Immediate Reactions to Alzheimer Biomarker Disclosure in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals in a Global Truncated Randomized Trial.

Background and Objectives: Preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) trials simultaneously test candidate treatments and the implications of disclosing biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Methods: The EARLY trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 study conducted in 143 centers across 14 countries from November 2015 to December 2018 after being stopped prematurely because of treatment-related hepatotoxicity. Participants age 60-85 years deemed cognitively unimpaired were disclosed an elevated or not elevated brain amyloid result by a certified clinician. Among 3,686 participants, 2,066 underwent amyloid imaging, 1,394 underwent CSF biomarker assessment, and 226 underwent both. Among biomarker-tested participants with at least one change score on an outcome of interest, 680 with elevated and 2,698 with not elevated amyloid were included in this analysis. We compared the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI), and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) before disclosure between amyloid groups. After disclosure, we assessed for differences in the Impact of Events Scale (IES, collected 24-72 hours after disclosure), a measure of intrusive thoughts. Additional scales included the Concerns for AD scale. Results: Among 3378 included participants, the mean (SD) age was 69.0 (5.3); most were female (60%) and White race (84%). No differences were observed before disclosure between participants with elevated and not elevated amyloid for the GDS, STAI, or CSSRS. Participants with elevated amyloid demonstrated higher Concerns for AD scores compared with participants with not elevated amyloid before disclosure. Participants with elevated amyloid demonstrated higher IES scores (9.6 [10.8] vs 5.1 [8.0]) after disclosure and increased Concerns about AD. Patterns of reactions (elevated vs not elevated) were similar for biomarker modalities, although scores were lower among those undergoing CSF compared with PET testing. Although score differences were apparent comparing geographical regions, patterns of group differences were similar. Discussion: Although sample bias must be considered, these results suggest that amyloid disclosure resulted in increased perceived risk and mild distress in those learning an elevated result. Although this study did not assess psychological safety, observed associations intrusive thoughts and distress could be important considerations in the future clinical practice.

The Discovery of Anti-Yo (Anti-PCA1) Antibody in Patients with Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration: Opening a Window into Autoimmune Neurological Disease.

Prior to 1982, ovarian and certain other cancers were known to have a rare complication of progressive cerebellar ataxia, a disorder characterized pathologically by severe-often total-obliteration of cerebellar Purkinje cells. However, the cause of cerebellar injury in these patients was unknown. In that year, we began studies in which sera from individuals with this disorder were reacted with frozen sections of human cerebellum. These studies revealed that patients with ovarian cancer and cerebellar degeneration had high titers of antibodies directed against cytoplasmic antigens of Purkinje cells and deep cerebellar nuclei-a previously undescribed pattern of antibody response which was subsequently found not to be present in ovarian cancer patients who remained neurologically normal. This antibody, now known as "anti-Yo" or "anti-PCA1" provides a marker for rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia and is heavily associated with gynecological and breast malignancies. Although the role of anti-Yo antibody in cerebellar injury has not been established in living animals, in vitro studies have demonstrated that anti-Yo antibody causes Purkinje cell death in the absence of T lymphocytes. In this commentary, we describe our studies leading to initial discovery of anti-Yo antibody, discuss the relationship of this discovery to current knowledge of paraneoplastic neurological disease, and outline some important questions which remain to be resolved before we fully understand the pathogenesis and optimal treatment of this disorder.

Findings of Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Outcomes of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Truncated Randomized Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial.

