Postoperative complications and predictors of mortality in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the perioperative outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients that needed emergency general surgery. The aim of the present study was to describe the perioperative outcomes and mortality of patients with COVID-19 who underwent emergency surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODs: Retrospective study of COVID-19 patients symptomatic versus asymptomatic from March 2020 to February 2022 that needed an emergency surgery in a national referral hospital. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in this study. Patients with symptomatic COVID-19 have higher ICU admissions and prolonged length of stay (LOS) as compared with asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. The 90-day survival probability of the entire cohort was 70.1% (60.3-79.9) and was significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 symptomatic 63.4% (50.5-76.2). The cut-off preoperative values for the prediction of mortality: Ferritin ≥ 438.5 ng/mL (Area under the curve [AUC] = 0.908), C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 12.5 mg/dL (AUC = 0.715), leukocyte ≥ 13.8 × 103/mL (AUC = 0.706), and albumin ≤ 2.78 g/dL (AUC = 704). Furthermore, a cut-off value of CRP of ≥ 12.5 mg/dL yielded an accuracy of 82.9% for the prediction of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic COVID-19 who needed emergency surgery have higher ICU admissions, prolonged LOS, and decreased 90-day survival as compared with asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. Preoperative ferritin, CRP, leukocytes, and albumin could be used as predictors of mortality.

ANTECEDENTES: Hay datos limitados sobre los pacientes con COVID-19 que necesitaron cirugía de emergencia. El objetivo del presente estudio fue describir los resultados perioperatorios y la mortalidad de pacientes con COVID-19 que se sometieron a cirugía de emergencia. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con COVID-19 sintomáticos vs. asintomáticos de marzo 2020 a febrero 2022 que requirieron cirugía de emergencia en un Hospital de Referencia Nacional. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 44 pacientes. Los pacientes con COVID-19 sintomático tienen más admisiones en la UCI y estancia hospitalaria prolongada en comparación con los pacientes con COVID-19 asintomático. La supervivencia a 90 días de la cohorte fue del 70,1% (60,3-79,9) y fue menor en los pacientes con COVID-19 sintomáticos del 63.4% (50.5-76.2). Los valores preoperatorios para la predicción de mortalidad: ferritina ≥ 438.5 ng/mL (AUC = 0.908), PCR ≥ 12.5 mg/dL (AUC = 0.715), leucocitos ≥ 13.8 × 103/mL (AUC = 0.706) y albúmina ≤ 2.78 g/dl (AUC = 704). La PCR de ≥ 12.5 mg/dL tiene una precisión del 82.9% para la predicción de complicaciones posoperatorias (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con COVID-19 sintomático tienen más admisiones en la UCI, estancia hospitalaria prolongada y menor supervivencia en comparación con los pacientes con COVID-19 asintomáticos. La ferritina, PCR, leucocitos y albúmina preoperatoria pueden utilizarse como predictores de mortalidad.

Surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients with confirmed COVID-19: Ten case reports and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Research concerning postoperative outcomes of confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients revealed unfavorable postoperative results with increased morbidity, pulmonary complications and mortality. Case reports have suggested that COVID-19 is associated with more aggressive presentation of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study is to describe the perioperative assessment and postoperative outcomes of ten patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with concomitant acute cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy. CASE SUMMARY: We report a total of 10 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with concomitant acute cholecystitis that underwent cholecystectomy. Six patients were males, the mean age was 47.1 years. Nine patients had moderate acute cholecystitis, and one patient had severe acute cholecystitis. All patients were treated with urgent/early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Regarding the Parkland grading scale, two patients received a Parkland grade of 3, two patients received a Parkland grade of 4, and six patients received a Parkland grade of 5. Eight patients required a bail-out procedure. Four patients developed biliary leakage and required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary sphincterotomy. After surgery, five patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. One patient died after cholecystectomy due to ARDS complications. The mean total length of stay (LOS) was 18.2 d. The histopathology demonstrated transmural necrosis (n = 5), vessel obliteration with ischemia (n = 3), perforation (n = 3), and acute peritonitis (n = 10). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with acute cholecystitis had difficult cholecystectomies, high rates of ICU admission, and a prolonged LOS.

Depression and Anxiety Disorders Impact in the Quality of Life of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Anxiety and depression have a negative influence in the quality of life. The aim of the study was to determinate the levels of sensitivity and specificity of the Anxiety and Hospital Depression Scale (HADS) and compare the quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and depression or anxiety. METHODS: This study included 104 patients with diagnosis of IBD. Each patient received psychiatric intervention with SCID-I (Structured Clinical Interview for DSMIV Axis I Disorders) instrument as a gold standard to stablish the cut-off points of HADS. Quality of life was also evaluated with IBDQ-32. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. RESULTS: Most of the patients reported a high quality of life (73.1%, n = 76), while 25.0% (n = 26) express a moderate quality of life. The ROC curves for both psychiatric entities showed an adequate discriminative capacity of the HADS-anxiety dimension (AUC = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.76-0.92) with a limited discriminability of the HADS-depression dimension (AUC = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.46-0.70) using the proposed scoring of 8 as a cut-off point. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression impact negatively in the quality of life in Mexican patients with IBD. The Mexican version of HADS had acceptable internal consistency and external validity, with moderate sensitivity and specificity for clearly identifying clinical cases of anxiety and depression in patients with IBD.

Prevalence of mental disorder and impact on quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease / Prevalencia del trastorno mental e impacto en la calidad de vida en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Introduction: Different studies have described psychiatric comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, but most of them focus mainly on depression and anxiety. Even though major mental disorders are considered one of the main factors that decrease quality of life (QoL), its role in IBD patients remains unclear. We sought to identify the prevalence of different mental disorders as well as its relationship with QoL. Patients and methods: Subjects were recruited from the IBD Clinic. IBD Questionnaire 32 and structured clinical interview (SCID) for DMS-IV Text Revision were applied. Demographic and clinical data were collected via self-report questionnaires and medical records. The correlation between mental disorders and QoL (IBDQ-32 score) was evaluated using the Spearman correlation test. Results: In all, 104 patients were recruited, 12 with Crohn's disease, and 92 with ulcerative colitis. The prevalence of any major mental disorder was 56.7%: anxiety (44.2%), mood (27.9%), substance use (12.2%), and other psychiatric diagnoses (17.3%), and 29.8% of the patients presented three or more comorbid diagnoses. Mental Disorder (p=0.005), mood disorder (p=0.004), anxiety disorder (p=0.009), were found to be significantly associated with lower QoL. Substance use disorder was associated with lower Digestive QoL (p=0.01). Major depressive disorder (p=0.004), social phobia (p=0.03), PTSD (p=0.02), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (p<0.001), were found to be significantly associated with lower QoL. Conclusions: IBD patients had important psychiatric comorbidity that significantly affects their QoL. These results warrant a systematic evaluation of psychiatric conditions in IBD patients.(AU)

Introducción: La comorbilidad psiquiátrica ha sido descrita en Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (EII), pero la mayoria de los reportes sólo se enfocan en la depresión y ansiedad. Los trastornos mentales son considerados uno de los principales factores que disminuyen la Calidad de Vida (CV), pero el papel que tienen en EII es hasta el momento incierto. Identificamos la prevalencia de diferentes trastornos mentales y su relación con la CV. Pacientes y métodos: Los pacientes fueron reclutados de la clínica de EII. El cuestionario IBDQ-32 y la Entrevista Clínica Estructurada (SCID) para los trastornos mentales del DSM IV Texto Revisado fueron aplicados. Variables sociodemográficas y clínicas fueron obtenidas por cuestionarios autoaplicados y expedientes clínicos. Se correlacionó los trastornos mentales y la CV utilizando la prueba de Correlación de Spearman. Resultados: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes, 12 con Enfermedad de Crohn y 92 con colitis ulcerativa. La prevalencia global de trastornos mentales fue 56.7%: ansiedad (44.2%), afecto (27.9%), uso de sustancias (12.2%) y otros trastornos mentales (17.3%). De ellos 29.8% presentaron 3 o más trastornos comórbidos. Se identificó a los trastornos mentales (p=0.005), trastornos afectivos (p=0.004), trastornos ansiosos (p=0.009), asociados significativamente con menor CV. Los trastornos por uso de sustancias estuvieron asociados a menor CV-digestiva (p=0.01). Depresión mayor (p=0.004), fobia social (p=0.03), PTSD (p=0.02), ansiedad generalizada (p<0.001), se asociaron a menor CV. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con EII tienen elevada comorbilidad psiquiátrica, la cual afecta su CV. Estos resultados justifican la evaluación sistemática de las condiciones psiquiátricas.(AU)

Sarcopenia predicts worse postoperative outcomes and decreased survival rates in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown an association of sarcopenia with adverse short- and long-term outcomes in multiple gastrointestinal cancer types. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of sarcopenia on the postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared postoperative outcomes or survival rates in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients with CRC. RESULTS: A total of 44 observational studies, comprising 18,891 patients, were included. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 37% (n = 7009). The pooled analysis revealed an association between sarcopenia and higher risk of total postoperative complications (23 studies, OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.49), postoperative severe complications (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.68), postoperative mortality (OR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.01-5.11), postoperative infections (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12-1.76), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.96-4.37), and prolonged length of stay (MD = 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.11) after colorectal cancer surgery. However, anastomotic leakage showed comparable occurrence between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.36). Regarding survival outcomes, sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter overall survival (25 studies, HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.57-2.14), disease-free survival (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.29-1.88), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.40-2.23) as compared with non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, sarcopenia is a strong predictor of increased postoperative complications and worse survival outcomes.

Prevalence of mental disorder and impact on quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Different studies have described psychiatric comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, but most of them focus mainly on depression and anxiety. Even though major mental disorders are considered one of the main factors that decrease quality of life (QoL), its role in IBD patients remains unclear. We sought to identify the prevalence of different mental disorders as well as its relationship with QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were recruited from the IBD Clinic. IBD Questionnaire 32 and structured clinical interview (SCID) for DMS-IV Text Revision were applied. Demographic and clinical data were collected via self-report questionnaires and medical records. The correlation between mental disorders and QoL (IBDQ-32 score) was evaluated using the Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: In all, 104 patients were recruited, 12 with Crohn's disease, and 92 with ulcerative colitis. The prevalence of any major mental disorder was 56.7%: anxiety (44.2%), mood (27.9%), substance use (12.2%), and other psychiatric diagnoses (17.3%), and 29.8% of the patients presented three or more comorbid diagnoses. Mental Disorder (p=0.005), mood disorder (p=0.004), anxiety disorder (p=0.009), were found to be significantly associated with lower QoL. Substance use disorder was associated with lower Digestive QoL (p=0.01). Major depressive disorder (p=0.004), social phobia (p=0.03), PTSD (p=0.02), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (p<0.001), were found to be significantly associated with lower QoL. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients had important psychiatric comorbidity that significantly affects their QoL. These results warrant a systematic evaluation of psychiatric conditions in IBD patients.

Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in Mexico from a nationwide cohort study in a period of 15 years (2000-2017).

Despite the worldwide increasing incidence and prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), our knowledge about it in Mexico is still limited. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and prevalence of IBD as well as its clinical and socio-demographical characteristics in Mexico from a nation-wide perspective.Multicenter nation-wide cohort study that included 42 IBD clinics from all over the country that participated with electronically register of the new cases over 17 years as well as all known existing cases together with their clinical and socio-demographical characteristics from patients with IBD (ulcerative colitis [UC], Crohn disease [CD], and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified [IBDU]). The data collection was conducted between January and October 2017. Incidence, prevalence, and mean incidence over 2 decades were then calculated. Data base was analyzed using SPSS v24 program SPSS (version 24, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).A total of 2645 patients with IBD were registered. The crude incidence rates of IBD, UC, and CD, respectively, were 0.21, 0.16, and 0.04 cases per 100,000-person year. The highest incidence was registered in the year 2015, compared with to the previous years. The mean incidence of IBD has increased steadily from 0.05 to 0.21 per 100,000 person-years over the past 15 years (P = .06). The incidence of IBD new cases have increased significantly throughout the last 16 years, 5.9-fold for IBD, 5.3-fold for UC, and 9.5-fold for CD. The prevalence rates of IBD, UC, and CD, respectively, were 1.83, 1.45, and 0.34 cases per 100,000-person-year.This is the first study from a nation-wide perspective that demonstrated a significant increase of prevalence and incidence of IBD in Mexico in the last 15 years.

