Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Law Med Ethics ; 49(1): 50-58, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966653

ABSTRACT

U.S. immigration policies and enforcement can make immigrants fearful of accessing healthcare. Although current immigration policies restrict enforcement in "sensitive locations" including healthcare facilities, there are reports of enforcement actions in such settings.


Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Personnel/psychology , Law Enforcement , Organizational Policy , Health Facilities , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Workplace
3.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 54(4): 538-545.e3, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28716621

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Health care professionals (HCPs) are crucial to physician-assisted death (PAD) provision. OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively assess the favorability of justifications for or against PAD legalization among HCPs, the effect of the terms "suicide" and "euthanasia" on their views and their support for three forms of PAD. METHODS: Our questionnaire presented three cases: physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia for a competent patient, and euthanasia for an incompetent patient with an advance directive for euthanasia. Respondents judged whether each case was ethical and should be legal and selected their justifications from commonly cited reasons. The sample included physician clinicians, researchers, nonphysician clinicians, and other nonclinical staff at a major academic medical center. RESULTS: Of 221 HCPs, the majority thought that each case was ethical and should be legal. In order of declining favorability, justifications supporting PAD legalization were relief of suffering, right to die, mercy, acceptance of death, nonabandonment, and saving money for the health care system; opposing justifications were the slippery slope argument, unnecessary due to palliative care, killing patients is wrong, religious views, and suicide is wrong. The use of suicide and euthanasia terminology did not affect responses. Participants preferred physician-assisted suicide to euthanasia for a competent patient (P < 0.0001) and euthanasia for an incompetent patient to euthanasia for a competent patient (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs endorsed patient-centered justifications over other reasons, including role-specific duties. Suicide and euthanasia language did not bias HCPs against PAD, challenging claims that such value-laden terms hinder dialogue. More research is required to understand the significance of competency in shaping attitudes toward PAD.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel/psychology , Suicide, Assisted/psychology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Competency , Middle Aged , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminology as Topic , Thinking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...