ABSTRACT
Antecedentes No se han aclarado suficientemente los beneficios del manejo multidisciplinar (código TEP) de los pacientes con tromboembolia de pulmón (TEP) aguda sintomática. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto sobre la mortalidad a corto plazo del código TEP comparado con la atención habitual. Métodos Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de TEP aguda sintomática ingresados en un hospital terciario universitario entre los años 2007 y 2022. Mediante un análisis de emparejamiento exacto 1:1, los pacientes atendidos por un equipo multidisciplinar para el manejo de la TEP (código TEP) fueron emparejados con otros que recibieron la atención habitual (es decir, no multidisciplinar) para la TEP. El evento primario de eficacia fue la mortalidad por cualquier causa durante los 30 primeros días después del diagnóstico. El evento secundario de eficacia fue la mortalidad por la propia TEP durante el mismo período de tiempo. Resultados De los 2.902 pacientes con diagnóstico de TEP aguda sintomática incluidos en este estudio, 223 (7,7%; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 6,7-8,7%) fueron manejados por el código TEP. Se emparejaron 207 pacientes manejados por el código TEP con 207 pacientes manejados de forma habitual. En la cohorte emparejada, la atención multidisciplinar a los pacientes con TEP aguda sintomática no se asoció a una reducción significativa de la mortalidad por cualquier causa (odds ratio [OR]: 1,09; IC del 95%: 0,63-1,89) o por la propia TEP (OR: 1,30; IC del 95%: 0,47-3,62) en el mes posterior al diagnóstico de la TEP. Conclusiones La atención multidisciplinar a los pacientes con TEP aguda sintomática no se asoció a una reducción significativa de la mortalidad precoz. (AU)
Background The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE. Methods We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality. Results Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE. Conclusions Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Pulmonary Embolism , Patient Care Team , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality. RESULTS: Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality.