Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
S D Med ; 75(11): 509-512, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893029

ABSTRACT

South Dakota's Newborn Screening (NBS) program has been in existence for nearly 50 years. What began as a screen for a single condition has now expanded to more than 50 conditions. From 2005-2019 alone, 315 infants were confirmed as positive for a condition detected by the newborn screen in South Dakota. This article summarizes the process of newborn screening in South Dakota, the role of the primary care physician when caring for an infant with a positive screen, the groups of conditions which are included on the South Dakota NBS panel, how NBS changed over time, and the process for adding conditions to the South Dakota NBS panel.


Subject(s)
Infant Mortality , Neonatal Screening , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , South Dakota
2.
Sleep Med ; 74: 315-331, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess sleep quality in adult patients with prevalent pain-related conditions. METHODS: Without language restrictions PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from their inception to January 2020. Independent reviewers screened and selected studies, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist, and performed an evidence synthesis for each measurement property. The results were classified as sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included investigating twelve PROMs and six pain-related conditions. Reliability, internal consistency, structural and construct validity were the most prevalent measurement properties investigated across the studies. Three questionnaires were investigated in more than one study (Jenkins Sleep Scale [JSS] and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale [PSQI] and the Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale [MOS-SS]). High-quality evidence was reported for sufficient content validity in the JSS and indeterminate responsiveness in the MOS-SS. Moderate to high evidence was reported for sufficient structural validity in the MOS-SS and PSQI and sufficient and insufficient construct validity in the JSS And MOS-SS. Low to high evidence was reported for sufficient internal consistency in the MOS-SS and PSQI, while low to moderate evidence for sufficient reliability in the JSS, MOS-SS, and PSQI. CONCLUSION: Studies reporting the most measurement properties included the JSS, MOS-SS, and PSQI in multiple prevalent pain-related conditions. Given this, not all measurement properties have been reported for these as well as other questionnaires, and much investigation is needed to ensure the quality of these questionnaires within high prevalence chronic pain conditions. PROSPERO: CRD42019136623.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Adult , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Humans , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prevalence , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sleep , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther ; 50(5): 252-258, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reporting of rehabilitation guidelines in studies of postoperative outcomes of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome and/or labral tear. DESIGN: Scoping review. LITERATURE SEARCH: A computer-assisted literature search was conducted of the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases on June 17, 2018. Using key words related to FAI syndrome/labral tear and both open and arthroscopic surgical outcomes, we identified 169 studies that included 16 675 patients. Separate authors calculated and verified the prevalence of reported outcomes. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included intervention and observational studies that were prospective or retrospective in design. Studies must have included patients with a primary diagnosis of FAI syndrome and/or labral tear. DATA SYNTHESIS: We calculated the mean ± SD prevalence for continuous variables, where possible. RESULTS: Hip arthroscopy was the primary surgical procedure (76% of studies). The mean ± SD age of participants was 34.8 ± 9.2 years and the mean ± SD follow-up time was 27 ± 15.3 months. Of the 169 included studies, 74 (44%) discussed phases of rehabilitation, 49 (29%) reported details on goals between phases, 1 in 3 described details on rehabilitation progression, and fewer than 1 in 10 reported sufficient detail to replicate the rehabilitation protocol. Weight-bearing and range-of-motion restrictions were poorly reported and variable in duration. CONCLUSION: Surgical outcome studies do not provide sufficient detail or consistency for practicing clinicians to replicate a postoperative rehabilitation protocol for patients with FAI syndrome/labral tear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(5):252-258. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9189.


Subject(s)
Femoracetabular Impingement/rehabilitation , Arthroscopy , Clinical Protocols , Exercise Therapy , Femoracetabular Impingement/physiopathology , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Care , Range of Motion, Articular , Weight-Bearing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL