The First Case Report of West Nile Virus-Induced Acute Flaccid Quadriplegia in Canada.

The 1999 New York City outbreak of West Nile virus (WNV) was associated with a high incidence of West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease (WNVND) where the outcomes for these patients were very poor. We describe a case of West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease (WNVND) characterized by acute flaccid quadriplegia with a favorable outcome in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Patient-driven hand hygiene audit process at a regional cancer center.

A patient-driven hand hygiene compliance audit strategy was piloted in a Canadian provincial cancer agency during routine provision of cancer outpatient care by health care providers (physicians, nurses, and health care aides) under conditions where the deployment of an independent external auditor was not feasible. The results of the audit suggest the feasibility of this approach as a routine institutional performance metric.

There should be no ESKAPE for febrile neutropenic cancer patients: the dearth of effective antibacterial drugs threatens anticancer efficacy.

The success of modern anticancer treatment is a composite function of enhanced efficacy of surgical, radiation and systemic treatment strategies and of our collective clinical abilities in supporting patients through the perils of their cancer journeys. Despite the widespread availability of antibacterial therapies, the threat of community- or healthcare facility-acquired bacterial infection remains a constant risk to patients during this journey. The rising prevalence of colonization by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in the population, acquired through exposure from endemic environments, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control strategies notwithstanding, increases the likelihood that such organisms may be the cause of cancer treatment-related infection and the likelihood of antibacterial treatment failure. The high mortality associated with invasive MDR bacterial infection increases the likelihood that many patients may not survive long enough to reap the benefits of enhanced anticancer treatments, thus threatening the societal investment in the cancer journey. Since cancer care providers arguably no longer have, and are unlikely to have in the foreseeable future, the antibacterial tools to reliably rescue patients from harm's way, the difficult ethical debate over the risks and benefits of anticancer treatments must now be reopened.

Neutropenic fever syndromes in patients undergoing cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Fever represents the major surrogate of infection in neutropenic cancer patients. A number of neutropenic fever syndromes have been recognized, the causes and significance of which will vary depending upon the clinical context. First neutropenic fever syndromes are typically of bacterial origin, the character of which may be influenced by whether antibacterial chemoprophylaxis has been administered. Persistent neutropenic fevers are documented during the empirical systemic antibacterial therapy for the first neutropenic fever, the cause of which is likely outside the spectrum of activity of the initial therapy. Recrudescent neutropenic fevers, defined by the appearance of a new fever after defervescence of the first fever, are often a function of invasive fungal infection or gram-positive infections outside the spectrum of the initial empirical antibacterial regimen. The myeloid reconstitution syndrome occurs in parallel with neutrophil recovery from aplasia and may not necessarily represent new infection. Recognition of these patterns can help the clinician make better clinical judgments and management plans.

Invasive fungal infection in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: epidemiology from the transplant physician's viewpoint.

The practice of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has undergone many changes that affect the likelihood that a given patient would develop an invasive fungal infection (IFI). The risks for IFI and the types of IFI that may occur are not continuous over the time course after transplantation. IFIs vary with the events that occur during the pre-engraftment neutropenic period, the early post-engraftment period until approximately day 100 post-transplant, and those in the late post-engraftment period after day 100. A number of well-recognized transplant recipient-, transplant procedure-, and transplant complication-related factors play a role in the likelihood of IFI. Important recipient-related factors include age, state of the underlying disease for which the HSCT is being done, and treatment-related history. Transplant procedure-related factors include the type of transplant (autologous or allogeneic), the use of and timing of anti-fungal prevention strategies including whether or not the transplant was conducted in a protected environment to minimize environmental exposure to mould conidia, the choice of conditioning (myeloablative or non-myeloablative), human leucocyte antigen-relatedness [autologous, matched related, mismatched related (including haploidentical pairings), unrelated (matched or mismatched)], stem cell source (bone marrow, peripheral, or cord blood), stem cell dosing, and stem cell product processing (red cell, plasma, or T-lymphocyte depletions, or CD34 selections). Transplant-related complications include duration of pre-engraftment period of neutropenia, graft failure or rejection, the degree of cytotoxic conditioning therapy-related intestinal mucosal damage, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), the use of corticosteroids for the prevention or management of GvHD, the presence of cytomegalovirus infection and disease. The interaction of these factors over a given patient's journey through HSCT conspires to promote or reduce the overall IFI risk and set the conditions for the development of any given IFI. The following discussion attempts to look at this from the perspective of the transplant physician struggling to account for these interactions and their attendant risks for IFI.

Intestinal mucosal dysfunction and infection during remission-induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Intestinal barrier function was prospectively examined in the course of a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lisofylline for reducing cytotoxic therapy-induced intestinal epithelial damage-related infectious morbidity in patients receiving standard remission-induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. The absorption and permeation of oral D-Xylose, lactulose and mannitol were measured weekly from baseline until marrow recovery in adult recipients of idarubicin plus cytarabine for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia. These studies were correlated with non-haematologic chemotherapy-related toxicities reflecting mucosal damage, including nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and systemic infection. D-xylose absorption decreased and lactulose:mannitol ratio reflecting intestinal permeability increased from baseline until the second and third week after the beginning of the treatment followed by recovery. These measures correlated with infection rates, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and increased blood product utilization. Lisofylline was associated with increased intestinal permeability, nausea, vomiting and infection-related morbidity despite a reduction in the duration of neutropaenia. These surrogates of intestinal barrier function correlated well with clinically important outcomes despite the failure to demonstrate reduced morbidity with lisofylline and represent useful objective outcome measurements for future clinical trials of products for the amelioration of the effects of cytotoxic therapy on the intestinal mucosa.

A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer requires antibacterial regimens active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. This study was performed to demonstrate the noninferiority of monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam, compared with cefepime. METHODS: We conducted a randomized-controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial among high-risk patients from 34 university-affiliated tertiary care medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia who were undergoing treatment for leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and were hospitalized for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes. Patients received piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g every 6 h) or cefepime (2 g every 8 h) intravenously. The primary outcome was success (defined by defervescence without treatment modification) at 72 h of treatment, end of treatment, and test of cure in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, microbiological efficacy, the additional use of glycopeptide antibiotics, emergence of resistant bacteria, and safety. RESULTS: For 528 subjects (265 received piperacillin-tazobactam and 263 received cefepime), success rates were 57.7% and 48.3%, respectively (P = .04) at the 72-h time point, 39.6% and 31.6% (P = .06) at end of treatment, and 26.8% and 20.5% (P = .11) at the test-of-cure visit. The analyses demonstrated noninferiority for piperacillin-tazobactam at all time points (P< or = .0001). Treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam was independently associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.64; P = .035). Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the noninferiority and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy, compared with cefepime, for the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Management of the febrile neutropenic cancer patient: lessons from 40 years of study.

Almost forty years ago the relationship between the circulating neutrophil count and the risk of pyogenic infection was established. Since that time, through the vehicle of clinical trials, much has been learnt about the etiologies, risk factors, pathogenesis, and natural history of first and subsequent febrile neutropenic episodes. Refinements to the empirical antibacterial management has reduced infection-related mortality to less than 10 percent. Algorithmic approaches to persistent fever in the setting of severe neutropenia have been developed. Circumstances wherein preventative strategies are most efficacious have been defined. Clinicians have learned that neutropenic patients comprise a heterogeneous population that does not encounter the same risks for infection-related morbidity and mortality. Tailored stratified approaches to management of the febrile neutropenic patient have been developed that are safe and cost-effective.

Long-term antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

The risks for invasive fungal infections, particularly mould infections such as invasive aspergillosis, among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are linked to the duration and severity of myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Strategies to prevent invasive fungal infections have focused primarily on the use of orally administered azole antifungal agents during the neutropenic period rather than on the more prolonged post-engraftment period. The major limitations of these studies included the heterogeneity among the subjects studied for fungal infection risk factors, the agents administered, the dosing, and duration of prophylaxis. More recent studies have attempted to examine the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis strategies among allogeneic HSCT recipients to day 100 and beyond. It is clear that a variety of products have efficacy in preventing invasive candidiasis, including imidazole and triazole antifungals, low-dose amphotericin B, and the echinocandin, micafungin; however, only the extended spectrum azole, itraconazole, has been shown to impact the incidence of proven invasive aspergillosis. Other extended spectrum azole antifungal agents, voriconazole and posaconazole, are being studied as long-term prophylaxis in high-risk HSCT recipients. While clinical trials have suggested that a duration of prophylaxis against moulds of six months or more may be required, it remains unclear if this is required in all cases. The prophylactic efficacy over time may be linked to the degree of immunosuppression as measured by markers such as the numbers of circulating CD4 T lymphocytes. Concerns about selection for resistant moulds among long-term recipients of these drugs are emerging. The cumulative experience to date suggests that long-term antifungal chemoprophylaxis is feasible and effective when applied in defined circumstances. The concerns about treatment-related toxicities, resistance, and costs are valid.

Invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients.

The incidence of invasive aspergillosis is increasing parallel to the intensity of immunosuppressive and myelosuppressive anticancer treatments. Successful management is linked to an understanding of the pathogenesis and recognition of risk factors. Identifying the patients and clinical circumstances associated with the highest risk for invasive aspergillosis and managing patients in protected environments remain the most effective means of prevention. Early accurate diagnosis continues to be a challenge; however, newer non-culture-based methods are encouraging and have been incorporated into standardized case definitions. Unacceptably high mortality rates persist with current treatment of established infection. Among the newer potentially less toxic antifungal therapies are the triazoles, and lipid-based polyene-formulations that target the fungal cell membrane and 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase inhibitors that target the fungal cell wall. These agents are currently in clinical trials. Host defense augmentation using hematopoietic growth factors with or without other cytokines such as interferon-gamma or hematopoietic growth factor-stimulated neutrophil transfusions remain controversial strategies that have yet to be tested in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose limiting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. DESIGN: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equivalence. SETTING: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries. PATIENTS: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous amphotericin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution. MEASUREMENTS: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related adverse events, and death. RESULTS: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therapy was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days, respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 patients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphotericin B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.8 to 19.5 percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itraconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P = 0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lower with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphotericin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infections (5 patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itraconazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Sixty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent efficacy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, itraconazole is associated with significantly less toxicity.

Need for alternative trial designs and evaluation strategies for therapeutic studies of invasive mycoses.

Studies of invasive fungal infections have been and remain difficult to implement. Randomized clinical trials of fungal infections are especially slow and expensive to perform because it is difficult to identify eligible patients in a timely fashion, to prove the presence of the fungal infection in an unequivocal fashion, and to evaluate outcome in a convincing fashion. Because of these challenges, licensing decisions for antifungal agents have to date depended heavily on historical control comparisons and secondary advantages of the new agent. Although the availability of newer and potentially more effective agents makes these approaches less desirable, the fundamental difficulties of trials of invasive fungal infections have not changed. Therefore, there is a need for alternative trial designs and evaluation strategies for therapeutic studies of invasive mycoses, and this article summarizes the possible strategies in this area.

Impact of fluconazole prophylaxis on fungal colonization and infection rates in neutropenic patients. The Canadian Fluconazole Study.

Fungal colonization profiles from four different anatomical sites were evaluated in 266 neutropenic cancer patients receiving intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute leukaemia or for autologous marrow transplantation. At the beginning of chemotherapy patients were allocated randomly to receive oral fluconazole 400 mg daily or an identical placebo until prophylaxis failure or marrow recovery. Candida albicans colonization was reduced from 30 to 10% in the fluconazole recipients while it increased from 32 to 57% in the placebo patients (P<0.001). By the end of prophylaxis, colonization with non-albicans Candida species increased from 7 to 21% and 8 to 18% in the fluconazole and placebo patients, respectively (P = 0.396). Although Candida glabrata was isolated more frequently at the end of the prophylactic period in the fluconazole patients than in the placebo patients (16 versus 7%), only one definite invasive C. glabrata infection was noted. Overall, definite invasive fungal infections were documented in 26 patients [four fluconazole versus 22 placebo patients (P< or =0.001)]. In 23 (92%) patients the infections were caused by persistently colonizing or newly acquired organisms. While probable invasive fungal infections were noted in five fluconazole patients, 10 placebo patients were also affected (P = 0.19). An end-of-prophylaxis colonization index >0.25 was 76% sensitive but only 69% specific for invasive fungal infection. However, a colonization index < or =0.25 at baseline had a negative predictive value of 88% for development of invasive fungal infection. Fluconazole prophylaxis decreased colonization by fungi and subsequent invasive fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.

Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life.

