ABSTRACT
High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue is increasingly being delivered in the outpatient setting. Such intensive outpatient management programs have reduced the total hospital length of stay without compromising clinical outcomes. However, a detailed financial analysis of outpatient programs has not been performed. These data are the results of a prospective study of 94 patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in one of three settings: traditional inpatient, partial outpatient, total outpatient. Patients were allowed to choose their own treatment setting based upon the availability of a caregiver and personal preference. Total hospital length of stay and the actual cost and charges for each patient were monitored prospectively. The patients in the three groups were well balanced with regard to age and functional status prior to high-dose chemotherapy. The average length of stay was reduced from 17.3 to 8.2 to 2.7 days in the three different treatment settings (P < 0.01). Mean procedure costs were reduced from $39.7 thousand (US dollars) to $36.2 thousand to $29.4 thousand in the three treatment settings (P < 0.029). No differences in toxicity or overall response to therapy was noted. High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue can be safely administered in the outpatient setting and results in significant cost savings.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Costs and Cost Analysis , Fees and Charges , Hospital Charges , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Prospective Studies , Safety , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) instead of autologous bone marrow leads to more rapid engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy. Mobilization regimens differ with respect to toxicity, efficiency, and cost. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with breast cancer received one of two mobilization regimens: granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 micrograms per kg was given subcutaneously for 5 days, with leukapheresis begun on Day 6, or low-dose cyclophosphamide followed by sequential granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms per kg for 5 days and by G-CSF at 10 micrograms per kg, with leukapheresis begun on Day 11. Results of CD34+ cell collection, engraftment, and costs of mobilization were determined. RESULTS: The combination chemotherapy and growth factor regimen was more efficient in mobilizing CD34+ cells. Sixty-six percent of patients reached a target 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg in a single leukapheresis session with the combination regimen, compared to 14 percent who received G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). The mean number of leukapheresis sessions required to reach a target of 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was 1.3 for the combination regimen and 2.7 for the regimen of G-CSF alone (p < 0.01). One patient in the chemotherapy and growth factor group developed febrile neutropenia. Engraftment was similar in both cohorts of patients. The cost of mobilization, including all supplies and cryopreservation, was $7381 for the G-CSF regimen and $5508 for the chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.05). This reduction was attributed to the lower number of leukapheresis and cryopreservation sessions, which outweighed the slight increase in expense for chemotherapy and growth factor in the combination regimen. CONCLUSION: This combination mobilization regimen allowed the predictable and efficient collection of CD34+ cells from the peripheral blood in a limited number of leukapheresis sessions, which reduced the cost of mobilization by approximately 25 percent.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Colony-Stimulating Factors/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/economics , Colony-Stimulating Factors/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cyclophosphamide/economics , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/economics , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to assess the toxicity and efficacy of an oral, combination antiemetic regimen including granisetron (Kytril; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA) in the setting of highly emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy for stem cell transplantation. Antiemetic prophylaxis consisted of oral granisetron 2 mg once daily, oral prochlorperazine 10 mg q 6 h and oral dexamethasone 4 mg q 6 h, beginning 1 h prior to chemotherapy on each of the 4 days of chemotherapy and continuing until 24 h after the completion of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients received either CVP (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, VP-16 1800 mg/m2 and carboplatin 1200 mg/m2) or CTP (thiotepa 500 mg/m2 in place of VP-16) in four daily doses given over 4 h from days -4 to -1. Previously mobilized and cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were reinfused on day +1. Evaluation of nausea, emetic episodes (EE), adverse events, and rescue medications were recorded on a daily patient diary. Thirty-six patients were entered. Fifty-three percent (95% CI = 37-75%) of patients achieved complete response for emesis (CR = 0 EE/24 h) and 75% (95% CI = 58-90%) had combined complete and major response (CR+MR = 0-3 EE/24 h) during all 5 of the treatment days. During the 5 study days, the average number of patient-days with no emesis was 3.7 (74%) and with 1-3 EE was 4.3 (86%). On days -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0, the combined CR+MR rate for emesis was 97, 92, 86, 78 and 75%, respectively. Nausea was absent or mild on all 5 study days in 57% (95% CI = 37-75%). Eight patients had severe late-onset emesis occurring on days +1 to +3 after reinfusion of stem cells. No clinically significant toxicities attributable to the antiemetic regimen were observed. An all oral antiemetic regimen of granisetron, prochlorperazine and dexamethasone appears to be safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple, daily, high-dose chemotherapy regimens. This regimen offers the advantage of cost-savings, a low side-effect profile and ease of administration in the predominately outpatient setting of HDC with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT).
Subject(s)
Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Administration, Oral , Adult , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Drug Tolerance , Female , Granisetron/administration & dosage , Granisetron/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prochlorperazine/administration & dosage , Prochlorperazine/adverse effects , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A prospective study to determine the feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent 165 cycles of HDC/ASCR for a variety of malignancies. HDC regimens were disease-specific. Initially, patients were hospitalized for HDC, discharged on completion, and maintained as outpatients unless toxicities required rehospitalization (subtotal outpatient transplantation [STOT]). Once this was established as safe, a total outpatient transplant (TOT) program was developed in which patients received all of the HDC, as well as supportive care, as outpatients. Patients who declined the outpatient programs received the same HDC and supportive care as inpatients. RESULTS: In 140 of 165 (85%) HDC cycles, patients agreed to participate in one of the outpatient transplant programs. Five patients in the STOT program could not be discharged from the hospital because of toxicities that developed during HDC; thus, 135 patients were monitored the outpatient setting, 95 (70%) of whom were never readmitted. The mean +/- SEM total hospital length of stay (LOS), including all readmissions and excess days after chemotherapy, was 18.33 +/- 5.06 days for patients who refused the outpatient program, 8.22 +/- 5.76 days for patients in the STOT program, and 2.81 +/- 7.66 days for those in the TOT program (P < .001). One treatment-related death occurred in each treatment setting: day 120 inpatient, day 17 STOT, and day 110 TOT. CONCLUSION: Outpatient management of HDC/ASCR is safe and acceptable for the vast majority of patients. The STOT program resulted in significant reduction in hospital LOS, while the TOT program appears equally safe and further reduces LOS. Hospitalization for HDC/ASCR is unnecessary in most patients.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Feasibility Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Program Evaluation , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
This study examines the effectiveness of prophylactic ciprofloxacin and rifampin following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDC/ ASCR). Specific endpoints included the incidence of fever, clinically documented infection, bacteremia, and readmission rates from an outpatient bone marrow transplant setting following infection or fever. A group of 97 patients receiving 134 cycles of HDC/ASCR were studied. Patients were given ciprofloxacin 750 mg p.o. twice daily and rifampin 300 mg p.o. twice daily beginning on the day of stem cell reinfusion (24-48 h after completion of high-dose chemotherapy). Most patients were either discharged to an outpatient setting following completion of their chemotherapy or received all of their chemotherapy in an outpatient setting. Febrile neutropenia was treated with empirical antibiotics in an outpatient setting unless it was complicated by hypotension, renal failure, severe mucositis or other problems. The median duration of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count below 500/mm3) was 7 days. Neutropenic fever occurred in 62% of patients but clinically documented bacterial infection occurred in only 2 (1.5%) patients during their neutropenic period. No bacteremia was noted. Readmission to the hospital following fever or infection occurred in 26% of patients maintained in the outpatient setting. There were no deaths from a bacterial infection in this study although 1 patient (0.7%) died from aspergillosis. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin and rifampin is a well-tolerated and highly effective combination that effectively decreases the risk of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial infection following HDC/ASCR. It facilitates outpatient management of myelosuppressed patients receiving autologous stem cell rescue.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Rifampin/therapeutic use , Ambulatory Care , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/etiology , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/therapy , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Studies with Human X Human (H X H), Human X Mouse (H X M), and Mouse X Mouse (M X M) hybridomas have enabled us to define specific factors that affect hybridoma growth in a species-specific manner. Three transferrins and three lipophilic iron chelates have been tested for their ability to support hybridoma proliferation and antibody production. The results of these studies demonstrate that H X H hybridomas do not respond to bovine transferrin a+ concentrations up to 100 micrograms/ml and are approximately 100-fold less responsive to mouse transferrin than to human transferrin. H X M and M X M hybridomas respond equally to human or mouse transferrin but are 100-fold less sensitive to bovine transferrin. An antibody to the human transferrin receptor inhibited the growth-promoting activity of human or mouse transferrin on H X H hybridomas but was ineffective on H X M hybridomas. This demonstrated the functionality of the human transferrin receptor in H X H hybridomas and that human, mouse, and bovine transferrin were interacting through the mouse transferrin receptor in H X M hybridomas. H X H and H X M hybridomas respond similarly to three different iron chelates exhibiting 80 to 110% of the growth response to human transferrin. M X M hybridomas fail to respond to the iron chelates at similar concentrations, suggesting that the human genome present in the other hybridoma species confers a unique ability for utilizing iron when delivered in this form.
Subject(s)
Hybridomas/metabolism , Iron/metabolism , Animals , Cattle , Cell Line , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Mice , Receptors, Transferrin/metabolism , Species Specificity , Transferrin/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains bearing plasmids pKM101, R64 or pColIb-P9 demonstrated enhanced UV survival when compared with strains not bearing plasmids. A strain of S. typhimurium bearing both pKM101 and pColIb-P9 survived UV irradiation slightly better than either of the single-plasmid strains. Spontaneous reversion of the hisG46 and trpE8 missense alleles was enhanced in each single-plasmid strain, and for the dual-plasmid strain containing pKM101 and pColIb-P9 enhancement represented a near additivity of the response seen for the single-plasmid strains. Following exposure to UV or visible-light irradiation, reversion of hisG46 and trpE8 was also enhanced in each single-plasmid strain, but quantitatively greater in the dual-plasmid strain and was equal to or slightly greater than additive the responses of the single-plasmid strains. In contrast to visible-light irradiation, UV exposure resulted in two phenotypic Trp+-revertant classes. One Trp+ class, having normal colony size (2.0 mm) and similar in number to His+ revertants, was comprised of intragenic revertants of trpE8, while the predominant Trp+ class, having smaller colony size (0.8 mm), represented intergenic suppressor revertants, illuminating the differences in mutation and/or repair specificity for UV and visible-light exposure. Methyl methane-sulfonate (MMS)-induced reversion of hisG46 was similar in effect to that seen with UV or visible-light irradiation. Plasmids pKM101 or pColIb-P9 enhanced the frequency of hisG46 reversion, while a more than additive response was seen in a strain with both plasmids. Furthermore, MMS-induced reversion of hisG46 was also observed to be greatest in a strain bearing plasmid R64 (incompatibility group I alpha) and pKM101, when compared with single-plasmid strains bearing either R64 or pKM101.
Subject(s)
Mutation , Plasmids , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Light , Methyl Methanesulfonate , Mutation/drug effects , Mutation/radiation effects , Salmonella typhimurium/radiation effects , Ultraviolet RaysABSTRACT
At 10-year recall, alveolar ridge topography was compared by three different methods in 36 patients whose complete dentures were fabricated by two different techniques. In general, if alveolar ridge change was observed, it was evidenced by a reduction in size following denture wearing. Group II patients appeared to have slightly less ridge change in the subjective and ridge width evaluations, but group I patients showed slightly less ridge change in the contourator tracing measurements. Since alveolar ridge topography is influenced by many variables, it would be a mistake to claim that either denture technique was proven superior by this research effort. Overall, the alveolar ridge changes were so small that they were statistically insignificant for this sample size. Some possible factors that might explain the minimal alveolar ridge changes seen in this study are (1) conscientious application of sound basic prosthodontic principles by the dentists who constructed the dentures initially, (2) periodic recall appointments for all of the patients, and (3) the fact that all of the patients were relatively young, experienced denture wearers who had been edentulous for at least 1 year before these tested dentures were placed.