Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
HIV Med ; 21(7): 463-469, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558205

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) care remains a challenge for individuals with potential sexual exposure to HIV in terms of PEP completion and ongoing risk behaviours. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on data from the French Dat'AIDS prevention cohort (NCT03795376) for individuals evaluated for PEP between 2004 and 2017. A multivariable analysis was performed of predictors of both PEP completion and condom use [odds ratios (ORs)] and their associated probabilities (P, with P > 95% being clinically relevant). RESULTS: Overall, 29 060 sexual exposures to HIV were evaluated for PEP [36% in men who have sex with men (MSM) and 64% in heterosexuals]. Overall, 12 different PEP regimens were offered in 19 240 cases (46%). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) was the preferred backbone (n = 14 304; 74%). We observed a shift from boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- or integrase inhibitor-based regimens in recent years. Overall, 20% of PEP prescriptions were prematurely discontinued. Older age, MSM, intercourse with a sex worker, rape and intercourse with a known HIV-infected source patient were factors associated with increased rates of PEP completion (OR > 1; P > 98%). None of the 12 PEP regimens was associated with premature discontinuation. We also found 12 774 cases of unprotected sexual intercourse (48%). Condom use decreased (OR < 1; P > 99%) with the year of exposure, and was lower in MSM and rape victims. Condom use increased (OR > 1, P > 99%) with age, and was higher in those who had intercourse with a sex worker or with a female partner and in those with knowledge of the partner's HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: We provide new insights into how rates of condom use and PEP completion might be improved in those receiving PEP by targeting certain groups of individuals for interventions. In particular, youth and MSM at risk should be linked in a prevention-to-care continuum.


Subject(s)
Emtricitabine/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Unsafe Sex/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Condoms , Female , France , HIV Infections/transmission , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Partners/classification
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(5): 1065-1073, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31953902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced the risk of Kaposi sarcoma (KS), KS cases still occur in HIV-infected people. OBJECTIVE: To describe all KS cases observed between 2010 and 2015 in a country with high ART coverage. METHODS: Retrospective study using longitudinal data from 44 642 patients in the French Dat'AIDS multicenter cohort. Patients' characteristics were described at KS diagnosis according to ART exposure and to HIV-plasma viral load (HIV-pVL) (≤50 or >50) copies/mL. RESULTS: Among the 209 KS cases diagnosed during the study period, 33.2% occurred in ART naïve patients, 17.3% in ART-experienced patients and 49.5% in patients on ART, of whom 23% for more than 6 months. Among these patients, 24 (11.5%) had HIV-pVL ≤50 cp/mL, and 16 (66%) were treated with a boosted-PI-based regimen. The distribution of KS localization did not differ by ART status nor by year of diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Data on human herpesvirus 8, treatment modalities for KS and response rate were not collected. CONCLUSION: Half of KS cases observed in the study period occurred in patients not on ART, reflecting the persistence of late HIV diagnosis. Factors associated with KS in patients on ART with HIV-pVL ≤50 cp/mL remain to be explored.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , HIV Infections , Herpesvirus 8, Human , Sarcoma, Kaposi , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma, Kaposi/epidemiology
3.
Med Mal Infect ; 49(1): 23-33, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30195462

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To quantify within a cohort of HIV-infected individuals the number of medical visits and procedures to be carried out according to comorbidities and risk factors to implement a personalized care pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 915 patients consulting from January 1 to December 31, 2016 at an outpatient unit of multidisciplinary consultations, using an electronic patient record. We built an algorithm using parameters required for the application of the national guidelines for the management of HIV-infected individuals. The frequency of comorbidities was measured according to gender, transmission risk group, and nadir CD4 (200/mm3). RESULTS: Patients were mostly men (median age: 52 years), of whom 16% were aged≥60 years. Viral load was<40 copies/mL in 93.5% of treated patients and CD4 cell count≥500/mm3 for 73%. Overall, 74.5% of patients had at least one comorbidity. The number of comorbidities was similar in men and women but was significantly higher in patients with a nadir CD4 <200/mm3 and increased with age (irrespective of gender). The minimum number of consultations to be scheduled per year was 8123: 70% for the management of comorbidities with an average of six consultations/year/patient. Overall, 53% of patients should attend a proctology consultation. The minimum number of paramedical procedures to be performed was 5115. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a personalized multidisciplinary management within a single facility seems to be a suitable care model to address the needs of HIV-infected individuals.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aftercare/standards , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HIV , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/therapy , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Retrospective Studies
5.
Case Rep Oncol Med ; 2016: 8515218, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27525143

ABSTRACT

Background. Non-AIDS-defining cancers represent a rising health issue among HIV-infected patients. Nevertheless, HIV testing is not systematic during the initial cancer staging. Here, we report a case of HIV infection diagnosed three years after chemotherapy initiation for multiple myeloma. Results. A 57-year-old woman diagnosed with multiple myeloma underwent a first round of chemotherapy by bortezomib/lenalidomide and then with bortezomib/liposomal-doxorubicine/dexamethasone, with partial remission, poor hematological tolerance, and multiple episodes of pneumococcal infection. Allogenic stem cell transplantation was proposed leading to HIV testing, which revealed seropositivity, with an HIV viral load of 5.5 Log10/mL and severe CD4 T cell depletion (24 cells/mm(3)). Chemotherapy by bendamustin was initiated. Multidisciplinary staff decided the initiation of antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir/emtricitabin/efavirenz and prophylaxis against opportunistic infections. After 34 months, patient achieved complete remission, sustained HIV suppression, and significant CD4 recovery (450 cells/mm(3)), allowing effective pneumococcal immunization without relapse. Conclusion. Our case illustrates the drawback that ignored HIV infection is still causing to cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and highlights the importance of early HIV testing in oncology. A multidisciplinary approach including oncologists/hematologists, virologists, and pharmacists is recommended in order to avoid drug interactions between chemotherapy and antiretroviral drugs. Moreover, prophylactic medication is recommended in these patients regardless of CD4+ cell count at the initiation of chemotherapy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...