Validación de Belief Medicines Questionnaire y Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale para medir adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment adherence is crucial in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to prevent relapses and complications. In Mexico, there is not a validated tool to assess adherence in patients with IBD. OBJECTIVE: To translate the beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) and self-efficacy for appropriate medication use scale (SEAMS) instruments, as well as to determine their validity, reliability and sensitivity in IBD-diagnosed Mexican patients. METHOD: After informed consent was obtained, 149 IBD-diagnosed patients were included. The instruments were translated into Spanish and were subsequently applied during medical consultation. For SEAMS, exploratory factorial analysis and ROC curve analysis were carried out and Cronbach's alpha was determined; for the BMQ, Cohen's kappa coefficient and its predictive capacity were employed. RESULTS: Seventy-five women (50.3%) were included, with an average age of 44 years. The SEAMS scale showed a single factor that was highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and a cutoff point of 33 to identify adherent patients. The "adherence" and "recall barrier" dimensions of the BMQ were adequate adherence predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The SEAMS and BMQ Spanish versions are valid for measuring self-efficacy and barriers to pharmacological treatment adherence in Mexican patients with IBD.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La adherencia terapéutica es crucial en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) para evitar recaídas y complicaciones. En México no se dispone de una herramienta validada para evaluar adherencia en pacientes con EII. OBJETIVO: Traducir los instrumentos Belief Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) y Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS), y determinar su validez, fiabilidad y sensibilidad en pacientes mexicanos con diagnóstico de EII. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 149 pacientes con diagnóstico de EII, previo consentimiento informado. Se tradujeron los instrumentos al español y posteriormente fueron aplicados durante la consulta médica. Para la SEAMS se realizó análisis factorial exploratorio, análisis de curva ROC y determinación del alpha de Cronbach; para el BMQ se empleó el coeficiente kappa de Cohen y su capacidad predictiva. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 75 mujeres (50.3 %) con edad promedio de 44 años. La escala SEAMS mostró un único factor altamente confiable (alfa de Cronbach = 0.92) y un punto de corte de 33 para identificar a los pacientes adherentes. Las dimensiones "adherencia" y "barrera de recuerdo" del BMQ fueron adecuados predictores de adherencia. CONCLUSIONES: Las versiones en español SEAMS y BMQ son válidas para medir autoeficacia y barreras para la adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes mexicanos con EII.

Validación de Belief Medicines Questionnaire y Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale para medir adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal / Validation of the Belief Medicines Questionnaire and Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale to measure adherence to pharmacological treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Resumen Introducción: La adherencia terapéutica es crucial en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) para evitar recaídas y complicaciones. En México no se dispone de una herramienta validada para evaluar adherencia en pacientes con EII. Objetivo: Traducir los instrumentos Belief Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) y Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS), y determinar su validez, fiabilidad y sensibilidad en pacientes mexicanos con diagnóstico de EII. Método: Se incluyeron 149 pacientes con diagnóstico de EII, previo consentimiento informado. Se tradujeron los instrumentos al español y posteriormente fueron aplicados durante la consulta médica. Para la SEAMS se realizó análisis factorial exploratorio, análisis de curva ROC y determinación del alpha de Cronbach; para el BMQ se empleó el coeficiente kappa de Cohen y su capacidad predictiva. Resultados: Se incluyeron 75 mujeres (50.3 %) con edad promedio de 44 años. La escala SEAMS mostró un único factor altamente confiable (alfa de Cronbach = 0.92) y un punto de corte de 33 para identificar a los pacientes adherentes. Las dimensiones “adherencia” y “barrera de recuerdo” del BMQ fueron adecuados predictores de adherencia. Conclusiones: Las versiones en español SEAMS y BMQ son válidas para medir autoeficacia y barreras para la adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes mexicanos con EII.

Abstract Introduction: Treatment adherence is crucial in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to prevent relapses and complications. In Mexico, there is not a validated tool to assess adherence in patients with IBD. Objective: To translate the beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) and self-efficacy for appropriate medication use scale (SEAMS) instruments, as well as to determine their validity, reliability and sensitivity in IBD-diagnosed Mexican patients. Method: After informed consent was obtained, 149 IBD-diagnosed patients were included. The instruments were translated into Spanish and were subsequently applied during medical consultation. For SEAMS, exploratory factorial analysis and ROC curve analysis were carried out and Cronbach’s alpha was determined; for the BMQ, Cohen’s kappa coefficient and its predictive capacity were employed. Results: Seventy-five women (50.3%) were included, with an average age of 44 years. The SEAMS scale showed a single factor that was highly reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) and a cutoff point of 33 to identify adherent patients. The “adherence” and “recall barrier” dimensions of the BMQ were adequate adherence predictors. Conclusions: The SEAMS and BMQ Spanish versions are valid for measuring self-efficacy and barriers to pharmacological treatment adherence in Mexican patients with IBD.

Right Heart Failure as a Risk for Stroke in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by complex lesions of the lungs and other organs as well as a progressive obstruction of the airway. In COPD patients, heart failure (HF) is associated with worse conditions such as inflammation, arterial stiffness, and increased risk mortality. However, the association of HF, COPD, and stroke are unclear; the examination of the role of HF, especially right HF, about increased risk of stroke in COPD patients has not been studied. We aimed to determine if right HF is a risk factor for stroke in patients with COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-control study of patients with COPD was carried out. The cases were defined as COPD patients with ischemic stroke and control COPD patients without stroke. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with COPD were analyzed: COPD with stroke (n = 35) and COPD alone (n = 127). COPD patients with right HF were at a greater risk of stroke compared with patients without right HF (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.13-10.12, p = .044) adjusted for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Right HF is an independent risk factor for stroke, probably because of cerebrovascular stasis secondary to congestion of the superior vena cava.