Desmopressin Administration and Impact on Hypertonic Saline Effectiveness in Intracranial Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin improves hemostasis through the release of factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and tissue plasminogen activator, and increases platelet adhesion. Neurocritical Care guidelines recommend consideration of desmopressin in antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage. Studies supporting its use have not evaluated the potential impact of desmopressin on serum sodium levels in patients receiving hypertonic saline therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of desmopressin on sodium levels and hypertonic saline effectiveness in intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective observational chart review. Patients were included in the desmopressin group if they were diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage, administered desmopressin, and received hypertonic saline infusion. Patients in the hypertonic saline alone group were then matched 1:1 to the patients in the desmopressin group. The primary end point was the effect of desmopressin on reaching a sodium goal of 145-155 mEq/L. The secondary end points included intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, change in sodium, time to reach sodium goal, thrombotic events, mortality, and a composite of increased cerebral edema, hematoma expansion, midline shift, herniation, need for neurosurgical intervention, and neurologic decompensation. RESULTS: Of 112 patients screened, 25 patients met inclusion criteria for the desmopressin group, and 25 patients were matched with patients in the hypertonic saline alone group. The percentage of patients who reached goal sodium in the desmopressin group compared with hypertonic saline alone was similar (80% vs. 88%, respectively). There were no differences in the secondary end points. In the subgroup analysis, patients in the hypertonic saline group met the predefined sodium goal of 150-155 mEq/L within 48 h more often than those in the desmopressin group (82% vs. 60%, respectively, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The use of desmopressin in intracranial hemorrhage does not appear to negatively impact the ability for patients to reach goal sodium of 145-155 mEq/L. However, in patients with higher sodium goals, desmopressin may decrease hypertonic saline effectiveness.

Thromboelastography Utilization in Delayed Recurrent Coagulopathy after Severe Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake Envenomation.

Venomous snakebites are fairly common in the United States and can present with a wide range of symptoms. A 48-year-old man presented after Eastern Diamondback rattlesnake envenomation. His hospital course was complicated by right leg compartment syndrome and delayed recurrent coagulopathy, requiring multiple doses of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (CroFab) antivenom and transfusions. Thromboelastography was used as an adjunct to standard coagulation studies in monitoring his delayed recurrent coagulopathy.

Analysis of All-Terrain Vehicle Trauma Data: Implications for Increased Regulation and Injury Prevention.

To determine the incidence and severity of all-terrain vehicle crashes (ATVCs) compared with motorcycle crashes (MCCs) in all critically injured patients. Prospective data were retrospectively reviewed on 1840 patients involved in ATVCs and MCCs admitted to a rural level one trauma center over 16 years. ATVC patients (n = 655) were younger (25 vs 38, P < 0.0001), more likely female (20% vs 11%, P < 0.001), less severely injured (13.5 vs 16, P < 0.0001), had similar Glasgow Coma Score (13.3 vs 13.4, p = NS), less helmet use (6% vs 69%, P < 0.0001), more closed head injuries (59.7% vs 54.3%, P < 0.05), more facial injuries (16.9%vs 12.5%, P < 0.05), and lower mortality rate (2.8% vs 5.9%, P < 0.01) compared with MCC patients (n = 1172). Pediatric patients involved in ATVC were more common (29.8% vs 4.8%, P < 0.001), had decreased helmet use (12% vs 59%, P < 0.001) and decreased mortality (3.5% vs 14.3%, P < 0.01). Further injury prevention efforts regarding helmet use and increased regulations regarding ATVCs are needed to decrease the morbidity associated with these recreational vehicles.

What's in the Box? The Effectiveness of a Low-Volume Massive Transfusion Protocol.

