A Growing Divide? Social Determinants of the Use of Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Survival.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of locally advanced rectal cancer was described as early as 2004. Initial national data demonstrated increase in utilization of NOM from 1998 to 2010, but newer national utilization data are not available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database to assess utilization and 5-y overall survival (OS) of NOM of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer, were over 40 y old, received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and were not being treated with palliative intent. RESULTS: 74,780 patients were analyzed. 64,540 (86.2%) underwent a definitive resection, 10,330 (13.8%) had NOM. Utilization of NOM steadily increased from 11.3% in 2010 to 18.6% in 2018. Multivariate regression identified the highest predictors of utilization of NOM to be uninsured status, government insurance, Black race, and treatment at a community cancer center. Multivariate regression identified NOM as the highest hazard for mortality (hazard ratio = 2.286, confidence interval 2.209-2.366). After propensity score matching, the mean estimated 5-y OS was 52.0% for those managed operatively compared to 39.8% for those managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2018, the utilization of NOM of locally advanced rectal cancer significantly increased. However, there was a significant discrepancy in OS in comparison to surgical resection for these patients. Further study is needed to determine the long-term oncologic safety of NOM.

The Presence of Implicit Gender Bias in Colon and Rectal Surgery Residency Letters of Recommendation.

BACKGROUND: Selection for colorectal surgery residency relies on letters of recommendation for assessment of candidates' strengths and weaknesses. It is unclear whether this process incorporates implicit gender bias. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the presence of gender bias in letters of recommendation for colorectal surgery residency. DESIGN: Mixed methods assessment of the characteristics described within the blinded letters of the 2019 application cycle to a single academic residency. SETTINGS: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Blinded letters from the 2019 colorectal surgery residency application cycle. INTERVENTIONS: Characteristics of the letters were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association of gender with the presence of descriptors within the letters. RESULTS: A total of 111 applicants, 409 letter writers, and 658 letters were analyzed. Forty-three percent of applicants were female. Female and male applicants had an equal mean number of positive (5.4 vs 5.8; p = 0.10) and negative (0.5 vs 0.4; p = 0.07) attributes represented. Female applicants were more likely to be described as having poor academic skills (6.0 vs 3.4%; p = 0.04) and possessing negative leadership qualities (5.2% vs 1.4%; p < 0.01) than male applicants. Male applicants were more likely to be described as kind (36.6% vs 28.3%; p = 0.03), curious (16.4% vs 9.2%; p = 0.01), possessing positive academic skills (33.7% vs 20.0%; p < 0.01), and possessing positive teaching skills (23.5% vs 17.0%; p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: This study analyzed a single year of applications to an academic center and may not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the qualities used to describe female versus male applicants in colorectal surgery residency application letters of recommendation. Female applicants were more often described in negative academic terms and possessing negative leadership qualities. Males were more likely to be described as kind, curious, academically impressive, and possessing good teaching skills. The field may benefit from educational initiatives to reduce implicit gender bias in letters of recommendation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C191 . LA PRESENCIA DE SESGO DE GNERO IMPLCITO EN LAS CARTAS DE RECOMENDACIN DE RESIDENCIA EN CIRUGA DE COLON Y RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:La selección para la residencia en cirugía colorrectal se basa en cartas de recomendación para la evaluación subjetiva de las fortalezas y debilidades de los candidatos. No está claro si este proceso incorpora un sesgo de género implícito.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la presencia de sesgo de género en las cartas de recomendación para la residencia en cirugía colorrectal.DISEÑO:Evaluación de métodos mixtos de las características descritas dentro de las cartas selladas del ciclo de solicitud de 2019 a una sola residencia académica.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Centro médico académico.PACIENTES:Cartas selladas del ciclo de solicitud de residencia en cirugía colorrectal de 2019.INTERVENCIONES:Las características de las cartas se determinaron utilizando medidas cualitativas y cuantitativas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Asociación del género con la presencia de descriptores dentro de las cartas.RESULTADOS:Hubo 111 solicitantes, 409 escritores de cartas y se analizaron 658 cartas. El 43% de los solicitantes eran mujeres. Los solicitantes masculinos y femeninos tenían el mismo promedio de atributos positivos (5,4 frente a 5,8; p = 0,10) y negativos (0,5 frente a 0,4; p = 0,07) representados. Las solicitantes femeninas tenían más probabilidades de ser descritas como con deficientes habilidades académicas (6,0 frente a 3,4%, p = 0,04) y poseían cualidades de liderazgo negativas (5,2% frente a 1,4%; p < 0,01) en comparacion con los solicitantes masculinos. Los solicitantes masculinos tenían más probabilidades de ser descritos como amables (36,6 % frente a 28,3%; p = 0,03), curiosos (16,4% frente a 9,2%; p = 0,01), que poseían habilidades académicas positivas (33,7 % frente a 20,0%; p < 0,01), y habilidades docentes positivas (23,5% vs 17,0%; p = 0,04).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio analizó un solo año de solicitudes a un centro académico y puede no ser generalizable.CONCLUSIÓN:Existen diferencias en las cualidades utilizadas para describir a los solicitantes femeninos versus masculinos en las cartas de recomendación de solicitud de residencia en cirugía colorrectal. Las candidatas femeninas se describieron con mayor frecuencia en términos académicos negativos y poseían cualidades de liderazgo negativas. Los hombres eran más propensos a ser descritos como amables, curiosos, académicamente impresionantes y con buenas habilidades docentes. El campo puede beneficiarse de iniciativas educativas para reducir el sesgo de género implícito en las cartas de recomendación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C191 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Impact of the first COVID-19 surge on the outcomes of diverticulitis.

Introduction: During the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare utilization changed. We sought to examine the impact of the first COVID-19 surge on the outcomes of patients whose elective surgeries for diverticulitis were postponed and those who underwent urgent surgery during the surge. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study from a single tertiary center in the Northeast of the US. Patients whose elective surgeries were delayed, or who underwent urgent surgery for diverticulitis during the first COVID-19 surge (3/16/2020 to 8/1/2020) were included. A cohort from 2019 was used for comparison. Variables were compared between groups including: procedure, death, length of stay, disposition, stoma rate, technique for surgery, and leak rate. Results: Forty-five patients were included in the COVID-19 group and 44 patients in the 2019 group. Twenty-seven patients had elective surgeries delayed during the COVID-19 surge. Ten (37%) required more urgent surgery, 80% with complicated disease. Six (22%) were admitted to the hospital and 13 (48%) required additional antibiotics. Eight (30%) patients postponed their surgeries indefinitely and 7 (26%) had surgery once permitted. There were no observed differences between the two groups in the rate of complicated disease, leaks, technique for surgery or stoma rate. Conclusions: During the first COVID-19 surge, over 1/3 of patients whose elective diverticulitis surgeries were postponed required urgent surgery, a majority of whom had complicated disease. There were no apparent differences in outcomes when compared to a pre-pandemic cohort, highlighting the importance of a triage system with the ability to escalate surgery in a timely manner.

Horseshoe Fistulae in the Age of LIFT.

BACKGROUND: Horseshoe fistula is a challenging benign anorectal condition to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization and success of different definitive fistula repair techniques in the treatment of horseshoe fistula. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series which included all patients who were treated for horseshoe fistula from 2006 to 2019 at a single, tertiary care center and whom had at least one follow-up visit. Patients were excluded if < 18 years of age or carried a diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Patients were assessed for fistula recurrence and incontinence. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were identified. On average, they were 47 years old, 63% male, and 18% current smokers. Seventy-nine percent required seton during their treatment course. Of the 8 first attempts at fistula repair, the types of repair included flap (15%), LIFT (35%), fistulotomy (31%), plug (12%), and fistulotomy and immediate reconstruction (1%). Recurrence for these procedures was as follows: flap 30%, LIFT 21%, fistulotomy 14%, plug 88%, and fistulotomy and immediate reconstruction 0%. Twelve patients who recurred underwent 17 additional procedures to attempt to cure their fistula. Overall, of those who underwent any attempt at definitive repair, 82% of patients were cured of their fistula, 12% had a chronic seton, and 6% had a chronic fistula. Thirteen percent of those who were cured had incontinence. The mean follow-up time was 1.1 years. Patients required a median of 3 procedures (range 1-11). CONCLUSION: Horseshoe fistula remains a complex anorectal condition. Successful repair can be performed in > 80% of patients. However, repair can often require multiple surgical procedures.

