The red hat - designating leadership using visual and verbal cues: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: During a critical event in the labor and delivery operating room, it is crucial for team members responding to the situation to be aware of the designated leaders. Visual and verbal cues have been utilized to designate leadership in various healthcare settings; however, previous research has indicated mixed results using visual cues for role designation. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to explore the use of the red surgical hat as a visual cue of leadership during obstetric emergency simulation training. We used a mixed-methods design to analyze simulation-based education video and debriefing transcripts. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participants who declared leadership vs. those who donned the red hat. Participants were more likely to visually declare leadership utilizing a red surgical bouffant hat than to verbally declare leadership. Most participants indicated that observing the red hat to detect leadership in the operating room was more effective than when leaders used a verbal declaration to inform others who was leading. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that utilizing a visual cue of leadership with the red surgical bouffant hat improves participant perceptions of communication of the surgical team during an obstetrical critical event in a simulation environment.

Putting the "learning" in "pre-learning": effects of a self-directed study hall on skill acquisition in a simulation-based central line insertion course.

BACKGROUND: Opportunities to practice procedural skills in the clinical learning environment are decreasing, and faculty time to coach skills is limited, even in simulation-based training. Self-directed learning with hands-on practice early in a procedural skill course might help maximize the benefit of later faculty coaching and clinical experience. However, it may also lead to well-learned errors if learners lack critical guidance. The present study sought to investigate the effects of a hands-on, self-directed "study hall" for central line insertion among first-year residents. METHODS: Learner cohorts before vs. after introduction of the study hall (n = 49) were compared on their pre- and post-test performance of key procedural behaviors that were comparable across cohorts, with all learners receiving traditional instructor-led training between tests. RESULTS: Study hall participants spent a median of 116 min in hands-on practice (range 57-175). They scored higher at pre-test (44% vs. 27%, p = .00; Cohen's d = 0.95) and at post-test (80% vs. 72%, p = .02; Cohen's d = 0.69). A dose-response relationship was found, such that 2 h of study hall were roughly equivalent to the performance improvement seen with four clinical observations or supervised insertions of central lines. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed, hands-on "study hall" supported improved procedural skill learning in the context of limited faculty availability. Potential additional benefits make the approach worth further experimentation and evaluation.

Integrative Literature Review on Cognitive Science to Reconsider Failure to Rescue in Nursing: A Call to Action.

BACKGROUND: When current workload demands exceed the cognitive capacity of nurses, tasks that are critical to early detection of clinical deterioration may be omitted. In many high-risk industries that require vigilance over sustained periods, such as the military, the cognitive resource theory of vigilance heavily guides systematic approaches. Yet, in research and policy on nursing failure to rescue, that same application of a cognitive science framework has been overlooked. METHOD: The nursing literature on failure to rescue was reviewed through the lens of the cognitive resource theory of vigilance. Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: relationship between clinical judgment and failure to rescue, implicit reference to the cognitive resource theory of vigilance, benefits of simulation-based education, and caregiver fatigue. CONCLUSION: The use of cognitive science to target advancement of patient management strategies has the potential to lead to a decrease in failure to rescue and an increase in nursing cognitive task efficiency. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023;54(6):253-260.].

Integrating simulation and interpretive description to explore operating room leadership: critical event continuing education.

In Obstetrics and Gynecologic operating room emergencies, the surgeon cannot both operate and lead a suddenly expanded and redirected team response. However, one of the most often used approaches to interprofessional continuing education designed to improve teams' ability to respond to unanticipated critical events still emphasizes surgeon leadership. We developed Explicit Anesthesia and Nurse Distributed (EXPAND) Leadership to imagine a workflow that might better distribute emergency leadership task responsibilities and practices. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate teams' responses to distributing leadership during an interprofessional continuing education simulated obstetrical emergency. We used interpretive descriptive design in a secondary analysis of teams' post-simulation reflective debriefings. One-hundred sixty providers participated, including OB-Gyn surgeons, anesthesiologists, CRNAs, scrub technicians, and nurses. Using reflective thematic analysis, we identified three core themes: 1) The surgeon is focused on the surgical field, 2) Explicit leadership initiates a nurse transition from follower to leader in a hierarchical environment, and 3) Explicit distributed leadership enhances teamwork and taskwork. Continuing education which uses distributed leadership to improve teams' ability to respond to an obstetric emergency is perceived to enhance team members' response to the critical event . The potential for nurses' career growth and professional transformation was an unexpected finding associated with this continuing education which used distributed leadership. Our findings suggest that healthcare educators should consider ways in which distributed leadership may improve teams' response to critical events in the operating room.

ISBARR Huddle: First-Year Medical Students Managing Critical Hypoglycemia as an Interprofessional Team.

Introduction: Recognizing a patient requiring urgent or emergent care and initiating evaluation and management must include elements that support teams working and thinking together. Although team communication strategies exist, a standardized approach for communicating about patients with urgent or emergent conditions is lacking. This simulation was designed to provide first-semester medical students with the opportunity to deliberately practice the foundational teamwork skills required to think as a team while caring for a patient with critical hypoglycemia. Methods: Students were introduced to a team huddle that was structured using ISBARR (identify, situation, background, assessment, recommend, recap) to assist in synthesizing gathered information and arriving at a diagnosis and associated care plan. Students practiced in small groups with faculty coaches and then applied the skills learned to two cases of a patient with critical hypoglycemia followed by debriefing. Results: Two hundred eight first-semester medical students participated in the simulation course across three campuses. We surveyed a single campus subset of 172 students. One hundred thirty-three students completed a postevent survey. The majority felt that the difficulty of the simulation was appropriate for their educational level (94%) and that the training would be applicable to real-life clinical events (76%) and would improve the quality and safety of care (100%). Survey comments highlighted teamwork and the use of the ISBARR huddle communication tool. Discussion: The course provided first-semester medical students with standardized practice of a team-based approach using huddle communication to advance patient care.

Balancing Deliberate Practice and Reflection: A Randomized Comparison Trial of Instructional Designs for Simulation-Based Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills.

INTRODUCTION: A key question in simulation-based education is how to maximize learning within time and resource limits, including how best to balance hands-on practice versus reflective debriefing. Several instructional design frameworks suggest setting the balance according to the type of learning objective(s); however, broad professional activities such as team-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation include several interrelated component skills. This study experimentally manipulated hands-on practice versus reflective debriefing for cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills, hypothesizing that the former best supports learning taskwork (eg, compression quality), whereas the latter best supports learning teamwork. METHODS: The study was a randomized comparison trial with a pretest and posttest. Twenty-six teams of 5 to 6 first-year residents underwent either "drill" practice of key resuscitation phases, designed to maximize deliberate practice opportunities for individual and team skills, or "scrimmage" practice, designed to maximize full-scenario rehearsals and reflective debriefs. Key taskwork and teamwork behaviors were coded, and compression quality was collected and analyzed from an accelerometer. RESULTS: Most performance parameters improved considerably from a pretest to posttest for both taskwork (eg, percent correct compression depth 62%-81%, P = 0.01) and teamwork (eg, role leadership, 47%-70%, P = 0.00). Only 2 parameters improved differently by condition, favoring "drill" training: checking "Do Not Actively Resuscitate" wristband (odds ratio = 14.75, P = 0.03) and use of compression adjuncts (estimated marginal means = 75% versus 67%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the notion that component skills in resuscitation do not clearly and exclusively constitute "taskwork" versus "teamwork," both instructional designs led to similar improvements despite differences in the balance between hands-on practice versus reflection.