Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Oncol ; 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037739

ABSTRACT

Several studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); however, the correlation of mean tumor molecules (MTM)/ml of plasma and mean variant allele frequency (mVAF; %) with clinical parameters is yet to be understood. In this study, we analyzed ctDNA data in a pan-cancer cohort of 23 543 patients who had ctDNA testing performed using a personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, mPCR-NGS assay). For ctDNA-positive patients, the correlation between MTM/ml and mVAF was examined. Two subanalyses were performed: (a) to establish the association of ctDNA with tumor volume and (b) to assess the correlation between ctDNA dynamics and patient outcomes. On a global cohort, a positive correlation between MTM/ml and mVAF was observed. Among 18 426 patients with longitudinal ctDNA measurements, 13.3% had discordant trajectories between MTM/ml and mVAF at subsequent time points. In metastatic patients receiving immunotherapy (N = 51), changes in ctDNA levels expressed both in MTM/ml and mVAF showed a statistically significant association with progression-free survival; however, the correlation with MTM/ml was numerically stronger.

2.
Transplantation ; 103(12): 2657-2665, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30801536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early detection of rejection in kidney transplant recipients holds the promise to improve clinical outcomes. Development and implementation of more accurate, noninvasive methods to detect allograft rejection remain an ongoing challenge. The limitations of existing allograft surveillance methods present an opportunity for donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), which can accurately and rapidly differentiate patients with allograft rejection from patients with stable organ function. METHODS: This study evaluated the analytical performance of a massively multiplexed polymerase chain reaction assay that targets 13 962 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, characterized and validated using 66 unique samples with 1064 replicates, including cell line-derived reference samples, plasma-derived mixtures, and transplant patient samples. The dd-cfDNA fraction was quantified in both related and unrelated donor-recipient pairs. RESULTS: The dd-cfDNA assay showed a limit of blank of 0.11%, a limit of detection and limit of quantitation of 0.15% for unrelated donors, and limit of blank of 0.23%, a limit of detection and limit of quantitation of 0.29% for related donors. All other metrics (linearity, accuracy, and precision) were observed to be equivalent between unrelated and related donors. The measurement precision of coefficient of variation was 1.8% (repeatability, 0.6% dd-cfDNA) and was <5% for all the different reproducibility measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the performance of a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based massively multiplexed polymerase chain reaction assay to detect the dd-cfDNA fraction with improved precision over currently available tests, regardless of donor-recipient relationships.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics , Graft Rejection/genetics , Kidney Transplantation , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Tissue Donors , Transplant Recipients , Allografts , Biomarkers/blood , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/blood , Female , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Forensic Sci ; 57(4): 1022-30, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22390771

ABSTRACT

The AutoMate Express™ Forensic DNA Extraction System was developed for automatic isolation of DNA from a variety of forensic biological samples. The performance of the system was investigated using a wide range of biological samples. Depending on the sample type, either PrepFiler™ lysis buffer or PrepFiler BTA™ lysis buffer was used to lyse the samples. After lysis and removal of the substrate using LySep™ column, the lysate in the sample tubes were loaded onto AutoMate Express™ instrument and DNA was extracted using one of the two instrument extraction protocols. Our study showed that DNA was recovered from as little as 0.025 µL of blood. DNA extracted from casework-type samples was free of detectable PCR inhibitors and the short tandem repeat profiles were complete, conclusive, and devoid of any PCR artifacts. The system also showed consistent performance from day-to-day operation.


Subject(s)
DNA Fingerprinting/instrumentation , DNA/isolation & purification , Blood Chemical Analysis , Bone and Bones/chemistry , DNA Contamination , Epithelial Cells/chemistry , Female , Hair/chemistry , Humans , Male , Microsatellite Repeats , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Saliva/chemistry , Spermatozoa/chemistry , Tooth/chemistry
4.
J Food Prot ; 75(2): 347-52, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22289596

ABSTRACT

Reducing the risk of Salmonella contamination in pet food is critical for both companion animals and humans, and its importance is reflected by the substantial increase in the demand for pathogen testing. Accurate and rapid detection of foodborne pathogens improves food safety, protects the public health, and benefits food producers by assuring product quality while facilitating product release in a timely manner. Traditional culture-based methods for Salmonella screening are laborious and can take 5 to 7 days to obtain definitive results. In this study, we developed two methods for the detection of low levels of Salmonella in pet food using real-time PCR: (i) detection of Salmonella in 25 g of dried pet food in less than 14 h with an automated magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction method and (ii) detection of Salmonella in 375 g of composite dry pet food matrix in less than 24 h with a manual centrifugation-based nucleic acid preparation method. Both methods included a preclarification step using a novel protocol that removes food matrix-associated debris and PCR inhibitors and improves the sensitivity of detection. Validation studies revealed no significant differences between the two real-time PCR methods and the standard U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (chapter 5) culture confirmation method.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Food Analysis/instrumentation , Food Contamination/analysis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Food Microbiology , Time Factors
5.
J Mol Diagn ; 14(2): 120-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22245225

ABSTRACT

Three mechanistically different sample extraction methodologies, namely, silica spin columns, phenol-chloroform, and an automated magnetic capture of polymer-complexed DNA (via an Automate Express instrument), were compared for their abilities to purify nucleic acids from blood culture fluids for use in TaqMan assays for detection of Staphylococcus aureus. The extracts from silica columns required 100- to 1000-fold dilutions to sufficiently reduce the powerful PCR inhibitory effects of the anticoagulant sodium polyanetholsulfonate, a common additive in blood culture media. In contrast, samples extracted by either phenol-chloroform or the Automate Express instrument required little or no dilution, respectively, allowing for an approximate 100-fold improvement in assay sensitivity. Analysis of 60 blood culture bottles indicated that these latter two methodologies could be used to detect lower numbers of pathogens and that a growing S. aureus culture could be detected 2 hours earlier than when using silica columns. Of the three tested methodologies, the Automate Express instrument had the shortest time to result, requiring only approximately 80 minutes to process 12 samples. These findings highlight the importance of considering the mechanism when selecting a DNA extraction methodology, given that certain PCR inhibitors act in a similar fashion to DNA in certain chemical environments, resulting in copurification, whereas other methodologies use different chemistries that have advantages during the DNA purification of certain types of samples.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/blood , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Automation , Bacteremia/blood , Bacteremia/genetics , Bacteremia/microbiology , Blood Specimen Collection , Humans , Male , Methicillin Resistance/genetics , Penicillin-Binding Proteins , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity
6.
J Forensic Sci ; 54(3): 599-607, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19302383

ABSTRACT

The PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit enables isolation of genomic DNA from a variety of biological samples. The kit facilitates reversible binding of DNA with magnetic particles resulting in high DNA recovery from samples with very low and high quantities of biological materials: 0.1 and 40 microL of human blood (donor 2) provided 14 and 2883 ng of DNA, respectively. Following the revised SWGDAM guidelines, performance of the developed method was investigated using different sample types including saliva on swabs, semen stains on cotton fabric, samples exposed to environment, samples with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors, blood stains (on denim, cotton cloth, and FTA paper), and touch evidence-type samples. DNA yields for all samples tested were equal or better than those obtained by both phenol-chloroform extraction and commercial kits tested. DNA obtained from these samples was free of detectable PCR inhibitors. Short tandem repeat profiles were complete, conclusive, and devoid of PCR artifacts.


Subject(s)
DNA Fingerprinting/instrumentation , DNA/analysis , Blood , DNA Fingerprinting/methods , Female , Humans , Magnetics , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Saliva , Semen , Tandem Repeat Sequences
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL