4 Gy versus 24 Gy radiotherapy for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma (FoRT): long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal radiotherapy dose for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma is uncertain. We aimed to compare 24 Gy in 12 fractions (representing the standard of care) with 4 Gy in two fractions (low-dose radiation). METHODS: FoRT (Follicular Radiotherapy Trial) is a randomised, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 43 study centres in the UK. We enrolled patients (aged >18 years) with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who had histological confirmation of follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma requiring radical or palliative radiotherapy. No limit on performance status was stipulated, and previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy to another site was permitted. Radiotherapy target sites were randomly allocated (1:1) either 24 Gy in 12 fractions or 4 Gy in two fractions using minimisation and stratified by histology, treatment intent, and study centre. Randomisation was centralised through the Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre. Patients, treating clinicians, and investigators were not masked to random assignments. The primary endpoint was time to local progression in the irradiated volume based on clinical and radiological evaluation and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The non-inferiority threshold aimed to exclude the chance that 4 Gy was more than 10% inferior to 24 Gy in terms of local control at 2 years (HR 1·37). Safety (in terms of adverse events) was analysed in patients who received any radiotherapy and who returned an adverse event form. FoRT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00310167, and the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN65687530, and this report represents the long-term follow-up. FINDINGS: Between April 7, 2006, and June 8, 2011, 614 target sites in 548 patients were randomly assigned either 24 Gy in 12 fractions (n=299) or 4 Gy in two fractions (n=315). At a median follow-up of 73·8 months (IQR 61·9-88·0), 117 local progression events were recorded, 27 in the 24 Gy group and 90 in the 4 Gy group. The 2-year local progression-free rate was 94·1% (95% CI 90·6-96·4) after 24 Gy and 79·8% (74·8-83·9) after 4 Gy; corresponding rates at 5 years were 89·9% (85·5-93·1) after 24 Gy and 70·4% (64·7-75·4) after 4 Gy (hazard ratio 3·46, 95% CI 2·25-5·33; p<0·0001). The difference at 2 years remains outside the non-inferiority margin of 10% at -13·0% (95% CI -21·7 to -6·9). The most common events at week 12 were alopecia (19 [7%] of 287 sites with 24 Gy vs six [2%] of 301 sites with 4 Gy), dry mouth (11 [4%] vs five [2%]), fatigue (seven [2%] vs five [2%]), mucositis (seven [2%] vs three [1%]), and pain (seven [2%] vs two [1%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Our findings at 5 years show that the optimal radiotherapy dose for indolent lymphoma is 24 Gy in 12 fractions when durable local control is the aim of treatment. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.

Transoral laser microsurgery and radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Equitable survival and enhanced function compared with contemporary standards of care.

INTRODUCTION: We describe the 5-year oncological and functional outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery, neck dissection (TLM + ND) and adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) used to treat patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. The effectiveness of external carotid artery (ECA) ligation in reducing post-operative bleeding, and fibrin glue following ND in reducing wound drainage and length of hospital stay is reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case review of consecutive patients undergoing TLM between 2006 and 2017 used the Kaplan-Meier Estimator and Log-Rank Test for univariate, time-to-event analyses, and Cox-Proportionate Hazard modelling for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 264 consecutive patients were included. Mean follow-up was 49.4 months. 219 (82.9%) patients received PORT. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 74.9%, 73.7%, and 86.2%, respectively. Five-year locoregional control was 89.4%. 65.5% of cases were Human papillomavirus associated (HPV+), for whom OS, DFS and DSS was 85.6%, 84.7% and 92.7%, respectively, and demonstrated significantly higher OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, CI 0.16-0.49, p < 0.0001), DFS (HR 0.28, CI 0.17-0.47, p < 0.0001) and DSS (HR 0.2, CI 0.09-0.44, <0.001). Post-operative oropharyngeal bleeding occurred in 23 patients (8.7%), of which 5 were major/severe, in patients without ECA ligation. Fibrin glue significantly reduced neck drain output (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.001). One-year gastrostomy dependence rate was 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: TLM + ND + PORT results in favourable 5-year survival and locoregional control rates, and low feeding tube dependency rates. ECA ligation and fibrin glue appear to reduce major post-operative haemorrhage, wound drainage and length of hospital stay.

