Single simple question in axonal polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The single simple question (SSQ), "What percentage of normal (0%-100%) do you feel regarding your disease?" has proven feasible and valid in assessing myasthenia gravis and a heterogeneous spectrum of neuropathies. This study explores the utility of the SSQ in axonal polyneuropathies (PNPs), encompassing diabetic neuropathy, and evaluates its responsiveness to scale changes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 150 patients with axonal PNP responding to the SSQ was performed. Patients underwent clinical and electrophysiological evaluations, and were evaluated by clinical and disability scales, including the Medical Research Council sum score, modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy score (mTCNS), Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale, and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (RODS). RESULTS: The SSQ total scores correlated moderately with both the RODS score (r = .59, p < .001) and the mTCNS symptom score (r = -.43, p < .001), maintaining significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Longitudinally, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, the change in mTCNS symptom score retained statistical significance (adjusted p = .048). The SSQ did not show any association with electrophysiological parameters or sensory symptoms, other than a lower score in those with pain (100% with SSQ <40%, 85% with SSQ 40%-70%, and 34% with SSQ >70%). DISCUSSION: The SSQ is a feasible, valid scale that may be utilized to assess and follow patients with length-dependent axonal PNPs. Given that the SSQ is not strongly associated with clinical and disability scales or electrophysiological findings, additional investigations are required for a comprehensive assessment of PNP.

Patient-reported preferences for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of parenteral drug treatments in adults with immune disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Several studies have found subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of similar drugs for long-lasting immunological and autoimmune diseases to have similar clinical effectiveness, meaning that what patients report they prefer is, or should be, a major factor in treatment choices. Therefore, it is important to systematically compile evidence regarding patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using SC or IV administration of the same drug. Materials & methods: PubMed database searches were run on 15 October 2021. Studies involving patients with experience of both home-based SC and hospital-based IV administration of immunoglobulins or biological therapies for the treatment of any autoimmune disease or primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) were included. The outcomes assessed were patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and HRQL. Preference data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 3504 citations were screened, and 46 publications describing 37 studies were included in the review. There was a strong overall preference for SC over IV administration, with similar results seen for PIDs and autoimmune diseases: PID, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-94%) preferred SC; autoimmune diseases, 83% (95% CI: 73-92%); overall, 82% (95% CI: 75-89%). The meta-analysis also found that 84% (95% CI: 75-92%) of patients preferred administration at home to treatment in hospital. Analysis of treatment satisfaction using the life quality index found consistently better treatment interference and treatment setting scores with SC administration than with IV administration. Conclusion: Compared with IV infusions in hospital, patients tend to prefer, to be more satisfied with and to report better HRQL with SC administration of the same drug at home, primarily due to the greater convenience. This study contributes to evidence-based care of patients with autoimmune diseases or PIDs.

Effect of Immunosuppression in Risk of Developing Generalized Symptoms in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: Early use of immunosuppression has been suggested to prevent generalization of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), but high-quality evidence is limited in this regard. We examined whether treatment with prednisone and other immunosuppressants reduce the risk of generalization in OMG. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive adults with pure OMG who had a minimum 6 months of follow-up. The main outcome was the time to developing generalized symptoms. We used propensity scores to create matched data sets of patients treated with prednisone or any immunosuppressant vs controls. We also used unmatched models with inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) and variable exposure times. We used Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratio (HR) for generalization, comparing treated patients vs controls. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 87.4 ± 73 months since onset. Forty-three (28%) were generalized, and mean time to generalization from diagnosis was 24.2 ± 24.1 months. Patients who received prednisone had lower risk of generalization than controls, with pooled HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.19-1.06) for the matched model, HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.21-0.89) for the IPTW model, and for HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.23-0.81) for the time-dependent exposure model. Patients who received any immunosuppressant had lower risk of generalization, with HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.77), 0.32 (95% CI 0.14-0.70), and 0.35 (95% CI 0.15-0.80) for the matched, IPTW, and IPTW-varying exposure models, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study provides evidence that steroidal and nonsteroidal immunosuppression in patients with OMG is associated with a reduced risk of developing generalized symptoms over time. This supports the early use of immunosuppression in this population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that treatment of OMG with corticosteroids or nonsteroidal immunosuppressants reduces the risk of generalization.

Canadian guidance for diagnosis and management of acute hepatic porphyrias.

