Abdominal compartment syndrome and intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: diagnostic value of computed tomography.

AIMS: The aims of the present work were to reevaluate, prospectively, the diagnostic value of already-described computed tomography (CT) landmarks of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and to study the diagnostic value of some undescribed CT signs for the diagnosis of IAH and ACS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in shock for whom an abdominal CT was clinically indicated were included. CT examinations were reviewed and scored by two reviewers for the 12 proposed CT features of IAH and ACS. Intravesical pressure (IVP) was measured for each patient. Imaging features and clinical data of patients with IAH (IVP ≥ 12 mmHg) were compared to those of patients with normal intra-abdominal pressure (IVP < 12 mmHg). RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included. Twenty-one patients (51%) presented IAH with an IVP value ≥ 12 mmHg. Four patients (10%) were considered to have ACS (10%). Only an increased peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio (PAR) was associated with the presence of IAH (PAR = 0.45 [0.40-0.49] in patients with IVP < 12 mmHg and PAR = 0.52 [0.48-0.53] in patients with IVP ≥ 12 mmHg; p < 0.001). Increased PAR ≥ 0.52 had a specificity of 85% for IAH diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that a PAR ≥ 0.52 could help radiologists to identify IAH on abdominal CT scan and could lead to adequate identification and/or treatment, even at early stages of IAH. KEY POINTS: • CT is an efficient first-intention procedure to evaluate and follow up underlying conditions in critically ill patients at risk of IAH and ACS overcome. • Raising the possibility of an IAH on a CT examination is relevant information for the clinician. • The only factors associated with intra-abdominal hypertension were the peritoneal-to-abdominal height ratio (PAR) and the ratio of maximal anteroposterior to transverse abdominal diameter (which define the round belly sign when > 0.8).

Acute appendicitis: Factors associated with inconclusive ultrasound study and the need for additional computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To identify variables associated with inconclusive ultrasound examination and the need for further abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) examination for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 adult patients with acute appendicitis were included. There were 55 patients (38 men, 17 women; mean age, 23±9 [SD] years; range: 15-58 years) with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis using ultrasound alone and 50 patients (30 men, 20 women; mean age, 31±14 [SD] years; range: 16-83 years) who required further CT. Demographic, clinical, and biological criteria and appendix location were compared between the two groups to search for variables associated with the need of further CT. RESULTS: Patients who required further CT were older (31.1±14 [SD] years) and had a greater body mass index (BMI) (26.7±4.3 [SD]kg/m2) than those who did not require CT (23±9 [SD] years and 22.9±3.4 [SD]kg/m2), respectively (P<0.01). A greater proportion of patients with complicated acute appendicitis was observed in patients who required further CT (9/50; 18%) than in those who had only ultrasound (1/55; 2%) (P=0.012). Atypical appendix location was more frequent in patients who required CT (19/50; 36%) than in those who had only ultrasound (6/55; 11%) (P<0.001). There were no significant differences regarding gender, inflammatory syndrome and hours of imaging (on call vs. working hours) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Advanced age, high BMI, atypical appendix location, and complicated appendicitis are associated with inconclusive ultrasound and the need for further CT to diagnose acute appendicitis.