Local control and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases patients and the impact of novel systemic treatments.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment modalities for patients with brain metastases consist of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Although much is known about local control of brain metastases after radiotherapy and surgery alone, more understanding is needed of the additional effect of new systemic treatments. Our study presents real-world data about the combined effects of different local and systemic treatment strategies on local response of irradiated brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients that presented with brain metastases in our institution between June 2018 and May 2020, reporting the impact of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy combined with systemic treatment on local control of irradiated brain metastases and toxicity. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy were temporarily discontinued around irradiation. RESULTS: 262 consecutively treated patients were included in the study. Median time to local failure of irradiated brain metastases was 18 months (IQR 9-34), median overall survival was 20 months (IQR 10-36). 211 (81 %) patients received systemic treatment. Patients with breast cancer had a worse local control (HR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.0-5.0, p = 0.038), as did patients without any systemic treatment (HR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.3, p = 0.034). Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 36 (14 %) patients. A diameter > 2.5 cm was associated with a higher risk of radiation necrosis. No association was found between systemic treatment in combination with local radiotherapy and symptomatic radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION: Patients who received any form of systemic treatment had better local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. We did not find an association between systemic treatment and the incidence of radiation necrosis.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

These joint European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO)­European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumours provide an update of the first joint EANO­ESMO guideline1 and complement the EANO­ESMO guideline on brain metastasis from solid tumours.2 LM is defined as the spread of tumour cells within the leptomeninges and the subarachnoid space. The present recommendations address LM from extra-central nervous system (CNS) solid tumours, but do not address LM from primary brain tumours, lymphoma or leukaemia. The recommendations cover diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, but do not cover the differential diagnosis, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) or supportive or palliative care in detail. The authors propose diagnostic criteria and assign levels of certainty to the diagnosis of LM in order to provide guidance regarding when to treat versus when to intensify diagnostic efforts and which patients to include in clinical trials. The authors also provide a pragmatic treatment algorithm based on LM subtypes. Supporting evidence for this guideline focuses on LM-specific data with reference to the EANO­ESMO guideline on brain metastasis from solid tumours2 when LM-specific data are not available. Given the low level of evidence available, recommendations are often based on expert opinion and consensus rather than on evidence from informative clinical trials. Still, these EANO­ESMO multidisciplinary recommendations serve as a valuable source of information for physicians and other health care providers, as well as for patients and relatives.

Optimizing treatment of brain metastases in an era of novel systemic treatments: a single center consecutive series.

BACKGROUND: The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases consists of surgical resection, radiation treatment and systemic treatment. Tailoring and timing these treatment modalities is challenging. This study presents real-world data from consecutively treated patients and assesses the impact of all treatment strategies and their relation with survival. The aim is to provide new insights to improve multidisciplinary decisions towards individualized treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: A retrospective consecutive cohort study was performed. Patients with brain metastases were included between June 2018 and May 2020. Brain metastases of small cell lung carcinoma were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed in multivariable models. RESULTS: 676 patients were included in the study, 596 (88%) received radiotherapy, 41 (6%) awaited the effect of newly started or switched systemic treatment and 39 (6%) received best supportive care. Overall survival in the stereotactic radiotherapy group was 14 months (IQR 5-32) and 32 months (IQR 11-43) in patients who started or switched systemic treatment and initially did not receive radiotherapy. In patients with brain metastases without options for local or systemic treatment best supportive care was provided, these patients had an overall survival of 0 months (IQR 0-1). Options for systemic treatment, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70 and breast cancer were prognostic for a longer overall survival, while progressive extracranial metastases and whole-brain-radiotherapy were prognostic for shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing prognosis in light of systemic treatment options is crucial after the diagnosis of brain metastasis for the consideration of radiotherapy versus best supportive care.

Management of meningeal solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytoma; surgery alone or surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy?

INTRODUCTION: A meningeal solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), also called hemangiopericytoma, is a rare mesenchymal malignancy. Due to anatomic constrains, even after macroscopic complete surgery with curative intent, the local relapse risk is still relatively high, thus increasing the risk of dedifferentiation and metastatic spread. This study aims to better define the role of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in meningeal SFTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed across seven sarcoma centers. Clinical information was retrieved from all adult patients with meningeal primary localized SFT treated between 1990 and 2018 with surgery alone (S) compared to those that also received postoperative RT (S + RT). Differences in treatment characteristics between subgroups were tested using independent samples t-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for proportions. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated as time from start of treatment until progression or death from any cause. LC and OS in groups receiving S or S + RT were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: Among a total of 48 patients, 7 (15%) underwent S and 41 (85%) underwent S + RT. Median FU was 65 months. LC was significantly associated with treatment. LC after S at 60 months was 60% versus 90% after S + RT (p = 0.052). Furthermore, R1 resection status was significantly associated with worse LC (HR 4.08, p = 0.038). OS was predominantly associated with the mitotic count (HR 3.10, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study, investigating postoperative RT in primary localized meningeal SFT patients, suggests that combining RT to surgery in the management of this patient population may reduce the risk for local failures.

The influence of 2020 coronavirus lockdown on presentation of oral and maxillofacial trauma to a central London hospital.

The novel coronavirus COVID-19 was first identified in China in December 2019. Its spread resulted in a pandemic, with the United Kingdom entering a period of national lockdown on 23 March 2020 to reduce disease burden on the National Health Service (NHS). King's College Hospital is a Major Trauma Centre serving an inner-city population of 700,000 with 120,000 patients attending the emergency department (ED) annually. We aimed to determine the effect of lockdown on OMFS trauma presentations and lessons learned from emergency service provision during a pandemic. All referrals to the oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMFS) team from ED during the first six weeks of the lockdown period - 23 March 2020 - 3 May 2020 - were compared with the same six-week period in 2019. A total of 111 referrals were made to OMFS during the first six weeks of the lockdown period in 2020 compared with 380 referrals in 2019. Of these, 50.5%, (n=192) were related to facial trauma in 2019 vs (63.1%, n=70) in 2020. Fewer patients were admitted under OMFS: 17.4% (n=35) in 2019 vs 2.9% (n=2) in 2020, and a greater number of patients were discharged from OMFS care directly from the ED: 63.2% (n=127) in 2019 vs 82.9% (n=58) in 2020. There was profound effect of the lockdown on referrals to OMFS from the ED, in number and type of diagnosis. This is potentially reflective of the increased availability of acute/emergency dental services in South-East London during the lockdown period. This gives us valuable insight for service planning in the event of further restrictions.

Leptomeningeal metastases of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour: a rare entity.

A 73-year-old man, without any medical history, had presented with dark urine and pale stool without pain. Diagnostic imaging revealed a tumour in the pancreas with liver metastases. Histopathological examination showed a well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. After a stable 2.5 years on everolimus, progression of the liver metastases was seen and a switch was made to chemotherapy. Three months later, he developed progressive spinal neurological symptoms. MRI of the spine and brain revealed leptomeningeal contrast-enhancing lesions. Cytopathological examination of the cerebrospinal fluid showed malignant epithelial cells compatible with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour. Epithelial cell-adhesion molecule-based flow cytometry of the cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the presence of epithelial tumour cells. Based on these results, the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases of an originally well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas was made.

Targeted treatment and immunotherapy in leptomeningeal metastases from melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Historically leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from melanoma have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of only 2 months despite treatment. Targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising new treatment options in advanced melanoma. We sought to determine the impact of targeted therapy and immunotherapy on the outcome of melanoma patients with LM and to evaluate the influence of prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a series of 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with LM from melanoma between May 2010 and March 2015 treated at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. Thirty-four of these patients also had brain metastases (BM). Statistical analyses assessed the influence of clinical and biological characteristics on survival. RESULTS: Median overall survival of the entire cohort was 6.9 weeks (95% confidence interval 0.9-12.8). Due to a poor performance status or rapidly progressive disease, 14 patients received no treatment. Median overall survival of untreated patients after the diagnosis of LM was 2.9 versus 16.9 weeks for treated patients (P < 0.001). The median survival of 21 patients treated with systemic targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy, with or without RT was 21.7 weeks (range 2-235 weeks). Five patients had LM without BM. Three of these patients died within 3 weeks before any treatment was given, whereas 2 patients are in ongoing remission for 26 weeks (following dabrafenib) and 235 weeks (following WBRT and ipilimumab). Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase and S100B at diagnosis of LM were associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSION: LM from melanoma still has an extremely poor prognosis. As observed in extracranial metastatic disease, new treatment modalities such as systemic targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to increase overall survival in LM, and may result in long-term remission. These new treatment options should be considered in patients with LM.

Strategies to target drugs to gliomas and CNS metastases of solid tumors.

The treatment for central nervous system metastases of solid tumors and gliomas is limited as the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an obstacle to systemic therapy. Here, we review the physiochemical properties of the BBB and both current and new drug strategies to penetrate brain tumors. We focus on targeting receptor- or carrier-mediated transport mechanisms over the BBB used by drug conjugates, nanoparticles, polymer-based nanocarriers, siRNA, and antibodies.

Survival of breast cancer patients with synchronous or metachronous central nervous system metastases.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases represent a devastating complication for advanced breast cancer patients. This observational study examines the influence of patient, tumour and treatment characteristics on overall survival after synchronous or metachronous CNS metastases. METHODS: Information on 992 breast cancer patients with CNS metastases (whose primary tumour was diagnosed between 2004 and 2010) was retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Overall survival was calculated from the date of CNS metastatic diagnosis, and the impact of prognostic factors on survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate extended Cox-regression models. RESULTS: We identified 165 patients with synchronous and 827 patients with metachronous CNS metastases. The majority of patients (88%) presented with brain metastases only, 12% had leptomeningeal metastases. Overall median survival was 5.0 months. Non-triple-negative breast cancer and systemic therapy were associated with improved survival in both groups. In patients with synchronous CNS metastases, surgery for the primary tumour and the metastases also improved survival. In patients with metachronous metastases, younger age (<50 years), lower initial tumour stage (I), ductal carcinoma, a prolonged time interval until diagnosis of CNS metastasis (>1 year), and absence of extracranial metastases were associated with improved survival. Metastasectomy and radiation therapy did not provide benefit beyond the first six months. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in survival was established between synchronous and metachronous CNS metastases. Triple-negative disease is prognostically unfavourable in both groups, while those receiving treatment have a better outcome. Metastasectomy and radiotherapy improve survival within the first six months, and additional benefit may be derived from systemic therapy.

Outcome of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma treated outside clinical trials.

Reports on the outcome of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are mainly based on results obtained in the context of clinical trials. However, due to poor performance status and cognitive impairment, most patients are actually treated outside clinical studies. The aim of this retrospective study was to get more insight into the outcome of HIV-negative PCNSL patients, treated between 2000-2010 in two hospitals (one academic centre and one categorical cancer centre). Fifty-two patients were identified. Eight patients were treated with corticosteroids only. Sixteen patients received high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based chemotherapy, ten received radiotherapy and 18 patients were treated with a combination of MTX-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 63.1 months, the median overall survival for all patients was 24.4 months (95% CI: 11.5-39.8 months), with an event-free survival of 14 months (95% CI: 7.3-24.4 months). Causes of death were progressive PCNSL in 29 patients, MTX toxicity in four patients and epileptic seizures in one patient. These results are comparable with the outcome of prospective clinical trials in this disease, which still has a relatively poor prognosis.

Physician-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures in chemotherapy-induced sensory peripheral neurotoxicity: two sides of the same coin.