Importance: Atabecestat, a nonselective oral ß-secretase inhibitor, was evaluated in the EARLY trial for slowing cognitive decline in participants with preclinical Alzheimer disease. Preliminary analyses suggested dose-related cognitive worsening and neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs). Objective: To report efficacy, safety, and biomarker findings in the EARLY trial, both on and off atabecestat treatment, with focus on potential recovery of effects on cognition and behavior. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 study conducted from November 2015 to December 2018 after being stopped prematurely. The study was conducted at 143 centers across 14 countries. Participants were permitted to be followed off-treatment by the original protocol, collecting safety and efficacy data. From 4464 screened participants, 557 amyloid-positive, cognitively normal (Clinical Dementia Rating of 0; aged 60-85 years) participants (approximately 34% of originally planned 1650) were randomized before the trial sponsor stopped enrollment. Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to atabecestat, 5 mg (n = 189), 25 mg (n = 183), or placebo (n = 185). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: change from baseline in Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite score. Secondary outcomes: change from baseline in the Cognitive Function Index and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status total scale score. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: Of 557 participants, 341 were women (61.2%); mean (SD) age was 70.4 (5.56) years. In May 2018, study medication was stopped early owing to hepatic-related AEs; participants were followed up off-treatment for 6 months. Atabecestat, 25 mg, showed significant cognitive worsening vs placebo for Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite at month 6 (least-square mean difference, -1.09; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.53; P < .001) and month 12 (least-square mean, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.76; P < .001), and at month 3 for Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (least-square mean, -3.70; 95% CI, -5.76 to -1.63; P < .001). Cognitive Function Index participant report showed nonsignificant worsening at month 12. Systemic and neuropsychiatric-related treatment-emergent AEs were greater in atabecestat groups vs placebo. After stopping treatment, follow-up cognitive testing and AE assessment provided evidence of reversibility of drug-induced cognitive worsening and AEs in atabecestat groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Atabecestat treatment was associated with dose-related cognitive worsening as early as 3 months and presence of neuropsychiatric treatment-emergent AEs, with evidence of reversibility after 6 months off treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02569398.

The pathway to secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a continuum consisting of a preclinical stage that occurs decades before symptoms appear. As researchers make advances in investigating the continuum, the importance of developing drugs for secondary prevention is garnering increased discussion. For efficacious drug development for secondary prevention it is important to define what are the earliest biological stages of AD. The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened November 27 to 28, 2018 to focus on pre-clinical AD. This review will address the biological approach to defining pre-clinical AD, detection, identification of at-risk individuals, and lessons learned from trials such as A4 and TOMMORROW.

Long-term safety and tolerability of atabecestat (JNJ-54861911), an oral BACE1 inhibitor, in early Alzheimer's disease spectrum patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and a two-period extension study.

BACKGROUND: Atabecestat, a potent brain-penetrable inhibitor of BACE1 activity that reduces CSF amyloid beta (Aß), was developed for oral treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The long-term safety and effect of atabecestat on cognitive performance in participants with predementia AD in two phase 2 studies were assessed. METHODS: In the placebo-controlled double-blind parent ALZ2002 study, participants aged 50 to 85 years were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo or atabecestat 10 or 50 mg once daily (later reduced to 5 and 25 mg) for 6 months. Participants entered ALZ2004, a 12-month treatment extension with placebo or atabecestat 10 or 25 mg, followed by an open-label phase. Safety, changes in CSF biomarker levels, brain volume, and effects on cognitive performance were assessed. RESULTS: Of 114 participants randomized in ALZ2002, 99 (87%) completed, 90 entered the ALZ2004 double-blind phase, and 77 progressed to the open-label phase. CSF Aß fragments and sAPPß were reduced dose-proportionately. Decreases in whole brain and hippocampal volumes were greater in participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD than in preclinical AD, but were not affected by treatment. In ALZ2004, change from baseline in RBANS trended toward worse scores for atabecestat versus placebo. Elevated liver enzyme adverse events reported in 12 participants on atabecestat resulted in dosage modification and increased frequency of safety monitoring. Treatment discontinuation normalized ALT or AST in all except one with pretreatment elevation, which remained mildly elevated. No case met ALT/AST > 3× ULN and total bilirubin > 2× ULN (Hy's law). CONCLUSION: Atabecestat was associated with trend toward declines in cognition, and elevation of liver enzymes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ALZ2002: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02260674, registered October 9, 2014; ALZ2004: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02406027, registered April 1, 2015.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Subcutaneous Bapineuzumab: A Single-Ascending-Dose Study in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease.

This study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending subcutaneous doses of bapineuzumab in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Forty patients were randomized across 5 cohorts (5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg; 8 patients each [bapineuzumab 6; placebo 2]). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in pooled bapineuzumab cohorts (83%) than in the pooled placebo group (27.7%). Most common TEAEs in the bapineuzumab group were gastrointestinal disorders and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (bapineuzumab 17% each; placebo 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 7% of bapineuzumab-treated patients without any deaths or adverse event-related discontinuation. The median times to reach peak measurable concentration (Cmax ) of bapineuzumab were 14 days for 5-, 10-, and 20-mg cohorts, 11 days for 40-mg, and 7 days for 80-mg cohorts. The apparent volume of distribution of bapineuzumab was 134.29 to 204.68 mL/kg. The total body clearance was consistent at 10 to 80 mg. The average terminal half-life ranged from 26 to 46 days (5- to 80-mg groups). Exposure to bapineuzumab increased dose-proportionally from 10 to 80 mg. There was a positive correlation between Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable concentration (AUClast ) of plasma amyloid-ß, and between the Cmax and AUClast of serum bapineuzumab.

