Late Treatment With Autologous Expanded Regulatory T-cell Therapy After Alemtuzumab Induction Is Safe and Facilitates Immunosuppression Minimization in Living Donor Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The TWO Study (Transplantation Without Overimmunosuppression) aimed to investigate a novel approach to regulatory T-cell (Treg) therapy in renal transplant patients, using a delayed infusion protocol at 6 mo posttransplant to promote a Treg-skewed lymphocyte repopulation after alemtuzumab induction. We hypothesized that this would allow safe weaning of immunosuppression to tacrolimus alone. The COVID-19 pandemic led to the suspension of alemtuzumab use, and therefore, we report the unique cohort of 7 patients who underwent the original randomized controlled trial protocol. This study presents a unique insight into Treg therapy combined with alemtuzumab and is therefore an important proof of concept for studies in other diseases that are considering lymphodepletion. METHODS: Living donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive autologous polyclonal Treg at week 26 posttransplantation, coupled with weaning doses of tacrolimus, (Treg therapy arm) or standard immunosuppression alone (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil). Primary outcomes were patient survival and rejection-free survival. RESULTS: Successful cell manufacturing and cryopreservation until the 6-mo infusion were achieved. Patient and transplant survival was 100%. Acute rejection-free survival was 100% in the Treg-treated group at 18 mo after transplantation. Although alemtuzumab caused a profound depletion of all lymphocytes, including Treg, after cell therapy infusion, there was a transient increase in peripheral Treg numbers. CONCLUSIONS: The study establishes that delayed autologous Treg therapy is both feasible and safe, even 12 mo after cell production. The findings present a new treatment protocol for Treg therapy, potentially expanding its applications to other indications.

Bed-rest and exercise remobilization: Concurrent adaptations in muscle glucose and protein metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Bed-rest (BR) of only a few days duration reduces muscle protein synthesis and induces skeletal muscle atrophy and insulin resistance, but the scale and juxtaposition of these events have not been investigated concurrently in the same individuals. Moreover, the impact of short-term exercise-supplemented remobilization (ESR) on muscle volume, protein turnover and leg glucose uptake (LGU) in humans is unknown. METHODS: Ten healthy males (24 ± 1 years, body mass index 22.7 ± 0.6 kg/m2) underwent 3 days of BR, followed immediately by 3 days of ESR consisting of 5 × 30 maximal voluntary single-leg isokinetic knee extensions at 90°/s each day. An isoenergetic diet was maintained throughout the study (30% fat, 15% protein and 55% carbohydrate). Resting LGU was calculated from arterialized-venous versus venous difference across the leg and leg blood flow during the steady-state of a 3-h hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (60 mU/m2/min) measured before BR, after BR and after remobilization. Glycogen content was measured in vastus lateralis muscle biopsy samples obtained before and after each clamp. Leg muscle volume (LMV) was measured using magnetic resonance imaging before BR, after BR and after remobilization. Cumulative myofibrillar protein fractional synthetic rate (FSR) and whole-body muscle protein breakdown (MPB) were measured over the course of BR and remobilization using deuterium oxide and 3-methylhistidine stable isotope tracers that were administered orally. RESULTS: Compared with before BR, there was a 45% decline in insulin-stimulated LGU (P < 0.05) after BR, which was paralleled by a reduction in insulin-stimulated leg blood flow (P < 0.01) and removal of insulin-stimulated muscle glycogen storage. These events were accompanied by a 43% reduction in myofibrillar protein FSR (P < 0.05) and a 2.5% decrease in LMV (P < 0.01) during BR, along with a 30% decline in whole-body MPB after 2 days of BR (P < 0.05). Myofibrillar protein FSR and LMV were restored by 3 days of ESR (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively) but not by ambulation alone. However, insulin-stimulated LGU and muscle glycogen storage were not restored by ESR. CONCLUSIONS: Three days of BR caused concurrent reductions in LMV, myofibrillar protein FSR, myofibrillar protein breakdown and insulin-stimulated LGU, leg blood flow and muscle glycogen storage in healthy, young volunteers. Resistance ESR restored LMV and myofibrillar protein FSR, but LGU and muscle glycogen storage remained depressed, highlighting divergences in muscle fuel and protein metabolism. Furthermore, ambulation alone did not restore LMV and myofibrillar protein FSR in the non-exercised contralateral limb, emphasizing the importance of exercise rehabilitation following even short-term BR.

Molecular mechanisms underpinning favourable physiological adaptations to exercise prehabilitation for urological cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for urological cancers is associated with high complication rates and survivors commonly experience fatigue, reduced physical ability and quality of life. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) as surgical prehabilitation has been proven effective for improving the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) of urological cancer patients, however the mechanistic basis of this favourable adaptation is undefined. Thus, we aimed to assess the mechanisms of physiological responses to HIIT as surgical prehabilitation for urological cancer. METHODS: Nineteen male patients scheduled for major urological surgery were randomised to complete 4-weeks HIIT prehabilitation (71.6 ± 0.75 years, BMI: 27.7 ± 0.9 kg·m2) or a no-intervention control (71.8 ± 1.1 years, BMI: 26.9 ± 1.3 kg·m2). Before and after the intervention period, patients underwent m. vastus lateralis biopsies to quantify the impact of HIIT on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) capacity, cumulative myofibrillar muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and anabolic, catabolic and insulin-related signalling. RESULTS: OXPHOS capacity increased with HIIT, with increased expression of electron transport chain protein complexes (C)-II (p = 0.010) and III (p = 0.045); and a significant correlation between changes in C-I (r = 0.80, p = 0.003), C-IV (r = 0.75, p = 0.008) and C-V (r = 0.61, p = 0.046) and changes in CRF. Neither MPS (1.81 ± 0.12 to 2.04 ± 0.14%·day-1, p = 0.39) nor anabolic or catabolic proteins were upregulated by HIIT (p > 0.05). There was, however, an increase in phosphorylation of AS160Thr642 (p = 0.046) post-HIIT. CONCLUSIONS: A HIIT surgical prehabilitation regime, which improved the CRF of urological cancer patients, enhanced capacity for skeletal muscle OXPHOS; offering potential mechanistic explanation for this favourable adaptation. HIIT did not stimulate MPS, synonymous with the observed lack of hypertrophy. Larger trials pairing patient-centred and clinical endpoints with mechanistic investigations are required to determine the broader impacts of HIIT prehabilitation in this cohort, and to inform on future optimisation (i.e., to increase muscle mass).