How to Get Ahead: Early-Career Colorectal Surgeons Reflect on Their First Few Years in Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To identify strategies and barriers to career progression in early-career colorectal surgeons. DESIGN: Qualitative research study performed via semi-structured interviews with early-career, board-certified colon, and rectal surgeons. Responses were analyzed, coded, and categorized to understand strategies towards career progression, perceived barriers to career progression, beliefs about case mix, and referral patterns. SETTING: Interviews conducted in person and via telephone across the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Early-career board-certified colorectal surgeons RESULTS: Twenty-two board-certified colorectal surgeons currently employed in 14 states and 1 foreign country were interviewed. Fourty-five percent were female. Their current practice environment was described as academic (77%), private practice (18%), or military (5%). Seventy-seven percent of surgeons were satisfied with their career progression. Seventy-two percent were satisfied with the case volume. Seventy-two percent were satisfied with their case mix. When asked about strategies for career progression, surgeons made 77 comments focused on three main themes: optimization of their job search, optimization of relationships while on the job, and efforts to augment individual achievement. When asked about barriers to career advancement, surgeons most frequently commented on a lack of time and a lack of mentors. When asked about case mix, 63% of surgeons felt that they had no control over it. They were evenly divided between believing that a broad case mix or a niche specialized case mix was more instrumental for career progression. CONCLUSIONS: Early-career colorectal surgeons were mostly satisfied with their career progression, volume, and case mix. In discussing their careers, many have developed a number of strategies focused on growth as an individual as well as relationship building. They also identified a number of barriers including lack of time and lack of mentorship. Early-career surgeons may be able to utilize these strategies and anticipate barriers prior to starting their first job, leading to greater likelihood of career satisfaction.

Oral examinations in undergraduate medical education - What is the 'value added' to evaluation?

BACKGROUND: Given the long tradition of oral examinations in surgical training, surgical clerkships continue to use oral examinations to evaluate medical students even though the value of oral examination at the post-graduate level has been questioned. The key issue in the context of undergraduate surgical training then is to understand value of the oral examination in assessment. The goal of this study is to clarify what oral examinations do, or appear to, test and how this complements other methods of assessment. METHODS: The study is a retrospective, qualitative study of comments provided by examiners on the oral examination score sheets evaluating performance of students completing their core surgery clerkship at an academic medical center. Through immersion in and initial familiarization with the data we develop a scheme of codes for labeling the data for subsequent synthesis. Using these inductive codes, all comments were reviewed and analyzed to determine what qualities examiners detect, or naturally comment on, when administering and scoring the oral examinations. RESULTS: Thirteen substantive codes (Communication, Critical Thinking, Decisiveness, Demeanor, Differential Diagnosis, Focus, Knowledge, Management, Organization, Pace, Prompting, Thoroughness, and Work Up) and three valence codes (Negative, Neutral, and Positive) were developed and used to code the data. The most universal code was 'Knowledge', used by 43 (100%) of examiners; the most frequently used code was 'Work Up', applied to the comments 437 (21.1%) times. Overall, positive valence was attached to 1146 (55.2%) of codes and negative valence to 879 (42.3%) codes. The most discriminating codes in grading were 'Demeanor', 'Focus', and 'Organization'. CONCLUSIONS: Oral examinations provide rich opportunity for testing qualities readily tested on other examinations but also many intangible qualities that are otherwise less well or not well tested. As such, the 'value-added' by oral examinations likely justifies their continued use in the evaluation of surgical trainees. The identification of testable qualities should aid in the development of a standardized scoring rubric, the use of which may aid in minimizing subjectivity and bias in what otherwise is a rich assessment tool.