The role of multidisciplinary decision making in oropharyngeal cancer: do we follow guidelines and are treatment decisions being implemented?

PURPOSE: A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to cancer management is gold-standard. With an increasing disease incidence and growing research into human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), updated UK management guidelines were recently published. This study aimed to evaluate the MDT decision-making process among OPC patients at a tertiary centre. METHODS: MDT meetings over a 12-month period were analysed retrospectively. MDT decisions were compared with guidelines and patient records examined to identify decision implementation. Reasons behind any discordant decisions were explored. RESULTS: This study included 140 OPC patients. Thirty-three (23.6%) were not tested for HPV. Patients over 70 years with a smoking history treated palliatively were less likely to be tested (P = 0.017). Eighty-five percent of MDT decisions followed guidelines with the majority not complying (76.2%) related to patient comorbidity. Ten decisions (7.1%) were not implemented. Reasons included: Seven due to patient choice, of which four patients (57.1%) were only seen following the MDT meeting, and three due to clinician decisions as new clinical information emerged. CONCLUSION: The majority of MDT decisions followed guidelines and any discordant decisions were justifiable. Discussing management options with patients beforehand facilitates decision implementation as decisions can potentially change after seeing the patient. Progress is still needed with regards to HPV testing. Reasons for not testing could include subliminal decision-making among clinicians, and patients falling between centres. Crucially, the role of the MDT in head and neck cancer should be to ratify decisions rather than making them, hence the need to see patients prior to MDT discussion.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Standard Therapy Plus Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Lung Cancer: FRAGMATIC Trial.

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. Evidence has suggested that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) might improve survival in patients with cancer by preventing both VTE and the progression of metastases. No trial in a single cancer type has been powered to demonstrate a clinically significant survival difference. The aim of this trial was to investigate this question in patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the addition of a primary prophylactic dose of LMWH for 24 weeks to standard treatment in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer of any stage and histology. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included metastasis-free survival, VTE-free survival, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: For this trial, 2,202 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms over 4 years. The trial did not reach its intended number of events for the primary analysis (2,047 deaths), and data were analyzed after 2,013 deaths after discussion with the independent data monitoring committee. There was no evidence of a difference in overall or metastasis-free survival between the two arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.10; P = .814; and HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.08; P = .864, respectively). There was a reduction in the risk of VTE from 9.7% to 5.5% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.79; P = .001) in the LMWH arm and no difference in major bleeding events but evidence of an increase in the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the LMWH arm. CONCLUSION: LMWH did not improve overall survival in the patients with lung cancer in this trial. A significant reduction in VTE is associated with an increase in clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Strategies to target those at greatest risk of VTE are warranted.

4 Gy versus 24 Gy radiotherapy for patients with indolent lymphoma (FORT): a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma has been shown to be highly radiosensitive with responses to doses as low as 4 Gy in two fractions. This trial was designed to explore the dose response for follicular lymphoma comparing 4 Gy in two fractions with 24 Gy in 12 fractions METHODS: FORT is a prospective randomised, unblinded, phase 3 non-inferiority study comparing radiotherapy given as 4 Gy in two fractions with a standard dose of 24 Gy in 12 fractions. Entry criteria included all patients aged over 18 years, having local radiotherapy for radical or palliative local control, with follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma, who had received no previous treatment for at least 1 month before. The primary outcome was time to local progression analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Randomisation was centralised through the Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre. Radiotherapy target sites were randomised (1:1) with minimisation stratified by histology (follicular lymphoma vs marginal zone lymphoma), treatment intent (palliative or curative) and centre. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00310167. FINDINGS: 299 sites were randomly assigned to 24 Gy and 315 sites to 4 Gy between April 7, 2006, and June 8, 2011, at 43 centres in the UK. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range 0·39-75·4), 91 local progressions had been recorded (21 in the 24 Gy group and 70 in the 4 Gy group). Time to local progression with 4 Gy was not non-inferior to 24 Gy (hazard ratio 3·42, 95% CI 2·09-5·55, p<0·0001). Eight (3%) of 282 patients in the 24 Gy group and four (1%) of 300 in the 4 Gy group had acute grade 3-4 toxic effects. Four (1%) patients in the 24 Gy group and four (1%) patients in the 4 Gy group had late toxic effects. Mucositis was the most common event in the 24 Gy group (two patients with acute mucositis and two with late mucositis; all grade 3) and was not reported in the 4 Gy group. The most common acute effect was pain at the site of irradiation (two patients in the 4 Gy group, one patient in the 24 Gy group; all grade 3), and the most common late effect was fatigue (two patients in the 4 Gy group, one patient in the 24 Gy group; all grade 3). INTERPRETATION: 24 Gy in 12 fractions is the more effective radiation schedule for indolent lymphoma and should be regarded as the standard of care. However, 4 Gy remains a useful alternative for palliative treatment. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.