Transfusion ratios approaching 1:1:1 of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to platelet have been shown to improve outcomes in trauma. There is little data available to describe in what quantity that ratio should be delivered. We hypothesized that lowering the total volume of products delivered in each protocol round would not adversely affect outcomes in the bleeding trauma patient. A retrospective review of 9732 trauma patients admitted to a rural Level I trauma center over a 3-year period was performed. Patients who received a massive transfusion (greater than 10 units of blood product transfused in the first 24 hours), between January 2012 and April 2015 were identified as the study cohort. In May of 2014, our institution switched from a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) that included 6 PRBCs:6 FFP:1 platelet to a lower volume massive transfusion protocol (LVMTP) that included 4 PRBC:4 FFP:1 platelet. Data collected included patient demographics, vital signs, and outcomes. A total of 131 patients met study criteria. MTP was activated on 65 per cent of patients (57/88), receiving a massive transfusion during the 28 months before implementation of the new protocol. In contrast, LVMTP was activated in 100 per cent of patients (43/43) receiving a massive transfusion in the 12 months after implementation of the new protocol. There was no significant difference in age (36.6 vs 37.2, P = 0.87), injury severity score (29.8 vs 32.3, P = 0.45), or per cent penetrating mechanism (43.9 vs 37.2%, P = 0.503) when comparing MTP to LVMTP. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality (47.4 vs 41.9%, P = 0.584), lengths of stay (13.5 vs 17.1, P = 0.258), or vent days (6.4 vs 8.2, P = 0.236) when comparing MTP to LVMTP. A LVMTP is safe and effective for the resuscitation of the trauma patient.

Dead or alive? New confirmatory test using quantitative analysis of computed tomographic angiography.

BACKGROUND: When clinical examination is not reliable for brain death (BD) diagnosis, the preferred confirmatory test at our institution is nuclear medicine perfusion test (NMPT). Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has been described as an alternative for BD confirmation. This study was designed to quantitatively analyze CTA, assess its accuracy compared with NMPT, and define set parameters for BD confirmation. METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study, from 2007 to 2014, evaluating a consecutive series of clinically BD patients (n = 60) and randomly selected control group with normal CTA findings (n = 20). NMPT, used as the reference standard, was performed on all study patients followed immediately by CTA. Assessment of NMPT and quantitative CTA Hounsfield units of the horizontal segment of middle cerebral artery (M1), precommunicating segment of anterior cerebral artery (A1), and basilar artery (BA) was performed. RESULTS: In the study cohort, 88% demonstrated absence of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on NMPT; however, only 50% demonstrated absence on CTA. Together, 50% had no CBF on NMPT and CTA (Group 1), 38% had no CBF on NMPT but persistent CBF on CTA (Group 2), 12% had persistent CBF on both NMPT and CTA (Group 3). Analysis of variance demonstrated that all groups varied significantly for M1, A1, and BA (p < 0.001). We were able to establish criteria that differentiate persistent CBF on CTA as either preserved cerebral perfusion or stasis filling. CONCLUSION: We propose that a CTA Hounsfield units less than 80 in M1, A1, and BA is concordant with no CBF on NMPT, therefore indicative of a lack of physiologic cerebral perfusion, and thus allows the confirmation of BD with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Blunt injury to the carotid or vertebral vessels (blunt cerebrovascular injury [BCVI]) is diagnosed in approximately 1 of 1,000 (0.1%) patients hospitalized for trauma in the United States with the majority of these injuries diagnosed after the development of symptoms secondary to central nervous system ischemia, with a resultant neurologic morbidity of up to 80% and associated mortality of up to 40%. With screening, the incidence rises to 1% of all blunt trauma patients and as high as 2.7% in patients with an Injury Severity Score of >or=16. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma organization Practice Management Guidelines committee set out to develop an EBM guideline for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BCVI. METHODS: A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine/National Institute of Health, Medline database was performed using citations from 1965 to 2005 inclusive. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to determine relevance, and isolated case reports, small case series, editorials, letters to the editor, and review articles were eliminated. The bibliographies of the resulting full-text articles were searched for other relevant citations, and these were obtained as needed. These papers were reviewed based on the following questions: 1. What patients are of high enough risk, so that diagnostic evaluation should be pursued for the screening and diagnosis of BCVI? 2. What is the appropriate modality for the screening and diagnosis of BCVI? 3. How should BCVI be treated? 4. If indicated, for how long should antithrombotic therapy be administered? 5. How should one monitor the response to therapy? RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine articles were selected for review, and of these, 68 met inclusion criteria and are excerpted in the attached evidentiary table and used to make recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The East Practice Management Guidelines Committee suggests guidelines that should be safe and efficacious for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of BCVI. Risk factors for screening are identified (see ), screening modalities are reviewed indicating that although angiography remains the gold standard, multi-planar (>or==8 slice) CT angiography may be equivalent, and treatment algorithms are evaluated. It is noted that change in the diagnosis and management of this injury constellation is rapid due to technological advancement and the difficulties inherent in performing randomized prospective trials in this patient population.

Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical practice guideline for red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care. DESIGN: Meetings, teleconferences and electronic-based communication to achieve grading of the published evidence, discussion and consensus among the entire committee members. METHODS: This practice management guideline was developed by a joint taskforce of EAST (Eastern Association for Surgery of Trauma) and the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). We performed a comprehensive literature review of the topic and graded the evidence using scientific assessment methods employed by the Canadian and U.S. Preventive Task Force (Grading of Evidence, Class I, II, III; Grading of Recommendations, Level I, II, III). A list of guideline recommendations was compiled by the members of the guidelines committees for the two societies. Following an extensive review process by external reviewers, the final guideline manuscript was reviewed and approved by the EAST Board of Directors, the Board of Regents of the ACCM and the Council of SCCM. RESULTS: Key recommendations are listed by category, including (A) Indications for RBC transfusion in the general critically ill patient; (B) RBC transfusion in sepsis; (C) RBC transfusion in patients at risk for or with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome; (D) RBC transfusion in patients with neurologic injury and diseases; (E) RBC transfusion risks; (F) Alternatives to RBC transfusion; and (G) Strategies to reduce RBC transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RBC transfusion in adult trauma and critical care will provide important information to critical care practitioners.

Guidelines for prehospital fluid resuscitation in the injured patient.

Although the need and benefit of prehospital interventions has been controversial for quite some time, an increasing amount of evidence has stirred both sides into more frequent debate. Proponents of the traditional "scoop-and-run" technique argue that this approach allows a more timely transfer to definitive care facilities and limits unnecessary (and potentially harmful) procedures. However, advocates of the "stay-and-play" method point to improvement in survival to reach the hospital and better neurologic outcomes after brain injury. Given the lack of consensus, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma convened a Practice Management Guideline committee to answer the following questions regarding prehospital resuscitation: (1) should injured patients have vascular access attempted in the prehospital setting? (2) if so, what location is preferred for access? (3) if access is achieved, should intravenous fluids be administered? (4) if fluids are to be administered, which solution is preferred? and (5) if fluids are to be administered, what volume and rate should be infused?

A Novel Technique of Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure That Functions as a Delayed Primary Closure.

Contaminated midline abdominal wounds are often left open and allowed to close via secondary intention to prevent surgical site infections. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices have decreased time of healing by secondary intention when compared to the prior standard of moist dressings. The authors report a modification of NPWT that utilizes the unique characteristics of the negative pressure system to achieve delayed primary closure while preventing surgical site infections by continuously draining the wound effluent.

Not so FAST.

BACKGROUND: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) as a screening tool in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma will lead to underdiagnosis of abdominal injuries and may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. METHODS: From October 2001 to June 2002, a protocol for evaluating hemodynamically stable trauma patients with suspected blunt abdominal injury (BAI) admitted to our institution was implemented using FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI and computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the abdomen and pelvis as a confirmatory test. At the completion of the secondary survey, patients underwent a four-view FAST examination (Sonosite, Bothell, WA) followed within 1 hour by an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. The FAST examination was considered positive if it demonstrated evidence of free intra-abdominal fluid. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging results were recorded at admission, and FAST examination results were compared with CT scan findings, noting the discordance. RESULTS: Patients with suspicion for BAI were evaluated according to protocol (n = 372). Thirteen cases were excluded for inadequate FAST examinations, leaving 359 patients for analysis. There were 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 16 true-positives, 22 false-negatives, and 8 false-positives. Using CT scanning as the confirmatory test for hemoperitoneum, FAST examination had a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 67%, a negative predictive value of 93%, and an accuracy of 92%; chi analysis showed significant discordance between FAST examination and CT scan (5.85%, < 0.001). Six patients with false-negative FAST examinations required laparotomy for intra-abdominal injuries; 16 patients required admission for nonoperative management of injury. Of the 313 true-negative FAST examinations, 19 patients were noted to have intra-abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum and 11 patients were noted to have retroperitoneal injuries. CONCLUSION: Use of FAST examination as a screening tool for BAI in the hemodynamically stable trauma patient results in underdiagnosis of intra-abdominal injury. This may have an impact on treatment and outcome in trauma patients. Hemodynamically stable patients with suspected BAI should undergo routine CT scanning.