What do Young Colorectal Surgeons Value From Their CRS Residency Training?

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal surgery (CRS) training has seen many changes over the years. This study sought to identify aspects of CRS residency curriculum that were most valued by recent graduates and what changes could be made to improve training. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were performed with board-certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from their CRS residency. Interview responses were qualitatively analyzed and converted to coded, categorizable data. Subjects were recruited via a snowball sampling method. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in person and via telephone with surgeons in a variety of practices across the United States and Canada. Analysis was performed by a team at Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, an academic, tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Board certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from CRS residency. RESULTS: Twenty surgeons from 11 different CRS residencies were interviewed. At the time of the interview, surgeons were employed in 13 states and 1 foreign country. When asked what aspects of their CRS residency were of value, surgeons produced 74 comments emphasizing: volume of cases (65% of subjects), variety of cases (55%), development of technical skills (40%), management of specific diseases (35%), faculty (30%), mentorship (30%), and practice management (15%). With regard to technical skills, surgeons cited pelvic surgery (40%) and minimally invasive techniques (45%) as the exposures that helped them become successful. When discussing what could be added to training, subjects made 54 comments identifying: more robotic exposure (35%), more anorectal disease (30%), more pelvic floor exposure (25%), and practice management/billing (35%) as items to incorporate. Sixty five percent of subjects believed that "nothing" should be eliminated from their training. CONCLUSIONS: Young colon and rectal surgeons valued their training highly and strongly declined to eliminate any substantial part of the existing curriculum. They also expressed a strong desire to add more elements to the CRS residency including further robotic training, more anorectal, more pelvic floor, and further training in practice management.

Exploring the Content of Intraoperative Teaching.

INTRODUCTION: Much teaching to surgical residents takes place in the operating room (OR). The explicit content of what is taught in the OR, however, has not previously been described. This study investigated the content of what is taught in the OR, specifically during laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs), for which a cognitive task analysis (CTA), explicitly delineating individual steps, was available in the literature. METHODS: A checklist of necessary technical and decision-making steps to be executed during performance of LCs, anchored in the previously published CTA, was developed. A convenience sample of LCs was identified over a 12-month period from February 2011 to February 2012. Using the checklist, a trained observer recorded explicit teaching that occurred regarding these steps during each observed case. All observations were tallied and analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 51 LCs were observed; 14 surgery attendings and 33 residents participated in the observed cases. Of 1042 observable teaching points, only 560 (53.7%) were observed during the study period. As a proportion of all observable steps, technical steps were observed more frequently, 377 (67.3%), than decision-making steps, 183 (32.7%). Also when focusing on technical and decision-making steps alone, technical steps were taught more frequently (60.9% vs 43.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Only approximately half of all possible observable teaching steps were explicitly taught during LCs in this study. Technical steps were more frequently taught than decision-making steps. These findings may have important implications: a better understanding of the content of intraoperative teaching would allow educators to steer residents' preoperative preparation, modulate intraoperative instruction by members of the surgical faculty, and guide residents to the most appropriate teaching venues.

Mini-clinical evaluation exercise as a student assessment tool in a surgery clerkship: lessons learned from a 5-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) used for clinical skill assessment in internal medicine provides in-depth assessment of single clinical encounters. The goals of this study were to determine the feasibility and value of implementation of the mini-CEX in a surgery clerkship. METHODS: Retrospective review of mini-CEX evaluations collected for surgery clerkship students at our institution between 2005 and 2010. Returned assessment forms were tallied. Qualitative feedback comments were analyzed using grounded theory. Principal components analysis identified thematic clusters. Thematic comment counts were compared to those provided via global assessments. RESULTS: For 124 of 137 (90.5%) students, mini-CEX score sheets were available. Thematic clusters identified comments on 8 distinct clinical skill domains. On the mini-CEX, each student received an average of 6.5 ± 2.2 qualitative feedback comments covering 4.5 ± 1.2 separate skills. Of these, 42.7% were critical. Comments provided in global evaluations were fewer (2.9 ± 0.6; P < .001), constrained in scope (0.8 ± 0.2 skills; P < .001), and rarely critical (9.1%). CONCLUSION: A mini-CEX can be incorporated into a surgery clerkship. The number and breadth of feedback comments make the mini-CEX a rich assessment tool. Critical and supportive feedback comments, both highly valuable, are provided nearly equally frequently when the mini-CEX is used as an assessment tool.

Observation of clinical teaching: interest in a faculty development program for surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Observation of clinical teaching is a powerful tool to develop faculty teaching skills. However, the process of being observed can be intimidating for any educator. Our aim is to assess interest in an Observation of Teaching Program within an academic surgical department. DESIGN: An electronic survey asking faculty to indicate interest in participation in a faculty development program that consists of a peer, expert, and/or cross-disciplinary physician observation of teaching was used. Faculty members were also asked whether they would like to observe other faculty as part of a peer-review track. The results were compiled for descriptive statistical analysis. SETTING: Electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: In all, 46 faculty, all of whom have assigned medical student and resident teaching responsibilities, were introduced to the Observation of Teaching Program and surveyed on their interest in participating. RESULTS: A total of 87% (40/46) of faculty responded after 2 e-mails and 75% (30/40) indicated interest in the Observation of Teaching Program. All faculty who responded positively indicated interest in expert review (30/30), 90% (27/30) in peer review, 87% (26/30) in surgeon review, and 83% (25/30) in cross-disciplinary physician review. A total of 48% (19/40) indicated interest in observing others. Of those who were not interested in the Observation of Teaching Program, restrictions on time (4/10), not enough clinical care responsibilities (2/10), not wanting to be watched (2/10), and program did not seem effective (1/10) were cited as reasons for not participating. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical faculty are interested in being observed and receiving feedback about their clinical teaching by experts, peers, colleagues, and cross-disciplinary physicians. Professional development programs for surgeons should consider observation as a teaching methodology.

Interest in and perceived barriers to flexible-track residencies in general surgery: a national survey of residents and program directors.

OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Surgery now permits general surgery residents to complete their clinical training over a 6-year period. Despite this new policy, the level of interest in flexible scheduling remains undefined. We sought to determine why residents and program directors (PDs) are interested in flexible tracks and to understand implementation barriers. DESIGN: National survey. SETTING: All United States general surgery residency programs that participate in the Association of Program Directors in Surgery listserv. PARTICIPANTS: PDs and categorical general surgery residents in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes about flexible tracks in surgery training. A flexible track was defined as a schedule that allows residents to pursue nonclinical time during residency with resulting delay in residency completion. RESULTS: Of the 748 residents and 81 PDs who responded, 505 residents and 45 PDs were supportive of flexible tracks (68% vs 56%, p = 0.03). Residents and PDs both were interested in flexible tracks to pursue research (86% vs 82%, p = 0.47) and child bearing (69% vs 58%, p = 0.13), but residents were more interested in pursuing international work (74% vs 53%, p = 0.004) and child rearing (63% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Although 71% of residents believe that flexible-track residents would not be respected as the equal of other residents, only 17% of PDs indicated they would not respect flexible-track residents (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most residents and PDs support flexible tracks, although they differ in their motivation and perceived barriers. This finding lends support to the new policy of the American Board of Surgery.

Career satisfaction of women in surgery: perceptions, factors, and strategies.

BACKGROUND: With the current and projected shortages of general surgeons, more attention is being paid to the increasing pool of women physicians. This study seeks to understand the variables leading to career satisfaction for women surgeons to better recruit, retain, and support them. STUDY DESIGN: Eighteen semi-structured interviews of 12 female and 6 male surgeons 2 to 12 years into practice were qualitatively analyzed and converted to coded, categorized data. Significance was derived by Fisher's exact test. Participants were recruited by snowball sampling. RESULTS: Our sample represents a highly satisfied group of female and male surgeons. Although both women and men describe with equal frequency having made career tradeoffs for personal and family time, and vice versa, women far more frequently than men cite reasons related to their personal time, predictable time, and family relationships as why they are currently satisfied with their career (34.1% versus 8.7%; p < 0.05). Both cite being satisfied by career content equally. When describing strategies used in developing a successful surgical career, women most frequently cite social networks as a key to success (88% versus 12% by men; p < 0.05), and men more frequently cite reasons related to training (29% versus 0% by women; p < 0.05) and compensation (24% versus 0% by women; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although both men and women make tradeoffs of career for family and family for career, women's perception of satisfaction comes from viewing their surgical career within the broader context of their lives. Women might be attracted to a career that acknowledges and values the whole person beyond the surgeon, and could benefit from work infrastructures that enhance networking.

Spaced education improves the feedback that surgical residents give to medical students: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgery residents teach medical students; feedback is one critical teaching skill. We investigated whether feedback given by surgery residents to students could be improved through an online spaced education program. METHODS: Surgery residents were randomized to receive either a weekly spaced education e-mail during a 9-month period containing teaching bullets on how to provide effective feedback, or no intervention. Medical students rated the frequency and quality of feedback they received from the residents. RESULTS: Students reported 45% (67 of 149) of the spaced education residents gave frequent feedback, compared with 31% (55 of 175) of control residents (relative risk [RR], 1.43; P = .016). Students reported resident feedback was "helpful in their learning" in 92% (132 of 143) of their evaluations of spaced education residents, compared with 82% (132 of 161) of their evaluations of control residents (RR, 1.13; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs using feedback bullets e-mailed weekly can significantly improve the frequency and quality of feedback that surgical residents provide medical students.

The ACGME competencies in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: In 1999, the ACGME introduced the 6 competencies that have become the basis for resident education. Since the operating room (OR) has traditionally been the major focus for resident teaching in surgery, we performed an observational study to determine whether it is an appropriate setting for the teaching and/or assessment of the competencies. METHODS: A 3-person team observed 11 operations and recorded all teaching events. Observers then determined whether each event involved the teaching of a competency by faculty or demonstration of a competency by residents. Frequency counts, mean times, and ranges were calculated for each competency taught and demonstrated. RESULTS: The Patient Care competency was both the most commonly taught and demonstrated. Faculty spent an average of 33% of operative time instructing in patient care, and residents demonstrated it 65% of the time. The Interpersonal/Communication Skills (4%) and Practice-Based Learning/Improvement (4%) competencies were also occasionally demonstrated by residents. The remaining competencies were addressed less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: OR teaching was primarily devoted to the Patient Care competency. The OR was also an appropriate setting for evaluating resident performance in this area. New approaches to OR teaching or educational efforts in other settings such as the clinic are necessary for teaching and assessing the remaining competencies.

Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection.

PURPOSE: Perineal wound complications are common following abdominoperineal resection. This study investigates the factors contributing to these complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection at our institution from June 1997 to May 2003 were reviewed. Significant predictors associated with minor (separation <2 cm, stitch abscesses, or sinus tracts) or major (>2 cm of separation, reoperation required, or readmission) wound complications were ascertained. RESULTS: Of 153 patients, there were 22 major (14 percent) and 32 minor (24 percent) wound complications. Patients with anal cancer had a higher rate of major complications than those with rectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. Minor wound complications were more common in patients with anal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease than those with rectal cancer. Factors associated with a higher rate of major wound complications included flap closure, tumor size, body mass index, diabetes, and indication for the procedure. When the subset of patients with rectal cancer was considered, higher rates of major wounds were associated with increased body mass index, diabetes, and stage. Minor complications were associated with a two-team approach and increasing body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: This is currently the largest review of perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection. Patients with anal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease were at higher risk for perineal wound complications than those with rectal cancer. Preoperative radiation and primary closure were not associated with increased complications following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.