Safely gaining experience in death and dying: Simulation in palliative care and end-of-life education.

BACKGROUND: Training in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care provision represents a critical topic in health professional curricula for ensuring a workforce prepared to provide safe and person-center care at the end of one's life. This manuscript describes the incorporation of a simulation-based learning experience (SBLE) and the evolution of a professional elective course for student pharmacists related to palliative and EOL care. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: A SBLE was incorporated into a long-standing professional pharmacy elective course in palliative and EOL care. The decision to incorporate and utilize SBLE to introduce topics of deprescribing, communication, prioritization of quality of life, and establishing goals of care was utilized in recognition of a need to establish a psychologically safer environment to allow students to explore these topics prior to the advanced pharmacy practice experiences. DISCUSSION: Incorporation of SBLE in this professional elective course resulted in a favorable effect on course enrollment. Observations from structured debriefing and anecdotal student feedback suggest that students had trouble tailoring care plans to the circumstances, particularly in focusing on de-escalating medication treatments, emphasizing the need for training in the care for this patient population which incorporate considerations for goals of care. Lessons related to the influence of environmental distractions, expressions of discomfort conveyed by body language, and challenges in prioritizing and focusing on tailoring care plans given evolving information at hand were identified. IMPLICATIONS: We describe the effective implementation and utilization of SBLE in a professional elective focused on palliative and EOL care for student pharmacists. Future directions include research initiatives designed to evaluate the impact of simulation on key competencies and areas developed through participation in such exercises. Systematic evaluation of outcomes and competencies related to team dynamics, sympathetic communication, professional identity formation and resiliency and preparation for dealing with death and dying in experiential learning are planned.

Vaccines for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of novel respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines approved for adults aged 60 years and older. DATA SOURCES: A literature search through February 27, 2024 was conducted using search terms, such as RSV, viral respiratory illness, vaccine, RSVpreF, RSVpreF3, Prefusion F, Abrysvo, and Arexvy. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Data from primary literature and vaccine prescribing information were reviewed, encompassing evaluations of clinical pharmacology, efficacy, safety, adverse events, warnings, and precautions. DATA SYNTHESIS: The literature review process resulted in 10 articles included within this article's scope, including the results of 2 major phase III trials presented in detail. Two RSV vaccines, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine (recombinant [adjuvanted]; RSVpreF3-ASO1E, Arexvy) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine (recombinant; RSVpreF, Abrysvo), approved for preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in adults aged 60 years or older in the United States are discussed. Results from Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of 1 dose of these vaccines in preventing RSV-associated LRTD across 2 RSV seasons. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices currently recommends use of these vaccines under shared clinical decision-making for adults aged 60 years or older. Most common adverse effects include injection site reactions (eg, site pain, redness, and swelling). Administration requires a single intramuscular injection of 0.5 mL, reconstituted prior to administration. CONCLUSIONS: The RSVpreF3-ASO1E and RSVpreF vaccines effectively prevent RSV-associated LRTD in adults aged 60 years and older.

Challenges to decarbonizing medication prescribing and use practices: A call to action.

Climate change undeniably impacts the social and environmental determinants of one's health. The healthcare sector, encompassing medications and the pharmaceutical industry supply chain, accounts for a significant portion of global health care contributions to greenhouse gas (GHG) and waste production. Despite these realities, healthcare professionals - physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and others - may be unaware of GHG emissions and the long-term environmental effects of the medications they prescribe, dispense, and administer daily. In this commentary, we identify existing challenges and explore potential strategies to recognize and reduce the climate change impacts associated with medication use.

A Framework for Engaging Healthcare Professional Trainees as Continuing Education Activity Planners and Speakers.