Cost utility of docetaxel as induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Trial TAX 324 showed that induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) compared with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) followed by chemoradiation increases survival and time to progression in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel in the United Kingdom from the payer perspective. Health states were based on the WHO criteria for objective response to cancer treatments. Efficacy and safety data were obtained from the trial. Resource utilization, costs, and utility data were primarily derived from the literature. RESULTS: A patient on TPF gained 4.1 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus 2.0 QALYs for PF patient. Corresponding lifetime costs were pound 32,440 and pound 28,718. The cost per QALY gained for TPF versus PF was pound 1782. CONCLUSIONS: TPF is cost-effective as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced SCCHN compared with PF. Local treatment patterns may impact findings for other countries.

Dose intensity comparison between weekly and 3-weekly Cisplatin delivered concurrently with radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparison from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.

AIMS: In this retrospective comparison, we describe the differences in dose intensity, delays and toxicity between weekly Cisplatin and 3-weekly Cisplatin given concurrently to patients with locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer (SCCHN) at New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients received radical Cisplatin based chemoradiotherapy for stage 4a SCCHN of the head and neck between September 2000 and December 2004. Twenty-seven patients were treated with 3-weekly inpatient Cisplatin for 3 cycles (20 patients-80 mg/m(2); 7 patients-100 mg/m(2)) concomitantly with radiotherapy (66-70 Gy/33-35 fractions). Twenty-four patients received a similar radiotherapy schedule but received weekly Cisplatin 33-40 mg/m(2). RESULTS: More patients received a higher cumulative dose of at least 240 mg/m(2) if given weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) or 3-weekly Cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) compared with those receiving Cisplatin 3-weekly 100 mg/m(2) (p=0.04). Maximum cumulative dose achievable in the latter group was only 200 mg/m(2) and none achieved the full 3 cycles. Mean Cisplatin dose in the weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) regime (mean 202 mg/m(2)) and 3-weekly arm of 80 mg/m(2) (mean 203 mg/m(2)) was higher than that reached if given 3-weekly Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (mean 180 mg/m(2)) although statistically insignificant (p=0.39) due to the small number of patients. More delays (29% vs. 41%) and omission of chemotherapy (5.6% vs. 17.4%) occurred in the 3-weekly compared with the weekly regime. Toxicity, radiotherapy overall treatment time and delays were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Delivery of 100 mg/m(2) Cisplatin 3-weekly with radiotherapy was less tolerated than 40 mg/m(2) weekly and resulted in less patients achieving cumulative dose beyond 200 mg/m(2), potentially lowering chemotherapy dose intensity.

Consensus conference: implementing treatment recommendations on yttrium-90 immunotherapy in clinical practice - report of a European workshop.

Radiolabelled immunotherapy is a significant step forward in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), with preliminary data suggesting long remissions in some patients. 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan is the only therapy approved for use after rituximab failure and is currently indicated in the EU for the treatment of adults with rituximab-relapsed or refractory CD20-positive follicular B-cell NHL. However, retrospective analyses confirm better responses when 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan is used earlier in the disease course. An expert panel of oncologists, haematologists and nuclear medicine physicians met at an European workshop to discuss proposed therapeutic algorithms for follicular lymphoma and the preliminary medical evidence supporting the incorporation of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan as an early therapeutic option. Phase II data indicate that 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan either alone as primary therapy or as consolidation therapy following induction chemotherapy with or without rituximab achieves high response rates in follicular lymphoma, with complete remission rates of 62-80%. Phase III data are warranted, but based on preliminary observations the expert panel recommended incorporation of radiolabelled immunotherapy into national lymphoma treatment algorithms across Europe. This approach would maximise the therapeutic potential of this agent by encouraging its use early in the disease course of follicular lymphomas.