Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(2)2024 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417932

ABSTRACT

An infant presented repeatedly with features of transient bowel obstruction 72 hours after unwitnessed ingestion of water beads. At the third presentation 5 days later, he underwent laparotomy and jejunal enterotomy for retrieval of obstructing water bead in the duodenum. Four other water beads were retrieved. Due to persistent obstructive symptoms, he had a relaparotomy on fourth postoperative day. A further obstructing bead at the duodenojejunal flexure was retrieved. Antegrade upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and retrograde endoscopy through the enterotomy were performed to ensure no further retained water beads. The patient progressed well postoperatively and was discharged home 5 days later. This case highlights the challenges involved in the diagnosis and management of water bead ingestion in children. Children under 2 years are at a higher risk of complications and most require intervention. Palpation alone can miss residual water beads at surgery. Endoscopy including intraoperative enteroscopy could be a useful adjunct.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Obstruction , Water , Male , Child , Infant , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Jejunum , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Eating
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(2): 239-244, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34823845

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We sought to assess variability and concordance between fetal MRI and ultrasound (USS) in the evaluation of fetal body abnormalities. METHODS: All fetal body anomalies reported on F-MRI within the iFIND database (http://www.ifindproject.com) were included. Differences in findings regarding anomalies on contemporaneous USS were explored. Three clinical specialists evaluated each case independently, and the anomaly severity was graded: as "insignificant" to "lethal". The value of MRI in alteration of either antenatal or postnatal care was established. RESULTS: Fifty-four cases were identified consisting of 5 healthy controls, 37 with USS-identified body anomalies, and 12 with known CNS or cardiac anomalies. In fetuses with a known body anomaly, information on the MRI was relevant to change the clinical course in 59% of cases. There was also an incidental detection rate of 7% in fetuses with known cardiac or CNS anomalies, or 1.5% of normal control, although these were rarely clinically relevant. Importantly, fetuses undergoing MRI for cardiac concerns did have major anomalies that were missed (one case of oesophageal atresia and two cases of ARM). CONCLUSIONS: In cases where fetal anomalies are suspected, F-MRI is a valuable means of further characterizing anomalies and may detect additional anomalies in fetuses with recognized cardiac or CNS anomalies. In fetuses with a recognized body anomaly, more than half of those scanned by MRI had information available which changed clinical management. Importantly there were also incidental findings in healthy control fetuses, so the management of these needs to be recognized in fetal MRI research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Prospective cohort study.


Subject(s)
Prenatal Diagnosis , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(2): 187-191, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34838306

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Preliminary reports suggest a promising role for oesophageal lengthening by traction (OLBT) in long gap oesophageal atresia (LGOA). Nevertheless, these encouraging results originate from specialist centres, and real-world experience is unquantified. We report the first multicentre, nationwide study of OLBT. METHODS: Cumulative experience of OLBT was recorded through a questionnaire sent to all UK paediatric surgery centres. OLBT was defined as "any attempt to increase oesophageal length using tension sutures". Contributors submitted all cases of attempted OLBT, regardless of outcome. Demographics, surgical detail, and outcomes were analysed with summary statistics. RESULTS: The response rate was 23/26 centres. Eleven centres reported using OLBT in 22 patients (2003-2020) with 117 LGOA treated by other means. One patient died from complications of cardiac surgery and was excluded. OLBT enabled oesophageal anastomosis in 16 (76%), of which 2 died of complications of surgery, and another died of unrelated disease. Of the survivors, 7 required oesophageal dilatation 2-14 times. Oesophageal anastomosis was not achieved in 5 (24%) patients. All had pouch leak or disruption pre- or peri-operatively and underwent cervical oesophagostomy with subsequent gastric pull-up. One patient required dilatation of the oesophagogastric anastomosis. CONCLUSION: OLBT is being carried out in the UK in a limited number of centres in a minority of patients. These data suggest OLBT enables oesophageal anastomosis in 76% of infants with LGOA. Oesophageal pouch leak or disruption was common to all instances of failure to anastomose. Our findings will inform discussions between surgeons and families of babies born with LGOA.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia , Anastomosis, Surgical , Child , Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Humans , Infant , Traction , United Kingdom
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(11): 1766-1771, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27522307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define characteristics and needs of Facebook users in relation to congenital anomalies. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of Facebook related to four congenital anomalies: anorectal malformation (ARM), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), congenital heart disease (CHD) and hypospadias/epispadias (HS/ES). A keyword search was performed to identify relevant Groups/Pages. An anonymous survey was posted to obtain quantitative/qualitative data on users and their healthcare needs. RESULTS: 54 Groups and 24 Pages were identified (ARM: 10 Groups; CDH: 9 Groups, 7 Pages; CHD: 32 Groups, 17 Pages; HS/ES: 3 Groups), with 16,191 Group members and 48,766 Page likes. 868/1103 (79%) of respondents were parents. Male:female ratio was 1:10.9. 65% of the users were 26-40years old. Common reasons for joining these Groups/Pages included: seeking support, education, making friends, and providing support to others. 932/1103 (84%) would like healthcare professionals (HCPs) to actively participate in their Group. 31% of the respondents felt that they did not receive enough support from their healthcare system. 97% of the respondents would like to join a Group linked to their primary hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Facebook Groups/Pages related to congenital anomalies are highly populated and active. There is a need for HCPs and policy makers to better understand and participate in social media to support families and improve patient care.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Congenital Abnormalities , Parents/psychology , Social Media , Social Support , Adult , Anorectal Malformations , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epispadias , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Humans , Hypospadias , Male , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...