Validation Study of the Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).

Background: Stigma is a relevant aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific stigma tools are needed to address the complex construct of stigma in PD comprehensively. Objective: To test the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the newly developed Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest). Methods: In this multi-center, cross-sectional study including PD patients and healthy controls, the dimensionality of the PDStigmaQuest was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Acceptability and psychometric properties were investigated. PDStigmaQuest scores of patients and healthy controls were compared. Results: In total, 201 PD patients and 101 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. Results suggested high data quality of the PDStigmaQuest (0.0001% missing data for patients). The exploratory factor analysis produced four factors: felt stigma, hiding, enacted stigma: rejection, and enacted stigma: patronization, explaining 47.9% of variance. An optional work domain for employed patients was included. Moderate floor effects and skewness, but no ceiling effects were found. Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 indicated high internal consistency. Calculated item-total correlations met standard criteria. Test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.83). PDStigmaQuest scores correlated significantly with other stigma measures (rs = 0.56-0.69) and were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls and higher in patients with depressive symptoms than in those without. Conclusions: The patient-reported 18-item PDStigmaQuest showed strong psychometric properties of validity and reliability. Our results suggest that the PDStigmaQuest can be used to assess and evaluate stigma comprehensively in PD, which will improve our understanding of the construct of PD stigma.

Validation of Tenths Stereotactic Coordinates Method Using Probabilistic Tractography of the Ansa Lenticularis in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of stereotactic coordinates to target the ansa lenticularis (AL) using 2 surgical planning methods, the conventional millimeter method (MM) and the normalized Tenths method (TM), assessed through individualized probabilistic tractography. METHODS: Stereotactic targeting of the AL was assessed in 2 groups: 16 patients with Parkinson's disease and 16 healthy controls from Group 1, and 39 Parkinson's disease patients from Group 2. Structural and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging probabilistic tractography identified the AL based on the Schaltenbrand-Wahren Atlas. The MM defined stereotactic coordinates in millimeters, while the TM refined the planning by dividing the intercommissural line (AC-PC) distance into 10 equal parts, normalizing the "X," "Y," and "Z" coordinates for each patient. We subsequently compared the percentage of structural connectivity (%conn) of the AL with predefined regions of interest (ROIs), including the frontopontine-corticothalamic tracts, globus pallidus internus-ventral oral anterior, and ventral oral posterior, and quantified the streamlines in 142 brain hemispheres using the MM and TM coordinates. RESULTS: Despite anatomical variations in intercommissural (AC-PC) line lengths between both groups (22.5 ± 2.09 mm and 24.4 ± 2.56 mm, respectively; P = 0.002), as well as differences in magnetic resonance imaging acquisition parameters, we found that the TM significantly enhanced streamline identification and %conn compared to the MM. These enhancements were noted across ROIs: frontopontine-corticothalamic and globus pallidus internus-ventral oral anterior in both hemispheres, and globus pallidus internus-ventral oral posterior in the left (P < 0.001) and right hemispheres (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: TM surpasses MM in identifying the structural connectivity between the AL and predefined ROIs, underscoring the advantages of coordinate normalization. However, variations in AC-PC line lengths and Euclidean distances between methods could lead to inaccuracies in the coordinate settings, potentially affecting the precision of structural connectivity and the efficacy of therapeutic outcomes.

A Retrospective Comparison of Multiple Approaches to Anatomically Informed Contact Selection in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming via trial-and-error warrants improvement to ensure swift achievement of optimal outcomes. The definition of a sweet spot for subthalamic DBS in Parkinson's disease (PD-STN-DBS) may offer such advancement. Objective: This investigation examines the association of long-term motor outcomes with contact selection during monopolar review and different strategies for anatomically informed contact selection in a retrospective real-life cohort of PD-STN-DBS. Methods: We compared contact selection based on a monopolar review (MPR) to multiple anatomically informed contact selection strategies in a cohort of 28 PD patients with STN-DBS. We employed a commercial software package for contact selection based on visual assessment of individual anatomy following two predefined strategies and two algorithmic approaches with automatic targeting of either the sensorimotor STN or our previously published sweet spot. Similarity indices between chronic stimulation and contact selection strategies were correlated to motor outcomes at 12 months follow-up. Results: Lateralized motor outcomes of chronic DBS were correlated to the similarity between chronic stimulation and visual contact selection targeting the dorsal part of the posterior STN (rho = 0.36, p = 0.007). Similar relationships could not be established for MPR or any of the other investigated strategies. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that a visual contact selection following a predefined strategy can be linked to beneficial long-term motor outcomes in PD-STN-DBS. Since similar correlations could not be observed for the other approaches to anatomically informed contact selection, we conclude that clear definitions and prospective validation of any approach to imaging-based DBS-programming is warranted.

Accelerometric Classification of Resting and Postural Tremor Amplitude.

Clinical rating scales for tremors have significant limitations due to low resolution, high rater dependency, and lack of applicability in outpatient settings. Reliable, quantitative approaches for assessing tremor severity are warranted, especially evaluating treatment effects, e.g., of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We aimed to investigate how different accelerometry metrics can objectively classify tremor amplitude of Essential Tremor (ET) and tremor in Parkinson's Disease (PD). We assessed 860 resting and postural tremor trials in 16 patients with ET and 25 patients with PD under different DBS settings. Clinical ratings were compared to different metrics, based on either spectral components in the tremorband or pure acceleration, derived from simultaneous triaxial accelerometry captured at the index finger and wrist. Nonlinear regression was applied to a training dataset to determine the relationship between accelerometry and clinical ratings, which was then evaluated in a holdout dataset. All of the investigated accelerometry metrics could predict clinical tremor ratings with a high concordance (>70%) and substantial interrater reliability (Cohen's weighted Kappa > 0.7) in out-of-sample data. Finger-worn accelerometry performed slightly better than wrist-worn accelerometry. We conclude that triaxial accelerometry reliably quantifies resting and postural tremor amplitude in ET and PD patients. A full release of our dataset and software allows for implementation, development, training, and validation of novel methods.