Clinical Evaluation of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Bapineuzumab Phase III Studies.

BACKGROUND: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with effusion or edema (ARIA-E) reported in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease in bapineuzumab phase III studies. OBJECTIVES: Assess symptoms, clinical severity, and ARIA-E outcomes, and to evaluate effects on cognition and function. METHODS: A centralized systematic sequential locked procedure and scoring system for assessment of magnetic resonance imaging scans in 1,331 APOE ɛ4 noncarriers and 1,121 carriers was conducted by experienced and trained pairs of neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent ARIA-E occurred in 15.8% of bapineuzumab and 0.8% placebo-treated patients. In all treated APOE ɛ4 noncarriers, the percentage of patients with ARIA-E was 5.6%, 13.4%, and 19.9% in the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg groups respectively, and the incidence of symptomatic ARIA-E was 1.5%, 1.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. In carriers, ARIA-E occurred in 21.2% in the 0.5 mg/kg group, and symptomatic ARIA-E occurred in 2.4%. The clinical severity of ARIA-E in those patients in whom it was detected during the study was mild in 57.1%, 61.3%, and 50.0% of cases in 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg noncarriers respectively, and in 73.8% of cases in 0.5 mg/kg carriers. Vascular risk factors did not appear to increase susceptibility to ARIA-E. Rate of decline in cognition and function measured by changes in ADAS-Cog/11 and DAD total scores did not meaningfully differ in patients with ARIA-E versus those without ARIA-E. Extent of cognitive decline was similar over all visit intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ARIA-E was mild and asymptomatic. ARIA-E did not demonstrate clinically meaningful acute or chronic impact on cognition or function.Registration: NCT00574132 (Bapineuzumab-301), NCT00575055 (Bapineuzumab-302).

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Phase 2, Open-Label Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab is a humanized anti-amyloid-beta (Aß) monoclonal antibody directed at lowering the cerebral Aß deposit in Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: This phase 2, open-label extension (OLE) study evaluated long-term safety and efficacy of bapineuzumab in patients with the mild-to-moderate AD. METHODS: Patients (58-78 years) who completed either of two randomized, placebo-controlled, doubleblind studies (subcutaneous [SC] single-dose-escalation, or intravenous (IV) multiple-ascending-dose)) entered the OLE. Three groups were assessed: bapineuzumab or placebo SC, and bapineuzumab (IV) in OLE (bapi SC/bapi IV); bapineuzumab (IV) in Study 201 and OLE (bapi/bapi); and placebo in Study 201 and bapineuzumab IV in OLE (placebo/bapi). RESULTS: Of 194 patients enrolled, 158 withdrew from OLE; primarily due to withdrawal by subject (n=85) and AE (n=30). Mean (SD) bapineuzumab exposure was 2.9 (1.90) years. There were no significant differences for efficacy endpoints (AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale [ADAS-Cog], Disability Assessment for Dementia [DAD] and MMSE scores) between the bapi/bapi and placebo/bapi groups. Most patients (94.8%, 184/194) reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in OLE. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with effusion or edema (ARIA-E) occurred in 22 (11.3%) patients. The most common TEAEs (>20% patients) were fall, agitation and urinary tract infection with similar incidences between bapi/bapi and placebo/bapi groups. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was seen in cognitive and functional decline between early and delayed treatment groups. No new safety concerns emerged. ARIA-E incidence was higher in patients first exposed to bapineuzumab in OLE versus previously exposed. No clear pattern of etiology contributed to death events.

