years. Doctors comprised 47.9% (57/119) of respondents in India and 74.6% (135/181) in SA. Majority of respondents in India (93/119, 78.2%) and SA (132/181, 72.9%) were from the private and public sectors, respectively, with more respondents in SA (123/174, 70.7%) than in India (38/104, 36.5%) involved in antimicrobial prescribing.Respondents reported increased IPC practices since the pandemic and noted a need for more training on case management, antibiotic and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. While they noted increased antibiotic prescribing since the pandemic, they did not generally associate their practice with such an increase. A willingness to be vaccinated, when vaccination becomes available, was expressed by 203/258 (78.7%) respondents. Conclusions: HCWs reported improved IPC practices and changes in antibiotic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted education on correct use of PPE was an identified gap. Although HCWs expressed concerns about antimicrobial resistance, their self-perceived antibiotic prescribing practices seemed unchanged. Additional studies in other settings could explore how our findings fit other contexts.

Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Preoperative Anemia Undergoing Colectomy for Colon Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative anemia is relatively common in colon cancer patients; however, its impact on short-term surgical outcomes is not well established. The aim of our study was to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes in colon cancer patients with preoperative anemia undergoing colectomy. METHODS: We performed a 4-year analysis of the ACS-NSQIP and included all adult patients who underwent colectomy for colon cancer. Patients were stratified into two groups based on preoperative anemia (Preop Anemia, No Preop Anemia). Our outcome measures were 30-day complications, 30-day unplanned readmissions, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 35,243 colon cancer patients who underwent colectomy were included in the analysis, of whom 50.4% had preoperative anemia. The mean age was 65 ± 13 years and the mean hemoglobin level was 12 ± 2 g/dL. Patients in the anemia group were more likely to be African American, have higher ASA class ≥3, and were more likely to receive at least 1 unit of packed red blood cells preoperatively (7.1% versus 0.3%, P < 0.01). Patients in the anemia group had higher rates of 30-day complications (34.5% versus 16.6%, P < 0.01), 30-day readmission related to the principal procedure (11.7% versus 8.7%, P < 0.01), and 30-day mortality (3.1% versus 1%, P < 0.01). On regression analysis, preoperative anemia was independently associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (P < 0.01), but not 30-day readmission, or 30-day mortality (P = 0.464 and P = 0.362 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia appears to be associated with postoperative complications. Preoperatively optimizing hemoglobin levels may lead to improved outcomes.

Patient understanding of and participation in infection-related care across surgical pathways: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the existing evidence on patient understanding of and/or participation in infection-related care in surgical specialties. METHOD: A scoping review of the literature was conducted. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature sources were searched using predefined search criteria for policies, guidelines, and studies in the English language. Data synthesis was done through content and thematic analysis to identify key themes in the included studies. RESULTS: The initial search identified 604 studies, of which 41 (36 from high-income and five from low- and middle-income countries) were included in the final review. Most of the included studies focused on measures to engage patients in infection prevention and control (IPC) activities, with few examples of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement strategies. While patient engagement interventions in infection-related care varied depending on study goals, surgical wound management was the most common intervention. AMS engagement was primarily limited to needs assessment, without follow-up to address such needs. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence highlights a gap in patient participation in infection-related care in the surgical pathway. Standardization of patient engagement strategies is challenging, particularly in the context of surgery, where several factors influence how the patient can engage and retain information. Infection-related patient engagement and participation strategies in surgery need to be inclusive and contextually fit.

Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review.

Importance: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (younger than 50 years) is rising globally, the reasons for which are unclear. It appears to represent a unique disease process with different clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics compared with late-onset colorectal cancer. Data on oncological outcomes are limited, and sensitivity to conventional neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy regimens appear to be unknown. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature on early-onset colorectal cancer. Observations: Within the next decade, it is estimated that 1 in 10 colon cancers and 1 in 4 rectal cancers will be diagnosed in adults younger than 50 years. Potential risk factors include a Westernized diet, obesity, antibiotic usage, and alterations in the gut microbiome. Although genetic predisposition plays a role, most cases are sporadic. The full spectrum of germline and somatic sequence variations implicated remains unknown. Younger patients typically present with descending colonic or rectal cancer, advanced disease stage, and unfavorable histopathological features. Despite being more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, patients with early-onset disease demonstrate comparable oncological outcomes with their older counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: The clinicopathological features, underlying molecular profiles, and drivers of early-onset colorectal cancer differ from those of late-onset disease. Standardized, age-specific preventive, screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies are required to optimize outcomes.