BACKGROUND: The different perception and assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) between healthcare providers and patients has not yet been fully addressed, although these two approaches might eventually lead to inconsistent, possibly conflicting interpretation, especially regarding sensory impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 281 subjects with stable CIPN was evaluated with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC v. 2.0) sensory scale, the clinical Total Neuropathy Score (TNSc©), the modified Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) sensory sumscore (mISS) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer CIPN specific self-report questionnaire (EORTC QOL-CIPN20). RESULTS: Patients' probability estimates showed that the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 sensory score was overall more highly related to the NCI-CTC sensory score. However, the vibration perception item of the TNSc had a higher probability to be scored 0 for EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scores lower than 35, as vibration score 2 for EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scores between 35 and 50 and as grade 3 or 4 for EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scores higher than 50. The linear models showed a significant trend between each mISS item and increasing EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 sensory scores. CONCLUSION: None of the clinical items had a perfect relationship with patients' perception, and most of the discrepancies stood in the intermediate levels of CIPN severity. Our data indicate that to achieve a comprehensive knowledge of CIPN including a reliable assessment of both the severity and the quality of CIPN-related sensory impairment, clinical and PRO measures should be always combined.

Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN-R-ODS).

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common neurological side-effect of cancer treatment and may lead to declines in patients' daily functioning and quality of life. To date, there are no modern clinimetrically well-evaluated outcome measures available to assess disability in CIPN patients. The objective of the study was to develop an interval-weighted scale to capture activity limitations and participation restrictions in CIPN patients using the Rasch methodology and to determine its validity and reliability properties. A preliminary Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (pre-R-ODS) comprising 146 items was assessed twice (interval: 2-3 weeks; test-retest reliability) in 281 CIPN patients with a stable clinical condition. The obtained data were subjected to Rasch analyses to determine whether model expectations would be met, and if necessarily, adaptations were made to obtain proper model fit (internal validity). External validity was obtained by correlating the CIPN-R-ODS with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) neuropathy scales and the Pain-Intensity Numeric-Rating-Scale (PI-NRS). The preliminary R-ODS did not meet Rasch model's expectations. Items displaying misfit statistics, disordered thresholds, item bias or local dependency were systematically removed. The final CIPN-R-ODS consisting of 28 items fulfilled all the model's expectations with proper validity and reliability, and was unidimensional. The final CIPN-R-ODS is a Rasch-built disease-specific, interval measure suitable to detect disability in CIPN patients and bypasses the shortcomings of classical test theory ordinal-based measures. Its use is recommended in future clinical trials in CIPN.

Improvements in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

To reduce the growing waiting list for kidney transplantation, we explored the limits of kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death by liberally accepting marginal donor kidneys for transplantation. As the percentage of primary non-function (PNF) increased, we evaluated our transplantation program and implemented changes to reduce the high percentage of PNF in 2005, followed by a second evaluation over the period 2006-2009. Recipients of a kidney from a donor after cardiac death between 1998 and 2005 were analyzed, with PNF as outcome measure. During the period 2002-2005, the percentage of PNF increased and crossed the upper control limits of 12% which was considered as unacceptably high. After implementation of changes, this percentage was reduced to 5%, without changing the number of kidney transplantations from donors after cardiac death. Continuous monitoring of the quality of care is essential as the boundaries of organ donation and transplantation are sought. Meticulous donor, preservation, and recipient management make extension of the donor potential possible, with good results for the individual recipient. Liberal use of kidneys from donors after cardiac death may contribute to a reduction in the waiting list for kidney transplantation and dialysis associated mortality.

The chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization study: from consensus to the first validity and reliability findings.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and dose-limiting complication of cancer treatment. Thus far, the impact of CIPN has not been studied in a systematic clinimetric manner. The objective of the study was to select outcome measures for CIPN evaluation and to establish their validity and reproducibility in a cross-sectional multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After literature review and a consensus meeting among experts, face/content validity were obtained for the following selected scales: the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc), the modified Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group sensory sumscore (mISS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and CIPN20 quality-of-life measures. A total of 281 patients with stable CIPN were examined. Validity (correlation) and reliability studies were carried out. RESULTS: Good inter-/intra-observer scores were obtained for the TNSc, mISS, and NCI-CTC sensory/motor subscales. Test-retest values were also good for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CIPN20. Acceptable validity scores were obtained through the correlation among the measures. CONCLUSION: Good validity and reliability scores were demonstrated for the set of selected impairment and quality-of-life outcome measures in CIPN. Future studies are planned to investigate the responsiveness aspects of these measures.