Acute hepatic porphyrias (AHP) comprise four rare monogenic autosomal conditions. Each is linked to a deficiency of heme metabolizing enzymes. Common manifestations include severe abdominal pain, nausea, confusion, hyponatremia, hypertension, tachycardia, and neuropathy. Diagnosis is challenging due to a non-specific, variable presentation with symptoms mimicking other common conditions. Initial diagnosis of AHP can be made with a test for urinary porphobilinogen, δ-aminolevulinic acid and porphyrins using a single random (spot) sample. However, many patients have complications due to delays in diagnosis and management. A novel small interfering RNA-based agent, givosiran, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing acute attacks in a recent Phase III trial, leading to its approval for the management of AHP. Early diagnosis is crucial for the timely introduction of disease-modifying treatments that reduce impairments, enhance quality of life, and extend survival. In this guidance, we aim to improve awareness and outcomes of AHP by making recommendations about diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment in Canada.

Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an imaging modality that shows peripheral nerve signal change in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRN and its potential as a monitoring tool after immunotherapy in treatment-naïve CIDP patients. METHODS: Whole-body MRN using coronal 3-dimensional short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) techniques was performed in patients being investigated for CIDP and in healthy controls. Baseline clinical neuropathy scales and electrophysiologic parameters were collected, and MRN findings were compared before and after CIDP treatment. RESULTS: We found highly concordant symmetrical thickening and increased T2 signal intensities in the brachial/lumbosacral plexus, femoral, or sciatic nerves in five of the eight patients with a final diagnosis of CIDP and none of the healthy controls. There were no treatment-related imaging changes in five patients with CIDP who completed a follow-up study. Diffuse, symmetrical thickening, and increased T2 signal in root, plexus, and peripheral nerves were found in two patients ultimately excluded due to a diagnosis of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, skin changes (POEMS) syndrome in addition to signal changes in the muscles, bony lesions, organomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. DISCUSSION: Whole-body MRN imaging shows promise in detecting abnormalities in proximal nerve segments in patients with CIDP. Future studies evaluating the role of MRN in assessing treatment response should consider follow-up scans after treatment durations of more than 4 months.

Electrophysiological grading scale for polyneuropathy severity.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a simple electrophysiological scale for patients with distal symmetric axonal polyneuropathy, in order to promote standardized and informative electrodiagnostic reporting, and understand the complex relationship between electrophysiological and clinical polyneuropathy severity. METHODS: We included 76 patients with distal symmetric axonal polyneuropathy, from a cohort of 151 patients with polyneuropathy prospectively recruited from November 2016 to May 2017. Patients underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS), were evaluated by the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS), and additional tests. The number of abnormal NCS parameters was determined, within the range of 0-4, considering low amplitude or conduction velocity in the sural and peroneal nerve. RESULTS: Higher number of NCS abnormalities was associated with higher TCNS, indicating more severe polyneuropathy. Polyneuropathy severity per the TCNS was most frequently (63%-70%) mild in patients with a low (0-1) number of NCS abnormalities, and most frequently (57%-67%) severe in patients with a high number (3-4) of NCS abnormalities, while patients with an intermediate (2) number of NCS abnormalities showed mainly mild and moderate severity with equal distribution (40%). CONCLUSIONS: A simple NCS classification system can objectively grade polyneuropathy severity, although significant overlap exists especially at the intermediate range, underscoring the importance of clinical based scoring.

FcRn Inhibitor Therapies in Neurologic Diseases.

In the last decade, the landscape of treating autoimmune diseases has evolved with the emergence and approval of novel targeted therapies. Several new biological agents offer selective and target-specific immunotherapy and therefore fewer side effects, such as neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeting therapy. Neonatal Fc receptor-targeted therapies are engineered to selectively target FcRn through various methods, such as Fc fragments or monoclonal anti-FcRn antibodies. These approaches enhance the breakdown of autoantibodies by blocking the immunoglobulin G recycling pathway. This mechanism reduces overall plasma immunoglobulin levels, including the levels of pathogenic autoantibodies, without affecting the other immunoglobulin class immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin E, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin D levels. Drugs that inhibit FcRn include efgartigimod, rozanolixizumab, batoclimab, and nipocalimab. These medications can be administered either intravenously or subcutaneously. Numerous clinical trials are currently underway to investigate their effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in various neurological conditions, including myasthenia gravis and other neurological disorders such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, myositis, neuromyelitis optica, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. Positive results from clinical trials of efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab led to their approval for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Additional clinical trials are still ongoing. Neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor agents seem to be well tolerated. Reported adverse events include headache (most commonly observed with efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab), upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, pyrexia, and nausea. Additionally, some of these agents may cause transient hypoalbuminemia and hypercholesterolemia notably reported with batoclimab and nipocalimab. In this review, we discuss the available clinical data for FcRN inhibitor agents in treating different neurological autoimmune diseases.

