New enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection of specific antibodies against multiple Leptospira serogroups in bovine sera.

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with worldwide endemicity in Argentina, it is a significant public health problem in low-income populations. Bovine leptospirosis is a serious economic problem for cattle production, causing abortions, reduced milk yield, mortality in calves and decreased daily weight gain. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with sonicated Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae serovar Copenhageni M 20. We evaluated its performance for the detection of specific antibodies against multiple Leptospira serogroups in bovine. The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) was used as the gold standard. The performance of this ELISA was evaluated with a panel of sera (118 MAT confirmed positive and 97 MAT negative). The overall sensitivity was close to 85.6 % and the specificity was 83.5 %, according to the MAT reference method. Analytical specificity of the IgG-ELISA was evaluated using 50 bovine serum samples from animals showing serum antibodies against other pathogens that cause abortion in bovine, such as Brucella sp., Neospora sp. and Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD), and no cross-reaction was observed. This IgG-ELISA can be an alternative to the MAT for diagnosis of leptospiral infection in bovine.

Diagnosis of canine leptospirosis: evaluation of two PCR assays in comparison with the microagglutination test / Diagnóstico de leptospirose canina: avaliação de dois ensaios de PCR em comparação com o teste de microaglutinação

Canine leptospirosis is definitely diagnosed by demonstrating seroconversion in paired serum samples from the acute and convalescent period by the microagglutination test (MAT). However, the application of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay can provide earlier confirmation of suspected cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate two PCR assays used in diagnosis of human leptospirosis (lipL32 real-time PCR and rrs conventional PCR) in cultured microorganisms and experimentally contaminated samples (whole blood, serum, urine), and investigate their applicability in clinical samples from dogs with presumptive diagnosis of leptospirosis by using the MAT as a reference. The analytical sensitivity of the lipL32 real-time PCR was 1 genome equivalent per reaction, whereas that for the rrs conventional PCR was 10 genome equivalents per reaction. Both assays amplified the pathogenic strains but were negative when evaluating the DNA of other microorganisms that may be present in clinical samples. The lipL32 real-time PCR detected 100 bacteria/mL in whole blood samples, 1000 bacteria/mL in serum samples and 10 bacteria/mL in urine samples, whereas the rrs conventional PCR detected 1000 bacteria/mL in whole blood and serum samples and 100 bacteria/mL in urine samples. Seven out of the 51 samples from dogs with presumptive diagnosis of leptospirosis were considered as confirmed cases. ThelipL32 real-time PCR detected positive results in six of the seven confirmed cases, whereas the rrs conventional PCR detected four. The PCR assays evaluated proved to be useful diagnostic tools in the confirmation of canine leptospirosis when used together with the MAT.(AU)

O diagnóstico definitivo da leptospirose canina é geralmente realizado demonstrando a seroconversão em amostras do paciente no período agudo e de convalescença por serologia. No entanto, a aplicação de técnicas de PCR pode contribuir para a confirmação de casos suspeitos num período de tempo mais curto. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar dois ensaios de PCR publicados em humanos (PCR-lipL32 em tempo real e PCR-rrs convencional) em culturas puras e em amostras de sangue com anticoagulante, soro e urina experimentalmente contaminados. Posteriormente, investigamos a utilidade de ambos os ensaios de PCR em amostras clínicas de cães com suspeita de leptospirose tomando a técnica de microaglutinação (MAT) como referência. A sensibilidade analítica foi de 1 e 10 genoma equivalente por reação para PCR-lipL32 em tempo real e para PCR-rrs convencional, respectivamente. Ambos os ensaios amplificaram corretamente as 14 estirpes patogênicas, mas foram negativos para avaliar o ADN de outros microrganismos que poderiam estar presentes em amostras clinicas. Em nas amostras experimentalmente contaminadas PCR-LipL32 em tempo real detectou 100 bactérias/mL em sangue total, 1000 bactérias/mL em soro e 10 bactérias/mL em urina. Enquanto o PCR-rrs convencional detectou 1000 bactérias/mL em sangue total e soro e 100 bactérias/mL na urina. Dos 51 cães suspeitos, sete foram considerados casos confirmados pela MAT. O PCR-lipL 32 em tempo real detectou seis dos sete casos confirmados, enquanto o PCR-rrs convencional foi positivo em quatro deles. As técnicas de PCR avaliadas provaram ser uma ferramenta de diagnóstico útil na confirmação de casos clínicos caninos quando utilizados em conjunto com a técnica MAT.(AU)