Interhospital failure to rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether interhospital variation in mortality rates for coronary artery bypass grafting was driven by complications and failure to rescue. METHODS: An observational study was conducted among 83,747 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between July 2011 and June 2017 across 90 hospitals. Failure to rescue was defined as operative mortality among patients developing complications. Complications included the Society of Thoracic Surgeons 5 major complications (stroke, surgical reexploration, deep sternal wound infection, renal failure, prolonged intubation) and a broader set of 19 overall complications. After creating terciles of hospital performance (based on observed:expected mortality), each tercile was compared on the basis of crude rates of (1) major and overall complications, (2) operative mortality, and (3) failure to rescue (among major and overall complications). The correlation between hospital observed and expected (to address confounding) failure to rescue rates was assessed. RESULTS: Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk was similar across hospital observed:expected mortality terciles (P = .831). Mortality rates significantly increased across terciles (low tercile: 1.4%, high tercile: 2.8%). Although small in magnitude, rates of major (low tercile: 11.1%, high tercile: 12.2%) and overall (low tercile: 36.6%, high tercile: 35.3%) complications significantly differed across terciles. Nonetheless, failure to rescue rates increased substantially across terciles among patients with major (low tercile: 9.1%, high tercile: 14.3%) and overall (low tercile: 3.3%, high tercile: 6.8%) complications. Hospital observed and expected failure to rescue rates were positively correlated among patients with major (R2 = 0.14) and overall (R2 = 0.51) complications. CONCLUSIONS: The reported interhospital variability in successful rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting supports the importance of identifying best practices at high-performing hospitals, including early recognition and management of complications.

Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgery.

Objective: This study evaluated interhospital variability and determinants of failure-to-rescue for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Methods: An observational study was conducted among 28,842 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between July 2011 and June 2017 across 90 hospitals participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Postoperative complications were defined as major (stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, sternal infection) and overall (major plus 14 other morbidities). Hospital terciles of observed to expected (O/E) mortality were compared on crude rates of major and overall complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue (among major and overall complications). The correlation between hospital observed and expected failure-to-rescue rates was assessed. Results: Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database predicted mortality risk was similar across hospital O:E mortality terciles (P = .10). As expected, mortality rates significantly increased across terciles (low O/E tercile: 1.6%, high O/E tercile: 4.7%; P < .001). Failure-to-rescue rates increased substantially across hospital mortality terciles among patients with major (low tercile, 8.8% and high tercile, 20.8%) and overall (low tercile, 3.0% and high tercile, 8.9%) complications. Hospital-level expected failure to rescue had a higher correlation with observed complications for overall complications (R2 = 0.71) compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons major complications (R2 = 0.24). Conclusions: Considerable interhospital variation exists in failure-to-rescue rates following aortic valve replacement. Hospitals in the low O/E mortality tercile experience failure to rescue nearly one-third less than those in the high O/E mortality tercile. Efforts to advance quality will benefit from identifying and disseminating optimal rescue strategies in this patient population.

Trends in vascular complications and associated treatment strategies following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular complications (VC) and bleeding complications impact morbidity and mortality after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). Few contemporary studies have detailed these complications, associated treatment strategies, or clinical outcomes. We examined the incidence, predictors, treatment strategies, and outcomes of VCs in a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing TF-TAVR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective registry and chart review of all nonclinical trial TF-TAVR patients from seven centers within a five-state hospital system from 2012 to 2016. Bleeding and VC were recorded as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations. Procedural and 30-day outcomes and 1-year mortality were compared between patients with no, minor, or major VC. Multivariable logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify predictors of major VC and mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1573 patients underwent TF-TAVR, with 96 (6.1%) experiencing a major VC and 77 (4.9%) experiencing a minor VC. The majority of VCs were access site related (74.2%), occurred intraoperatively (52.6%), and required interventional treatment (73.2%). The site, timing, and treatment method of VCs did not significantly change over the study period. Patients with VCs had a greater need for blood transfusion, longer postoperative length of stay, higher rates of cardiac events, increased vascular-related 30-day readmission, and higher 30-day mortality. Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% CI, 1.91-4.72) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 2.14 ; 95% CI, 1.38-3.31) were the strongest predictors of major VC. VCs modestly decreased over the study period: every 90-day increase in surgery date decreased the odds of major VC by 6% (95% CI, 1%-10%). Patients with major VCs had worse 1-year survival (OR, 79%; 95% CI, 69%-86%) compared with patients with minor VCs (OR, 92%; 95% CI, 82%-96%) or no VCs (OR, 88%; 95% CI, 87%-90%; P = .002). However, for patients who survived more than 30 days, the 1-year survival did not differ between groups For patients who survived more than 30 days, male sex (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.60) and the logit of STS mortality risk score (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.48-2.65) were the strongest predictors of mortality. After adjusting for other factors, minor and major VC were not predictors of 1-year mortality for patients who survived more than 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In our contemporary cohort, VCs after TF-TAVR have modestly decreased in recent years, but continue to impact perioperative outcomes. Patient selection, consideration of alternative access routes, and prompt recognition and treatment of VCs are critical elements in optimizing early clinical outcomes after TF-TAVR.

Reduction in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery mortality and morbidity during a 3-year multicenter quality improvement project.

OBJECTIVE: Risk-adjusted operative mortality is a key quality measure for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Through a multicenter quality improvement initiative, we sought to improve this measure at 14 surgical programs within a large and geographically dispersed health care system. METHODS: Observed mortality and combined mortality/morbidity rates for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were collected from January 2014 to June 2017. Expected mortality and mortality/morbidity rates were determined using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk models. The observed/expected ratios during the baseline (2014) and final 12-month outcome period were compared. The quality improvement intervention was multifaceted and surgeon led, and consisted of (1) regular sharing of unblinded data, (2) standardized quality improvement processes, (3) regular system-wide quality improvement meetings, (4) annual observed/expected mortality targets, (5) identification of underperforming institutions and creation of nonpunitive quality improvement action plans, and (6) implementation of checklists to drive perioperative care standardization. RESULTS: The observed/expected ratio of mortality was 1.19 during the baseline period and decreased to 0.59 for the outcome period (P = .004) without a change in expected mortality or case volume. The observed/expected ratio decreased for mortality/morbidity, and mortality without antecedent morbidity was almost eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: A significant and clinically meaningful 50% reduction in the observed/expected ratio for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting mortality was observed during a multifaceted quality improvement initiative across a large multicenter health care system. Morbidity also decreased. Keys to success included surgeon leadership and engagement, frequent unblinded data sharing, development of standardized quality improvement processes, improvement and standardization of care delivery, setting of quality improvement targets, and a shared vision for improved patient outcomes.

Effect of hospital culture on blood transfusion in cardiac procedures.

BACKGROUND: In our effort to reduce the use of blood products in cardiac operations in a health care system, we noted variations in transfusion practices among facilities. Interestingly, surgeons practicing at the same hospital had similar transfusion rates. We sought to quantitate the contribution of hospital influence on individual surgeons' transfusion practices. METHODS: Blood transfusion data for coronary artery bypass graft operations at 12 Providence Health & Services facilities between January 2008 and June 2011 were reviewed. Frequency of perioperative blood transfusion, amount of transfusion, components transfused, and timing of transfusions were compared. Variation among surgeons at the same institution vs between institutions was computed based on multilevel mixed-effect logistic and linear regression models. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 5,744 nonemergency first-time coronary artery bypass graft procedures were performed by 42 not-low volume (n>30 in 2.5 years) surgeons at 12 Providence Health & Services hospitals during the 3.5-year study period. Frequency, amount, timing, and blood component usage were different among facilities but relatively similar for surgeons within a facility. The variance of red blood cell transfusion rate among hospitals (.82) is more than two times that among surgeons practicing within the same hospital (.35). Thus, surgeons contribute 30% to the variation, and 70% of the total variation can be explained by the hospital effect. CONCLUSIONS: In our multihospital system, the hospital that a surgeon practices at plays a larger role in determining blood utilization than the individual surgeon's preference.

The perfusionist's role in a collaborative multidisciplinary approach to blood transfusion reduction in cardiac surgery.

Red blood cell transfusion is associated with adverse outcomes. Transfusion practices remain varied in cardiac surgery and are a subject of growing debate. We initiated a data-driven, multidisciplinary effort to decrease allogeneic red blood cell transfusion at our institution. Creative perfusion strategies are an essential component of our program and led to a low transfusion rate. Innovations in treatment protocols were implemented and evaluated to reduce hemodilution associated with the cardiopulmonary bypass machine. Frequent review of outcomes guided our evolving clinical practice. Standardization among the perfusionists was the first step to a successful blood conservation program. Techniques included vacuum assisted venous drainage with dry 3/8" tubing, a short (10 foot) arterial-venous loop, retrograde autologous prime, and saline prime removal from the primary and cardioplegia circuit. We used a polymer-coated perfusion circuit. Hemoconcentrator and cell saver use was determined on a case-by-case basis. Normothermia was maintained except in cases of circulatory arrest or specific surgeon request. Two thousand nine hundred and seventy-nine consecutive cardiac surgical procedures (2.8% off pump coronary artery bypass) were performed from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2008. Our overall utilization of red blood cell transfusion decreased from 43.2% to 13.6% for all patients and 38.5% to 8.7% for coronary artery bypass graft only patients. Patient outcomes were not significantly changed through 2007. Cardiopulmonary perfusion can be performed safely with low utilization of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. Standardization and creative perfusion techniques, in the presence of a multi-faceted approach to blood management, play an important role in blood conservation.

Blood transfusion reduction in cardiac surgery: multidisciplinary approach at a community hospital.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence exists for more restrictive blood transfusion practices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Few studies, however, have recognized or agree upon a method by which this decrease in allogeneic red blood cell transfusion can be achieved. We will review our methods and experience in a blood conservation initiative from 2003 to 2007. METHODS: A data driven, multidisciplinary effort to decrease allogeneic red blood cell transfusion was instituted in a community hospital. Numerous innovations in treatment protocols were implemented and evaluated. Clinical data from 2003 to 2007 will be presented. Yearly review of outcomes led to an evolving clinical practice and lowered transfusion rates. RESULTS: A total of 2,531 consecutive cardiac surgical procedures were performed during a five-year period. Using a multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement, and with the goal of using fewer blood products, our incidence of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion was decreased, from 43% in 2003 to 18% in 2007. Patient outcomes were not significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery in a community hospital can be performed safely with low utilization of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. A multidisciplinary approach to blood conservation can result in lower transfusion rates and equivalent patient outcomes.