Office-based respiratory assessment in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.

Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) can present with respiratory dysfunction, ranging from exercise intolerance to overt respiratory failure, increased fatigue, or sleep-disordered breathing. To investigate the value of multiple respiratory tests in MG, we performed clinical and respiratory assessments in patients with mild to moderate generalized disease. One-hundred and thirty-six patients completed the myasthenia gravis quality-of-life score(MG-QOL-15), myasthenia gravis impairment index(MGII), Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS), University of California-San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire(UCSD-SOB), Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scales(MRC-DS), supine and upright forced vital capacity(FVC), maximal inspiratory pressures(MIPs) and sniff nasal inspiratory pressures(SNIP). Seventy-three (54 %) had respiratory and/or bulbar symptoms and 45 (33 %) had baseline abnormal FVC, with no significant postural changes (p = 0.89); 55 (40.4 %) had abnormal MIPs and 50 (37 %) had abnormal SNIPs. Overall, there were low scores on respiratory and disability scales. Females had increased odds of presenting with abnormal FVC (OR 2.89, p = 0.01) and MIPs (OR 2.48, p = 0.022). There were significant correlations between MIPs, FVC and SNIPs; between MGII/MG-QOL15 and UCSD-SOB/MRC-DS and between ESS and respiratory scales in the whole group. Our data suggests that office-based respiratory measurements are a useful screening method for stable MG patients, even when presenting with minimal respiratory symptoms and no significant disability.

Value of multi-modality small fiber assessments in a genotypically diverse cohort of transthyretin-related amyloidosis in the early stages of disease.

INTRODUCTION: Transthyretin-related amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a progressive multisystem disorder, predominantly involving the peripheral nerve system (PNS) and heart. Quantification of small fiber damage may help guide treatment decisions, as amyloid deposits frequently affect those fibers early in disease course. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a promising method to monitor patients with ATTRv, due to similarities between corneal nerves and PNS, as the cornea is innervated by Aδ and C fibers. METHODS: We compared CCM measures from ATTRv patients to a group of healthy individuals, matched by age and gender. We then investigated the correlations between small fiber tests (SFT): CCM, LDI-Flare and CDT, COMPASS-31 and disability scales (RODS and ONLS) in patients. RESULTS: Of 20 patients (6 with V30M), mean age 50.3±15.3Y, 7 female (35%), six (30%) had polyneuropathy and 10 (50%) carpal tunnel syndrome. CDT was abnormal in 9 and LDI-flare in 6 patients. CCM was abnormal in 19 tested patients and significantly reduced when compared to controls (CNFL: 6.31±0.31 vs. 15.21±1.02mm/mm2, p<0.001). Mean COMPASS-31-scores were 22.27±22.84; RODS and ONLS were 38.15±12.33 and 2.05±2.3, with no significant differences between sub-group scores. Disease duration was significantly correlated with ONLS (0.43, p=0.05) and RODS (0.46, p=0.03). There were no significant correlations between measures of disability and SFT. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse cohort of ATTRv patients, CCM was the most frequent abnormal measurement. CCM can be a useful test to triage patients in the early disease stages and with few or equivocal symptoms.

Epilepsy in neurofibromatosis type 1: Prevalence, phenotype, and genotype in adults.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown an increased risk of epilepsy in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, most reports focus on the pediatric population. In this study, we describe the trajectory of patients with NF1 and epilepsy beyond childhood. METHODS: Patients with NF1 ≥18 years-old consecutively seen at a multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic during a four-year period were prospectively enrolled and offered routine EEG, MRI, and genetic testing. The lifelong and point prevalence of epilepsy in patients with NF1 were calculated. Demographic, genetic, radiological, and clinical features found to be statistically associated with having received a diagnosis of epilepsy were incorporated into a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among 113 patients with NF1 included in this study (median age at study inclusion: 33 years), the lifelong prevalence of epilepsy was 11% (CI95%=6-18%) and point prevalence 7% (CI95%= 3-13%). Most patients (73%) were diagnosed with epilepsy before the age of 18 and achieved seizure-freedom by adulthood. At study inclusion, three-quarters of patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy had been seizure-free for more than one year and a third had resolved epilepsy. A routine EEG with epileptiform discharges had a sensitivity of 25% (CI95%=3-65) and specificity of 99% (CI95%=93-100) for identifying adult patients with NF1 and unresolved epilepsy. A history of epilepsy was associated with having a low-grade glioma (OR: 38.2; CI95%=2.2-674.7; p<0.01), learning disability (OR: 5.7; CI95%=1.0-31.5; p<0.05), and no plexiform neurofibroma (OR: 0.05; CI95%=0.0-0.8; p=0.04). No single mutation type was associated with the development of epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NF1, although resolution of epilepsy over time was observed in many cases, the prevalence of epilepsy was higher among adults with NF1 than that reported in the general population. Epileptogenesis in NF1 likely requires the combination of multiple genetic and environmental factors and suggests involvement of a network that spreads beyond the borders of a well-defined parenchymal lesion.

Safety and Efficacy of Nipocalimab in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results From the Randomized Phase 2 Vivacity-MG Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in a phase 2 study the safety and efficacy of IV nipocalimab, a fully human, antineonatal Fc receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). METHODS: Patients with gMG with inadequate response to stable standard-of-care (SOC) therapy were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive either IV placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) or one of 4 IV nipocalimab treatments: 5 mg/kg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), 30 mg/kg Q4W, 60 mg/kg Q2W each for 8 weeks, or a 60 mg/kg single dose, in addition to their background SOC therapy. Infusions (placebo or nipocalimab) were Q2W in all groups to maintain blinding. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 57 in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores. Dose response of change at day 57 was analyzed with a linear trend test over the placebo, nipocalimab 5 mg/kg Q4W, nipocalimab 30 mg/kg Q4W, and nipocalimab 60 mg/kg Q2W groups. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (nipocalimab: n = 54; placebo, n = 14) were randomized; 64 patients (94.1%) were positive for antiacetylcholine receptor autoantibodies, and 4 patients (6%) were positive for antimuscle-specific tyrosine kinase autoantibodies. Fifty-seven patients (83.8%) completed treatment through day 57. The combined nipocalimab group compared with the placebo group demonstrated similar incidences of TEAEs (83.3% vs 78.6%, respectively) and infections (33.3% vs 21.4%, respectively). No deaths or discontinuations due to TEAEs and no TEAEs of special interest (grade ≥3 infection or hypoalbuminemia) were observed with nipocalimab treatment. A statistically significant dose response was observed for change from baseline in MG-ADL at day 57 (p = 0.031, test of linear trend). DISCUSSION: Nipocalimab was generally safe, well-tolerated, and showed evidence of dose-dependent reduction in MG-ADL scores at day 57 in this phase 2 study. These results support further evaluation of nipocalimab for the treatment of gMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03772587; first submitted December 10, 2018; EudraCT Number: 2018-002247-28; first submitted November 30, 2018; date of first patient dosed April 10, 2019. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with gMG, nipocalimab was well-tolerated, and it did not significantly improve MG-ADL at any individual dose but demonstrated a significant dose response for improved MG-ADL across doses.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSNMG) is defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) without detectable or low affinity antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). There are limited data on detailed clinical features and outcomes after treatment in dSNMG patients. The aim was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in dSNMG patients based on MG scales. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with MG who had negative AChR or MuSK antibodies and they were compared with an AChR-positive MG cohort. Correlations were made with data from the first and last clinic visits, between demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and disease severity, based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America category, Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII), Patient Acceptable Symptom State and simple single question (SSQ). RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria for dSNMG. The baseline MGII and SSQ scores in the dSNMG cohort showed no significant differences from the AChR group (p = 0.94 and p = 0.46). The dSNMG cohort MGII and SSQ scores improved significantly at the last clinical evaluation (p = 0.001 and p = 0.047). The MGII improvement in the AChR cohort was significantly better (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The initial severity of dSNMG based on clinical scores is similar to antibody-positive MG patients. There is significant clinical improvement in dSNMG patients after therapy, measured in the last clinical evaluation. This supports an immune pathophysiology of many dSNMG patients.

Effect of efgartigimod on muscle group subdomains in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis: post hoc analyses of the phase 3 pivotal ADAPT study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic, neuromuscular autoimmune disease mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Patients with gMG experience debilitating muscle weakness, resulting in impaired mobility, speech, swallowing, vision and respiratory function. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment engineered for increased binding affinity to neonatal Fc receptor. The neonatal Fc receptor blockade by efgartigimod competitively inhibits endogenous IgG binding, leading to decreased IgG recycling and increased degradation resulting in lower IgG concentration. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of efgartigimod were evaluated in the ADAPT study. Key efficacy outcome measures included Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Efgartigimod demonstrated significant improvement in both the MG-ADL and QMG scores. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether all subdomains of MG-ADL and QMG improved with efgartigimod treatment. Individual items of MG-ADL and QMG were grouped into four subdomains: bulbar, ocular, limb/gross motor and respiratory. Change from baseline over 10 weeks in each subdomain was calculated for each group. RESULTS: Greater improvements from baseline were seen across MG-ADL subdomains in participants treated with efgartigimod compared with placebo. These improvements were typically observed 1 to 2 weeks after the first infusion and correlated with reductions in IgG. Similar results were observed across most QMG subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: These post hoc analyses of MG-ADL and QMG subdomain data from ADAPT suggest that efgartigimod is beneficial in improving muscle function and strength across all muscle groups, leading to the observed efficacy in participants with gMG.

An evaluation of rozanolixizumab-noli for the treatment of anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an auto-immune disease characterized by fluctuating symptoms of muscle weakness and fatigue. Corticosteroids and corticosteroid-sparing broad-spectrum immunosuppression play a great role in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. However, debilitating side effects and long time to treatment effect highlight the need for development of novel target-specific medications. Rozanolixizumab is a highly specific neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitor that acts on immunoglobulin G (IgG) homeostasis. Results from the MycarinG Phase III randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant efficacy of rozanolixizumab in generalized MG in terms of primary outcome and all secondary endpoints, tolerability, and safety compared to placebo. AREAS COVERED: We included different trials on myasthenia gravis and rozanolixizumab which include Phase II (NCT03052751) and Phase III MycarinG (NCT03971422) studies. EXPERT OPINION: Clinical trials have demonstrated that rozanolixizumab has strong efficacy with a 78% reduction in pathogenic IgG like plasma exchange (PLEX) and has therapeutic benefits comparable with PLEX and IVIG. It has less treatment adverse events and is easily accessible through subcutaneous infusion. The safety and effectiveness of rozanolixizumab need to be assessed further in the real-world context in post-marketing studies. If current trial information holds true, rozanolixizumab may become a medication of choice for MG in succeeding years.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod (ADAPT+): interim results from a phase 3 open-label extension study in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis.

Objective: ADAPT+ assessed the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod in adult participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: ADAPT+ was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, up to 3-year extension of the pivotal phase 3 ADAPT study. Efgartigimod was administered in treatment cycles of 4 intravenous infusions (one 10 mg/kg infusion per week). Initiation of subsequent treatment cycles was individualized based on clinical evaluation. Safety endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events. Efficacy endpoints assessed disease severity using Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Results: As of January 2022, 151 participants had rolled over to ADAPT+ and 145 had received ≥1 dose of efgartigimod, of whom, 111 (76.6%) were AChR-Ab+ and 34 (23.4%) were AChR-Ab-. Mean study duration (treatment plus follow-up) was 548 days, and participants received up to 17 treatment cycles, corresponding to 217.6 participant-years of exposure. In the overall population, 123 (84.8%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were headache (36 [24.8%]), COVID-19 (22 [15.2%]), and nasopharyngitis (20 [13.8%]). Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was seen as early as 1 week following the first infusion across multiple cycles in AChR-Ab+ and AChR-Ab- participants. Maximal MG-ADL and QMG improvements aligned with onset and magnitude of total IgG and AChR-Ab reductions. For AChR-Ab+ participants at any time point in each of the first 10 treatment cycles, more than 90% had a maximum reduction of ≥2 points (CMI) in MG-ADL total score; across the 7 cycles in which QMG was measured, 69.4% to 91.3% of participants demonstrated a maximum reduction of ≥3 points (CMI) in QMG total score. Many participants demonstrated improvements well beyond CMI thresholds. In AChR-Ab+ participants with ≥1 year of combined follow-up between ADAPT and ADAPT+, mean number of annualized cycles was 4.7 per year (median [range] 5.0 [0.5-7.6]). Conclusion: Results of ADAPT+ corroborate the substantial clinical improvements seen with efgartigimod in ADAPT and support its long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy, as well as an individualized dosing regimen for treatment of gMG. Clinical trial registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03770403, NCT03770403.