Long-Term Follow Up of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Treated with Bapineuzumab in a Phase III, Open-Label, Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: A 3-year extension of two Phase III parent studies of intravenous (IV) bapineuzumab in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia (apolipoprotein (APOE) ɛ4 carriers and noncarriers) is summarized. OBJECTIVES: The primary and secondary objectives were to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and maintenance of efficacy of bapineuzumab. METHODS: A multicenter study in patients who had participated in double-blind placebo-controlled parent studies. Patients enrolled in the extension study were assigned to receive IV infusions of bapineuzumab (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) every 13 weeks until termination but were blinded to whether they had received bapineuzumab or placebo in the parent studies. RESULTS: A total of 1,462 (688 were APOEɛ4 carriers and 774 were noncarriers) patients were enrolled. Extension-onset adverse events occurred in >81% of the patients in each dose group. Fall, urinary tract infection, agitation, and ARIA-E occurred in ≥10% of participants. The incidence proportion of ARIA-E was higher among carriers and noncarriers who received bapineuzumab for the first time in the extension study (11.8% and 5.4%, respectively) versus those who were previously exposed in the parent studies (5.1% and 1.3%, respectively). After 6 to 12 months exposure to bapineuzumab IV in the extension study, similar deterioration of cognition and function occurred with no significant differences between the dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of bapineuzumab 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg every 13 weeks for up to 3 years was generally well tolerated, with a safety and tolerability profile similar to that in previous studies.

Biomarker pattern of ARIA-E participants in phase 3 randomized clinical trials with bapineuzumab.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema/effusion (ARIA-E) observed in bapineuzumab clinical trials was associated with specific biomarker patterns. METHODS: Bapineuzumab, an anti-ß-amyloid monoclonal antibody, was evaluated in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Amyloid PET imaging, CSF biomarkers, or volumetric MRI (vMRI) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1,512 participants underwent one or more biomarker assessments; 154 developed incident ARIA-E. No differences were observed at baseline between ARIA-E and non-ARIA-E participants in brain amyloid burden by PET, the majority of vMRI measures, or CSF biomarkers, with the exception of lower baseline CSF Aß42 in APOE ε4 noncarrier ARIA-E vs non-ARIA-E groups (bapineuzumab non-ARIA-E p = 0.027; placebo non-ARIA-E p = 0.012). At week 71, bapineuzumab-treated participants with ARIA-E vs non-ARIA-E showed greater reduction in brain amyloid PET, greater reductions in CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau) (all comparisons p < 0.01), and total tau (t-tau) (all comparisons p < 0.025), and greater hippocampal volume reduction and ventricular enlargement (all p < 0.05). Greater reduction in CSF Aß40 concentrations was observed for ARIA-E versus both non-ARIA-E groups (bapineuzumab/placebo non-ARIA-E p = 0.015/0.049). No group differences were observed at week 71 for changes in whole brain volume or CSF Aß42. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline biomarkers largely do not predict risk for developing ARIA-E. ARIA-E was associated with significant longitudinal changes in several biomarkers, with larger reductions in amyloid PET and CSF p-tau and t-tau concentrations, and paradoxically greater hippocampal volume reduction and ventricular enlargement, suggesting that ARIA-E in bapineuzumab-treated cases may be related to increased Aß efflux from the brain and affecting downstream pathogenic processes.

Central Review of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Two Phase III Clinical Trials of Bapineuzumab in Mild-To-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) consist of ARIA-E (with effusion or edema) and ARIA-H (hemosiderin deposits [HDs]). OBJECTIVES: To address accurate ascertainment of ARIA identification, a final magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading was performed on patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease randomized to bapineuzumab IV or placebo during two Phase III trials (APOE ɛ4 allele carriers or noncarriers). METHODS: Final MRI central review consisted of a systematic sequential locked, adjudicated read in 1,331 APOE ɛ4 noncarriers and 1,121 carriers by independent neuroradiologists. Assessment of ARIA-E, ARIA-H, intracerebral hemorrhages, and age-related white matter changes is described. RESULTS: In the Final Read, treatment-emergent ARIA-E were identified in 242 patients including 76 additional cases not noted previously in real time. Overall, incidence proportion of ARIA-E was higher in carriers (active 21.2%; placebo 1.1%) than in noncarriers (pooled active 11.3%; placebo 0.6%), and was more often identified in homozygote APOE ɛ4 carriers than heterozygotes (34.5% versus 16.9%). Incidence rate of ARIA-E increased with increased dose in noncarriers. Frequency of ARIA-E first episodes was highest after the first and second bapineuzumab infusion and declined after repeated infusions. Incidence of total HDs <10 mm (cerebral microhemorrhages) was higher in active groups versus placebo. CONCLUSION: ARIA was detected more often on MRI scans when every scan was reviewed by trained neuroradiologists and results adjudicated. There was increased incidence of ARIA-E in bapineuzumab-treated carriers who had a microhemorrhage at baseline. ARIA-E was a risk factor for incident ARIA-H and late onset ARIA-E was milder radiologically. Age-related white matter changes did not progress during the study.