PURPOSE: To examine the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life of venous access ports implanted at the outset of a course of intravenous cancer chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults beginning a course of intravenous chemotherapy at two university-affiliated hospitals were randomly allocated to have venous access using a surgically implanted venous access port (Port-a-Cath; Pharmacia, Canada Inc, Montreal, Québec, Canada) or using standard peripheral venous access. All accesses were documented by number, route, purpose, and procedure duration. Outcome measurements included port complications, access strategy failure, access-related anxiety and pain, quality of life (Functional Living Index-Cancer [FLI-C]), and costs. RESULTS: Port complication rates were low (0.23/1,000 days). Failure occurred in two (3.4%) of 59 port subjects and 16 (26.7%) of 60 controls (P =. 0004) at a median period of 26 days after randomization (95% confidence interval, 8 to 92). Peripheral accesses in port subjects took less time, had less access-related anxiety and pain, and were less costly to perform than in controls. Allocation had no effect on FLI-C scores. Peripheral access failure correlated with allocation to the control group (P =.007), higher pain scores with intravenous (IV) starts (P =.003), and anxiety with IV starts (P =.01). Venous accessing overall in port patients was four times more costly than that in controls ($2,178/patient v $530/patient, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ports were safe and effective but had no detectable impact on functional quality of life, despite less access-related anxiety, pain, and discomfort. Because only approximately one quarter of control patients ultimately required central venous access, economic considerations suggest that port-use policies should be based upon defined criteria of need.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole prophylaxis for neutropenic cancer patients: benefit based on purpose and intensity of cytotoxic therapy. The Canadian Fluconazole Prophylaxis Study Group.

A randomized, double-blind trial comparing oral fluconazole (400 mg daily) with placebo as prophylaxis for adult patients receiving intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia or autologous bone marrow transplantation was conducted in 14 Canadian university-affiliated hospitals. Although fluconazole prophylaxis did not obviate the need for parenteral antifungal therapy compared with placebo (81 [57%] of 141 vs. 67 [50%] of 133, respectively), its use resulted in fewer superficial fungal infections (10 [7%] of 141 vs. 23 [18%] of 131, respectively; P = .02) and fewer definite and probable invasive fungal infections (9 vs. 32, respectively; P = .0001). Fluconazole recipients had fewer deaths attributable to definite invasive fungal infection (1 of 15 vs. 6 of 15, respectively; P = .04) and achieved more frequent success without fungal colonization (52 [37%] of 141 vs. 27 [20%] of 133, respectively; P = .004; relative risk reduction, 85%) than did placebo recipients. Patients benefiting the most from fluconazole prophylaxis included those with acute myeloid leukemia who were undergoing induction therapy with cytarabine plus anthracycline-based regimens and those receiving marrow autografts not supported with hematopoietic growth factors. Fluconazole prophylaxis reduces the incidence of superficial fungal infection and invasive fungal infection and fungal infection-related mortality among patients who are receiving intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy for remission induction.

Antimicrobial regimens prescribed by Canadian physicians for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenic episodes.

