Accuracy of a zero-heat-flux thermometer in cardiac surgery, a prospective, multicentre, method comparison study.

Accurate measurement of core temperature is of utmost importance during on-pump cardiac surgery, for detection of hypothermia before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), guidance of temperature management on CPB, active rewarming on CPB and guidance of warming therapy after CPB. Most temperature measurement methods are known to become inaccurate during rapid changes in core temperature and suffer from delayed detection of temperature changes. Zero-heat-flux temperature (ZHF) measurement from the lateral forehead may be an alternative, non-invasive method quantifying the core temperature. A prospective, observational, multicentre study was conducted in one hundred patients scheduled for on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Core temperatures were measured every minute by two zero-heat-flux thermometer (SpotOn™) and a bladder thermometer and a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the period after induction of anesthesia until CPB. Accuracy and precision of both methods were compared against core temperature measured in the pulmonary artery using the method of Bland and Altman. A high accuracy (around 0.1 °C) and a very good precision (Limits of agreement (LoA) - 0.6; 0.4 °C) were found between zero-heat-flux thermometer and core temperature measured by PAC. Among the two ZHF thermometers the bias was negligible (- 0.003 °C) with narrow LoA of - 0.42 °C and 0.41 °C. In contrast, bias between bladder temperature and PAC temperature was large (0.51 °C) with corresponding LoA of - 0.06 °C and 1.1 °C. ZHF thermometers are in contrast to bladder temperature a reliable core temperature monitor in cardiac surgery during the period after induction of anestesia until CPB. The zero-heat-flux method can provide clinicians reliably with continuous and non-invasive measurements of core temperature in normothermic and mild hypothermic temperature ranges and therefore can be helpful to guide temperature management.

Prewarming Parturients for Cesarean Section Does Not Raise Wound Temperature But Body Heat and Level of Comfort: A Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Prewarming before cesarean section lowers the rates of surgical site infections (SSIs). We hypothesized that this effect is explained due to a higher core temperature resulting in a higher wound temperature. DESIGN: We conducted an open-labeled randomized study with on-term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomized into an intervention group (prewarming) and a control group. METHODS: Core and wound temperature, comfort level, and examination results were taken at defined times until discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). There was a follow-up visit and interview 1 day after the procedure. The primary outcome was a difference in wound temperature. The secondary outcomes were differences in core temperature, patient comfort, blood loss, SSI, and neonatal outcome. FINDINGS: We randomized a total of 60 patients, 30 per group. Prewarming lead to a significantly higher core temperature. Additionally, patient comfort was significantly higher in the prewarming group even after discharge from PACU. We did not find a difference in wound temperature, SSI, neonatal outcome, or blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Prewarming before cesarean section under spinal anesthesia maintains core temperature and improves patient comfort but does not affect wound temperature.

What is the best way to keep the patient warm during technical rescue? Results from two prospective randomised controlled studies with healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Accidental hypothermia is a manifest problem during the rescue of entrapped victims and results in different subsequent problems as coagulopathy and wound infection. Different warming methods are available for the preclinicial use. However, their effectiveness has hardly been evaluated. METHODS: In a first step a survey among German fire brigades was performed with questions about the most used warming methods. In a second step two crossover studies were conducted. In each study two different warming method were compared with forced air warming - which is the most frequently used and highly effective warming method in operation rooms (Study A: halogen floodlight vs. forced air warming; Study B: forced air warming vs. fleece blanket). In both studies healthy volunteers (Study A: 30 volunteers, Study B: 32 volunteers) were sitting 60 min in a cold store. In the first 21 min there was no subject warming. Afterwards the different warming methods were initiated. Every 3 min parameters like skin temperature, core body temperature and cold perception on a 10-point numeric rating scale were recorded. Linear mixed models were fitted for each parameter to check for differences in temperature trajectories and cold perception with regard to the different warming methods. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one German fire brigades responded to the survey. The most frequently used warming methods were different rescue blankets (gold/silver, wool) and work light (halogen floodlights). Both studies (A and B) showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values in mean skin temperature, mean body temperature and total body heat for the forced air warming methods compared to halogen floodlight respectively fleece blanket shortly after warming initiation. In contrast, values for the cold perception were significantly lower (less unpleasant cold perception) during the phase the forced air warming methods were used, compared to the fleece blanket or the halogen floodlight was used. CONCLUSION: Forced air warming methods used under the standardised experimental setting are an effective method to keep patients warm during technical rescue. Halogen floodlight has an insufficient effect on the patient's heat preservation. In healthy subjects, fleece blankets will stop heat loss but will not correct heat that has already been lost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The studies were registered retrospectively on 14/02/2022 on the German Clinical Trials registry (DRKS) with the number DRKS00028079.

Evaluation of the non-invasive Temple Touch Pro temperature monitoring system compared with oesophageal temperature in paediatric anaesthesia (PETER PAN): A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring peri-operative body temperature in children is currently mainly achieved through invasive devices. The Temple Touch Pro Temperature Monitoring System estimates core temperature noninvasively based on heat flux thermometry. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement of this noninvasive sensor against standard oesophageal core temperature. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital recruiting between April and July 2021. PATIENTS: One hundred children (32 girls) aged 6 years or younger scheduled for noncardiac surgery, resulting in 6766 data pairs. Exclusion criteria were contraindication for the insertion of an oesophageal temperature probe, and procedures in which one of the measurement methods would interfere with the surgical field. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the agreement analysis by a Bland-Altman comparison with multiple measurements. Posthoc, we performed another agreement analysis after exclusion of a statistically determined equilibration time. Secondary outcomes were the temperature differences over time and subgroup analysis of hypothermic, normothermic and hyperthermic temperature ranges, age, sex and sensor's side by type III analysis of variance. Further, we correlated the sonographically determined depth of the artery with trueness. RESULTS: The mean difference was -0.07°C (95% CI -0.15 to +0.05) with limits of agreement of -1.00 and +0.85°C. After adjusting for an equilibration time of 13 min, the mean difference improved to -0.04°C (95% CI -0.08 to +0.01) with limits of agreement of -0.68 and +0.60°C. Concordance correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.84). Differences between the skin sensor and oesophageal reference increased over time by -0.05°C per hour. Subgroup analysis showed no clinically relevant differences. Depth of artery negatively correlated with trueness by 0.03°C per millimetre. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Temple Touch Pro sensor showed acceptable accuracy after allowing for an equilibration time, it still needs further investigation for routine use in children. This particularly affects accuracy in hypothermic ranges, imprecise positioning and applicability in children with immature or vulnerable skin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, identifier: DRKS00024703.

Evaluation of the Temple Touch Pro™ noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system in 100 adults under general anesthesia: a prospective comparison with esophageal temperature.

Perioperative hypothermia is still common and has relevant complication for the patient. An effective perioperative thermal management requires essentially an accurate method to measure core temperature. So far, only one study has investigated the new Temple Touch Pro™ (Medisim Ltd., Beit-Shemesh, Israel). during anesthesia Therefore, we assessed the agreement between the Temple Touch Pro™ thermometer (TTP) and distal esophageal temperature (TEso) in a second study. After approval by the local ethics committee we studied 100 adult patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. Before induction of anesthesia the TTP sensor unit was attached to the skin above the temporal artery. After induction of anesthesia an esophageal temperature probe was placed in the distal esophagus. Recordings started 10 min after placement of the esophageal temperature probe to allow adequate warming of the probes. Pairs of temperature values were documented in five-minute intervals until emergence of anesthesia. Accuracy of the two methods was assessed by Bland-Altman comparisons of differences with multiple measurements. Core temperatures obtained with the TTP in adults showed a mean bias of -0.04 °C with 95% limits of agreement within - 0.99 °C to + 0.91 °C compared to an esophageal temperature probe. We consider the TTP as a reasonable tool for perioperative temperature monitoring. It is not accurate enough to be used as a reference method in scientific studies, but may be a useful tool especially for conscious patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia or regional anesthesia with sedation. Trial registration This study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: 00024050), day of registration 12/01/2021.

Modeling iatrogenic intraoperative hyperthermia from external warming in children: A pooled analysis from two prospective observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of normothermia is an important quality metric in pediatric anesthesia. While inadvertent hypothermia is effectively prevented by forced-air warming, this therapeutic approach can lead to iatrogenic hyperthermia in young children. AIMS: To estimate the influence of external warming by forced air on the development of intraoperative hyperthermia in anesthetized children aged 6 years or younger. METHODS: We pooled data from two previous clinical studies. Primary outcome was the course of core temperature over time analyzed by a quadratic regression model. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of hyperthermia (body core temperature >38°C), the probability of hyperthermia over the duration of warming in relation to age and surface-area-to-weight ratio, respectively, analyzed by multiple logistic regression models. The influence of baseline temperature on hyperthermia was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Two hundred children (55 female) with a median age of 2.1 [1st -3rd quartile 1-4.2] years were analyzed. Mean temperature increased by 0.43°C after 1 h, 0.64°C after 2 h, and reached a peak of 0.66°C at 147 min. Overall, 33 children were hyperthermic at at least one measurement point. The odds ratios of hyperthermia were 1.14 (95%-CI: 1.07-1.22) or 1.13 (95%-CI: 1.06-1.21) for every 10 min of warming therapy in a model with age or surface-area-to weight ratio (ceteris paribus), respectively. Odds ratio was 1.33 (95%-CI: 1.07-1.71) for a decrease of 1 year in age and 1.63 (95%-CI: 0.93-2.83) for an increase of 0.01 in the surface-to-weight-area ratio (ceteris paribus). An increase of 0.1°C in baseline temperature increased the hazard of becoming hyperthermic by a factor of 1.33 (95%-CI: 1.23-1.43). CONCLUSIONS: In children, external warming by forced-air needs to be closely monitored and adjusted in a timely manner to avoid iatrogenic hyperthermia especially during long procedures, in young age, higher surface-area-to-weight ratio, and higher baseline temperature.

Target insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes in children: A prospective observational study analyzing magnetic resonance images.

BACKGROUND: Core temperature monitoring is indispensable to prevent children from perioperative thermal perturbations. Although nasopharyngeal measurements are commonly used in anesthesia and considered to reflect core temperature accurately, standardized target depths for probe insertion are unknown in children. AIMS: Our primary goal was to determine a target depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probe insertion in children by measuring distances on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary aims were to correlate these measurements with biometric variables and facial landmark-distances to derive formulas estimating target depth. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in children ≤12 years undergoing cranial MRI with anesthesia. We documented patient characteristics and measured the landmark-distances nostril-mandible, nostril-tragus, and philtrum-tragus on patient's faces. On MRI, the target point for the probe tip was considered to be the site of the nasopharyngeal mucosa with the closest proximity to the internal carotid artery. After its determination in the transverse axis and triangulation to the sagittal axis, we measured the distance to the nostril. This distance, defined as target insertion depth, was correlated with the patient characteristics and used for univariate and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty children with a mean age of 4.5 years were included. The target insertion depth ranged from 61.8 mm in infants to 89.8 mm in 12-year-old children. Height correlated best (ρ = 0.685, 95%-CI: [0.57-0.77]). The best-fit estimation in millimeters, "40.8 + height [cm] × 0.32,″ would lead to a placement in the target position in 67% of cases. A simplified approach by categories of 50-80, 80-110, 110-130, and >130 cm height with target insertion depths of 60, 70, 80, and 85 mm, respectively, achieved similar probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Height-based formulas could be a valuable proxy for the insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes. Further clinical trials are necessary to investigate their measurement accuracy.

Perioperative temperature management: a survey of 6 Asia-Pacific countries.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia leads to impairments in central and peripheral thermoregulatory responses. Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is hence a common perioperative complication, and is associated with coagulopathy, increased surgical site infection, delayed drug metabolism, prolonged recovery, and shivering. However, surveys across the world have shown poor compliance to perioperative temperature management guidelines. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalent practices and attitudes to perioperative temperature management in the Asia-Pacific region, and determined the individual and institutional factors that lead to noncompliance. METHODS: A 40-question anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to anesthesiologists and anesthesia trainees in six countries in the Asia-Pacific (Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, India and South Korea). Participants were polled about their current practices in patient warming and temperature measurement across the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods. Questions were also asked regarding various individual and environmental barriers to compliance. RESULTS: In total, 1154 valid survey responses were obtained and analyzed. 279 (24.2%) of respondents prewarm, 508 (44.0%) perform intraoperative active warming, and 486 (42.1%) perform postoperative active warming in the majority of patients. Additionally, 531 (46.0%) measure temperature preoperatively, 767 (67.5%) measure temperature intraoperatively during general anesthesia, and 953 (82.6%) measure temperature postoperatively in the majority of patients. The availability of active warming devices in the operating room (p < 0.001, OR 10.040), absence of financial restriction (p < 0.001, OR 2.817), presence of hospital training courses (p = 0.011, OR 1.428), and presence of a hospital SOP (p < 0.001, OR 1.926) were significantly associated with compliance to intraoperative active warming. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance to international perioperative temperature management guidelines in Asia-Pacific remains poor, especially in small hospitals. Barriers to compliance were limited temperature management equipment, lack of locally-relevant standard operating procedures and training. This may inform international guideline committees on the needs of developing countries, or spur local anesthesiology societies to publish their own national guidelines.

Perioperative Hypothermia-A Narrative Review.

Unintentional hypothermia (core temperature < 36 °C) is a common side effect in patients undergoing surgery. Several patient-centred and external factors, e.g., drugs, comorbidities, trauma, environmental temperature, type of anaesthesia, as well as extent and duration of surgery, influence core temperature. Perioperative hypothermia has negative effects on coagulation, blood loss and transfusion requirements, metabolization of drugs, surgical site infections, and discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. Therefore, active temperature management is required in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative period to diminish the risks of perioperative hypothermia. Temperature measurement should be done with accurate and continuous probes. Perioperative temperature management includes a bundle of warming tools adapted to individual needs and local circumstances. Warming blankets and mattresses as well as the administration of properly warmed infusions via dedicated devices are important for this purpose. Temperature management should follow checklists and be individualized to the patient's requirements and the local possibilities.

Perioperative Hypothermia in Children.

BACKGROUND: First described by paediatric anaesthesiologists, perioperative hypothermia is one of the earliest reported side effects of general anaesthesia. Deviations from normothermia are associated with numerous complications and adverse outcomes, with infants and small children at the highest risk. Nowadays, maintenance of normothermia is an important quality metric in paediatric anaesthesia. METHODS: This review is based on our collection of publications regarding perioperative hypothermia and was supplemented with pertinent publications from a MEDLINE literature search. RESULTS: We provide an overview on perioperative hypothermia in the paediatric patient, including definition, history, incidence, development, monitoring, risk factors, and adverse events, and provide management recommendations for its prevention. We also summarize the side effects and complications of perioperative temperature management. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative hypothermia is still common in paediatric patients and may be attributed to their vulnerable physiology, but also may result from insufficient perioperative warming. An effective perioperative warming strategy incorporates the maintenance of normothermia during transportation, active warming before induction of anaesthesia, active warming during anaesthesia and surgery, and accurate measurement of core temperature. Perioperative temperature management must also prevent hyperthermia in children.

Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates esophageal temperature by 0.26 °C: an observational study in 100 infants and young children.

In pediatric anesthesia, deviations from normothermia can lead to many complications, with infants and young children at the highest risk. A measurement method for core temperature must be clinically accurate, precise and should be minimally invasive. Zero-heat-flux (ZHF) temperature measurements have been evaluated in several studies in adults. We assessed the agreement between the 3M Bair Hugger™ temperature measurement sensor (TZHF) and esophageal temperature (TEso) in children up to and including 6 years undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. Data were recorded in 5 min-intervals. We investigated the accuracy of the ZHF sensor overall and in subgroups of different age, ASA classification, and temperature ranges by Bland-Altman comparisons of differences with multiple measurements. Change over time was assessed by a linear mixed model regression. Data were collected in 100 children with a median (1st-3rd quartile) age of 1.7 (1-3.9) years resulting in 1254 data pairs. Compared to TEso (range from 35.3 to 39.3 °C; median 37.2 °C), TZHF resulted in a mean bias of +0.26 °C (95% confidence interval +0.22 to +0.29 °C; 95% limits of agreement -0.11 to +0.62 °C). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.89. There was no significant or relevant change of temperature over time (0.006 °C per hour measurement interval, p = 0.199) and no relevant differences in the subgroups. Due to the mean bias of +0.26 °C in TZHF, the risk of hypothermia may be underestimated, while the risk of hyperthermia may be overestimated. Nevertheless, because of its high precision, we consider ZHF valuable for intraoperative temperature monitoring in children and infants.

Accuracy of zero-heat-flux thermometry and bladder temperature measurement in critically ill patients.

Core temperature (TCore) monitoring is essential in intensive care medicine. Bladder temperature is the standard of care in many institutions, but not possible in all patients. We therefore compared core temperature measured with a zero-heat flux thermometer (TZHF) and with a bladder catheter (TBladder) against blood temperature (TBlood) as a gold standard in 50 critically ill patients in a prospective, observational study. Every 30 min TBlood, TBladder and TZHF were documented simultaneously. Bland-Altman statistics were used for interpretation. 7018 pairs of measurements for the comparison of TBlood with TZHF and 7265 pairs of measurements for the comparison of TBlood with TBladder could be used. TBladder represented TBlood more accurate than TZHF. In the Bland Altman analyses the bias was smaller (0.05 °C vs. - 0.12 °C) and limits of agreement were narrower (0.64 °C to - 0.54 °C vs. 0.51 °C to - 0.76 °C), but not in clinically meaningful amounts. In conclusion the results for zero-heat-flux and bladder temperatures were virtually identical within about a tenth of a degree, although TZHF tended to underestimate TBlood. Therefore, either is suitable for clinical use.German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015482, Registered on 20th September 2018, http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00015482 .

Camostat Mesylate May Reduce Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Sepsis: A First Observation.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 cell entry depends on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 and is blocked in cell culture by camostat mesylate, a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Whether camostat mesylate is able to lower disease burden in coronavirus disease 2019 sepsis is currently unknown. DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. SETTING: Patient treated in ICU of University hospital Göttingen, Germany. PATIENTS: Eleven critical ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients with organ failure were treated in ICU. INTERVENTIONS: Compassionate use of camostat mesylate (six patients, camostat group) or hydroxychloroquine (five patients, hydroxychloroquine group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical courses were assessed by Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score at days 1, 3, and 8. Further, viral load, oxygenation, and inflammatory markers were determined. Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score was comparable between camostat and hydroxychloroquine groups upon ICU admission. During observation, the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score decreased in the camostat group but remained elevated in the hydroxychloroquine group. The decline in disease severity in camostat mesylate treated patients was paralleled by a decline in inflammatory markers and improvement of oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 decreased upon camostat mesylate treatment within a period of 8 days and a similar effect was not observed in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine. Camostat mesylate thus warrants further evaluation within randomized clinical trials.

Is There a "Blind Spot" in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration.

Short interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming are associated with low intraoperative hypothermia rates.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of inadvertent hypothermia is recommended for procedures >30 minutes because hypothermia increases the risk of myocardial ischemia, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and wound complications. Therefore, short warming interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming might result in lower hypothermia rates. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to determine whether the incidence of inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia was affected by the warming interruption. METHODS: The lowest intraoperative body core temperature value and the warming interruption time were taken from anaesthesia records. Body core temperature was recorded continuously, and a patient was classified to be hypothermic if the lowest recorded temperature value was <36°C. Hypothermia rates and the correlation between warming interruption times and intraoperative hypothermia rates were calculated. RESULTS: Five thousand eighty-four patients were analysed. The intraoperative hypothermia rate was 15.3%. Nineteen patients (0.4%) had a recorded temperature of <35.0°C. An increase in forced-air warming interruption time was significantly associated with an increase in intraoperative hypothermia rates (P < .0001). Patients with interruptions in forced-air warming >20 minutes showed significantly higher hypothermia rates than those with interruptions of ≤20 minutes (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative hypothermia rates increased significantly with longer forced-air warming interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming. Short warming interruptions can preserve the effect of pre-warming and are associated with low intraoperative hypothermia rates.

Implementing a thermal care bundle for inadvertent perioperative hypothermia: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Active warming reduces risk of surgical complications. Implementation of a perioperative thermal care bundle increased use of active warming for surgical patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if implementing a thermal care bundle to prevent inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is cost-effective. DESIGN: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken using Monte Carlo simulations from input distributions to estimate costs and effects. SETTING: Hospitals undertaking between 5,000 and 40,000 surgeries per year, which either implemented or did not implement the thermal care bundle, were modelled. PARTICIPANTS: The decision tree guiding the structure of the model was populated with clinical outcomes (surgical site infection, blood transfusion requirement and morbid cardiac events) of a hypothetical cohort of surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation or non-implementation of the thermal care bundle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Net monetary benefit was calculated by multiplying the health benefits (quality-adjusted life years) by the willingness-to-pay threshold minus the cost. We tested a range of values for willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year thresholds and plotted results for expected incremental benefits and probability of cost-effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was also calculated. RESULTS: Thermal care bundle implementation simultaneously reduced costs and increased quality-adjusted life years in the majority of simulations (88.1%). The average cost reduction was $689,659 (95% credible intervals spanned from a $2,718,364 decrease in costs to $379,826 increase in costs) and average difference in quality-adjusted life years was 54 (95% CI = 0.4 less to 176 more). This equated to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12747 saved per quality-adjusted life year gained. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that increasing use of active warming by implementing the thermal care bundle would generate cost-savings and improve the quality of life for surgical patients. It would be good value for hospitals with similar characteristics to those included in our model to allocate the extra resources required for implementation.

Influence of oral premedication and prewarming on core temperature of cardiac surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia is still very common and associated with numerous adverse effects. The effects of benzodiazepines, administered as premedication, on thermoregulation have been studied with conflicting results. We investigated the hypotheses that premedication with flunitrazepam would lower the preoperative core temperature and that prewarming could attenuate this effect. METHODS: After approval by the local research ethics committee 50 adult cardiac surgical patients were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-centre study with two parallel groups in a university hospital setting. Core temperature was measured using a continuous, non-invasive zero-heat flux thermometer from 30 min before administration of the oral premedication until beginning of surgery. An equal number of patients was randomly allocated via a computer-generated list assigning them to either prewarming or control group using the sealed envelope method for blinding. The intervention itself could not be blinded. In the prewarming group patients received active prewarming using an underbody forced-air warming blanket. The data were analysed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the randomized 25 patients per group 24 patients per group could be analysed. Initial core temperature was 36.7 ± 0.2 °C and dropped significantly after oral premedication to 36.5 ± 0.3 °C when the patients were leaving the ward and to 36.4 ± 0.3 °C before induction of anaesthesia. The patients of the prewarming group had a significantly higher core temperature at the beginning of surgery (35.8 ± 0.4 °C vs. 35.5 ± 0.5 °C, p = 0.027), although core temperature at induction of anaesthesia was comparable. Despite prewarming, core temperature did not reach baseline level prior to premedication (36.7 ± 0.2 °C). CONCLUSIONS: Oral premedication with benzodiazepines on the ward lowered core temperature significantly at arrival in the operating room. This drop in core temperature cannot be offset by a short period of active prewarming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered with the German registry of clinical trials under the trial number DRKS00005790 on 20th February 2014.

Association between perioperative hypothermia and patient outcomes after thoracic surgery: A single center retrospective analysis.

Hypothermia due to anaesthetic-induced impairment of thermoregulatory control and exposure to a cool environment is common in surgical patients. Peripheral vasodilation due to neuroaxial blockade may aggravate hypothermia. There is few data on perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery under combined general and regional anesthesia. We reviewed all thoracic surgical patients between 2006 and 2011 to determine the incidence and extent of hypothermia with or without an epidural anesthesia and evaluated its effect.Around 339 patients underwent lung resection procedures with intraoperative forced-air warming: 197 with general and epidural anesthesia (GA + EPI), 199 with general anesthesia alone (GA). Statistical analyses were performed to determine the association between hypothermia (T < 36°C) and transfusion requirements, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital LOS, and in hospital mortality.The overall incidence of hypothermia was 64.3%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed three significant risk factors for the development of hypothermia: long induction time (P = .011), small body surface area (P = .003), and application of more fluid intraoperatively (P < .001). Factors determining the extent of hypothermia were: receiving an open thoracotomy (P = .009), placement and use of an epidural catheter (P = .002), and a lower body mass index (BMI) (P < .001). Additional epidural anesthesia reduced core temperature by 0.26°C (95% CI -0.414 to -0.095°C, P < .05). There was no difference in transfusion requirements, ICU LOS or mortality between both groups. Hospital LOS was longer in patients with hypothermia.More than half of all thoracic patients suffered from hypothermia. A long induction time, small body surface area, and large intraoperative fluid application were independent risk factors for the development of perioperative hypothermia. Additional epidural anesthesia to general anesthesia did not increase the incidence of hypothermia but decreased body core temperature to an-albeit not clinically significant-degree. Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery will probably benefit from an additional period of prewarming prior to induction to reduce the high incidence of perioperative hypothermia.

Heart Transplantation in a Toddler with Cardiac Kawasaki Disease.

Kawasaki disease is very rare in Western Europe. The disease may involve coronary arteries. A 2-year-old boy diagnosed with Kawasaki disease had had seizure-like symptoms. Further evaluation revealed recurrent myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction. Due to extraordinary extension of the coronary disease, myocardial revascularization was not feasible and the toddler underwent successful heart transplantation after 97 days on waiting list.