Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1258236, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37854715

ABSTRACT

Background: Preliminary evidence for efficacy in pulmonary sarcoidosis has been shown for efzofitimod. Here we present supportive evidence of efficacy based on an exposure-response analysis. Methods: Data from two studies (Phase 1, N = 24, single dose in healthy volunteers, and Phase 1b/2a, N = 25, multiple doses over 24 weeks in participants with pulmonary sarcoidosis) were used to build a population pharmacokinetic model. Using this model, the relationship between efzofitimod exposure and three prespecified efficacy parameters [mean daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, percent-predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) and King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire-Lung (KSQ-Lung) score] was explored. Linear regression described the relationship of efzofitimod exposure and OCS reduction, ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score. Logistic regression related efzofitimod exposure to the probability of achieving a minimal clinically important difference for ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score. Due to the small study size, trends (not statistical significance) in relationships are reported. Results: In patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, as efzofitimod exposure increased, the mean daily OCS dose decreased, and ppFVC and KSQ-Lung score improved over baseline. The slope for all the endpoints by both linear and logistic regression showed an improving trend with increased exposure. Conclusion: These preliminary findings of a positive exposure-response across multiple efficacy endpoints support the claim that proof of concept has been established for the use of efzofitimod in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03824392.

3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 191: 110042, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes is a significant, life-long condition which affects many people worldwide. One of the most feared causes of type 1 diabetes mortality, overnight mortality, often caused by the dead in bed syndrome, is largely underreported. A systematic literature search was undertaken to understand the frequency, risk factors, causes and impact that diabetes-related technologies have on overnight mortality, in this population. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and Cochrane were searched to June 2021, using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was undertaken. RESULTS: Overall, 26 records met the inclusion criteria. Large-scale cohort studies examined data up to 2013, and there were no studies published after 2018. The proportion of deaths attributable to the dead in bed syndrome was between 2 and 5% of deaths in children, adolescents, and young adults, with a slight decrease in proportion of dead in bed syndrome since 1991. CONCLUSION: Overnight mortality is occurring for people with type 1 diabetes, reported as recently as in 2018. Living alone, alcohol and illicit substances consistently appear as risk factors, and the impact of technology on overnight mortality is not fully understood, with more recent data, from larger cohort studies being required.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Adolescent , Child , Cohort Studies , Humans , Risk Factors , Young Adult
5.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(9): 3388-3397, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534138

ABSTRACT

During a pandemic caused by a novel pathogen (NP), drug repurposing offers the potential of a rapid treatment response via a repurposed drug (RD) while more targeted treatments are developed. Five steps of model-informed drug repurposing (MIDR) are discussed: (i) utilize RD product label and in vitro NP data to determine initial proof of potential, (ii) optimize potential posology using clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) considering both efficacy and safety, (iii) link events in the viral life cycle to RD PK, (iv) link RD PK to clinical and virologic outcomes, and optimize clinical trial design, and (v) assess RD treatment effects from trials using model-based meta-analysis. Activities which fall under these five steps are categorized into three stages: what can be accomplished prior to an NP emergence (preparatory stage), during the NP pandemic (responsive stage) and once the crisis has subsided (retrospective stage). MIDR allows for extraction of a greater amount of information from emerging data and integration of disparate data into actionable insight.


Subject(s)
Drug Repositioning , Pandemics , Research Design , Retrospective Studies
6.
Intern Med J ; 51(1): 116-120, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33572031

ABSTRACT

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a rare form of monogeneic diabetes that classically presents as non-insulin requiring diabetes with evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance in individuals who are typically young and lean. However, these criteria do not capture all cases and can also overlap with other types of diabetes. The hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha (HNF1A) mutation is a common cause of MODY and is highly sensitive to sulphonylureas, which should be first-line therapy. Our case represents the diagnostic challenges of HNF1A MODY and the implications of a delayed diagnosis, which can lead to reduced success of sulphonylurea treatment.


Subject(s)
Delayed Diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4/genetics , Humans , Mutation
7.
Diabet Med ; 38(5): e14528, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33496979

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT AND AIM: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is becoming widely accepted as an adjunct to diabetes management. Compared to standard care, CGM can provide detailed information about glycaemic variability in an internationally standardised ambulatory glucose profile, enabling more informed user and clinician decision making. We aimed to review the evidence, user experience and cost-effectiveness of CGM. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by combining subject headings 'CGM' and 'flash glucose monitoring', with key words 'type 1 diabetes' and 'type 2 diabetes', limited to '1999 to current'. Further evidence was obtained from relevant references of retrieved articles. RESULTS: There is a strong evidence for CGM use in people with type 1 diabetes, with benefits of reduced glycated haemoglobin and hypoglycaemia, and increased time in range. While the evidence for CGM use in type 2 diabetes is less robust, similar benefits have been demonstrated. CGM can improve diabetes-related satisfaction in people with diabetes (PWD) and parents of children with diabetes, as well as the clinician experience. However, CGM does have limitations including cost, accuracy and perceived inconvenience. Cost-effectiveness analyses have indicated that CGM is a cost-effective adjunct to type 1 diabetes management that is associated with reduced diabetes-related complications and hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous glucose monitoring is revolutionising diabetes management. It is a cost-effective adjunct to diabetes management that has the potential to improve glycaemic outcomes and quality of life in PWD, especially type 1 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/economics , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycemic Control/economics , Glycemic Control/instrumentation , Glycemic Control/statistics & numerical data , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life
8.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(4): 1364-1366, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828137

ABSTRACT

As the global COVID-19 pandemic continues, unabated and clinical trials demonstrate limited effective pharmaceutical interventions, there is a pressing need to accelerate treatment evaluations. Among options for accelerated development is the evaluation of drug combinations in the absence of prior monotherapy data. This approach is appealing for a number of reasons. First, combining two or more drugs with related or complementary therapeutic effects permits a multipronged approach addressing the variable pathways of the disease. Second, if an individual component of a combination offers a therapeutic effect, then in the absence of antagonism, a trial of combination therapy should still detect individual efficacy. Third, this strategy is time saving. Rather than taking a stepwise approach to evaluating monotherapies, this strategy begins with testing all relevant therapeutic options. Finally, given the severity of the current pandemic and the absence of treatment options, the likelihood of detecting a treatment effect with combination therapy maintains scientific enthusiasm for evaluating repurposed treatments. Antiviral combination selection can be facilitated by insights regarding SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and cell cycle dynamics, supported by infectious disease and clinical pharmacology expert advice. We describe a clinical evaluation strategy using adaptive combination platform trials to rapidly test combination therapies to treat COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Epidemiologic Research Design , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Combinations , Drug Repositioning/methods , Humans , Interferon beta-1b/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Clin Transl Sci ; 13(4): 646-648, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441462

ABSTRACT

The global response to finding therapeutics for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is chaotic even if well intentioned. There is an opportunity, but more importantly, an obligation for the global clinical and quantitative pharmacology community to come together and use our state-of-the-art tools and expertise to help society accelerate therapeutics to fight COVID-19. This brief commentary is a call to action and highlights how the global pharmacology community should contribute to the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Drug Approval/organization & administration , Drug Development/organization & administration , Drug Discovery/organization & administration , Pharmacology, Clinical/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Dosage Calculations , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Safety , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Workflow
10.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 48(5): 256-261, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management options for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are evolving rapidly. Individuals with T1DM are able to obtain information regarding new therapeutic options online. It is important for all members of the multidisciplinary diabetes care team to keep up with the latest therapies for optimal clinical care of people with T1DM. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of new and changing therapeutic options for management of T1DM. DISCUSSION: Insulin pumps, continuous and flash glucose monitoring and new insulins are changing the treatment landscape for people with T1DM. As well as access to evidence-based medicine, financial and personal factors play a significant role in influencing management choices.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Australia/epidemiology , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/adverse effects , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion Systems/trends , Inventions/trends
11.
BMC Vet Res ; 11: 39, 2015 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25881213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advances in mobile technology mean vets are now commonly presented with videos of paroxysmal events by clients, but the consistency of the interpretation of these videos has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between vets (both neurology specialists and non-specialists) on the description and classification of videos depicting paroxysmal events, without knowing any results of diagnostic workup. An online questionnaire study was conducted, where participants watched 100 videos of dogs and cats exhibiting paroxysmal events and answered questions regarding: epileptic seizure presence (yes/no), seizure type, consciousness status, and the presence of motor, autonomic and neurobehavioural signs. Agreement statistics (percentage agreement and kappa) calculated for each variable, with prevalence indices calculated to aid their interpretation. RESULTS: Only a fair level of agreement (κ = 0.40) was found for epileptic seizure presence. Overall agreement of seizure type was moderate (κ = 0.44), with primary generalised seizures showing the highest level of agreement (κ = 0.60), and focal the lowest (κ =0.31). Fair agreement was found for consciousness status and the presence of autonomic signs (κ = 0.21-0.40), but poor agreement for neurobehavioral signs (κ = 0.16). Agreement for motor signs ranged from poor (κ = ≤ 0.20) to moderate (κ = 0.41-0.60). Differences between specialists and non-specialists were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low levels of agreement described here highlight the need for further discussions between neurology experts regarding classifying and describing epileptic seizures, and additional training of non-specialists to facilitate accurate diagnosis. There is a need for diagnostic tools (e.g. electroencephalogram) able to differentiate between epileptic and non-epileptic paroxysms.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases/diagnosis , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Seizures/veterinary , Animals , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Cat Diseases/classification , Cats , Dog Diseases/classification , Dogs , Movement/physiology , Observer Variation , Seizures/classification , Seizures/diagnosis , Veterinarians/statistics & numerical data , Veterinary Medicine , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...