ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate relevant material properties (flexural strength (σf), elastic modulus (E), water sorption (Wsp) and solubility (Wsl), and biocompatibility) of a 3D-printed resin (3D) and a heat cured acrylic resin (AR-control) used for complete denture manufacturing, testing the hypothesis that constructs from both materials would present acceptable material properties for clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The σf, E, Wsp and Wsl were evaluated according to the ISO 20795-1:2013 standard, and the biocompatibility was evaluated using 3-4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl-2.5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays. Disk-shaped specimens were fabricated and used for Wsp (n = 5), Wsl (n = 5), and biocompatibility (n = 3). Bar-shaped specimens (n = 30) were fabricated and stored in 37° C distilled water for 48 hours and 6 months before flexural testing in a universal testing machine with constant displacement rate (5 ± 1 mm/min) until fracture. Data from σf, E, Wsp, Wsl and biocompatibility were statistically analyzed using Student t test (α= 0.05), Weibull analysis was also used for σf and E data. RESULTS: Significant differences between the two polymers were found for the evaluated material properties. Water storage for 6 months did not affect the flexural strength of 3D. Yet, the additive manufactured polymer showed inadequate flexural strength and water solubility values. CONCLUSION: Despite adequate biocompatibility and strength stability after 6 months of water storage, the additive manufactured polymer recommended for complete denture needs further development to improve the remaining material properties evaluated in this study.