OBJECTIVE: To study the antimicrobial management of cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia by Canadian physicians. SETTING: A cohort of 274 cancer patients with severe neutropenia (ie, less than 0.5×10(9) neutrophils/L) who participated in a prospective double-blind, placebo controlled study on antifungal prophylaxis conducted in 14 Canadian university-affiliated centres. Antifungal prophylaxis (oral fluconazole 400 mg daily) was administered to 153 of 274 (56%) patients. RESULTS: Antibacterial prophylaxis with a quinolone was given to 87 patients (32%) at the onset of chemotherapy whereas trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole was given to 56 (20%) patients. Fever (ie, 38°C or over) occurred in 216 (79%) patients after a median duration of neutropenia of four days (range one to 31 days). Empirical antibacterial antibiotics were administered in 214 febrile patients. In 164 (77%) patients antibiotics were started during the first 24 h of fever. Monotherapy with a third generation cephalosporin and duotherapy with a antipseudomonal beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside were prescribed in 69 (32%) and 61 (28%) of the febrile patients, respectively. Inclusion of vancomycin in the initial empirical regimen was noted in 32 (15%) patients. Modifications of the initial regimen occurred in 187 (87%) patients after a median of five days (range one to 28 days). Empirical systemic amphotericin B was added after a median duration of nine days (range one to 34 days) of the empirical antibacterial regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the antimicrobial management of cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia by Canadian physicians follows the current guidelines promulgated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Remission induction therapy of untreated acute myeloid leukemia using a non-cytarabine-containing regimen of idarubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of idarubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin as remission induction therapy for patients younger than 60 years with untreated acute myeloid leukemia was studied as an alternative to standard regimens based on cytarabine plus anthracycline. METHODS: Eligible patients received idarubicin (36-40 mg/m2), etoposide (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (1000-1500 mg/m2) over 5 days. Those who achieved complete remission received a single course of cytarabine 1.5 gm/m2 every 12 hours for a total of 12 doses. D-xylose absorption was studied as a marker for cytotoxic therapy-induced gut mucosal damage. Cytogenetic and immunophenotyping studies were performed at the time of diagnosis and examined for prognostic importance. RESULTS: Remission was achieved in 29 (67%) of 43 patients with a single induction course. The median leukemia free and overall survival times were 15.4 months (95% CI 6.5-24.2) and 12.5 months (95% CI 5.9-19.1), respectively. Induction mortality was 14%. Karyotype (normal, simple, or complex vs. very complex) was the strongest predictor of remission (79% vs. 25%, P=0.01), leukemia free survival (odds ratio [OR] 19.3, 95% CI 2.7-138.9), and overall survival (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.1-13.9). Dose-limiting gut mucosal toxicity was greatest during Weeks 2 and 3. Bloodstream infections occurred in 49% of patients at a median of 12 days. Grade 3-4 diarrhea, nausea, stomatitis, esophagitis/dysphagia, and vomiting developed in 33%, 26%, 23%, 9%, and 2% of cases, respectively, at a median of 17, 16, 11, 15.5, and 21 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was active in adults younger than 60 years with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and normal, simple, or complex karyotypes. Remission duration was confounded by karyotype. Mucosal toxicity limited the tolerability of this regimen. These adverse effects might be overcome by increasing the intensity of postremission therapy and modifying the dosing schedule.

Infection risk and cancer chemotherapy: the impact of the chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with lymphoma and solid tissue malignancies.

Modern chemotherapy for lymphoma and solid tissue malignancy is most frequently administered in a cyclical fashion on an outpatient basis over many months. During this time patients have a significant risk of developing severe neutropenia due to the myelotoxic effects of the treatment regimens; this increases the risk of potentially life-threatening infection. The risk of grade IV neutropenia (<0.5 x 10(9)/L) ranges from approximately 20% to >70% depending upon the cytotoxic potential of the regimen. The risks of infection associated with severe neutropenia range from approximately 10-20% to >50%. Haematopoietic growth factors have had only minimal impact on these risks and on the natural history of febrile neutropenic events that occur during the course of cancer chemotherapy.

Cytotoxic therapy-induced D-xylose malabsorption and invasive infection during remission-induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

PURPOSE: To study the sequential changes in the intestinal absorption of an oral pentose probe, D-xylose, in patients receiving therapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and to correlate these changes to infectious morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial D-xylose absorption studies were conducted in 110 consecutive adult patients admitted to a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital for remission-induction therapy for untreated newly diagnosed AML. Serial serum D-xylose levels were obtained 1 hour after a 5-g oral dose of D-xylose at baseline and weekly for 4 weeks until marrow recovery. These results were correlated with invasive infection using multivariate techniques. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SEM) serum D-xylose levels were 0.88 +/- 0.03, 0.69 +/- 0.03, 0.58 +/- 0.02, 0.53 +/- 0.02, and 0.73 +/- 0.02 mmol/L at baseline and weeks 1 to 4, respectively (P < .0001, analysis of variance [AN-OVA]). Time to malabsorption varied with induction regimen (P = .007, log-rank test). Bloodstream infections during week 2 correlated with malabsorption (P = .007). Neutropenic enterocolitis correlated independently with induction regimen (P = .009), malabsorption at week 2 (P = .02), and the development of candidemia (P = .005). Hepatosplenic fungal infection correlated with induction regimen (P = .03), malabsorption at week 2 (P = .02), and fever at diagnosis (P = .003). Malabsorption was unrelated to the duration of severe neutropenia and the administration of parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSION: Serial D-xylose absorption studies in subjects with AML produced a characteristic profile of cytotoxic therapy-related damage to the functional integrity of the intestinal epithelium that was regimen dependent, myelosuppression independent, and predictive for invasive infectious complications. Further study to validate these observations appears warranted.