Visual mapping of team dynamics and communication patterns on surgical ward rounds: an ethnographic study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of team dynamics on infection management and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) behaviours is not well understood. Using innovative visual mapping, alongside traditional qualitative methods, we studied how surgical team dynamics and communication patterns influence infection-related decision making. MATERIALS/METHODS: Between May and November 2019, data were gathered through direct observations of ward rounds and face-to-face interviews with ward round participants in three high infection risk surgical specialties at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Sociograms, a visual mapping method, mapped content and flow of communication and the social links between participants. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Data were gathered from 70 hours of ward round observations, including 1024 individual patient discussions, 60 sociograms and face-to-face interviews with 61 healthcare professionals. AMS and infection-related discussions on ward rounds vary across specialties and are affected by the content and structure of the clinical update provided, consultant leadership styles and competing priorities at the bedside. Registrars and consultants dominate the discussions, limiting the input of other team members with recognised roles in AMS and infection management. Team hierarchies also manifest where staff position themselves, and this influences their contribution to active participation in patient care. Leadership styles affect ward-round dynamics, determining whether nurses and patients are actively engaged in discussions on infection management and antibiotic therapy and whether actions are assigned to identified persons. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical bedside ward round remains a medium of communication between registrars and consultants, with little interaction with the patient or other healthcare professionals. A team-focused and inclusive approach could result in more effective decision making about infection management and AMS.

Investigating infection management and antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: a qualitative study from India and South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the drivers for infection management and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) across high-infection-risk surgical pathways. METHODS: A qualitative study-ethnographic observation of clinical practices, patient case studies, and face-to-face interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients-was conducted across cardiovascular and thoracic and gastrointestinal surgical pathways in South Africa (SA) and India. Aided by Nvivo 11 software, data were coded and analysed until saturation was reached. The multiple modes of enquiry enabled cross-validation and triangulation of findings. RESULTS: Between July 2018 and August 2019, data were gathered from 190 hours of non-participant observations (138 India, 72 SA), interviews with HCPs (44 India, 61 SA), patients (six India, eight SA), and case studies (four India, two SA). Across the surgical pathway, multiple barriers impede effective infection management and AMS. The existing implicit roles of HCPs (including nurses and senior surgeons) are overlooked as interventions target junior doctors, bypassing the opportunity for integrating infection-related care across the surgical team. Critically, the ownership of decisions remains with the operating surgeons, and entrenched hierarchies restrict the inclusion of other HCPs in decision-making. The structural foundations to enable staff to change their behaviours and participate in infection-related surgical care are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the implicit existing HCP roles in infection management is critical and will facilitate the development of effective and transparent processes across the surgical team for optimized care. Applying a framework approach that includes nurse leadership, empowering pharmacists and engaging surgical leads, is essential for integrated AMS and infection-related care.

Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for 'loss of domain' (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdominal wall surgeons. METHODS: A Delphi study involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons was performed. Four written and two volumetric definitions of LOD were identified via systematic review. Panelists completed a questionnaire that suggested these definitions as standardized definitions of LOD. Consensus on a preferred term was pre-defined as achieved when selected by ≥80% of panelists. Terms scoring <20% were removed. RESULTS: Voting commenced August 2018 and was completed in January 2019. Written definition: During Round 1, two definitions were removed and seven new definitions were suggested, leaving nine definitions for consideration. For Round 2, panelists were asked to select all appealing definitions. Thereafter, common concepts were identified during analysis, from which the facilitators advanced a new written definition. This received 100% agreement in Round 3. Volumetric definition: Initially, panelists were evenly split, but consensus for the Sabbagh method was achieved. Panelists could not reach consensus regarding a threshold LOD value that would preclude surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus for written and volumetric definitions of LOD was achieved from 20 internationally recognized AWR surgeons. Adoption of these definitions will help standardize the use of LOD for both clinical and academic activities.