Validation of an MRI Rating Scale for Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapeutic agents against amyloid beta (Aß) are associated with adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema and effusion (ARIA-E). Recently, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rating scale was developed for ARIA-E detection and classification. The aim of this study was to validate the use of this rating scale in a larger patient group with multiple raters. METHODS: MRI scans of 75 patients (29 with known ARIA-E and 46 control subjects) were analyzed by five neuroradiologists with different degrees of expertise, according to the ARIA-E rating scale. For each patient, we included a baseline and a follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image. Interrater agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: On average, 4.1% of the ARIA-E cases were missed. We observed a high interrater agreement for scores of sulcal hyperintensity (SH; ICC = .915; 95% CI 85-95) and for the combined scores of the 2 ARIA-E findings, parenchymal hyperintensity (PH) and SH (ICC = .878; 95% CI 79-93). A slightly lower agreement for PH (ICC = .678; 95% CI 51-81) was noted. CONCLUSION: The ARIA-E rating scale is a simple tool to evaluate the extent of ARIA-E in patients recruited into Aß-lowering therapeutic trials. It shows high interrater agreement among raters with different degrees of expertise.

Effect of concomitant use of memantine on mortality and efficacy outcomes of galantamine-treated patients with Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: A large, prospective, 2-year, randomized study in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease or mixed dementia demonstrated reductions in mortality and cognitive/functional decline in galantamine-treated patients. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to study the effect of (the presence or absence of) concomitant memantine use on treatment outcome. METHODS: Randomized patients (N = 2045) were divided into subgroups based on memantine use. Analyses included demographic and clinical characteristics (age, nursing home placement, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scores) and mortality endpoints. RESULTS: Overall, 496 (24.3 %) patients were memantine users and were older (mean (SD), 74.0 (8.76) vs 72.8 (8.76), p = 0.008), with lower MMSE scores (18.2 (4.16) vs 19.2 (4.02), p < 0.0001) and DAD scores (58.0 (23.49) vs 62.5 (20.52), p < 0.0001) than nonusers. Mortality rates (per 100 patient-years) in memantine nonusers (n = 1549) were lower for galantamine (1.39) vs placebo-treated patients (4.15). In memantine users, mortality rates were similar for placebo-treated (4.49) and galantamine-treated patients (5.57). In memantine nonusers at 24 months, the decline in MMSE scores (effect size (95 % CI) 0.25 (0.14; 0.36)) and DAD scores (0.17 (0.06; 0.28)) from baseline was lower in galantamine patients vs placebo patients. The absence of these benefits in memantine users could not be explained by baseline age, MMSE, or DAD scores. CONCLUSION: This post-hoc analysis shows that the beneficial effects of galantamine at 2 years post treatment were not observed in patients who had been placed on background memantine. The reasons for memantine treatment and the possibility of interaction between memantine and galantamine merit further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00679627 . Registered 15 May 2008.

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Biomarker Results of Subcutaneous Bapineuzumab in Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets amyloid-ß (Aß1-40/1 -42) that is believed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of monthly subcutaneous (SC) bapineuzumab versus placebo on cerebral amyloid signal in amyloid-positive patients with mild to moderate AD. The incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema/effusion (ARIA-E), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and other safety aspects of bapineuzumab were also evaluated. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind study, 146 patients were randomized (1 : 1:1 : 1) to SC bapineuzumab 2, 7, or 20 mg/month or placebo. Lack of efficacy of intravenous (IV) bapineuzumab in Phase III studies led to truncation of the treatment duration from 24 months to 12 months. Primary endpoint: change from baseline to month 12 in brain amyloid signal as measured by standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) using florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET). RESULTS: Florbetapir PET SUVR decreased significantly (p = 0.038) from baseline to month 12 for the bapineuzumab 7 mg/month group only; reductions versus placebo were not significant for any dosage. One patient each in bapineuzumab 2 mg/month and 20 mg/month groups had ARIA-E. The percentages of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in placebo (77.8%) and bapineuzumab 2 mg/month (78.4%) group, but higher in 7 mg/month (94.4%) and 20 mg/month (89.2%) groups. CONCLUSION: Bapineuzumab SC once-monthly did not demonstrate significant treatment difference over placebo on cerebral amyloid signal at one year but was well-tolerated. There was less ARIA-E than had been expected based on prior experience with comparable exposure on IV bapineuzumab.