Health professional education and post-graduate training programs, including residencies, fellowships, and other post-graduate training experiences, may encourage or require trainee participation in continuing education (CE) activity planning and development. Providers of CE should ensure appropriate mentorship and faculty guidance during development of the activity and provide direction on the expectations of adult learning principles (e.g. identification of an educational gap; development of measurable learning objectives; inclusion of independent, balanced, and evidenced-based content; use of active learning techniques; and incorporation of learning assessment methods). Nonetheless, there is no established best practice or approach for how CE providers should ensure trainees are prepared to serve as CE activity faculty. New practitioners provided with an opportunity to participate may be unsure of where to begin and may be hesitant to engage in this new activity. In this manuscript, authors delineate key principles to incorporate when introducing trainees to CE activity development and share outcomes associated with a comparison of trainee- vs. faculty-developed and delivered CE.

Recommendation for Cannabis Use Disorder Diagnosis in a Context of Cannabis for Therapeutic Purposes.

This Viewpoint proposes a model of cannabis use disorder diagnosis in the context of cannabis for therapeutic purposes that is based on DSM-5 model of diagnosing substance use disorder in the context of prescribed medication use.

Tobacco/nicotine use among individuals using cannabis for therapeutic purposes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While the relationship between recreational cannabis and nicotine use is well established, little is known about nicotine use among users of cannabis for therapeutic purposes (CTP). METHODS: Patients attending a medical marijuana dispensary (N = 697; 75.3% White; 60.0% male) completed a survey examining nicotine use, motivation to quit cigarette smoking, routes of administration of nicotine and cannabis, and CTP qualifying conditions. RESULTS: More than one-third (39.3%) of participants reported current nicotine use. Compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, e-cigarette users and non-users of nicotine were approximately four times more likely to vape, rather than to smoke, cannabis. Furthermore, 46.8% of cigarette smokers reported plans to quit smoking in the next 6 months (but not in the next month) and an additional 31.6% planned to quit in the next month. Having a psychiatric condition was associated with nicotine use and higher motivation to quit smoking. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Users of CTP are more likely to use nicotine products than the general population and the route of administration of nicotine products is related to the route of administration of CTP. If aerosolized CTP is a less harmful route of administration than smoked CTP, dispensary staff should be aware of this relationship and take this into account when recommending a noncombustible route. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study further characterizes nicotine use behaviors and motivation to quit smoking among users of CTP and may be among the first to examine nicotine use among patients of a medical marijuana dispensary.

Pharmacists' Perceptions and Drivers of Immunization Practices for COVID-19 Vaccines: Results of a Nationwide Survey Prior to COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists play a vital role in recommending and providing vaccines to improve public health and are on the front line of mass immunization efforts. AIM: The objective of this study is to evaluate pharmacists' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccines prior to emergency use authorization (EUA) amid a global pandemic. METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was conducted between September and November 2020. Survey respondents included a convenience sample of licensed pharmacists in the United States. The primary outcomes were pharmacists' willingness to receive and recommend hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines. Covariates assessed in the survey included COVID-19 exposure or personal experience, primary pharmacy practice setting, background in training, geographic region, and prioritization of clinical data. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: This study surveyed 763 pharmacists and results from 632 participants were included in final analysis. Overall, 67.1% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 63.4% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine at ≤1 year from the time of vaccine approval. At >1 year after vaccine approval, 78% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 81.2% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Survey findings suggest that, while a majority of pharmacists surveyed indicate acceptance of hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines, there remains to be hesitancy among pharmacists to receive or recommend vaccination.

Potassium-lowering agents for the treatment of nonemergent hyperkalemia: pharmacology, dosing and comparative efficacy.

Hyperkalemia represents a common and potentially life-threating electrolyte abnormality, a complication frequently observed in patients with heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes or in those receiving drug therapies influencing the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Elevated serum potassium levels are often the result of impaired urinary potassium elimination, inadequate or reduced cellular potassium uptake, severe heart failure, use of medications influencing potassium levels in the circulation, or, more commonly, a combination of these factors. Strategies for the treatment of nonemergent hyperkalemia include the use of cation-exchange resins, polymers or other novel mechanisms of potassium trapping, including sodium polystyrene sulfonate, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. These agents differ in their pharmacology and mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, including onset and extent of potassium-lowering effect, dosage and administration, and potential safety and adverse effect profiles. In this review, an evaluation of these characteristics, including clinical evidence and safety concerns, in the management of nonemergent hyperkalemia will be explored.