Gene Panel Sequencing of Patients With Monogenic Diabetes Brings to Light Genes Typically Associated With Syndromic Presentations.

Gene panel sequencing (NGS) offers the possibility of analyzing rare forms of monogenic diabetes (MgD). To that end, 18 genes were analyzed in 1,676 patients referred for maturity-onset diabetes of the young genetic testing. Among the 307 patients with a molecular diagnosis of MgD, 55 (17.9%) had a mutation in a gene associated with a genetic syndrome. Of the patients with mutations, 8% (n = 25) carried the m.3243A>G variant associated with maternally inherited diabetes and deafness. At the time of referral very few had reported hearing loss or any other element of the typical syndromic presentation. Of the patients, 6% had mutation in HNF1B even though the typical extrapancreatic features were not known at the time of referral. Surprisingly, the third most prominent etiology in these rare forms was the WFS1 gene, accounting for 2.9% of the patients with pathogenic mutations (n = 9). None of them displayed a Wolfram syndrome presentation even though some features were reported in six of nine patients. To restrict the analysis of certain genes to patients with the respective specific phenotypes would be to miss those with partial presentations. These results therefore underlie the undisputable benefit of NGS strategies even though the situation implies cascade consequences both for the molecular biologist and for the clinician.

Functional characterization of ABCC8 variants of unknown significance based on bioinformatics predictions, splicing assays, and protein analyses: Benefits for the accurate diagnosis of congenital hyperinsulinism.

ABCC8 encodes the SUR1 subunit of the ß-cell ATP-sensitive potassium channel whose loss of function causes congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). Molecular diagnosis is critical for optimal management of CHI patients. Unfortunately, assessing the impact of ABCC8 variants on RNA splicing remains very challenging as this gene is poorly expressed in leukocytes. Here, we performed bioinformatics analysis and cell-based minigene assays to assess the impact on splicing of 13 ABCC8 variants identified in 20 CHI patients. Next, channel properties of SUR1 proteins expected to originate from minigene-detected in-frame splicing defects were analyzed after ectopic expression in COSm6 cells. Out of the analyzed variants, seven induced out-of-frame splicing defects and were therefore classified as recessive pathogenic, whereas two led to skipping of in-frame exons. Channel functional analysis of the latter demonstrated their pathogenicity. Interestingly, the common rs757110 SNP increased exon skipping in our system suggesting that it may act as a disease modifier factor. Our strategy allowed determining the pathogenicity of all selected ABCC8 variants, and CHI-inheritance pattern for 16 out of the 20 patients. This study highlights the value of combining RNA and protein functional approaches in variant interpretation and reveals the minigene splicing assay as a new tool for CHI molecular diagnostics.

Methylation Tolerance-Based Functional Assay to Assess Variants of Unknown Significance in the MLH1 and MSH2 Genes and Identify Patients With Lynch Syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately 75% of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome carry variants in MLH1 or MSH2, proteins encoded by these genes are required for DNA mismatch repair (MMR). However, 30% of these are variants of unknown significance (VUS). A assay that measures cell response to the cytotoxic effects of a methylating agent can determine the effects of VUS in MMR genes and identify patients with constitutional MMR-deficiency syndrome. We adapted this method to test the effects of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 genes found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome. METHODS: We transiently expressed MLH1 or MSH2 variants in MLH1- or MSH2-null human colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 or LoVo), respectively. The MMR process causes death of cells with methylation-damaged DNA bases, so we measured proportions of cells that undergo death following exposure to the methylating agent; cells that escaped its toxicity were considered to have variants that affect function of the gene product. Using this assay, we analyzed 88 variants (mainly missense variants), comprising a validation set of 40 previously classified variants (19 in MLH1 and 21 in MSH2) and a prospective set of 48 VUS (25 in MLH1 and 23 in MSH2). Prediction scores were calculated for all VUS according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, based on clinical, somatic, in silico, population, and functional data. RESULTS: The assay correctly classified 39 of 40 variants in the validation set. The assay identified 12 VUS that did alter function of the gene product and 28 VUS that did not; the remaining 8 VUS had intermediate effects on MMR capacity and could not be classified. Comparison of assay results with prediction scores confirmed the ability of the assay to discriminate VUS that affected the function of the gene products from those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Using an assay that measures the ability of the cells to undergo death following DNA damage induction by a methylating agent, we were able to assess whether variants in MLH1 and MSH2 cause defects in DNA MMR. This assay might be used to help assessing the pathogenicity of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome.