Column-Specific Distal Radius Fracture Fixation.

SUMMARY: Despite the popularity and success of volar fixed angle plating, variations in distal radius fracture presentation underscore the importance of understanding different surgical treatment options to maximize patient outcomes. The 3-column theory of wrist mechanics provided the foundation for using a column-specific fixation approach. Implant placement within the ulnar column can be challenging because of anatomical constraints. Some have described "safe zones" for implant position to decrease the potential for tendon impingement. A thorough understanding of the surrounding anatomy can allow fixation decisions based on fracture fragment location. Literature reports have shown excellent results when using fragment specific fixation constructs and similar outcomes when comparing these constructs with volar locked plating. Achieving optimal outcomes in surgically treated distal radius fractures requires the surgeon to be competent along a spectrum of surgical approaches and fixation constructs.

Assessing the Value of Routine Pathologic Examination of Resected Femoral Head Specimens After Femoral Neck Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of routine pathologic examination (PE) of femoral head (FH) specimens after arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures and to determine the cost. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 850 acute femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty These were evaluated to determine whether the FH was sent for PE, the resultant findings, alterations in medical treatment, and cost. RESULTS: A total of 466 FH specimens (54.8%) were sent to pathology. Four (0.9%) were positive for a neoplastic process. All four had a known history of cancer, antecedent hip pain, or an inappropriate injury mechanism. None of the findings resulted in an alteration in medical treatment. The average cost of PE was $195 USD. DISCUSSION: The routine PE of FH specimens after arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is not warranted and uneconomic. Sending the FH for PE, only when clinically indicated, rather than routine, will result in notable savings for the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Biomechanical comparison of syndesmotic injury fixation methods using a cadaveric model.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in suture-button devices for syndesmosis injury, which are intended to offer less rigid fixation than screw fixation. METHODS: The fixation strength with 2 different suture-button devices, ZipTight and TightRope, were compared using 5 cadaveric leg pairs (n = 10). In an additional 5 pairs (n = 10), ZipTight was compared to 3.5 mm quadricortical screw fixation. Ankle motion was measured intact, then following simulated syndesmosis injury and fixation. Cyclic loads (peak 750 N, 7.5 Nm) were applied. Finally, external rotation to failure was measured and failure mode was documented. RESULTS: Range of motion increased after simulated injury and fixation with all devices (max 14.5 degrees). In all groups, diastasis remained below 1.0 mm intact and below 2.0 mm during cyclic loading. Compared to intact, under load to failure, diastasis with ZipTight devices increased by 4.7 ± 1.3 mm and 7.6 ± 4.3 mm, with TightRope, 6.3 mm, and screw construct, 1.3 mm. ZipTight specimens rotated approximately 80 ± 22 degrees before failure, TightRope, 67 ± 13 degrees, screw constructs, 76 ± 27 degrees. Mean failure torque was between 22.2 ± 6.9 Nm and 28.1 ± 12.7 Nm for ZipTight, compared to 32.9 ± 8.0 Nm for TightRope (P = .07), and 30.1 ± 9.6 Nm for screw constructs (P = .03). The majority of suture-button constructs failed by fibular fracture (ZipTight = 6, TightRope = 4), the remaining by device pull-through (ZipTight = 3, TightRope = 1) and loosening (ZipTight = 1). Conversely, 3 of screw-fixed specimens failed by device failure, 2 from bone fracture. CONCLUSION: Suture-button devices provided torsional strength below that of screw fixation. However, all devices may provide failure torques well above 20 Nm, exceeding likely torques applied in casts during healing.(1,2,4) CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture-button devices appear to have provided adequate fixation strength for syndesmosis injuries.