Long-term safety and tolerability of bapineuzumab in patients with Alzheimer's disease in two phase 3 extension studies.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid beta has been under investigation as a treatment for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The 3000 and 3001 phase 3 clinical studies of intravenous bapineuzumab assessed safety and efficacy in patients with mild to moderate AD recruited in over 26 countries. This article describes the long-term safety and tolerability of bapineuzumab in the extension studies for these two protocols. METHODS: The long-term safety and tolerability of intravenous-administered bapineuzumab in patients with AD was evaluated in apolipoprotein E ε4 allele noncarriers (Study 3002, extension of Study 3000) and apolipoprotein E ε4 allele carriers (Study 3003, extension of Study 3001). Those receiving bapineuzumab in the parent study were continued at the same dose; if receiving placebo, patients began bapineuzumab. Bapineuzumab doses were 0.5 mg/kg in both studies and also 1.0 mg/kg in the noncarrier study. Clinical efficacy of bapineuzumab was also assessed in exploratory analyses. RESULTS: Because of lack of efficacy in two other phase 3 trials, the parent protocols were stopped early. As a result, Studies 3002 and 3003 were also terminated. In total, 492 and 202 patients were enrolled in Studies 3003 and 3002, respectively. In apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers (Study 3003), treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 70.7% of the patients who originally received placebo and 66.9% of those who originally received bapineuzumab. In noncarriers, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 82.1% and 67.6% of patients who received placebo + bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg and placebo + bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg, respectively, and in 72.7% and 64.3% of those who received bapineuzumab + bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema or effusions were the main bapineuzumab-associated adverse events in both studies, occurring in approximately 11% of placebo + bapineuzumab and 4% of bapineuzumab + bapineuzumab groups overall. Exploratory analyses of clinical efficacy were not significantly different between groups in either study. CONCLUSIONS: In these phase 3 extension studies, intravenous bapineuzumab administered for up to approximately 3 years showed no unexpected safety signals and a safety profile consistent with previous bapineuzumab trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Noncarriers (Study 3002): ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00996918 . Registered 14 October 2009. Carriers (Study 3003): ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00998764 . Registered 16 October 2009.

Biomarker Exposure-Response Analysis in Mild-To-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Trials of Bapineuzumab.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, was evaluated as a candidate for immunotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment effect of bapineuzumab therapy on disease-relevant biomarkers in patients with mild-to-moderate AD, using exposure-response modeling. METHODS: Biomarker data from two Phase III studies were combined to model the impact of bapineuzumab exposure on week-71 change from baseline in brain amyloid burden by 11C-labeled Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET imaging (global cortical average of the Standardized Uptake Value ratio values), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated (p)-tau concentrations, and brain volumetrics (brain boundary shift integral) by magnetic resonance imaging. Bapineuzumab or placebo was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling helped determine the most appropriate exposure-response model and estimate the impact of disease-relevant covariates (baseline biomarker value, APOE*E4 allele copy number, and baseline disease status as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination score) on the three biomarkers. RESULTS: Linear exposure-response relationships with negative and significant slope terms were observed for PiB PET and CSF p-tau concentration. Baseline biomarker value and APOE*E4 carrier status were significant covariates for both biomarkers. No exposure-response relationship on brain boundary shift integral was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab treatment induced exposure-dependent reductions in brain amyloid burden. Effects on CSF p-tau concentrations were significant only in APOE*E4 carriers. No apparent influence of bapineuzumab exposure on brain volume could be demonstrated.

Bapineuzumab for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in two global, randomized, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy (clinical and biomarker) and safety of intravenous bapineuzumab in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Two of four phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 18-month trials were conducted globally: one in apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers and another in noncarriers. Patients received bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg (both trials) or 1.0 mg/kg (noncarrier trial) or placebo every 13 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 78 on the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale and the Disability Assessment for Dementia. RESULTS: A total of 683 and 329 patients completed the current carrier and noncarrier trials, respectively, which were terminated prematurely owing to lack of efficacy in the two other phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in AD. The current trials showed no significant difference between bapineuzumab and placebo for the coprimary endpoints and no effect of bapineuzumab on amyloid load or cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau. (Both measures were stable over time in the placebo group.) Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema or effusion were confirmed as the most notable adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: These phase 3 global trials confirmed lack of efficacy of bapineuzumab at tested doses on clinical endpoints in patients with mild to moderate AD. Some differences in the biomarker results were seen compared with the other phase 3 bapineuzumab trials. No unexpected adverse events were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Noncarriers (3000) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00667810 ; registered 24 Apr 2008. Carriers (3001) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00676143 ; registered 2 May 2008.

First-In-Human safety and long-term exposure data for AAB-003 (PF-05236812) and biomarkers after intravenous infusions of escalating doses in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: In the First-In-Human (FIH), 39-week, randomized, adaptive design study, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and biomarkers were measured in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) after infusion of a humanized monoclonal antibody to amyloid ß, AAB-003 (NCT01193608; registered 19 August 2010). AAB-003 was developed by modifying bapineuzumab to reduce Fc-receptor-mediated effector function as a strategy to reduce the removal of amyloid from vessel walls associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema/effusions (ARIA-E) without diminishing overall amyloid clearance. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with AD received up to three infusions of AAB-003 (or placebo) 13 weeks apart at doses of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg/kg in the FIH trial. Dose escalation was based on safety data reviews using a Bayesian escalation algorithm. Subjects who completed the FIH study were permitted to enter a 1-year open-label extension trial with four additional intravenous infusions of AAB-003 (NCT01369225; registered 10 May 2011). RESULTS: Dose-dependent increases in plasma amyloid ß and AAB-003 were observed. No significant changes in cerebral spinal fluid biomarkers were observed. Pharmacokinetics elimination half-life (21-28 days) clearance and volume of distribution values were consistent across dose groups indicating linearity. ARIA-E was the most notable safety finding detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 8 mg/kg in two patients. Three cases of microhemorrhage were observed. No new safety findings or MRI abnormalities were observed for the 52 subjects who received AAB-003 in the extension trial. CONCLUSION: Based on integrated review of laboratory, electrocardiogram, adverse events, and MRI, AAB-003 was safe and well tolerated up to 8 mg/kg for up to 91 weeks (FIH and extension trials) in patients with mild to moderate AD. Asymptomatic and resolvable ARIA-E was observed after the first or second infusion of AAB-003, similar to bapineuzumab. The AAB-003 dose at which ARIA-E was observed was higher compared to bapineuzumab, supporting the hypothesis that reducing Fc-receptor effector function may reduce the ARIA associated with monoclonal antibodies targeting cerebral amyloid.

Challenges, solutions, and recommendations for Alzheimer's disease combination therapy.

Given the complex neuropathology Alzheimer's disease (AD), combination therapy may be necessary for effective treatment. However, scientific, pragmatic, regulatory, and business challenges need to be addressed before combination therapy for AD can become a reality. Leaders from academia and industry, along with a former member of the Food and Drug Administration and the Alzheimer's Association, have explored these challenges and here propose a strategy to facilitate proof-of-concept combination therapy trials in the near future. First, a more integrated understanding of the complex pathophysiology and progression of AD is needed to identify the appropriate pathways and the disease stage to target. Once drug candidates are identified, novel clinical trial designs and selection of appropriate outcome assessments will be needed to enable definition and evaluation of the appropriate dose and dosing regimen and determination of efficacy. Success in addressing this urgent problem will only be achieved through collaboration among multiple stakeholders.

Changes in Brain Volume with Bapineuzumab in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, an anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibody, was evaluated in two placebo-controlled trials in APOE*ɛ4 carriers and noncarriers, respectively, with Alzheimer's disease. OBJECTIVES: A volumetric magnetic resonance imaging substudy was performed to determine if bapineuzumab altered brain volume rate of change. METHODS: Bapineuzumab dosages included 0.5 mg/kg in carriers and 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg in noncarriers, every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. Volumetric outcomes included annualized brain, ventricular, and mean hippocampal boundary shift integrals (BBSI; VBSI; HBSI) up to Week 71. Treatment differences were estimated using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: For BBSI and HBSI, there were no significant treatment-related differences within either study, but, compared to pooled carriers and noncarriers receiving placebo, noncarriers receiving1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab had greater increases in these measures. Bapineuzumab-treated patients showed significantly greater VBSI rates compared with placebo for 0.5 mg/kg in carriers and 1.0 mg/kg (but not 0.5 mg/kg) in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab produced an increase in ventricular volume compared with placebo. Etiology for this increase is unclear but may be related to amyloid-ß clearance or its consequences.