Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 72(3): 206-207, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728684

ABSTRACT

In aortic valve repair, whilst performing a Yacoub remodelling operation, the external annuloplasty of the aortic ring plays a very important role. Here we present an adjustable external Dacron annuloplasty as an additional tool, in very selected cases, that can help surgeons to further improve their immediate results thus influencing the long-term ones.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Polyethylene Terephthalates , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty/methods
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 307: 130-135, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32067832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative myocardial fibrosis and remodeling impact on outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We aimed at investigating the prognostic impact of preoperative electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of left ventricular (LV) myocardial damage, i.e. bundle branch block (BBB) and ECG strain pattern after (surgical or transcatheter) AVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: Between April 2008 and October 2017, we explored consecutive patients referred to our Heart Valve Clinic for first AVR for severe AS. Detailed pre-operative phenotyping and ECG analysis were performed. Patients were followed-up after AVR for major cardiac events (ME), i.e. cardiovascular death, cardiac hospitalization for acute heart failure and stroke. RESULTS: BBB and ECG strain were respectively observed in 13.5 and 21% of the 1122 patients included. These ECG markers identified a subgroup of older patients, with higher NYHA class and more advanced myocardial disease as detected by echocardiography, i.e. higher LV mass and lower LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain and integrated backscatter, than patients without ECG strain or BBB. ME occurred in 212 (18.6%) patients during a mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 1.5 years with higher incidence in case of ECG strain or BBB (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.13-2.14, p = 0.006; HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.02-2.13, p = 0.04 respectively). The prognostic value of ECG strain remained significant after adjustment for age, diabetes and pre-operative LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative ECG markers of myocardial damage identify a subgroup of AS patients at high risk of post-AVR cardiovascular complications irrespective of other prognostic factors and should help the multiparametric staging of cardiac damage to guide AVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Biomarkers , Electrocardiography , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL