Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development

The first microfluidic microphysiological systems (MPS) entered the academic scene more than 15 years ago and were considered an enabling technology to human (patho)biology in vitro and, therefore, provide alternative approaches to laboratory animals in pharmaceutical drug development and academic research. Nowadays, the field generates more than a thousand scientific publications per year. Despite the MPS hype in academia and by platform providers, which says this technology is about to reshape the entire in vitro culture landscape in basic and applied research, MPS approaches have neither been widely adopted by the pharmaceutical industry yet nor reached regulated drug authorization processes at all. Here, 46 leading experts from all stakeholders - academia, MPS supplier industry, pharmaceutical and consumer products industries, and leading regulatory agencies - worldwide have analyzed existing challenges and hurdles along the MPS-based assay life cycle in a second workshop of this kind in June 2019. They identified that the level of qualification of MPS-based assays for a given context of use and a communication gap between stakeholders are the major challenges for industrial adoption by end-users. Finally, a regulatory acceptance dilemma exists against that background. This t4 report elaborates on these findings in detail and summarizes solutions how to overcome the roadblocks. It provides recommendations and a roadmap towards regulatory accepted MPS-based models and assays for patients' benefit and further laboratory animal reduction in drug development. Finally, experts highlighted the potential of MPS-based human disease models to feedback into laboratory animal replacement in basic life science research.

Finding synergies for the 3Rs - Repeated Dose Toxicity testing: Report from an EPAA Partners' Forum.

The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a Partners' Forum on repeated dose toxicity (RDT) testing to identify synergies between industrial sectors and stakeholders along with opportunities to progress these in existing research frameworks. Although RTD testing is not performed across all industrial sectors, the OECD accepted tests can provide a rich source of information and play a pivotal role for safety decisions relating to the use of chemicals. Currently there are no validated alternatives to repeated dose testing and a direct one-to-one replacement is not appropriate. However, there are many projects and initiatives at the international level which aim to implement various aspects of replacement, reduction and refinement (the 3Rs) in RDT testing. Improved definition of use, through better problem formulation, aligned to harmonisation of regulations is a key area, as is the more rapid implementation of alternatives into the legislative framework. Existing test designs can be optimised to reduce animal use and increase information content. Greater use of exposure-led decisions and improvements in dose selection will be beneficial. In addition, EPAA facilitates sharing of case studies demonstrating the use of Next Generation Risk Assessment applying various New Approach Methodologies to assess RDT.

Differences in tissue distribution of iron from various clinically used intravenous iron complexes in fetal avian heart and liver.

Nanomedicines are more complex than most pharmacologically active substances or medicines and have been considered as non-biological complex drugs. For nanomedicines pivotal pharmacokinetic properties cannot be assessed by plasma concentration data from standard bioequivalence studies. Using intravenous iron complexes (IICs) as model we show that fetal avian tissues can be used to study time dependent tissue concentrations in heart and liver. Clear differences were found between equimolar doses of sucrose, gluconate or carboxymaltose coated iron particles. The range in tissue iron concentrations observed with these clinically widely used IICs provides an orientation as to what should be acceptable for any new IICs. Moreover, sensitivity of the experimental model was high enough to detect a 20% difference in tissue iron concentration. For the authorization of generic products under Article 10 (1) of Directive 2001/83/EC a plasma concentration of an active substance in the range of 80%-125% versus the reference product is usually considered acceptable. Based on its high discriminatory sensitivity this method was used to support a positive marketing authorization decision for a generic nanomedicine product.

Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9-10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the "Gold Standard". As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.

The in vivo comet assay: use and status in genotoxicity testing.

The in vivo comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis assay) in its alkaline version (pH >13) is being increasingly used in genotoxicity testing of substances such as industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals, food additives and pharmaceuticals. Recommendations for an appropriate performance of the test using OECD guidelines for other in vivo genotoxicity tests have been published. In this review, we critically discuss the biological significance of comet assay effects in general and the status of the test in current strategies for genotoxicity testing. Examples for practical applications of the in vivo comet assay and potential consequences of positive and negative test results are given. The significance of comet assay results for hazard identification and risk assessment is discussed. In accordance with international guidelines for genotoxicity testing the in vivo comet assay is recommended for follow-up testing of positive in vitro findings. It is particularly useful as a tool for the evaluation of local genotoxicity, especially for organs/cell types which cannot easily be evaluated with other standard tests. A positive result in an appropriately performed in vivo comet assay indicates genotoxicity of the test compound in the tissue tested and gains particular significance when a mutagenic potential of the test compound has already been demonstrated in vitro. Such findings will have practical consequences in the risk assessment processes and further development of substances.

Photochemical genotoxicity: principles and test methods. Report of a GUM task force.

In recent years, assessing the photogenotoxic potential of a compound became an issue for certain drugs and cosmetical products. Therefore, existing methods performed according to international guidelines (e.g. OECD guidelines) were adapted to the use of concurrent UV-visible (UV-Vis) light irradiation for the assessment of photomutagenicity/photogenotoxicity. In this review, photobiological bases of the processes occurring in the cell after irradiation with UV- and/or visible (vis)-light as well as a compilation of testing methods is presented. Methods comprise cell free investigations on naked DNA and in vitro methods, such as the photo-Ames test, the photo-HPRT/photo-mouse lymphoma assay (MLA), the photo-micronucleus test (MNT), the photo-chromosomal aberration test (CA) and the photo-Comet assay. A compilation of the currently available international literature of compounds tested on photogenotoxicity is given for each method. The state of the art of photogenotoxicity testing as well as the rational for testing are outlined in relation to the recommendations reached in expert working groups at different international meetings and to regulatory guidance papers. Finally, photogenotoxicity testing as predictor of photocarcinogenicity and in the light of risk assessment is discussed.

Prevalidation of a rat liver foci bioassay (RLFB) based on results from 1600 rats: a study report.

A rat liver foci bioassay (RLFB) based on an initiation-promotion protocol employing preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH) as an endpoint, was prevalidated in 5 different laboratories. FAH were identified by immunohistochemical demonstration of glutathione-S-transferase (placental form, GSTP) and by staining with hematoxilin/eosin (H&E), and their area fraction was quantified morphometrically. The four model hepatocarcinogens N-nitrosomorpholine, 2-acetylaminofluoren, phenobarbital, and clofibrate were selected according to characteristic differences in their presumed mode of action, and tested in a total of 1,600 male and female rats at 2 different dose levels. The chemicals were found to differ characteristically in their potency and dose-response relationship to induce FAH when given alone or when administered following initiation with diethylnitrosamine. The interlaboratory variation was small for results obtained with the GSTP-stain and somewhat larger with respect to H&E. The assessment of the carcinogenic potential of the four chemicals by the different laboratories was in the same range and the nature of their dose-response relationships did not differ essentially between laboratories. Our results suggest that this RLFB is a sensitive bioassay, providing potentially valuable information for risk assessment including the classification of carcinogenic chemicals according to their mode of action.

Dimethylhydrazine: a reliable positive control for the short sampling time in the UDS assay in vivo.

In the first international guideline addressing the unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay in vivo (OECD guideline no. 486, adopted July 1997) only the genotoxic liver carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is proposed as positive control for the short sampling time. Since NDMA is extremely volatile, alternative positive controls should be identified to facilitate handling and reduce exposure risk during routine testing. At Bayer AG and at RCC-CCR GmbH, the genotoxic but non-volatile dimethylhydrazine (DMH; as dihydrochloride) was used instead as positive control in livers of Wistar rats and to a limited extent of NRMI mice after 2-4h exposure. As shown by the data presented in this paper DMH induced a positive result in a total of 21 UDS in vivo studies over a period of 7 years. A negative result was never seen for DMH. Due to these results DMH was proven to be a suitable and reliable positive control in the UDS assay in vivo. Consequently, DMH should be considered as positive control for the short sampling time in the next issue of OECD guideline no. 486.