Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2356038, 2024 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830822

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of neonatal morbidity after maternal central neurotropic drug exposure. METHODS: Retrospective single-center level-III neonatology cohort analysis of neonates after CND from 2018 to 2021. Control group of neonates born to mothers without CND cared for at the maternity ward. RESULTS: Significantly more frequent therapy need of neonates with CND [OR 23 (95% CI: 7.8-62); RR 14 (95% CI: 5.4-37); p < 0.01]. Neonates after CND had lower Apgar-scores LM 1 [CND 8.1; CG 8.6; p < 0.05]; LM 5 [CND 9; CG 9.7; p < 0.01]; LM 10 [CND 9.6; CG 9.9; p < 0.05]. The first symptom occurred in 95.35% within 24 h (mean: 3.3 h). CND group showed significantly more often preterm delivery [OR 3.5; RR 3.2; p < 0.05], and especially cumulative multiple symptoms [OR 9.4; RR 6.6; p < 0.01] but no correlation to multiple maternal medication use (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Neonates exposed to CND are at increased risk for postnatal therapy, often due to multiple symptoms. Neonates should be continuously monitored for at least 24 h.


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Humans , Female , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy , Adult , Male , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/chemically induced , Central Nervous System Agents/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Agents/therapeutic use , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Case-Control Studies , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology
2.
J Perinat Med ; 51(1): 27-33, 2023 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Establishing immediate intravenous access to a newborn is challenging even for trained neonatologists in an emergency situation. Correct placement of umbilical catheter or an intraosseous needle needs consistent training. We evaluated the time required to correctly place an emergency umbilical button cannula (EUC) or an umbilical catheter (UC) using the standard intersection (S-EUC or S-UC, respectively) or lateral umbilical cord incision (L-EUC) by untrained medical personnel. METHODS: Single-center cross-over pilot-study using a model with fresh umbilical cords. Video-based teaching of medical students before probands performed all three techniques after assignment to one of three cycles with different sequence, using a single umbilical cord divided in three pieces for each proband. RESULTS: Mean time required to establish L-EUC was 89.3 s, for S-EUC 82.2 s and for S-UC 115.1 s. Both application routes using the EUC were significantly faster than the UC technique. There was no significant difference between both application routes using EUC (p=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Using an umbilical cannula is faster than an umbilical catheter, using a lateral incision of the umbilical vein is an appropriate alternative.


Subject(s)
Cannula , Umbilical Cord , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Umbilical Veins , Pilot Projects , Umbilical Cord/surgery , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...