An evaluation of ankle and foot bolus in paediatric modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI).

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use. METHODS: The clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re-optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re-optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Variation in doses >10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference < 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average > 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc. CONCLUSION: This study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.

Considerations and adaptions to the modulated arc total body irradiation technique: dosimetry description.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is a complex treatment technique, which has been slow to transition to a three-dimensional (3D) planning approach. There is limited literature available providing a detailed description on methods to plan TBI on a 3D planning system. 3D planning using the modulated arc TBI (MATBI) technique is a complex process involving a significant number of quality assurance processes and scripts, due to more than 40 treatment beams and two patient positions. This article will focus on the workflow and technical planning aspects of our institution's MATBI technique and identify reasons for modifications made to the developing institution's original MATBI approach. Included is a description of specific simulation equipment, detailed explanation of the four-stage computing process including the role of scripting to standardise and streamline what is otherwise a complex number of steps. The information provided is specific to one centre's approach but shows the fundamental planning process and demonstrates a streamlined method, which can be adapted to other planning systems. Overall, the ability to accurately represent the TBI technique in 3D on a planning system will be shown.

Modification of a modulated arc total body irradiation technique: Implementation and first clinical experience for paediatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: To implement the modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI) technique within the existing infrastructure of a radiation oncology department. The technique needed to treat paediatric patients of all ages, some of whom would require general anaesthesia (GA). METHODS: The MATBI technique required minor modifications to be incorporated within existing departmental infrastructure. Ancillary equipment essential to the technique were identified and in some cases custom designed to meet health and safety criteria. GA equipment was also considered. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented technique, an audit of the cases clinically treated was conducted. RESULTS: A motorised treatment couch was designed to allow the patient to be positioned in stabilisation equipment at a height, then lowered to the floor to accommodate source-to-skin-distances from 180 cm to 198 cm to treat the fixed 40 cm × 40 cm field size. Treatment couch design also facilitated positioning of the bespoke two-part spoiler. While organ at risk dose is limited using a beam weight optimisation technique, the dose is further reduced using compensators placed close to the patient's skin on a 3D printed custom-made support bridge. A digital radiography system is used to verify compensator position. Fifteen patients have been treated to date for various diseases using a variety of dose fractionations ranging from 2 Gy in a single fraction to 12 Gy in 6 fractions. Five patients have required GA due to age or behavioural issues. CONCLUSION: The modified MATBI technique and the equipment required for treatment delivery has been found to be well tolerated by all patients.

A snapshot of radiation therapy techniques and technology in Queensland: An aid to mapping undergraduate curriculum.

INTRODUCTION: Undergraduate students studying the Bachelor of Radiation Therapy at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) attend clinical placements in a number of department sites across Queensland. To ensure that the curriculum prepares students for the most common treatments and current techniques in use in these departments, a curriculum matching exercise was performed. METHODS: A cross-sectional census was performed on a pre-determined "Snapshot" date in 2012. This was undertaken by the clinical education staff in each department who used a standardized proforma to count the number of patients as well as prescription, equipment, and technique data for a list of tumour site categories. This information was combined into aggregate anonymized data. RESULTS: All 12 Queensland radiation therapy clinical sites participated in the Snapshot data collection exercise to produce a comprehensive overview of clinical practice on the chosen day. A total of 59 different tumour sites were treated on the chosen day and as expected the most common treatment sites were prostate and breast, comprising 46% of patients treated. Data analysis also indicated that intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) use is relatively high with 19.6% of patients receiving IMRT treatment on the chosen day. Both IMRT and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) indications matched recommendations from the evidence. CONCLUSION: The Snapshot method proved to be a feasible and efficient method of gathering useful data to inform curriculum matching. Frequency of IMRT use in Queensland matches or possibly exceeds that indicated in the literature. It is recommended that future repetition of the study be undertaken in order to monitor trends in referral patterns and new technology implementation.

Graduate Reflective Practice Program: Were Long-term Objectives Achieved?

BACKGROUND: Reflection has been identified as a deep learning strategy necessary for radiation therapists to foster professional growth, to monitor current practice, and to evaluate the effects of change. To further develop reflective practice in radiation therapists, a department-based reflective practice program was designed and implemented in 2010. The program continues to be delivered annually to each new cohort of graduates. Long-term objectives of the program included the continued use of reflective practice and participation in reflective activities; the ability to communicate knowledge, skills, and values through reflective discussion within the team environment; the further development of clinical knowledge and skills; and the promotion of a reflective culture within the department. AIM: The purpose of the research was to establish if the learning program was meeting its long-term objectives. Are these radiation therapists continuing to use the reflective skills they developed during their graduate year? METHOD: An online survey was designed to evaluate whether the long-term objectives of the program were being achieved. The target respondents were radiation therapists who had completed their graduate year in 2010 or 2011. RESULTS: Seven of a possible 10 radiation therapists completed the survey. All respondents perceived they are using reflection in their practice and results indicate that a number of reflective activities are actually being used. The majority of respondents indicated they had initiated reflective practice discussions in their work areas, and the overall perception indicated more frequent intentional reflective practice occurring within the department. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of survey responses revealed that radiation therapists who participated in the reflective learning program during their graduate year continued using reflection skills and contributed to reflective activities within the clinical environment.